tour speed review

Plugged-In-Golf-White-on-Blue-e1597419240829

Get plugged in…

Titleist Tour Speed Golf Ball Review

on October 14, 2020

50 Words or Less

The Titleist Tour Speed golf balls has great ball speed and solid performance around the green. Slightly firmer feel than the Pro V1.

Introduction

For a company that most see as exceedingly traditional, Titleist has shaken up their golf ball line substantially over the last few years. The long running NXT departed, AVX entered the fold, and a “Tour Only” Pro V1 hit the retail shelves. For 2020, there’s another new addition: Tour Speed. I tested it to figure out where it fits in the Titleist line up and what players should be reaching for it.

On the greens , the Titleist Tour Speed feels slightly softer and has a lower-pitched impact sound than the Pro V1 . The difference isn’t huge, but it’s noticeable and consistent if you’re focused on feel. Contact creates a sound that’s a little more of a “thud” than the crisp “tock” of the Pro V1.

With a wedge , the Tour Speed feels slightly firmer than a Pro V1 , but it’s not hard or clicky. On pitches and chips, it feels very solid off the club face. In the long game, the Tour Speed fits in the middle of the bell curve – it’s not noticeably soft or hard.

Per Titleist, the Tour Speed has a “proprietary TPU” (thermoplastic polyurethane) cover that “generates greenside spin.” When I took the Tour Speed to the course, I was satisfied with how it performed around the green , so I was very interested to see what the launch monitor had to say.

Testing the Tour Speed head-to-head with a Pro V1 , I found that the Tour Speed had roughly 10% less spin on everything from pitches to full wedge shots. Here’s where I insert my standard caveat: your results may vary. I’m a low spin player, so it’s possible you will see a bigger difference.

I can’t tell you how significant 10% is for your short game. What I can tell you is that when I hit a good pitch, the Tour Speed checked up. A good full wedge ended up near it’s pitch mark. If you’ve got Tiger-level control, I’m sure 10% is life-altering, but I think the recreational player will be very happy with the Tour Speed around the green.

Before any launch monitor testing, I played the Titleist Tour Speed for a couple rounds at Eagle Ridge . These were my first rounds in over a month because I was sidelined by a wrist injury. Knowing that my wrist was weak and that my swing was rusty, I tempered my distance expectations off the tee. But then I was flying over my expected landing zones and hitting drives that met my normal expectations. Could the Tour Speed really be faster than my normal golf balls?

When I got on the launch monitor, the majority of the drives that I hit with the Tour Speed were extremely similar to those I hit with the Pro V1 . The spin of both balls is fairly low, though I’ll repeat that I’m a low spin player and your results may vary. On most shots, I was seeing equivalent speed, too.

However, all my fastest shots – the ones that were 2-4 MPH better than the rest, came with the Tour Speed. Is it possible that the Tour Speed happened to get my best swings? Yes. Did I have some subconscious bias toward the Tour Speed after good showings on the course? Possible, but I hit a lot of drives to try to even things out. Realistically, I don’t think the Tour Speed is 4 MPH faster than the Pro V1, but, for the 100ish MPH player, it is possible that the Tour Speed provides a little extra juice .

In the approach game, the Tour Speed is not markedly different than the Pro V1 . Ball speeds were similar as was spin. If I was splitting hairs, the Tour Speed might be slightly lower spin, but I don’t think the difference is meaningful.

Retailing for $40/dozen, the Titleist Tour Speed is at the high end of the mid-tier golf ball market but is still more affordable than the Pro V1. If you want most of the short game performance of the Pro V1 with the potential for a bit more distance and speed, it’s worth checking out.

24 Comments

Matt: Another great review. I was given a box as a gift and played with the ball for 3 rounds. I usually play the AVX and the ProV1. My qualitative observation is very much in line with your observations. Interestingly enough, I was skeptical about the ball initially, but was surprised by the performance.

Initial Reactions: For some reason, the box, the color scheme of the sleeve, the multi-color arrow, the particular white tint and everything else about the ball screamed “mid-tier” and “not Titleist” to me. I was not excited to play with it the way I had been with, say, the AVX in 2018. The cover also doesn’t have that soft, tacky feel that the ProV1/1x or the AVX has. The cover feels rather thin and hard.

My drives were just as long as my gamers (AVX/ProV1), if not slightly longer. As an aging mid-handicapper (11-12) playing with single-digit guys from the tees that are probably too long for me (6700-6800 yards), I usually hit a hybrid or a long iron into the green on more holes than I should. The ball performed well there, flying slightly higher than the AVX, and with consistent distances.

I didn’t expect the Tour Speed to perform well on full wedge shots and chipping because the cover felt like a distance ball. I was pleasantly surprised with the outcome. I have a pretty good and consistent short game around the green. The Tour Speed performed pretty much the same as the AVX, which I have found is about the same as the ProV1 on chipping and pitching for me. On putting, frankly, I didn’t see much of a difference.

Conclusion: The Tour Speed is a ball that I initially didn’t want to like. I am still not entirely sold on the ball as there is something about it that doesn’t sit right with me (irrationally, I am sure). That said, it sure seems to perform well for my rather middle-aged Regular Joe game. I have too many dozens of the ProV1 and AVX balls at home that I have accumulated from the spring 4 for 3 deal and outings/ tournaments. So, I am not looking to buy golf balls any time soon. But, if I had to buy some at a pro shop because I had forgotten to pack my regular balls in my bag, I wouldn’t hesitate to buy the Tour Speed.

Thank you Duffer. Your review was as good as Matt’s

I played a few rounds with the tour speed. The only true thing I noticed a difference in was distance off the driver. It was a full 8 yards longer than the pro v1. Irons were about the same. Spin off the wedge wasn’t noticeable different. So to gain 8 yards and save money, I’m all in.

Wonder how it compares with the ProV1X, which typically has a higher launch and more spin than the ProV1.

I play to about a 9-10 handicap, but do not generate the clubhead speed that Matt or some of you do. Driver distance on good cracks will travel around 230 to 245 and max out there. I currently play Chrome-Soft, but not married to it. My question is……how would slower swing speed players fare with the Tour Speed? Again, Matt, always enjoy your reviews and the comments from my fellow golfers.

If you’re hitting it 230-245, I think you have plenty of speed to give the Tour Speed a try and perhaps see some additional or more consistent speed.

I have used this new ball in temps above 70 and found it to be as you have detailed. 60 and below and it is like a rock!

How was durability? I’ve read several comments online that the TPU cover shreds fairly easily.

I didn’t see any cover damage during my play or launch monitor testing, and the latter included a heavy diet of wedge shots.

How would you compare to Tour Response, Q Star Tour, Snell MTB Black?

The only head to head testing I did was against the Pro V1. We have full reviews of all those other balls on the site.

This ball performed well for me off the irons and that was about it. I normally play the AVX which gives me optimal launch and spin throughout my bag. Maybe it’s not meant for my SS, delivery, etc with the driver, fairway, hybrids and wedges. What struck me the most was how soft it was off my M Craft putter. I really had to give the ball a lot more to get it to the hole on long putts. Like putting a marshmallow tbh. There’s an unwritten rule at Titleist, no ball they make is meant to outperform their flagship line (V1, V1X). Some may do better in one area for one metric but that is about it.

I am 70 years old, a 6 handicap, and still generate 95-102 club speed. This ball definitely flies farther off the tee. I am routinely hitting 275 yard drives at my course (elevation 3500 feet), and occasionally pass 300. It is a touch harder on approach shots, but still checks up nicely. I LOVE this ball…..:)

Hey Matt, I’m a little late to this review, but if you’re still out there… My question is this: Why did Titleist add this ball to the lineup when it already has the AVX? It seems to fit a similar demographic and provides similar playing characteristics. Just wonder what your observations are regarding which ball would be best for my 7 handicap game? Thank you.

I’d agree that it’s similar to the AVX but not identical. It really comes down to how much difference a given golfer can notice. At the Tour level, players can notice minute differences. For a 30 handicap, the difference between the AVX and Tour Speed is probably meaningless.

As for what ball you’d be best with, there are a lot of factors to consider. If you’re between the two you mentioned, I’d suggest buying a sleeve of each and seeing if there’s a meaningful difference to you. If there’s not, the Tour Speed will put a few extra dollars in your pocket.

The reason is that there are many mid-cappers like myself who would like to think we should be playing The AVX because we are not quite Pro V1 guys, but in reality this ball serves us better than the AVX. The AVX is basically for a Pro V1 guy who needs almost exactly the same spin as the Pro V1 but a lower ball flight. Us 12-cappers get too much spin from the AVX–and The Pro V1 as well. Our swing faults are uber magnified by the Pro V1 and the AVX. While comparing the AVX to The Tour Speed, I had a much easier time fighting my miss with The Tour Speed which turns draws into hooks. Though slightly more forgiving than the Pro V1 –the AVX–because it is spinnier than the Tour Speed is definitely less forgiving. Now f you are a single digit capper and don’t quite need the height or spin of the Pro V1 you will be better served by the AVX, as its spin makes it more workable than the Tour Speed. So Basically Pro V1–Low Single Digit to scratch player who needs height and spin. AVX–Low Single digit to possible scratch player who needs almost as much spin but lower trajectory Tour Speed–Mid Capper who needs more spin than a two piece, and a high trajectory.

I am a 12 capper–have played all three- and rather enjoy my experience with the Tour Speed which will be my ball until I become a lower single digit handicap.

This is my go-to golf ball and the only one I will use. Granted I’m someone who would be paranoid that using a different ball would mess with my play substantialy, but still. It feels great, goes far, and checks up incredibly well. Tack on that it’s cheaper than the Pro V1s or Pro V1xs, and it’s a no brainer.

I have been playing the Tour Speed for 2 years but now Titleist is discontinuing it. The AVX and Pro V-1 or PV1X do not get the distance that I need at age 70 and 10 HCP. What ball by other manufacturers would be closest to what the Tour Distance has provided?

If you’re after distance, have you tried the Bridgestone Tour RX balls or the e6?

I just found this site; and I realize I’ve been digging into the archives here, trying to see how various new items (like balls) compare to the ones that I am familiar with. I still have a sleeve of my last version of NXT Tours (just read that review), which were my go-to ball for years, (after I realized that wound DT 100’s I grew up playing were long gone.) I tried the Tour Speeds (and just lost the last of those that I had), which I very much liked and which seemed to be the closest thing. Pro V1/V1X options are pricey to me; and I think I have a low spin on most of my shots. Stemming from learning to let it the ball roll out on very small, extremely hard & fast greens, I rarely try to stop it on any shot.

Since they have stopped making these, I need to find something that is “crisp” (like those noted were, especially on my “original Anser” putter) but does not significantly alter my spin rates too much (changing distances) … or without breaking the bank. I think I read that the “new” Tour Soft is supposed to be (based on reading) a merge of the old tour soft and the old tour speed models. Or perhaps I should try the “- Pro V1x” (if I can keep the $ down) ? Any suggestions where to start reading / trying would be great. (and in the meanwhile, I will keep reading). THANKS!

Welcome! A couple questions to start with: you say that you’re low spin because your approaches don’t stop where they land. Do you like this or would you prefer to see more spin and stopping power? What price per dozen are you trying to maintain? And roughly how far are your drives carrying?

Hi Matt, Sorry for the slow reply. I was playing my “engineer” (aka over-analytic thinker) card. I wanted some real data. Based on that I am going to retract “low spin”, since I am less sure of it. I just know I learned to let the ball roll out as it does more often than not for me. I was not looking to change that, but I would like (more?) consistent performance. $ per Dozen in the 35-45 range, but better quality if nothing works in that range.

To answer spin and distance, I stopped at the local PGA superstore and took along an NXT Tour, and a TOUR SPEED. The salesman let try an AVX part way through (without showing me what it was). I hit 15 NXT’s then 10 Tour Speeds; then alternate each 5 – then tried the AVX for 15 and alternated with the NXT Tour (partly because the Tour Speed got stuck on a popup). The biggest take way to me was – I’m out of shape. I’ve lost club speed; and after the first 12 shots or so, had trouble maintaining quality contact and lost even more club speed it seemed. OK details: 1st Driver is 9° Cobra X Speed w/ S shaft (about 2004 model). NXT TOUR: average: 135 mph, 3500 rpm back, 1450 rpm right, 14.5° launch, 210 carry, 227 total. Tour Speed: average 127 mph, 4500 rpm back, 1100 rpm right, 20.3° launch, 190 carry, 203 total AVX: average 127 mph, 4325 rpm back, 1500 rpm right, 17.7° launch, 185 carry, 198 total

If I break out the first and last sets of NXTs: 1st set: 139 mph, 2800 rpm back, 525 rmp right, 14.8° launch, 231 carry, 250 total last set: 134 mph, 4100 rpm back, 2350 rpm right, 13.7° launch, 198 carry, 213 total.

also, from starting to look at irons a couple of months ago – with chrome soft balls in the bay my 6i (’82 Wilson 1200LT “player” type) : 101 mph, 22.6°, 6950 rpm, 136 carry, 145 total vs new ping i-230 7i: 99.8 mph, 23.1°, 6100 rpm, 135 carry 145 total.

I’ve made short list of tour level / near tour level balls but would love to know what you think might be good? (and getting in shape starts … uhm … NOW – LOL) THANKS for any reply / help / thoughts!

I think the Bridgestone Tour B RX or RXS could serve you well, based on your swing speed. You might also look at something one step town in price like the Srixon Q-Star.

Thank you! The Bridgestone Tour B RX is on my short list (and I tried the Tour B XS for 9-holes, and I was liking it). I am going to try these, and look at the Srixon’s too.

Plugged In Golf

Do You Like Free Golf Gear?

Sign up for our weekly newsletter and not only will you get the latest reviews, instruction, and more delivered directly to your inbox, you’ll also be entered into regular giveaways for golf clubs and more.

Titleist Tour Speed Review: Pros, Cons, Alternatives

As a golfer, finding the right ball can make a world of difference in your game. Today, we’re diving into the Titleist Tour Speed golf ball, which has caught the attention of many players since its release in August 2020.

The Titleist Tour Speed is an excellent choice for golfers looking for a high-performance ball with a great combination of distance, control, and feel. However, it might not suit those who prioritize maximum greenside spin or prefer a softer feel.

Don’t miss out on our detailed Titleist Tour Speed review, it might just be the key to unlocking your full potential on the course.

Read on to learn everything you need to know about the Titleist Tour Speed, from its features to how it performs on the course to alternatives.

Key Metrics To Consider

Who it’s best for, our verdict, how we reviewed these products, things to consider before buying the titleist tour speed, exceptional distance performance for a wide range of swing speeds, enhanced control on approach shots for improved scoring, durable and high-performance cover for extended playability, advanced aerodynamics for improved ball flight and stability, impressive distance and speed without sacrificing control, soft feel for enhanced control and touch, optimized for mid to low-handicap golfers seeking performance, consistency across the entire ball, titleist’s reputation for performance and quality, taylormade tp5x: a firmer, high-performance alternative, bridgestone tour b rx: a softer feel for moderate swing speeds, callaway chrome soft: an ultra-soft choice for feel-focused golfers, srixon z-star: a balanced alternative with spin control, does titleist tour speed have a urethane cover, is the titleist tour speed suitable for beginners, how does the titleist tour speed compare to the titleist pro v1, what is the compression of the titleist tour speed, titleist tour speed review: overview.

No products found.

Impressive distance off the tee
Good control on approach shots
Durable cover for extended playability
Competitive price point for a premium ball
Not as much greenside spin as some competitors
Firmer feel compared to other Titleist model

The Titleist Tour Speed golf ball is designed for golfers seeking a balance of distance, control, and feel. It’s three-piece construction and thermoplastic urethane (TPU) cover provide an impressive blend of performance characteristics.

In my experience, the Titleist Tour Speed is best suited for golfers looking for a ball that offers distance, control, and feel without breaking the bank. It’s an excellent option for mid to low-handicappers who want a high-performance golf ball.

However, you might want to consider other options if you prioritize maximum greenside spin or prefer a softer feel.

The Titleist Tour Speed is a well-rounded golf ball that truly delivers in terms of distance, control, and feel, providing a comprehensive performance package that caters to a wide range of golfers. As someone who has used this golf ball extensively, I can attest to its impressive performance and benefits on the golf course.

One of the most notable features of the Titleist Tour Speed is its ability to generate significant distance off the tee. My experience with the ball has shown that it’s high-speed core and thermoplastic urethane cover work together to produce faster ball speeds and lower long-game spin, resulting in increased distance across various swing speeds.

When I play with the Tour Speed, I consistently find myself hitting longer drives and getting closer to the green on longer par-4s and par-5s, which has been a game-changer for me in terms of scoring.

The Tour Speed has allowed me to shape my shots effectively and consistently hold the green on approach shots, even when faced with challenging pin positions.

Despite its focus on distance and speed, the Titleist Tour Speed also offers a remarkably soft feel I’ve come to appreciate. The responsive feedback on putts has also helped me gauge the speed of the greens better, leading to more confident strokes and better-putting performance.

What about the Titleist Tour Speed vs the Titleist Velocity ball? Both have great distance. The Velocity is better for speed, has a softer feel, and the 350 octahedral dimple pattern will give you a higher trajectory.

Alternatives to the Titleist Tour Speed

TaylorMade 2021 TP5x 2.0 Golf Balls White

The TaylorMade TP5x is another high-performance golf ball that offers impressive distance and speed, thanks to its five-layer construction and high-energy Speed-Layer System.

With a firmer feel compared to the Titleist Tour Speed, the TP5x may be better suited to golfers who prefer a slightly harder feel and more feedback on their shots.

However, some players may find the TP5x lacks the same level of greenside control and spin as the Tour Speed, potentially making it a less ideal choice for those who prioritize short-game. The TP5x is well-suited for high swing speed players and professionals, as its firmer composition can better handle the increased force imparted on the ball.

Bridgestone Golf 2022 Tour B RX White Golf Balls

The Bridgestone Tour B RX is designed for golfers with moderate swing speeds who want a combination of distance, feel, and control. With its Gradational Compression Core and proprietary Reactive Urethane cover, the Tour B RX offers comparable performance to the Titleist Tour Speed regarding distance and control.

However, it has a slightly softer feel, which some golfers may prefer for improved touch around the greens and on putts. While the Tour B RX provides excellent performance for moderate swing speed players, it may not provide the same level of distance and speed as the Tour Speed for faster swingers.

This ball is a solid option for those who value a softer feel without sacrificing too much distance.

Callaway Golf 2022 Chrome Soft Golf Balls, Triple Track, White

The Callaway Chrome Soft is a popular golf ball that focuses on providing an ultra-soft feel alongside distance and control. With its Graphene-infused Dual SoftFast Core and urethane cover, the Chrome Soft delivers impressive greenside spin and control, making it an excellent choice for golfers who prioritize touch and feel around the greens.

However, due to its softer composition, the Chrome Soft may not deliver the same level of speed and distance as the Titleist Tour Speed, especially for players with higher swing speeds. Golfers who value soft feel above all else may find the Chrome Soft an ideal alternative to the Tour Speed. Still, they should be prepared to potentially sacrifice some distance and speed in exchange for a softer playing experience.

Srixon Golf Ball:Z-Star 7 (12), White, one Size

The Srixon Z-Star is another alternative to the Titleist Tour Speed that offers a blend of distance, control, and feel. With its FastLayer Core, Spin Skin coating, and advanced 338 Speed Dimple pattern, the Z-Star provides a balanced performance that appeals to a wide range of golfers.

While it may not offer the same level of distance as the Tour Speed, the Z-Star excels in terms of spin control, particularly on approach shots and around the greens.

Golfers who prioritize spin control and a balanced overall performance may find the Srixon Z-Star an appealing alternative to the Titleist Tour Speed.

Titleist Tour Speed Review: FAQs

No, the Titleist Tour Speed features a durable TPU (thermoplastic urethane) cover known for its resistance to cuts and scuffs. This cover material ensures consistent performance and playability while providing excellent greenside control and spin.

Yes, the Titleist Tour Speed can be suitable for beginners looking for a golf ball that offers a combination of distance, speed, and control. Its soft feel and greenside performance can help new golfers develop their short game skills, while the advanced aerodynamics and high-speed core can aid in maximizing distance off the tee.

The Titleist Tour Speed vs Pro V1 sparks regular debate amongst golf aficionados. The Titleist Tour Speed is designed to provide maximum distance and speed while maintaining a soft feel and excellent greenside control. The Pro V1, on the other hand, is geared more toward overall performance with a focus on greenside control, feel, and long game spin. The Pro V1 also features a urethane cover, whereas the Tour Speed has a TPU cover. Both golf balls are high-quality options, but the Tour Speed may be a better fit for golfers prioritizing distance and speed, while the Pro V1 might suit those who value control and feel.

The Titleist Tour Speed performs consistently well in various weather conditions. Its advanced aerodynamics, which includes a 346 quadrilateral dipyramid dimple design, helps maintain stability and accuracy in windy conditions. Furthermore, the durable TPU cover provides excellent grip and control even in wet conditions, ensuring that golfers can maintain their performance on the course regardless of the weather.

If you are a senior seeking a low-compression ball, check our list of the best low compression golf balls for seniors .

Let’s wrap up this Titleist Tour Speed review with a brief summary: The Titleist Tour Speed is a top-tier golf ball that offers impressive distance, speed, and control.

I found the advanced aerodynamics, high-speed LSX core, and durable TPU cover made this ball a standout option for golfers seeking to improve their performance on the course. We highly recommend the Titleist Tour Speed for players looking to up their game.

Sam Ledgerwood

Sam has been playing golf for over 20 years and founded Impact Golfer . As a teenager, he discovered his love for the game using his grandad’s clubs, including a wooden driver. As a golf obsessive, Sam plays whenever possible, regularly competing in matchplay with his friends and in tournaments at his local club. He's fortunate to have a close friend who is a club pro– he has tested almost every type of equipment on the market (no freebies yet).

Sam has a handicap index of 13 and likes playing at the Metro Golf Centre near his home in London. He putts with a Taylormade Spider because Rory uses it but regrets selling an old Scotty Cameron putter on eBay.

Sam Ledgerwood https://www.golfspan.com/author/sam-ledgerwood Piper Golf Balls Review: Pros, Cons, Alternative
Sam Ledgerwood https://www.golfspan.com/author/sam-ledgerwood Wedge Bounce Explained: In Simple Terms & Images
Sam Ledgerwood https://www.golfspan.com/author/sam-ledgerwood TaylorMade M6 Irons Review: Pros, Cons, Alternatives
Sam Ledgerwood https://www.golfspan.com/author/sam-ledgerwood The 10 Worst Golf Courses in the World

You might also like these

CONNECT WITH US

Titleist Tour Speed Golf Ball (2022) Review

Published: 24 May 2022 Last updated: 06 August 2024

The Titleist Tour Speed is in its second generation in 2022.

At a glance

TG Rating 4 out of 5
Owner Rating Not yet rated

– Solid from tee to green

– Lot of ball for your money

– Impressive distance

– TPU cover puts the Tour Speed behind competitors

– Soft feel won't suit everyone

Titleist Tour Speed Golf Ball

What we say..., titleist’s second-generation tour speed golf ball targets club golfers who want a premium-quality ball that has been specifically designed for their game..

The Tour Speed golf was first introduced in 2020 after Titleist watched the likes of TaylorMade, Callaway and Srixon move into this market space. Many of these golf balls are now regarded as some of the best golf balls available to regular club golfers.

They said the original model delivered category-leading speed, distance and precise short-game control, but unlike the competition ( Tour Response , Chrome Soft , Q-Star Tour ), the Tour Speed has a thermoplastic urethane cover (TPU), not the urethane cover you’d find in the brand’s market-leading Pro V1 and Pro V1x.

The TPU cover hasn’t changed in the 2022 model, with Titleist happy with the levels of greenside spin and short game control its R&D experts created in the original, but the new Tour Speed does feature a reformulated high-speed core and a high-flex casing layer.

RELATED: Robot tested – Which golf ball is right for you?

The Titleist Tour Speed is available in white and yellow.

Titleist Tour Speed Golf Ball (2022)

Titleist Tour Speed Golf Ball Review: Key Technologies

– Proprietary Titleist Performance Urethane (TPU) Cover is engineered to deliver exceptional greenside spin for short game control.

– Reformulated, high speed, high compression 1.550” core generates fast speed on full swing shots to deliver maximum distance.

– Reformulated proprietary high-flex casing layer helps maintain low, long game spin.

– 346 quadrilateral dipyramid dimple design provides a penetrating flight trajectory for long distance.

RELATED: Best Tour Golf Balls

The Titleist Tour Speed's dimple pattern.

Titleist Tour Speed Golf Ball Review: What they say

“The key to the development process was successfully reformulating the core and high-flex casing layer to perform in conjunction with the proprietary Titleist Performance Urethane (TPU) cover to our stringent quality controls, so the golf ball performs consistently on every shot,” said Frederick Waddell, Titleist’s director of product management.

“The Titleist Performance Urethane cover material is innovative and best in class. We did maintain the 346 quadrilateral dipyramid dimple pattern based on feedback from the Tour Speed golfer who prefers its penetrating mid-flight trajectory and long distance,” said Mike Madson, Titleist’s senior director of research and engineering.

RELATED: Which Titleist ball is right for you?

The Titleist Tour Speed is aimed at club golfers.

Titleist Tour Speed Golf Ball Review: Today’s Golfer verdict

For us it’s key not to see the Tour Speed as a cheaper Pro V1. If it’s a softer feeling Pro V1 you’re after (the Pro V1 has a compression around 90, and the Tour Speed is 15-20 points softer) then you really should be looking at the AVX , but remember this ball gives a lower, more penetrating ball flight, which is not optimal for lots of club golfers.

We’re yet to test the new Tour Speed, which was only revealed in late May, but in our club golfers’ balls test earlier this year the original model wasn’t our fastest or longest with a driver (20 yards back from our longest) or 7-iron (five yards back from our longest).

And as nice as the Tour Speed felt with a wedge, there’s no covering up how our data supports exactly what Titleist say, which is that you can expect high wedge spin from the Pro V1 but just mid-spin from the Tour Speed. For us that meant 625rpm less stopping power than a Pro V1 and 16% less than our top spinning model, the Wilson Triad . For us at least, that means the original Tour Speed was a tad disappointing.

Hopefully, the new model will see those numbers improve, but without an update to the cover, we’re not sure. However, as a standalone ball, the Tour Speed is certainly a solid option for the majority of amateur golfers, and the TPU cover is arguably more durable than the urethane option found on its competitor models.

RELATED: Best Balls for Beginners and High Handicappers

The Tour Speed has a soft feel and provides excellent performance from tee to green.

RELATED: Best Golf Balls On Amazon

Product information.

RRP £40.00 per dozen | VIEW UK OFFER | $42 per dozen | VIEW US OFFER

Colours White, yellow

Layers Three

Cover Thermoplastic Urethane Cover (TPU)

Compression 78

Generation Second. First-generation launched in 2020

Released May 2022

Your Reviews

Titleist balls user reviews.

Remember me Not recommended on shared computers

Forgot your password?

Tour and Pre-Release Equipment

MEMBER REVIEWS: Titleist Tour Speed Golf Balls! See What Members Are Saying!

By knudson81 October 12, 2020 in Tour and Pre-Release Equipment

Reply to this topic
Start new topic

Link to comment

Share on other sites.

Created 3 yr
Last Reply 2 yr

Popular Days

Hehateme 9 posts

postfold 5 posts

hondarob 3 posts

anythingfinite 2 posts

Oct 12 2020

Oct 19 2020

Oct 22 2020

Posted Images

Thank you to Titleist and GolfWRX for the opportunity to test and review the new Tour Speed golf ball! I received mine on Saturday and of course couldn't pass on the opportunity to put one in play yesterday.

Quick background: 50ish, 9 index, play 3x a week+ from April to November, weather permitting otherwise. Short hitter, I've never had driver swing speed measured but it's slow, I'd guess 90 or so given that a decent drive is about 200 carry, 230 total. Ball of choice for the last five years has been the Bridgestone e6 (2016 version), though I'm starting to run low and have been playing ProV1s with more frequency this season. Important features for me are feel first, distance second. I need to keep the ball in play off the tee and save shots around the green.

Anyway, the quick and dirty based on about a dozen holes: NICE. Played a regular ProV1 for the first two holes due to lack of warmup and to establish a baseline for the swing of the day. Brought on the Tour Speed on #3 and promptly piped one dead center, five yards past my previous best on that hole this season. Hmm. Next hole is a par 3, off a hybrid the TS hit three feet short, took a hop and grabbed for an easy birdie. On the sixth hole, was 20 yards past my season best. I'll skip the others, but they were all good. It was a good swing day, but the clearly TS outperformed the ProV1. The trajectory was perfect - no ballooning, the ball just went. Next time out I'll see how it compares to the e6.

I checked the Titleist website and used the ball selector tool before I went out, as expected it suggested the ProV1. The manufacturer-touted benefits of the Tour Speed are lower spin in the long game, penetrating ball flight and great control around the green. My initial observation is that the ball is clearly longer for me and definitively outperformed the ProV1 (but ... very very small sample size!). I'll hold off on assessing around the green qualities until I get to try it on greens that weren't recently aerated and top dressed.

molecularman

49 minutes ago, postfold said: Important features for me are feel first, distance second. I need to keep the ball in play off the tee and save shots around the green.

Thoughts on the feel vs. Prov1? Softer, firmer, about the same? Thanks!

First and foremost thank you Titleist and Golfwrx for giving me the opportunity to test what I believe will be another great product! I just received my dozen from Titleist yesterday and can’t wait to test the ball out on the course.

The box colors used for these balls are great! The Blue, black and grey mesh well! I compared the TourSpeed with a ProV1 and right away there are noticeable but subtle difference. The cover reminds me of the old DT Solo balls and the alignment aid offers a different look. I’m not a huge fan of the alignment aid but it’s not a put off!

I messed around with the ball on my putting mat at the house and here is what I can tell you:

The TourSpeed ball and the ProV1 feel almost identical to me. The TourSpeed may feel a little firmer but it’s hard to tell on a 5ft putt. I can’t wait to use these on the course and provide more feedback for everyone!

PXG 0811 X+ Proto 9.5*

Titleist 917 F2 15*

Taylormade Burner Superfast 2.0 Rescue 18*

Taylormade RSI TP 3-PW

Cleveland CG12 50, 54 Callaway MD3 60

Scotty Cameron Special Select Fastback 1.5

7 minutes ago, molecularman said: Thoughts on the feel vs. Prov1? Softer, firmer, about the same? Thanks!

They feel very similar to the ProV1 from a putting standpoint. The TourSpeed may be a bit firmer but it’s very difficult to tell.

anythingfinite

Thank you to Titleist and GolfWRX for the opportunity to test and review the new Tour Speed golf ball! I received mine on Saturday and played 18 with them today.

First, about me: 40 years old, 4.2 HDCP, 105avg driver speed. I play 10-15x/mo, year round, weather permitting. I have been playing Callaway CS/X for years.

Prior to getting on the course, I spent the weekend putting on my putting mat and comparing it to my current ball. It is definitely firmer than Chrome Soft but softer than CSX, although just slightly.

I played this morning and opened my round by bombing my first drive over the fairway bunker I typically aim at on the outside of the dogleg. The ball went into the high fescue 275yds from the tee. Thats 25 yds longer than I typically hit my first drive without a warm up. The ball rocketed off the face and went forever. I played a little knock down wedge from 70yds out of the rough that bounced once and checked. Impressed.

Second hole, I picked my usual line and hit another rocket through the fairway. 274yds. I then hit 3wood from the rough 244yds to just right of the green. Okay, this ball goes.

My drives on 3, 4, and 5 were all 275+. Irons and wedges are hitting and sticking. Not sucking back...but holding easily. Still impressed.

Hole 7 is a long par 4, always into the wind. The ball flew 240 and stopped where it landed. I had 5 iron into the green and hit it well, where the ball checked. Thats not uncommon for me bc I hit the ball (too) high. When I picked up the ball, I noticed some fishscaling from iron shots. This would be a theme throughout the rest of the round. And I'm a sweeper/picker so that's troubling.

As would the long drives. The ball just has a crazy strong flight, even into the wind.

On the 9th hole, I missed the green long onto the collar. Had a tricky downhill chip with a nice tight lie. Now, the ball didn't check like Chrome Soft, but it checked nicely and rolled up to 3 inches for a tap in par.

The back 9 was basically the same story. It ended with a 293yd bomb on 18 that went through the fairway, followed by a flighted wedge from 90yds that stuck and sat down.

I was in the market for a ball with a lower price point than CS/X and this is probably going to be it. I averaged 20yds longer off the tee, and 5-10yds longer on all my irons. The only knock I have at all is the durability of the cover. That was pretty shocking for a Titleist product. Oh, I'm not a fan of the "enhanced alignment" aid either but I got used to it.

TonytheTiger

Now granted I am not one of the above mentioned testers, I do have experience testing over 100 different golf balls in tournament play, on the range with monitors, and in the elements. I have over 5,000 golf balls in storage right now and I recently came across the tour speed ball. I was curious as to how it paralleled the ProV1 as they are both 3 piece golf balls. So I took it upon myself to do a blind test. My buddies and I took 'em out to the course, blurred the logos and decals and ran a couple of tests. On the greens I brought a blind fold and wanted to see if I could tell the difference between the ProV and tour speed. I couldn't! The tour speed is amazing on and around the greens in terms of feel. The ProV1 trumps it in terms of softness and consistency but the tour speed beats any other golf ball in that category, beating the project A, tour response, callaway super soft and hex tour soft, etc... I will try and post huge golf ball review blogs on here because I literally think I may have every ball ever made now in my collection. Thanks for hearing me out. Give the tour speed a try and let me know what you think. Definitely not a bad alternative to the paramount ProV1 series.

3 hours ago, molecularman said: Thoughts on the feel vs. Prov1? Softer, firmer, about the same? Thanks!

I thought the feel was very similar.

Also checked the ball I used to see how the cover held up (had to clean it up first lol), looks mostly pristine. One very minor abrasion along a ridge line.

I like the alignment graphic, I'm used to a larger one coming from the old e6.

Thanks for the chance to be a tester. I received mine on Saturday...and thankfully at that. I was going to either make a Costco run for my Sunday round or pull some beat-up balls out of the hitting net in my garage because I only had 3 balls left!

Needless to say, I was able to put the Tour Speed into play almost immediately.

About me: 41, 11.4 index, swing speed in the 105-110 neighborhood, and my gamer is the Kirkland 3-piece. I've had some struggles this year, especially off the tee, but I got a tune-up a couple of weeks ago and have been hitting the ball much better since. I'll post my thoughts on the Tour Speed, by club, with some real-world examples.

Driver (2016 TM M1, Aldila Black 70S at 44.5"):

First used on hole 2, a very open 512 yard par 5 that slightly dog legs left. The center or right-hand side of the fairway leaves the best angle in to a green protected left by a large bunker complex. My tee shot was downwind with wind peaking at 9mph, I hit a small fade, and was left with 209 in on my second.
Hole 14 was dead into the wind. It's a long par 4 and the tees were as far back as they position them. I took an aggressive line down the right hand rough, which is the shortcut for this particular hole. There are a cluster of bushes next to the tee box and, out of curiosity, I lasered them from where my drive came to rest and came up with 271. The tee was about another 5 yards beyond the bushes, so I got ~275 into the wind our of that drive
Hole 17 is par 5 that doglegs right at 90 degrees over a lake. This is a risk/reward tee shot: play conservatively down the fairway and it's a three shot hole or challenge the water (requiring a 240 - 265 yard carry depending on your line) to have a chance at getting home in two. There was a right-to-left cross breeze, slightly into us. Normally, I'd have take the safe route, but I wasn't scoring and I had been hitting driver very solidly, so I decided to take on the water. I cleared it with room to spare and was left with 173 in.
Thoughts : The Tour Speed felt good off the driver. It helped that I was finding the center of the clubface, but even less-than-perfect contact felt no different from my Kirkland. I noticed the ball flight was higher, which I liked, and the ball performed quite well into the wind. All in all, this ball really does fly off the driver.
Hole 2 I was left with 209 in and hit 4 hybrid (Titleist 816 H1 22). I striped it, with a bit of a draw, that landed pin high just off the left side of the green. Unfortunately, it took a hard kick into the aforementioned bunker complex left. This was the only hybrid I hit other than a pair of tee shots on short par 4s
Thoughts: Nothing to really add here. The ball performed very similarly to my gamer, but I don't notice much difference between balls on hybrids

Long and Irons (Mizuno JPX-850 Forged, XP115 Stiff)

I broke the shaft on my 4 iron last year hitting a punch shot from under a pine tree. I almost never found myself with 4i in hand, and TrueTemper discontinued the XP115, so I replaced it with a hybrid. That said, 5i is the only "long" iron in my bag, and I only had one occasion to hit it this round. Par 3 16th, a lot of water right, 187 to the flag. The flag was on the left side of the green and hit my tee shot pin high onto the fringe, with slippery downhill 8' putt left for birdie....I don't want to talk about it. I've dunked so many balls in the lake on this particular hole, so staying dry always feels like a win.
Thoughts: I hit my irons high, so stopping on greens is rarely a problem for me. I had a couple of 6, 7 and 9i tee/approach shots that found the green and stopped within a few feet of my pitch mark. Distance seemed good. Had a 184 yard 6i approach that landed pin high. No surprises with the Tour Speed.
Thoughts: This is where I expected the Tour Speed to struggle. I had a pretty lousy wedge day, but that was the painter and not the brush. I had two really nice drives that were wasted on wedge approaches that I hit in the teeth. Most of my misses around the green are left/right and I'm hitting out of the rough, so I don't normally pay much attention to spin. However, I had one chip from the front collar with a LW that I really pinched and expected it to take one hop and skid to a stop...didn't happen. Instead of stopping inside 5', it rolled out to about 15'. This could have been the ball, it could have been the damp morning conditions, but I believe a urethane ball would have spun up. The bunker shot I played on hole 2 after my second shot kicked off the side of the green also came out hot and skipped across the green.

Final Thoughts: I only have one round with the Tour Speed and I generally like the ball. It performs very well off the driver, hybrids, and middle/long irons. I'll reserve judgement around the green until I've got a larger sample size, but I've never been especially fond of surlyn balls when it comes to the short game. I will also say the cover is quite durable. I caught a PW in the teeth and it ended up sipping across a cart path. A urethane ball would have been thrashed, but there was only a small scuff on the Tour Speed.

So far, my biggest gripe about the Tour Speed, unrelated to the actual performance, is the price. I play a links style course with lots of heather and water. Being a mid-cap who hits the ball a decent distance and is known to go on streaks where I spray the ball off the tee, I can go through balls pretty quickly. That's 90% of the reason I play the Kirkland ball...it performs pretty well (especially around the green) and the price can't be beat.

I'll try to get some pictures posted soon. This time of year is day-by-day where weather is concerned. I've got tee times booked for the next two weeks, but they'll be "game time" decisions for the rest of the year. I'll post updates as I get in more play.

Great reviews! I am going to try a pack this weekend.

Honma TR20 Vizard RED S

Callaway Fusion 3 Wood Recoil S

PXG 6-Gap TT Elevate S

Vokey SM8 50, 54, 58

Scotty Phantom X 5.5

Another big thank you to GolfWRX and Titleist for the opportunity to review.

This is the 3rd ball review I have been selected for in the past 5 years. Unfortunately I was only able to get two rounds with these before snow ended our golf season early. Before I get started on the actual ball, I just wanted to point out that this is by far the best looking packaging color scheme that I have ever seen. The one criticism I have here is that if you are planning to have an exposed cutout on the outer box, avoid the plastic film on the sleeve some that the consumer can actually touch the cover.

IMG_0975.JPG.e29ee46dd2d633d87bb49454496c279b.JPG

Player Profile

Handicap: 11

Driver SS: high 90's

Ball Flight: generally medium-high ball flight, medium spin overall

Primary ball this season: 2013/2015 Srixon Z-Star (working through my Z-Star stash oldest to newest)

Off the Tee

I have no quantitative data to support this, but it seemed to be average in distance and dispersion off the tee. Compared to the my regular gamer (Z Star) it seemed to spin similarly with a slightly higher peak apex off the driver.

Long iron performance was very similar to most other multi-layer urethane balls. Feel was a bit unique for a urethane ball and felt more like a lower compression ionomer covered ball where the initial impact feels slightly clicky but with a almost mushy feeling after. This was more apparent with long irons than it was with short irons.

Short Irons

Short iron spin fell a bit short of the average multi-layer urethane balls. It seemed to fall somewhere between a cast thermoset covered ball like the ProV1 and an ionomer covered ball from a spin perspective. I had several high peak, full wedge shots that ended up rolling out noticeably more than I am used to (below is a good example):

IMG_0977.JPG.2d0dd6694eaab99fee7834eb1e55079a.JPG

Around the Green

Going into this knowing that this was a lower compression TPU urethane covered ball, I was not expecting drop and stop performance around the green. I generally play most shots assuming some run out around the green as it tends to be easier to control vs throwing shorter, aggressive darts at the pin. On the few aggressive 30-40 yard punches that I took, the Tour Speed rolled out a bit more than I was expecting even for a TPU ball. Performance was very similar to the Srixon Q Star Tour only with a slightly firmer feel.

Tour Speed seems to have a firmer cover and mantle which materializes in slightly clicky initial feedback which was a bit harder than the Z Star and similar to the Q Star Tour or the Bridgestone Tour B RX balls. The "aftertaste" feel is a bit mushy and I found myself struggling with distance control as a result. The side stamp is likely elicit a love it or hate it response, but I personally found the parallel arrows and primary arrow heads to be more of a distraction than an aid when lining up putts (I prefer a simpler stamp with text and arrows or extended line).

Aside from a single aggressive full wedge which left a scuff on a single ball (see pic below), the cover held up pretty well to normal play. Once of the other balls looked basically new after about 5 holes once the grass stains were cleaned off. Definitely an improvement vs its prototype, the EXP-01.

IMG_0974.JPG.d8689ba01f8908458d70e288f987d8f3.JPG

Overall Feel

According to a competing site, the Tour Speed measures out to an overall compression of 78 on the ATTI scale firmly (no pun intended) placing it in the low compression urethane category with the Srixon Q Star Tour, Callaway Chrome Soft, and Bridgestone Tour B RXS.

Not only was this Achusnet's first injection molded TPU covered model (I lump the EXP-01 in since it was the prototype), but it was also the first multi-layer ball with a mantle (all prior models with a mantle layer have had a cast thermoset urethane cover). All of Acushnet's injection molded cover models under the Titlest, Pinnacle, and Union Green brands are produced in Ball Plant 2 while their Titleist cast thermoset urethane models are produced in Ball Plant 3 (MA) or Ball Plant 4 (Thailand).

IMG_0976.JPG.bdcbeb44a6ef2b72bf799a637a808556.JPG

This ball is priced similarly vs most of the other low compression, 3-piece, urethane offerings from the big OEMs. The Srixon Q Star Tour is extremely similar in feel and performance is priced at $10 less per dozen, however given Titleist's track record for consistency as well as the unique alignment aid may be worth the additional cost per ball to some players. Bottom line, if you are looking for lower compression, multi-layer, urethane ball that spins and costs a bit less than the ProV1, this would not be a bad choice and likely a better fit than the AVX for most players.

Round 2 with the balls this morning. The weather was about 15* cooler. The ball still rocketed off the clubface and I was taking much more aggressive lines off the tee. Had more opportunities to test out the short game spin of the ball. It definitely does not have the greenside grab of a CS but its honestly not bad at all. I didn't have any issues getting up and down that were caused by the ball.

With that said, the cover durability is still an issue. The picture below is a brand new ball after a single 5i off a tee on a par 3. Again, I am not a steep digger at the ball, but more of a sweeper/picker.

I did go out after the round and buy another dozen to see if I just got a bad batch. I hope the ball is more durable because it is absolutely changing my game, especially off of the tee.

Thank you to golfWRX and Titleist for the opportunity to test, I received the balls on Monday. I haven't had the opportunity to play a round yet but will post a thorough report when I do. I suspect next week.

As far as me and my game, 56 years old, Florida golfer, and I am currently playing to a 3.2, swing speed max with a driver is 108. Majority of 2020 I have been playing the new Bridgestone B tour ball and the Taylormade TP5X, but I am always looking for a ball that costs less and performs nearly as well. In the last year I have tried every ball on the market (seriously) and played 10+ rounds with a Callaway Warbird recently. Really liked that ball actually.

If you guys have a certain certain ball you would like me to compare this Titleist to, please reply and let me know. I will play a round with the ball you want as well as the Tour Speed and post a report.

Got in my second round with the Tour Speed today ... actually the same ball. I'm up to about 30 holes with it and it has held up well, though I haven't hit any trees or cart paths that I recall. Two minor abrasions, but still completely playable.

It wasn't a day for comparison testing, just a regular round after waiting out a frost delay. Temperature never got out of the 40s and it got progressively windier. Very impressed by how the Tour Speed performs in the wind, I can't think of anything I've played that's better. No ballooning, no funny business.

I would like to thank GolfWRX and Titleist for being selected to test the Tour Speed as well, receiving them last Wednesday. It took a few days before I could get out to test them. As my driver is a bit erratic right now I chose to only do a short game test of them at first. About myself, currently a 12 handicap with about 93-95 driver swing speed. Lately I have been playing the Kirkland 3 piece, but also practice with Pro V1's too.

First impressions, I like the appearance. It has a slightly more glossy sheen to it than the Pro V1 and the Kirkland, and the font seems more bold (#4 ball). It looks pretty good to my eye. I don't really care for the alignment device, as I always sharpie my own regardless of the ball I use.

35F170F1-3E9A-4A07-9669-0E97655A416B_1_201_a.jpeg.b6c30bb756c8db2100f861de8dee1a56.jpeg

All short shots were done consecutively, and somewhat rapidly to maintain some consistency. Basically, I'd hit the 3 same balls in succession without looking up to determine distance from pin. Then the next set of 3, and the last set of 3 in the same style. I did this so I wouldn't adjust in between individual swings with the same ball type. Beginning with:

15ft green-side pitch shots:

Really couldn't determine any difference other than maybe a tiny bit of firmness with the Tour Speed, almost same as ProV1. Kirkland maybe a tad softer.

25ft green-side pitches:

Tour Speed seemed to roll out a little bit more, and possibly confirming the firmer feel. Kirkland again a bit softer. All very close.

35 yard Low trajectory shots:

This actually took a long time to get nine consecutive shots that felt similar. This was a very firm, small green that slopes away and downwind. So I thought it perfect to test on. I did notice the ProV1 seemed to carry a touch further for some reason, but felt much the same as the Tour Speed. The Tour Speed and Kirkland felt like I had to add a little speed to the swing for similar carry and they both still landed short. Kirkland feeling very soft compared to the other two.

35 yard High trajectory shots:

No video for these but the similar feel to the ProV1 was noticed on these shots, but a bit more runout comparably. Again, a softer Kirkland note. I was going to try similar testing from 45 yards but the wind sucked.

8 foot Putts:

All three balls are very similar in feel at this distance, maybe the Kirkland feeling a tad softer, but probably my imagination. I'm not that good.

15 foot Putts:

Same feel as above but had to adjust slightly with the Kirklands, giving them more pace. Maybe due to softer feel.

20 foot Putts:

This seemed to be a little more of a change in feel, with the Tour Speed a touch more firm than ProV1, and more so than Kirkland.

25 foot green-side Chips/Bump n Run:

Using my 50*, I felt the most consistent with this test. The Tour Speed felt slightly more firm and a little more rollout than the other two (5-6ft). But still, nothing wrong with that, just different.

Conclusions:

The Tour Speed seems to work just as well as the ProV1 and Kirkland 3pc. It has a similar feel overall as the ProV1 around the greens, but both are different than the Kirkland, to me. I haven't yet tested for durability which is where the Kirkland always struggles. I intend to test again on a par 3 exec course, where almost every tee shot is a wedge. That being said, as far as value and performance is concerned, I'll probably be sticking with the Kirklands. Hopefully this review gives a little more insight for those curious. I don't think I can do any better 😄 . Cheers!

TM Stealth 10.5* -- Speeder Evo VII 569s

TM Stealth 16.5* -- GD AD-IZ 6s

Titleist T200 4 -- Accra 200H M4

Titleist T100S 5-GW -- Modus 120

TM MG3 52*, 56*TW, 60*TW -- KBS HiRev

Sik Jo C -- KBS CT Tour

Okay, not my "official" report but DAMN what a fine golf ball. I don't find it any longer than any other ball I have been playing, but I really enjoyed my round yesterday. Hit 15 greens on the way to shooting a smooth 66 with this ball in winds gusting to 25mph. Ball is easy to flight, easy to control, has just the right amount of spin both on full shots and pitch shots. It doesn't make that click sound like your typical mid range ball makes. As a matter of fact, I would say it feels softer off the face than it does hard, atypical for a "distance" ball. I will post some pictures later today. Suffice to say that I liked it.

I got in my second round today with the Tour Speed and not much has changed since my first review. I didn't have a great day with the driver, so I can't say whether the distance I saw the first round with the Tour Speed was an aberration, but I did hit a lot of greens today. I still wasn't able to reliably get the ball to check around the green, though. I have practically brand-new 56 and 60 wedges, too.

I really like the ball, I just don't like it for $40 a dozen. I'd rather pay an extra $5-8 for ProV/Tour B/TP5, but I'll stick with the Snell/Maxfli Tour/Kirkland urethane balls, personally.

****UPDATE****

I played 9 holes with the ball a few days ago and here is what I learned.

For me the ball performed its best on iron shots. The ball landed and didn't spin back a ton and it didn't release more than I wanted on the greens. Around the greens the ball seemed to roll out quite a bit more than the ProV1 that I usually play. This makes me change my approach to chipping and pitching as I am used to the reaction from the ball I normally play. Honestly I did not care for how the ball played off of my driver. Could just be me not hitting the ball well but it felt like the ball would just die mid flight and it was definitely shorter than when I hit my ProV1. I can confirm that the ball does feel just like a ProV1 when putting! I play ProV1's and the TourSpeed ball is just a bit firmer overall.

The worse part of this golf ball is the cover. As others have mentioned, the cover seems to not like grooves. I played the same ball for 9 holes and kept the ball in the short grass for the most part. I didn't put the ball in any areas that would scuff the cover and yet it looks like the ball caught the cart path. This for me is a problem! I am sure that many of you feel the same as I do when it comes to buying premium golf balls. If I am spending this kind of money I expect to get the most out of that golf ball. I should be able to play it more than 9 holes before it goes in the shag bag.

All in all the ball is really good! If you are looking for an alternate to the Callaway ERC Soft or Q-Star Tour then give this ball a shot. I will try and post some video of the ball in its natural environment this upcoming weekend for everyone to see just how the ball acts.

From the first review posted a few weeks back to today the cover issue is a constant. Who signed off a ball at that price point with such poor durability?

I didn't find the cover durability to be an issue. I played the same ball for 17 holes and unfortunately I hit the ball I used all day in the lake on 18 and had to play a new ball. So, no pictures of that used all day ball. To that point I really didn't see any cover issues other than one of my errant drives that bounced off of a cart path and got scarred up

4 different shots into greens. Gap wedge, 9 iron into the wind, 7 iron 190 yard down wind and a 8 iron with a little hurting wind

1993770490_9iron.jpg.b2a66493b1100cfc72b3ddb8f66745d7.jpg

Thanks again to Golfwrx and Titliest for giving me the chance to test out their new offering.

Backround. 43, 4 kids, mainly play once a week and if Im lucky sneak in an extra one. My Index is right at 2.1 but scores as of now have been between 73 and 77. I love to tinker and compare stuff for myself versus what I read on Golf digest top list as well as 3rd party testing. Good input by other players but I always believe golf balls are like drinking wine. You have to find one you will drink and enjoy regardless of price. Now on to the testing. So I wanted to conduct a test versus golf balls that I have put into the rotation. The TP5X, the Vice pro plus, and the Snell MTBX I wanted to exclude the TP5X due to pricing since the reason why Titliest wanted to offer the Tour Speed golf balls were to get into the sub $40 dollar a dozen market, but since I have sleeve of the TP5X's, I threw it in there.

Initial look, just looks shinier than others. Good look with the thicker alignment strip which is nice but not a deal maker for me since I dont use one when I putt. Very Similar to the ProV's if you were just looking at the number side. Same Urethane exterior which is nice.

Practice Green. So I managed to do a putting comparison between them all rolling some lag putts as well as some 4 footers. Not much stands out between the Tourspeed and the TP5. The Vice pro sounds a little clickier while the Snell sounds more muted and felt heavier off the putter face(main reason I dont play the snell) in comparison to the Titliest ball. The Tour speed is suppose to have a softer cover which promotes more spin but a harder cover to have added distance. Distance on each putt did not vary much. The difference with players using this ball will be the type of putter and insert the player will have. I have a milled grind Cleveland and it felt smooth of the face. The tour speed itself sounds good off the putter. Not clicky or cheap sounding. Reaction and result did not stand out in comparison to the rest of the field. On to the short game area.

Chipping/Pitching- I spent some good time in the short game area as I always do since I for one believe this is where most players can pick up at least 5 strokes on their game. I am one for wanting a ball that is both pleasing when it comes to sound and of course the spin and roll out I get. The Tour speed is very nice around the green. Very solid action when it comes to chipping for me. Im using the Cleveland RTG zip core. Not too much bite with a very repeatable roll out. Very similar to my Vice Pro plus which too me has a harder cover. The spin from this short range wasnt a factor in my opinion. Something shouts out to me using the Tourspeed. Something screams NXT Tour when it first came out. The TP5 had a better sound but not too far off. The Snell felt heavier out of the group very similar to the Bridgestone ball that Tiger uses. Pitching it around the green, the spin was better in my opinion than the Vice Pro as well as the TP5X. Maybe a softer design is the main reason. Comparable in action this time to the Snell MTBX. Nice action but not uncontrollable.

On Course-Off the tee the Tour Speed shines but not outshines. This ball reminds me of the distance I get with the Vice Pro plus. A little shorter than the TP5X and longer than the MTBX. Very nice distance as I felt it shoot off the face. The Sound is very similar to the TP5X. Good roll out and distance in my opinion. Very solid and comparable to what I was getting with a Prov V which I tend to favor over the ProvV1X (just me). I didnt pick up too much distance to make me say WOW like Ive read on other reviews. Still a good option off the tee.

Into the green- Here I took the golf balls to 155 and 125 yards and proceeded to hit some 8 irons and Wedges in. I like the feel of the ball of my Mizuno's. Very solid sounding. The action on the green is very good. Not too much spin or action. This ball is very similar to the TP5X in my opinion as well as the Snell ball. Has more action then the Vice Pro but not overwhelming enough to make me not like it. The Tourspeed ball is very good ball hitting into greens. The mid to longer irons, again, the Tourspeed I believe delivered on what they wanted. Good sound, solid feel (not cheap feeling) and the right amount of spin I will looking for. As i got into higher flyers in (75 yards) the Tour speed was very competitive with the TP5X in my opinion. Again more spin than the Vice and along the same lines as both the TP5X and the Snell.

Recap- Very interesting offering from Titliest but I can see where they are needing something to fill the gap between the Prov and AVX line and maybe the Truefeel (DT line) The Tourspeed screams to me NXT Tour when it was available. Maybe they just didnt like the color of the Box the NXT came in so they changed the name and color scheme. Overall, it is a good ball but will probably get lost in their other offerings. The Tour Speed is a great distance ball, very decent amount of spin, and good off the flat stick.

Thanks again for the opportunity to give my impression on the Titliest TourSpeed. Hope I get more chances to breakdown products from a players perspective.

Cobra LTD 9* TP6HD Cobra Big Tour 14.5* TP7HD

Cobra F6 Baffler 19* Kiyoshi Purple

Wilson Staff Staff Blades 3-PW Recoil I95 stiff

Wilson PMP 52/56 Raw

Titliest SquareBack LA 135

Vice Pro+ Lime Green Goodness

Like the others, I greatly appreciate being selected as a tester and received notification that the balls had been delivered. Unfortunately, I'm a couple hundred miles away from home on vacation and won't be returning until Saturday.

Even worse than that we're supposed to get three inches of snow Sunday thru Tuesday with temperatures in the 20's so I might be a little tardy with my review from a playing standpoint!

Nonetheless, many thanks to Golfwrx and to Titleist and I'm anxious for a chance to put these in play and report back.

Ping G430 Max with Ping Distanza or MP5 Ladies flex or Grafalloy Pro Launch Blue 45 in Senior

Ping G430 Five Wood Ping Distanza

Ping G430 Seven Wood Ping Distanza

Ping G430 Nine Wood Ping Distanza

Ping i230 5-PW Red Dot + 1" Recoil Dart 105

Ping i230 Utility Wedge +1" Recoil Dart 105

Ping Glide 4.0 56 Degree ES Red Dot ZZ 115

Scotty Cameron Squareback 2.5 341/2"

Scotty Cameron Phantom X 5.5 35"

Great reviews. I appreciate reading what mostly very low handicap golfers have to say about a ball not designed for them. This ball should be reviewed by golfers with a handicap that the ball is designed for.

The ball is designed for golfers with swing speeds of 90 or less. As I read the reviews I see that almost everyone who states their handicap is a single digit player. I see people who are 2s, 3s, 4s, etc reviewing this ball. I don't find that very helpful to the 10 and over crowd. They need to know how golfers in the same grouping find the ball.

I don't think it is much different than if you had a bunch of golfer withs handicaps of 20 or more reviewing Callaway Apex irons or scratch golfers reviewing super game improvement irons.

The comment sections here are dominated by low handicappers ad the vast majority if golfers do not fit into that category.

I am likely to get roasted for saying this stuff out loud, but that's the way it is. If you don't go with the flow you get roasted.

Michaele- no roasting from me, you are certainly entitled to your opinion. I do take exception to some of your comments though. First, throw a 20+ handicap into this trial and what "specific shot" feedback is he going to be able to give you? A 20+ isn't a consistent enough ball striker to be able to give specific feedback on ball performance. Kind of confirmed with your comments regarding Apex irons. Having single digit handicaps review the ball translates directly to the 10+ handicaps game. Secondly, where did you see that the ball is designed for swing speeds under 90? Lastly, Forester_fire and Seth514 are both 10+ handicaps and gave pretty thorough reviews. I think Knudson came up with a great mix of talents, ages etc to test these.

On 10/21/2020 at 2:07 PM, Michaele said: Great reviews. I appreciate reading what mostly very low handicap golfers have to say about a ball not designed for them. This ball should be reviewed by golfers with a handicap that the ball is designed for. The ball is designed for golfers with swing speeds of 90 or less. As I read the reviews I see that almost everyone who states their handicap is a single digit player. I see people who are 2s, 3s, 4s, etc reviewing this ball. I don't find that very helpful to the 10 and over crowd. They need to know how golfers in the same grouping find the ball. I don't think it is much different than if you had a bunch of golfer withs handicaps of 20 or more reviewing Callaway Apex irons or scratch golfers reviewing super game improvement irons. The comment sections here are dominated by low handicappers ad the vast majority if golfers do not fit into that category. I am likely to get roasted for saying this stuff out loud, but that's the way it is. If you don't go with the flow you get roasted.

Funny how Titleist does not believe in assigning a swing speed or handicap to their balls yet so many golfers still do.

Ping G430 Max 10K 10.5° driver - Diamana PD 60S

Ping G430 Max 15° #3 fairway - Diamana TB 70S

Ping G430 Max 21° #7 fairway - Diamana TB 80S

Ping G430 Max 26° #5 hybrid - MMTh 90S

Miura TC-201 5-PW irons - Modus 105S

Miura Forged Wedge 50° Y Grind - Modus 105S

Miura Forged Wedge 54° C Grind and 58 C Grind - Modus 115S

Ping Tomcat 14

Titleist Pro V1 #38

I picked up a dozen and have experienced the same durability issues others have. Bummer, especially at $39..

After another round yesterday, I'm sold. This ball is perfect for me.

Paired with someone I've played with enough to know his game. He's usually a little longer than I am off the tee. Not yesterday, I was clearly longer. Repeatedly. The handful of extra yards I'm getting on every drive is helpful.

I like the feel as well. The performance off the irons and wedges is consistent. It's not the highest spinning, grippiest ball, but that's not my game. Feel and consistency matter.

If I remember I'll clean up the ball later and see how it looks after nearly 3 full rounds with it. It'll probably go in the leaf ball colleciton but I don't remember seeing any issues other than the minor abrasions noted after the last round.

18 holes with the same ball. Absolutely no durability issues, no cover issues at all. I would post pictures but you would all deny that the ball has actually been played. I will throw in that I always clean my clubs and never hit a ball with sand/dirt still on the face.

On 10/22/2020 at 10:09 PM, noodle3872 said: Funny how Titleist does not believe in assigning a swing speed or handicap to their balls yet so many golfers still do.

Yeah, your correct that Titleist does not indicate a swing speed within their determination on what ball is best suited when you use their web site. The problem is that swing speed is the biggest factor in determining distance and spin rate. Titleist is just pushing balls into the market place (granted so are other OEM's) and hoping that golfers will respond to the name and accept the high price tag.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

× Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead

Only 75 emoji are allowed.

× Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead

× Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor

× You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Insert image from URL
Submit Reply

Recently Browsing 0 members

No registered users viewing this page.

2024 Albertsons Boise Open - Discussion and Links to Photos

GolfWRX_Spotted posted a topic in Tour and Pre-Release Equipment , Monday at 04:17 PM

2024 FedEx St Jude - Discussion and Links to the Photos

GolfWRX_Spotted posted a topic in Tour and Pre-Release Equipment , August 12

2024 Wyndham Championship - Discussion and Links to Photos

GolfWRX_Spotted posted a topic in Tour and Pre-Release Equipment , August 5

2024 Utah Championship - Discussion and Links to Photos

GolfWRX_Spotted posted a topic in Tour and Pre-Release Equipment , July 29

3M Open - Discussion and Links to Photos

GolfWRX_Spotted posted a topic in Tour and Pre-Release Equipment , July 22

Popular Now

By Argonne69 Started Monday at 01:04 PM

Welcome. Register Here.

Come on in, the water is fine...

Recent B/S/T

mikekim251 · Started 1 hour ago

lsutigerz2001 · Started 4 hours ago

BogeyB54 · Started 6 hours ago

noaces06 · Started 7 hours ago

VanTheMan0519 · Started 7 hours ago

knudson81 · Started July 31

GolfWRX_Spotted · Started June 3

Existing user? Sign In

The Bag Room

Tour & Pre-Release Equipment
WRX Club Techs
Golf Sims/GPS/RFs/Apps
Golf Style and Accessories

The Club House

General Golf Talk
Classic Golf And Golfers
Courses, Memberships and Travel
Groups, Tourneys, and Partners Matching

WRX Academy

Instruction & Academy
Rules of Golf and Etiquette
Swing Videos and Comments

Classifieds & ProShops

Deal/No Deal

Website Help

Forum Support
BST AD Help Forum

My Activity Streams

BST/Deal Activity
All Activity
Unread - No BST/19th
Subscriptions

Classifieds

For Sale Forum
Wanted to Buy
Mall of Pro Shops
Where Did My Ad Go?
Trade In Tool
Create New...

FedEx St. Jude Championship

TPC Southwind

TOTAL GOLF FITNESS

New Titleist Tour Speed is something completely different and yet distinctly the same

/content/dam/images/golfdigest/fullset/2020/08/tour speed.jpg

When Titleist launched an experimental research project last fall that also happened to be a ball you could buy, the internet pulled a hammy trying to figure out what it might be. Now, we get the answer, and it’s something the company that’s been making Titleist golf balls for 85 years has never done before.

But in a way, the experimental ball that was the EXP·01 yielded a new ball that typifies what Titleist balls seem to always have been: a product engineered for a specific type of player’s needs. That product is the new Tour Speed, the first Titleist ball ever to feature a thermoplastic urethane [TPU] cover. It’s aimed at golfers looking for distance with a healthy dose of the tour ball greenside spin that ionomer [Surlyn] balls just can’t produce. Tour Speed also is targeting a price point a notch closer to affordability compared to the balls the best players in the world have been using.

Titleist’s urethane cover balls, the dominant Pro V1 family and the AVX, utilize a thermoset cast urethane cover. Over the years, Titleist engineers have strongly made the case that cast urethane, and specifically its own version of cast urethane, offers the best combination of playability, spin and feel for short game shots. Thermoplastic urethane is a more affordable alternative, but developing it for the Tour Speed wasn’t simply a cost-cutting exercise. According to Titleist golf ball product manager Michael Fish, “Our R&D and Ops team tested hundreds of TPU formulations and additive combinations to make sure this was the right one for our standards. The reason it took as many years for us to get to a place where we felt comfortable bringing it to market is because they did find quality issues with a lot of TPUs, whether it was the performance or even just the appearance.

“But it’s not just the TPU, it’s the entire construction of the golf ball.”

That deep digging [the company says it has 42 percent of all golf ball patents issued since 2012 and it added a special wing to its ball-making operations in New Bedford, Mass. just to produce the TPU cover on the Tour Speed] was focused on finding a way to make a ball that answered multiple performance attributes, starting with distance but with spin a close second.

“We spent a lot of time talking with golfers that played products in this space,” Fish said. “We look at this golfer as kind of the savvy selector. They know they want the performance of a golf ball that’s really good, they just want to spend say ten dollars less.”

The TPU process allows that affordability but it also allows for a distinct distance proposition, Fish said. That comes from a three-piece construction that features a new mantle, or casing layer, that uses the company’s most resilient ionomer, and a core that works with the mantle to produce ball speed and lower spin for better distance with the longer clubs. That formulation grew from the EXP·01 but Tour Speed isn’t simply EXP·01 with a different sidestamp. Tour Speed reflects tweaks in all aspects, including the 346 quadrilateral dipyramid dimple design and of course the cover formulation.

“Those changes don’t happen without a ton of work, and much of that came out of the test market with EXP·01,” he said. Fish also said extensive short-game testing of unmarked balls at the company’s research facility with its 100-yard-long green and the supervision of Titleist’ veteran tour rep Fordie Pitts indicated how important that performance aspect was in the design.

Tour Speed is set to arrive in stores Aug. 7 [$40 a dozen].

More from Golf Digest

Trending now.

Titleist Tour Speed vs Tour Soft Balls: Comparison

titleist tour speed vs tour soft review and comparison

Titleist has come out with two new golf balls, the Tour Soft and Tour Speed. Both types of golf balls are great for beginners and pros alike.

But which type is right for you?

In this article, I’ll compare the pros and cons of the Titleist Tour Speed vs Tour Soft golf balls and help you decide which type is right for your game.

Below, I’ll tell you which golf ball is perfect for every type of golfer and situation:

Those looking for low or high spin
Golfers looking to add extra distance off the tee
Improved control around the green
Those with slower swing speeds
The soft ball of choice for average golfers

In the end, you will be able to compare the Titleist Tour Speed vs Tour Soft and determine which ball is worth buying today. If you’ve tried these golf balls before, comment down at the bottom of this guide and let us know which one you preferred.

How to Buy Titleist Tour Speed & Tour Soft Golf Balls

Use the links below to buy and check out more details about each golf ball.

Titleist Tour Speed Golf Balls , 12 Count ( Pack of 1)

Titleist Tour Speed Overview

titleist tour speed golf ball review 2022

The Titleist Tour Speed is a three-piece ball with a thermoplastic urethane cover. It is a new golf ball to Titleist’s lineup.

The ball offers precise short game control and exceptional distance in the long game. The Tour Speed is perfect for those looking for a penetrating flight, long distance, and shot stopping control into the green.

The ionomer casting layer combines with the high-speed core formulation for faster ball speeds, and low spin on tee shots and with longer clubs.

Thanks to the new 346 quadrilateral dipyramid dimple design, these balls have increased speed, forgiveness, and penetrating flight. This may sound confusing for beginners, but the idea is that the dimple design lets the ball easily cut through the air, retaining a tight dispersion and encouraging long distance.

The Tour Speed has a 346 quadrilateral dipyramid dimple design. This makes it suitable for golfers who desire great distances and higher swing speeds . At contact, these balls have low-spin performance and a firmer feel. When you hit the ball with a club or wedge, it will easily spring off into the green side. The three-piece construction encourages accuracy, increased stability, and lower side spin.

The Tour Speed comes with a thermoplastic urethane cover. The shell construction makes it more resistant to scratches and durable to fly through the air. The thermoplastic urethane cover offers more drag around the greens and good ball control with clubs and wedges.

A dozen of the Tour Speed has a retail price of $40 per doze . You can buy the golf ball in both standard white or yellow colors.

Key Features

The Tour Speed comes with a reformulated high speed core and proprietary casing layer.
A moderate compression so the beginners can easily achieve maximum distance.
Longer distances and maximum durability over the previous generation.
346 quadrilateral dipyramid dimple design makes it great for higher swing speeds .

Use the links below to buy your Tour Speed balls.

Titleist Tour Soft Overview

titleist tour soft golf ball review 2022

The Titleist Tour Soft is a bit similar to the Tour Speed, only that it is a two-piece golf ball and comes with a much softer feel. If you prefer a softer feel and you’re not so concerned about ball speeds, then you should try these balls.

The Tour Soft uses the 4CE-grafted cover with a 345 quadrilateral dipyramid dimple design. It is long and fast off the tee, and features one of the largest cores Titleist has ever produced.

The large core and casing layer offer increased short game spin around the green. The Tour Soft golf balls are the third generation of the company’s entry into the ionomer market. It’s designed with feel-driven golfers in mind and is perfect for golfers who want some green side spin. The dimple design encourages less drag and a straighter flight.

Featuring a fast and large ionomer core, the Tour Soft comes with a more efficient aerodynamic package for longer distance off the tee. In fact, the balls are engineered to perform tee-to-green and have a compression rating of 65.

The larger core supports better energy transfer and higher ball velocity. Aside from the soft feel, the Tour Speed offers the advantage of durability for high handicap golfers.

The Tour Soft comes with an ionomer casing layer with a 345 quadrilateral dipyramid dimple design that’s suitable for all playing conditions. The dimple technology and cover design helps the balls gain improved spin and ball flight around the green. It also helps the balls perform differently on short and long shots.

These two-piece golf balls have an affordable price of $35 per dozen. The balls are available in both white and yellow colors.

The Tour Soft offers consistent flight and improved aerodynamics.
The balls have reliable short game control and soft feel.
Contains a large fast core that encourages less drag and maximum durability.

Use the links below to buy your Tour Soft balls.

Titleist Tour Speed vs Tour Soft: Detailed Comparison

Which Golf Ball Has More Spin?

The Tour Speed offers more spin, and is also formulated for high greenside spin and plenty of short game control. Its quadrilateral dipyramid dimple design provides good control moderate swing speed. You’ll be able to control it better when you need to.

Which Golf Ball Has More Distance?

The farthest golf ball between these two is the Tour Speed. The Tour Speed is built for distance and low spin from the tee. It delivers more optimal distance with woods and irons than the Tour Soft.

The Tour Speed also offers higher ball flight and improved green side control in all playing conditions. If you are a lower handicap golfer, you will achieve great distance without much effort.

Tour Speed vs Tour Soft: Which Golf Ball is Better Off the Tee Box?

The Tour Soft is fast and long off the tee. It provides fast initial ball speed on all full swing shots. On top of that, the Tour Soft also has a more advanced dimple pattern and cover formulation, which golfers can easily use to their advantage each when hitting clubs or wedges to hit the ball off the tee.

Tour Speed vs Tour Soft: Which Golf Ball is Better For Approach Shots?

Compared to the Tour Speed, the Tour Soft is perfect and better for approach shots. These balls also offer great distance with a mid-low trajectory off the tee, and offer higher launch angle with great greenside spin. Plus, they are designed for high precision spin control without sacrificing performance.

Tour Speed vs Tour Soft: Which Golf Ball is Better On The Green?

The Tour Speed is better on the green. It offers medium durability, especially when played in a cold atmosphere. They also perform excellently in spring and summer, and offer an urethane cover for amazing spin around the green.

Which Golf Ball is Better for Slow Swing Speeds?

Performance-wise, the Tour Soft is better for slow swing speeds . This golf ball feels softer and because of the ionomer, it spins less around the green.

Tour Speed vs Tour Soft: Which Is Best for Beginners?

If you’re new to golf, the Tour Soft is best for beginners. It will help you get used to the feel of a golf ball, as well as provide good distance and control. You’ll be able to play your first few rounds without any problems.

Titleist Tour Speed vs Tour Soft Conclusion: Which Golf Ball is Better?

There’s no doubt that Titleist Tour Speed golf balls are the top choice for players looking for maximum distance. They’re designed to provide consistent flight characteristics and high-level performance.

However, if you prefer soft ball with greater control, the Titleist Tour Soft golf ball is the perfect option for you. It features a soft cover material and the largest core that provides excellent green game spin and feel. The Tour Soft is a lower compression ball which makes it more forgiving.

Both options are made using the same technology, so they have similar construction and performance. Each can be a great golf ball for average golfers.

Buy a dozen of each golf ball below and check them out for yourself. Each have a competitive price verses other balls on the market.

Alternatives to the Titleist Tour Speed & Tour Soft

Want to check out other alternatives to these golf balls? Here are the comparable golf balls from the other brands:

Titleist Velocity
Callaway ERC
Bridgestone e6 or e12

About Titleist

Titleist is one of the world’s leading manufacturers of golf equipment, including drivers, fairway woods, hybrids, putters, sand wedge/pitching wedge and specialty products such as golf apparel and accessories.

Titleist golf balls are some of the most widely used on the PGA tour and by amateur golfers around the world. They feature innovative technologies that help deliver more distance, forgiveness and consistency. With an unmatched combination of design, materials and manufacturing processes, Titleist golf balls consistently set new standards for quality and innovation.

Golfers worldwide choose Titleist for its superior quality equipment and legendary customer service. Headquartered in Carlsbad, California, Titleist employs more than 6,000 people worldwide who design and manufacture products at 15 manufacturing facilities located throughout North America, Europe, Asia and South America.

Ryan William

With over 25 years hands-on experience in the golfing world, Ryan is not just an avid golfer but a topical authority. His journey has had him delve deep into the nuances of the sport, from mastering the swing to understanding new golf technology. As an entrepreneur, Ryan is at the forefront of the latest golf trends, reviewing all new clubs, accessories, and training aids. His insights and expertise are backed by a prolific writing career, with over 1000 articles published across various platforms. Ryan's commitment is clear: to guide and inform the golf community with unparalleled knowledge and passion.

Last update on 2024-08-21 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

Titleist Tour Speed Vs. Pro V1 Golf Balls: In-depth Differences

Step onto any golf course and the name “Titleist” will echo around you. For good reason, too. Titleist has carved a prestigious name in golf, creating some of the industry’s best and most sought-after balls.

Today, we’re going to put two top contenders in their lineup head to head: the Titleist Tour Speed and the Pro V1.

A Brief Comparison Table

Journey into titleist’s territory.

Before we delve into the comparisons, let’s get acquainted with the brand that brings us these exceptional products. Titleist, a significant player in the golf industry, is known for its commitment to quality, performance, and tradition.

Golfers worldwide, from beginners to professionals, swear by Titleist for their consistency and durability.

Now, the stage is set for the two big hitters – the Tour Speed and the Pro V1. They’re both excellent choices, but which one will emerge as the champion? Let’s find out.

Unmasking the Titleist Tour Speed

The Titleist Tour Speed, a recent addition to the lineup, is a testament to the company’s relentless drive for innovation. This golf ball has been specifically designed to provide exceptional distance and control in all parts of the game.

Pros of Tour Speed

Speed and Distance: The Tour Speed’s name gives it away. It’s engineered for speed and distance, and it delivers on this promise. The thermoplastic urethane cover, combined with a unique LSX core, generates high speed and low long game spin. This leads to more distance off the tee and in the long game.
Shot Control: It’s not all about distance, though. The Tour Speed provides impressive control on the greens. It offers more spin and less roll, giving golfers the ability to stop the ball quicker on approach shots.
Price: Another plus is the cost. The Tour Speed is a more budget-friendly option than the Pro V1, making it a great choice for golfers who want high performance without breaking the bank.

Cons of Tour Speed

Feel: Some golfers have reported that the Tour Speed has a firmer feel than they prefer. This comes down to personal preference, though, and may not be a drawback for everyone.

Probing the Pro V1

The Pro V1 is a legendary name in the world of golf. It’s the gold standard, trusted by professionals and amateurs alike.

Pros of Pro V1

Soft Feel: The Pro V1 shines in its incredibly soft feel. The softer urethane elastomer cover provides excellent feedback on every shot and is a joy to play around the greens.
Consistent Flight: Consistency is key in golf, and the Pro V1 delivers. It offers a very stable, penetrating ball flight, and its drop-and-stop short game control is second to none.
Durability: Pro V1 balls are robust and durable. They withstand rough shots better and typically last longer than the average golf ball, making them a worthy investment.

Cons of Pro V1

Price: The primary downside of the Pro V1 is its cost. It’s one of the most expensive balls on the market. Although it offers excellent performance, the price tag may deter some golfers.

Key Differences between Titleist Tour Speed and Pro V1

Avid golfers are always in pursuit of a ball that fits their game style perfectly. The search is, quite literally, for a game-changing ball. That’s why knowing the key differences between two high performers like the Titleist Tour Speed and Pro V1 can make all the difference.

Let’s delve deeper and see how these balls differ in their construction, performance, and suitability for different golfers.

Constructing Excellence: Tour Speed vs. Pro V1

Construction-wise, the Tour Speed and Pro V1 are different in their core and cover makeup.

The Tour Speed is a three-piece golf ball that includes a high-speed core, a fast ionomer casing layer, and a thermoplastic urethane cover.

This construction is designed to give high speed and low long game spin, enhancing the distance achieved.

On the other hand, the Pro V1 is a three-piece multi-component golf ball with a very soft compression ZG process core, ionomeric casing layer, and softer urethane elastomer cover.

This design focuses on providing an incredibly soft feel, long-lasting durability, and excellent short game spin.

Performance Parameters: Distance, Spin, and Feel

When it comes to distance, the Tour Speed shines. Thanks to its LSX core and thermoplastic urethane cover, this ball is designed for maximum speed. If you’re looking for a ball that will give you extra yards off the tee, the Tour Speed may be your best bet.

Spin control is where the Pro V1 outclasses most of its competitors. Its soft urethane elastomer cover ensures fantastic short game spin control, providing golfers with a precision edge around the greens. If you value control over your shots, the Pro V1 has got you covered.

The feel is another crucial point of differentiation. The Pro V1 has an incredibly soft feel that many golfers love. It provides excellent feedback, allowing golfers to fine-tune their short game. The Tour Speed, while not unpleasant, has a noticeably firmer feel due to its construction.

Suitability: Who Should Use Which Ball?

The Pro V1 is ideal for low handicappers and professional golfers who demand superior short game control and soft feel. Its high price point reflects its high-level performance and is often considered a worthy investment for serious players.

On the other hand, the Tour Speed, with its distance-centric design and lower price point, is excellent for mid-to-high handicappers who want to improve their game. It offers impressive distance, reasonable control, and a firmer feel, all at a friendlier price than the Pro V1.

Also Read: Differences Between Titleist Tour Speed And AVX Golf Balls .

Wrapping It Up

So, which is the better ball?

The Titleist Tour Speed or the Pro V1? Well, it all comes down to your individual needs as a golfer. The Tour Speed offers impressive speed, distance, and a more friendly price point.

However, if you’re seeking an incredibly soft feel, consistent flight, and don’t mind investing a little extra, the Pro V1 could be the perfect fit for you.

Remember, the best way to decide is to try both out for yourself. After all, the right golf ball can turn a good game into a great one.

Happy golfing!

Goon tape vs. hockey tape: in-depth differences with features.

Hockey enthusiasts around the globe are well familiar with the quintessential argument that stirs up quite a buzz: the classic Goon Tape and Hockey Tape…

StrackaLine Vs. PuttView: An In-depth Comparison and Review

In the world of golf, StrackaLine and PuttView have emerged as two of the top tools for players seeking to elevate their games. Whether you’re…

Titleist 2024 Tour Soft Golf Ball Review

Sam De’Ath discusses why the Titleist 2024 Tour Soft golf ball is one you should consider putting in play

The Titleist 2024 Tour Soft offers really strong performance for a mid-priced golf ball. The soft feel will please those who prioritise this, particularly with the scoring clubs, but thanks to a new faster core, ball speeds also remained fairly high. A great alternative to premium golf balls without sacrificing too much.

Bright white finish

Useful alignment aid sidestamp

Generous greenside spin

Small drop in carry distance compared to a premium ball

Why you can trust Golf Monthly Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test .

Understandably the first ball that springs to mind when talking about Titleist is the Pro V1 and Pro V1x . However, this year sees a new iteration of, in my opinion, one of the most underrated balls in golf - the Titleist Tour Soft. Coming to retail at $40/£34 per dozen, these balls are saving you a decent amount of money compared to the best premium golf balls but how does the performance stack up? I tested these mid-priced golf balls indoors on a Trackman 4 launch monitor at My Golf Matters in Berkshire and out on the course to get a good understanding of the performance package.

Titleist 2024 Tour Soft Golf Balls

The first thing worth mentioning is how premium the packaging looks before you take them out of the box, and then how pearly white they are once removed. The reformulated thin Fusablend cover has been designed for reliable greenside spin but also adds a shimmer to these balls that really helps them standout. This actually became very helpful when looking for my ball in the thick rough out on the golf course. These balls are also offered in a yellow and green option for those wanting even more assistance in locating or tracking their ball through the air so the 2024 Tour Soft should be considered one of the best yellow golf balls on the market. As someone who currently plays the Pro V1, I have become used to the franchise name and two arrows as an alignment aid on the ball, but the additional thicker line and ‘T’ marking on the side of the Tour Soft golf balls was really handy, particularly when aligning putts from inside 10 feet.

The alignment aid on the Titleist 2024 Tour Soft Golf Ball really helps holing puts from inside 10 feet

The balls themselves are, as the name suggests, extremely soft. That said, they still felt powerful off the face and the data I captured suggests what I gained in soft feel, I didn’t actually lose as much as I thought I would when it came to distance. Yes, If you are looking for outright speed, choosing one of the best distance golf balls would provide the most, but the 2024 Tour Soft offers a balanced blend of performance attributes. Some of the best soft feel balls struggle to maintain speed but that wasn’t so much the case with the Tour Soft.

On an average of five well struck drives I saw an average ball speed of 168.7mph, just 3mph less than I average with my ball of choice, the Titleist Pro V1, and an average carry of 288 yards with the Tour Soft ball compared to an average carry of 299 yards with the Titleist Pro V1. The discrepancy here came by way of added spin. As a high spin player the Tour Soft did climb a little too high with spin and therefore resulted in a slight lack of distance but other than that, the performance was really solid.

Titleist 2024 Tour Soft Golf Ball

Out on the course I did see good levels of spin with the wedges and around the greens. I managed to spin pitch shots and flighted wedges just as I would want to and the Tour Soft felt great while chipping and putting. The Tour Soft ball proved to be somewhat durable with one ball lasting multiple wedge shots and 9 holes while testing, but did suffer from a few minor scuff marks.

Pound for pound I think the Titleist 2024 Tour Soft ball holds its own with some of the best golf balls on the market given the rounded performance it offers from tee to green.

Get the Golf Monthly Newsletter

Subscribe to the Golf Monthly newsletter to stay up to date with all the latest tour news, equipment news, reviews, head-to-heads and buyer’s guides from our team of experienced experts.

Sam has worked in the golf industry for 12 years, offering advice on equipment to all levels of golfers. Sam heads up any content around fairway woods, hybrids, wedges and golf balls but also writes about other equipment from time to time. Sam graduated from Webber International University in 2017 with a BSc Marketing Management degree while playing collegiate golf. His experience of playing professionally on both the EuroPro Tour and Clutch Pro Tour, alongside his golf retail history, means Sam has extensive knowledge of golf equipment and what works for different types of golfer.

Sam’s current What’s In The Bag?

Driver: Callaway Paradym Ai Smoke TD, 9°

Fairway Wood: Ti tleist TRS2, 13°

Driving Iron: Titleist U505 17°

Irons: P ing Blueprint T 4-PW

Wedges: Titleist Vokey SM 10, 50°, 54°, 60°

Putter: T aylorMade Spider Tour X

Ball: Titleist Pro V1

Sam Saunders hits driver during his final pro start at the 2024 Korn Ferry Tour's Magnit Championship

Sam Saunders made over 300 PGA Tour-sanctioned starts in his career but called it a day at the Korn Ferry Tour's Magnit Championship

By Jonny Leighfield Published 18 August 24

Jose Luis Ballester looks on at the 2024 US Amateur

Discover more about 2024 US Amateur finalist Jose Luis Ballester via these facts regarding his life and career so far

Discover more about 2024 US Amateur finalist Noah Kent via these facts regarding his life and career so far

Contact Future's experts
Terms and conditions
Privacy policy
Accessibility statement
Cookies policy
Advertise with us

Golf Monthly is part of Future plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site . © Future Publishing Limited Quay House, The Ambury, Bath BA1 1UA. All rights reserved. England and Wales company registration number 2008885.

Fox Upends the Wireless Dropper Market with Its Superb Transfer Neo

With superb performance, an excellent remote, and many sizes and drops, Fox's Transfer Neo is the new leader of the wireless dropper category.

The Takeaway: Fox joins the bleep-bloop dropper party with the superb Transfer Neo. It’s fast and light action, and the remote is excellent too. Fox offers the Neo in more drops than the RockShox Reverb AXS—200mm, most notably where RockShox tops out at 170mm—and Fox lets riders customize drop force and return speed with air pressure while RockShox does not. All together, Fox’s Transfer Neo is the best wireless dropper—and one of the best droppers mechanical or wireless—you can buy today.

It wasn’t the first, and it is not the only wireless dropper post—other available electronic droppers include the Magura Vyron, KS LEV Circuit, and TranszX EDP01—but the RockShox Reverb AXS has owned the category since its debut in early 2019.

But if anyone can knock them from that perch, it is Fox. It seemingly took the brand forever to respond, but it finally unveiled its first electronic and wireless dropper. The Transfer Neo (Neo is the tag for all things Fox wireless) is essentially an electronically actuated version of the updated—and much improved—mechanically actuated Transfer that Fox debuted earlier this year. But there is a lot more to it than that, of course.

The Transfer Neo Dropper Post—Details and Features

The neo battery, the neo remote—low profile, there’s an app, of course, price, weights, sizes, ride impressions.

Wireless Built For Speed

The core of Fox’s new dropper is a wireless protocol the company developed for it, and future wireless products.

As the brand describes, other wireless protocols are slower than Fox demands—the protocols are designed to move more information than the company needs for its products. So, Fox developed a minimalist protocol that is, it claims, 100 times faster than Bluetooth and 20 times faster “than our closest competitor” (RockShox, it is safe to assume). Fox claims “virtually zero latency” which results in almost instantaneous actuation.

Members from various Fox teams presented these details to me at an event in Whistler, BC, during Crankworx. During a free-flowing discussion, the subject of wires came up. Fox’s team freely admitted that “Wires are inherently the fastest communication method.”

But if wires are faster—and if latency is so important—why did it go wire-less, I asked? Surprisingly, the answer was for durability and simplicity.

Fox argues that wires can be cut or damaged and have connections that are another potential failure point. Plus, wires need to be routed from point A to point B, which has drawbacks, especially as full suspension frames become more intricate.

Though unsaid, I assume that Fox feels that wireless is seen by the buying public as not only expected in 2024 but also more desirable. Plus, removing wires makes a bike look cleaner. Certainly, wireless has drawbacks and compromises. However, in Fox’s view, it can be fast enough but also brings a level of reliability and simplicity not possible with wires.

The placement of the battery was another major consideration during the development of the wireless Transfer, in addition to the Neo wireless protocol. All other wireless droppers on the market place the battery at the top of the post adjacent to the saddle clamp. Fox chose a different path and located the battery at the top of the outer post.

When I first saw it, I wondered about potential tire clearance and interference challenges, particularly on smaller frames with longer travel rear suspension. However, Fox says that its battery placement provides better tire clearance than posts with a top-located battery and significantly reduces the compressed length of the post.

From Fox’s press pack, “To achieve the ISO-recommended six-millimeters of clearance between tire and battery, other wireless dropper posts must be run as much as 18-millimeters above full insertion. Combined with taller stack height, this position means your saddle height sits 40 millimeters higher than Transfer Neo when fully compressed.”

The Neo battery is rectangular and secured by a robust latch. The standard battery position faces rearward, but I’m told that OEs can order the post with a forward-facing battery.

Dropper posts are notoriously problematic and need regular service to keep them operating optimally. The new Transfer architecture—shared between the mechanically and electronically actuated posts—has a six-fold “duty cycle” improvement and 62 percent “reduction in air loss” compared to the previous Transfer. Fox recommends a full service after 8,000 actuations. Fox’s app keeps track of actions and will alert riders when it's time for service. In between full services, Fox states the dust wiper can be “easily” removed at home for cleaning and regreasing.

Fox offers the Transfer Neo in drops from 100 to 200mm. But, unlike the new mechanically actuated Transfer, travel is not adjustable owing to the Neo’s motor placement at the base of the post.

I wish for a utopia where competing bike industry members think of the rider first and agree to a standard battery design for the growing number of wireless components.

But that is not our world, so Fox’s Neo uses a proprietary-designed battery. And this also means it has a unique charging dock. At least the charger employs a USB-C connection.

Fox claims a 40-hour battery life with charge times of 1.5 hours or less. For context, RockShox claims up to 60 hours for the Reverb AXS.

Fox has a “Transport Mode” option within its app that prevents motion from waking the system. This allows riders to leave the battery in place with minimal drain for long road trips or flying. If you’ve ever removed a RockShox Reverb AXS battery for travel only to arrive at the trailhead and realize its sitting on your bench at home (guilty!), you will understand why this is a helpful feature.

I asked Fox if it coordinated with Shimano on the battery design. We know that wireless Shimano mountain bike drivetrains are on the horizon (sources say Sea Otter 2025 for the new XTR 13-speed wireless system, though that could always change). It would be handy if new Shimano components used the same battery as Fox’s Neo components. Alas, Fox said there was no coordination on the battery design.

However, Fox’s Transfer Neo product presentation did say that the battery is compatible with “future Neo products.”

Fox didn’t look far for the Neo remote’s design inspiration. The Neo remote’s position imitates that of Fox’s mechanical dropper remote, and its rubber paddle cover texture is intended to mirror the mechanical variant.

The big difference is that Neo’s lever throw is much lighter and six times shorter than the mechanical one. Fox says the Neo remote is lower profile (by 10mm) than RockShox’s Reverb AXS controller. Its paddle resides somewhat under the bar, while the RockShox stands more rearward.

The Neo remote's power comes from a standard 2032 coin cell, which should last about a year before needing replacement.

The remote—with a 22.2mm discreet clamp, SRAM Matchmaker, and Shimano I-Spec EV mounts—is included with the purchase of a Transfer.

There’s no way Fox would launch a new wireless electronic thingy without an app to go with it.

Once paired to the post, the Fox Bike app provides the battery status of the post and remote, pushes firmware updates, counts actuation, and alerts the user when service is recommended. If service is needed, that app has a service center locator and a service request tool.

The app also allows riders to engage “Transport Mode” and “Bike Park Mode”. The former disables the post’s shake-to-wake function to preserve battery life, while the latter prevents unwanted post-actuation during park sessions.

Fox only offers the Factory series—with a Kashima-coated inner post—for aftermarket sales. However, a Performance Elite level Transfer—with a standard black-coated inner post—is available to brands for OEM specification.

Sizes offered are:

30.9mm and 31.6mm : 100mm, 125mm, 150mm, 175mm and 200mm drop
34.9mm : 125mm, 150mm, 175mm and 200mm drop

The Factory Series Transfer Neo costs $859. That price includes the post, remote, battery, charger and cord, and three remote clamping options.

For comparison, the Reverb AXS sells for $645 including a battery and charger. But the RockShox remote is sold separately for $215 (Reverb AXS controller), $150 (AXS Pod controller), or $200 (AXS Pod Ultimate controller). Also note that SRAM Controllers are sold with 22.2mm discreet clamps only: other mounts are sold separately.

So, the minimum price for a Reverb AXS with battery, charger, and controller is $795. That is a bit cheaper than the Transfer Neo, though Fox provides the additional remote clamping options.

The Transfer Neo’s spare prices: Battery, $79; charger and cable, $49. RockShox charges $59 for a spare battery and $49 for an extra charger and cord.

Claimed weights range from 528 grams (30.9x100mm) to 800 grams (34.9x200mm). For additional reference, a 31.6x150mm post (a good average for today’s trail bikes) weighs 639 grams (claimed). The lever, meanwhile, weighs about 65 grams with a 22.2mm discrete clamp.

On my scale a 30.9mm by 175mm drop Transfer Neo weighed 670 grams, 13 grams less than a 30.9mm by 170mm drop RockShox Reverb AXS.

I don’t have many ride impressions to share regarding the Transfer Neo (or really any dropper) because all it does is make your saddle go up and down. Still, it is wild how that simple motion has forever changed riding a mountain bike.

Anyway, the Transfer Neo goes up and down smoothly and quickly. Breakaway force is minimal, making finding a sweet spot in the middle of its travel easy. And it has very little rotational slop. It’s speedy, too, with almost instantaneous actuation. RockShox’s Reverb AXS isn’t slow, but the Transfer Neo feels snappier.

The Neo remote is also excellent. It’s sleek with solid ergonomics, and the action has a crisp feel. The paddle’s spring force and throw length are light and quick, enough to prevent unwanted actuation.

Battery life seems fine. I can’t say precisely because my testing load prevents me from exclusively riding my Transfer Neo-equipped bike. Fox claims up to 40 hours, while RockShox claims up to 60 hours for its Reverb AXS. This seems like a substantial difference on paper. But checking and charging batteries is an ingrained part of riding life, so I don’t think this difference is significant. You can’t put 40 hours—or even 10—on a mountain bike without doing some inspection and maintenance. Batteries are part of that routine now.

The huge remaining question with the Transfer Neo is (as it is with every dropper post) durability. Fox (compared to a category with generally awful reliability) made a pretty reliable mechanically actuated dropper until it didn’t. Earlier this year, Fox launched a wholly overhauled Transfer with new internals intended to make it more reliable, and it is now user-serviceable as well.

The Neo shares its guts with the new Transfer—the only difference is the Neo does not offer adjustable maximum travel—so it’s still unclear how it might hold up over time. Hopefully, Fox’s claims of enhanced durability will prove true. We also don’t know how the motor, electronics, and batteries will hold up. In 2024, it seems like these should be pretty sorted, but time will tell.

On both the mechanical and electronics front, all I can say is I’ve been on a Transfer Neo since mid-April, and I’ve done nothing but wipe grime off the seal and top off the battery charge a few times.

It’s impossible not to compare the Transfer Neo to the RockShox Reverb AXS . I’ve experienced countless Reverb AXS posts on test bikes for the past five years, and they all worked relatively well. The Reverbs occasionally go soft at the top, but in every case, I could fix the issue by using the Vent Valve tool included with the post.

Head-to-head, the performance of the Transfer Neo is superior to the Reverb AXS. The Transfer is more reactive—I know it’s only fractions of a second, but the Transfer’s delay from when the remote is pressed to when the post moves is perceptibly faster than the Reverb’s. Another noticeable difference is the Transfer requires less breakaway force to drop the saddle into the post’s travel, something lighter riders will especially appreciate.

I also prefer the Transfer’s remote to Reverb’s remote options (the pod and the controller). The Transfer remote has a lower profile, the paddle’s position and movement path feel more natural, and the paddle force and feedback feel right.

And those are not the only ways the Transfer surpasses the Reverb AXS. The Transfer Neo is available in more lengths—notably a 200mm drop in all post diameters—and has adjustable air pressure so riders can customize the drop force and return speed.

This isn’t to say the Reverb AXS is terrible. It’s pretty good and deserves to be recognized for revolutionizing the dropper category. But it is five years old and beginning to show its age, especially in the face of Fox’s much younger competitor. However, I expect a new Reverb AXS is coming very soon.

But for now, Fox’s Transfer Neo is the best wireless dropper you can buy.

A gear editor for his entire career, Matt’s journey to becoming a leading cycling tech journalist started in 1995, and he’s been at it ever since; likely riding more cycling equipment than anyone on the planet along the way. Previous to his time with Bicycling , Matt worked in bike shops as a service manager, mechanic, and sales person. Based in Durango, Colorado, he enjoys riding and testing any and all kinds of bikes, so you’re just as likely to see him on a road bike dressed in Lycra at a Tuesday night worlds ride as you are to find him dressed in a full face helmet and pads riding a bike park on an enduro bike. He doesn’t race often, but he’s game for anything; having entered road races, criteriums, trials competitions, dual slalom, downhill races, enduros, stage races, short track, time trials, and gran fondos. Next up on his to-do list: a multi day bikepacking trip, and an e-bike race.

preview for HDM All Sections Playlist - Bicycling

.css-1t6om3g:before{width:1.75rem;height:1.75rem;margin:0 0.625rem -0.125rem 0;content:'';display:inline-block;-webkit-background-size:1.25rem;background-size:1.25rem;background-color:#F8D811;color:#000;background-repeat:no-repeat;-webkit-background-position:center;background-position:center;}.loaded .css-1t6om3g:before{background-image:url(/_assets/design-tokens/bicycling/static/images/chevron-design-element.c42d609.svg);} Member Exclusive

How to Become a Better Climber

two cyclists on fixies flying through the streets

The Best Bike Is an Old Track Bike

Give Your Bike the Love It Deserves

affects of coronavirus on cycling industry

The Benefits of Riding an Indoor Trainer All Year

group of women cyclists taking a break and chatting at an urban cafe outdoor cycling lifestyle active urban life concept

All You Need to Know About Century Break Times

Trek Checkpoint & Checkmate Gravel Bikes Reviewed

A Guide to Road Cycling for Beginners

test for grip strength and how improving your grip strength is linked to better health

Ways to Test Your Grip Strength

This Bike Made Me Laugh, Cry, and Puke—Buy It!

The AhHa Toaster Is Your Next Bike Rack Solution

What to Know About Cycling Power Zones

Tour Edge Hot Launch E524 Driver Review

Tour edge hot launch e524 driver.

Tour Edge’s new Hot Launch family of metalwoods is the most technology rich that this line of clubs has ever been. Just as the previous generation, the Hot Launch 524 lineup features the “competitive” C series and the “extreme spec” E series. Both ranges also utilize strong technologies that had only been previously available in the premium Exotics family. Therse technologies include Ridgeback, Diamond Face VFT, RyzerSole and Vibrcor. The Tour Edge Hot Launch E524 driver is designed to be the easiest driver to hit on the market for players with moderate swing speeds at an extremely affordable price.

It’s important to remember that the Tour Edge Hot Launch “extreme spec” E series is designed for a high level of forgiveness. As such, the Hot Launch E524 driver does come with some offset. This offset makes it easier to launch the ball in the air and prevent or reduce slicing. Aside from the offset, the HL E524 driver has a clean look at address. The contrast between the visible Ridgeback spine and patterned finish really sets up nicely.

There’s also something called the Houdini Sole on the bottom of the club. This has important performance benefits but does give the sole a different look. Essentially, this sole places a high amount of mass low and deep in the head to help raise the MOI and optimize launch. (More on that later.) Houdini Sole is by no means new to the Hot Launch line, but its integration in the E524 driver is definitely the smoothest it’s ever looked!

How Does it Feel?

I found the Tour Edge Hot Launch E524 driver to feel very well balanced and smooth. The high MOI design really keeps the head under control throughout the swing, and it’s easy to get a square face to the ball at impact. The Aldila Ascent shaft is slightly on the softer side, but players looking for something that’s easy to load and release will get along with it well.

Tour Edge introduced Diamond Face VFT and a Ridgeback spine in the Hot Launch 524 series. These additions have a very direct and beneficial impact on the club’s feel. First, Diamond Face VFT is a technology where there are thirty-six diamond shapes of varying thicknesses behind the face. These diamonds act as mini trampolines and provide more speed at impact. As a result, there’s a lot of heat off the face, even when you don’t find the center. The Ridgeback spine makes the club head more rigid from front to back so more energy is transferred into the ball and not lost in the head absorbing the shock. That rigidity makes the club feel stronger and like you’re getting more power in your tee shot.

How Does it Sound?

Like the C524 , the Tour Edge Hot Launch E524 is a hollow-body titanium driver. This gives it a somewhat metallic tone, but the Ridgeback spine helps keep that sound firm and tight. To be fair, the E524 driver is a touch on the louder side, but at more moderate swing speeds of players that are likely to play this driver, it will be more appropriate. In fact, I’d even say that the target audience will enjoy the presence of the E524’s sound. As far as the tone, I’d give it a combination of “thwap” and “pop.” The impact sound will be heavily dependent on your swing speed.

On-Course Performance

There are two main objectives for the Tour Edge Hot Launch E524 driver: easy launch/carry, and removing the right miss. As mentioned earlier, the Houdini Sole drives the CG low and back in the head. Doing so makes it easier to launch the ball in the air and adds more spin to the shot. That additional spin helps keep the ball in the air for greater carry distances. My shot data above certainly reflects that extra carry yardage that this club is capable of.

This driver is an absolute slice killer. Players that really struggle with the right miss will find the Hot Launch E524 to be a lifesaver. Obviously, the offset face plays a huge role in this. An offset face helps the driver naturally square the face at impact so you don’t slice it (as much), or even get a little draw to your shot. Additionally, there’s a sole weight toward the heel of the club that also promotes squaring the face at impact. The end result is a shot that does everything in its power to eliminate trouble on the right side of the course. (Or the left side if you’re left-handed.) Of course, beware if you tend to draw or hook the ball for your miss. You should probably consider the Hot Launch C524 driver instead as you’re likely not looking to prevent a slice.

Final Thoughts – Tour Edge Hot Launch E524 Driver

The Tour Edge Hot Launch E524 driver is a solid option for golfers seeking maximum forgiveness and distance without breaking the bank. Its combination of high MOI, offset design, and Houdini Sole technology effectively removes the dreaded slice, while the Diamond Face VFT and Ridgeback spine technologies deliver impressive ball speeds and a solid feel. Ultimately, the E524’s ability to easily launch the ball with long carry distances and extreme forgiveness makes it a strong contender for golfers looking to simplify their game off the tee.

Additionally, the Hot Launch E524 can be fit and customized through most Tour Edge retailers which you can look up here . Custom options for Hot Launch metalwoods include grip, shaft flex, and length. All Hot Launch custom orders will be shipped within two business days of Tour Edge receiving the order.

Stock Tour Edge Hot Launch E524 Driver Specs

20mph restrictions force key British race to make late route change

Junior Tour of Wales altered at last minute due to 11 kilometres of 20mph sections

The Junior Tour of Wales , one of Britain’s most important development races, has been forced into a last minute course alteration due to a handful of 20mph zones featuring in the 381 kilometre route, Cycling Weekly has learned.

First held in 1981, the long-standing four-day event typically attracts Britain’s best junior male riders as well as elite international junior teams from across Europe. Former winners include Roger Hammond, Dan Martin, Fred Wright, Tom Pidcock and Lewis Askey.

Despite the initial course for this year including just eleven kilometres of 20mph zones, the collapse of a planned legal mitigation has meant that the race organiser was left with no choice other than to adjust the course ahead of the race taking place this weekend.

Race organiser Richard Hopkins confirmed the course change last week. He said that the introduction of the 20mph default in Wales last year had largely meant that the writing was on the wall for his event, but he explained that his team had worked tirelessly alongside Welsh Cycling and the Welsh government to ensure that a work around could be found.

"We were hoping to have a legal mitigation in place to enable the initial route to remain fully viable but it hasn't come through in time," Hopkins told CW . "And we can't assure the race, and public's, safety in a context where our marshals, lead cars, commissaires and the convoy can't always keep pace and spacing around the riders.

"This has been an issue we knew was coming since the introduction of the 20mph default in Wales last year - and to be fair, both Welsh Cycling and the Welsh Government recognised it as an unintended consequence of the legislation and have been working on the mitigation in order to keep racing going."

Hopkins explained that after weeks of discussions, he had only been notified at the last minute that a course change was likely to be his only option to ensure that support from the relevant authorities to enable his race to take place safely was available.

Get The Leadout Newsletter

The latest race content, interviews, features, reviews and expert buying guides, direct to your inbox!

"We've tried everything we can, and we were so agonisingly close to a solution, but now have no choice but to adapt the route," he added. "It's so massively frustrating, as the actual amount of 20mph is minute - just 7 miles of a 237 mile race, and most of it is just a few hundred metres at a time. But it's enough, unfortunately.

"I just hope the standby routes are actually achievable and keep enough of the flavour of the race to maintain the riders' interest. Both because we need to see a sporting, hard-won Tour, but also because the risks of riders pulling out make the race unviable from a financial standpoint."

After weeks of dialogue, Hopkins recently notified entrants that the course would be changing.

He explained that throughout the entire process there had been inconsistency with different authorities regarding the situation, and called on the sport’s governing bodies to do more in order to ensure that the procedure around dealing with 20mph zones was clearer, so that similar situations did not develop in future.

"I know the general idea of 20mph zones has caused issues to other event organisers in England too and it's a massive potential problem," he said.

"One section of just a few hundred metres can take an entire course out of commission. And while some councils and police services are reactive and supportive, others aren't - and the differences in approach in different regions makes it very difficult for organisers to keep up.

"It's already very difficult and time-consuming to put races on, and this is another challenge where we really need the governing bodies to step up and advocate for a solution."

British Cycling and Welsh Cycling have both been contacted to provide further information on this story.

Thank you for reading 20 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access

Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

*Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription

Join now for unlimited access

Try first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

Tom has been writing for Cycling Weekly since 2022 and his news stories, rider interviews and features appear both online and in the magazine.

Since joining the team, he has reported from some of professional cycling's biggest races and events including the Tour de France and the World Championships in Glasgow. He has also covered races elsewhere across the world.

As well as on the ground reporting, Tom writes race reports from the men's and women's WorldTour and helps with coverage of UK domestic cycling.

Ineos’ Leo Hayter opening up about his struggles last week was just the latest example of a new positive wave

By Adam Becket Published 20 August 24

Matthew Richardson at the Paris Olympics

Triple Olympic medallist for Australia explains the process and his reasons behind changing his racing nationality

By Tom Davidson Published 20 August 24

Useful links

Tour de France
Giro d'Italia
Vuelta a España

buyers-guides

Best road bikes
Best gravel bikes
Best smart turbo trainers
Best cycling computers
Editor's Choice
Bike Reviews
Component Reviews
Clothing Reviews
Contact Future's experts
Terms and conditions
Privacy policy
Cookies policy
Advertise with us

Cycling Weekly is part of Future plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site . © Future Publishing Limited Quay House, The Ambury, Bath BA1 1UA. All rights reserved. England and Wales company registration number 2008885.

IMAGES

Titleist Tour Speed Golf Ball (2022) Review
Titleist Tour Speed Golf Ball (2022) Review
Titleist Tour Speed 2022 Golf Ball Review
Titleist Tour Speed Golf Ball Review
Titleist Tour Speed Golf Ball Review
Titleist Tour Speed vs Tour Soft Balls: Comparison Guide

COMMENTS

Titleist Tour Speed Golf Ball Review
Conclusion. Retailing for $40/dozen, the Titleist Tour Speed is at the high end of the mid-tier golf ball market but is still more affordable than the Pro V1. If you want most of the short game performance of the Pro V1 with the potential for a bit more distance and speed, it's worth checking out. Author.
Titleist Tour Speed Review: Pros, Cons, Alternatives
Let's wrap up this Titleist Tour Speed review with a brief summary: The Titleist Tour Speed is a top-tier golf ball that offers impressive distance, speed, and control. I found the advanced aerodynamics, high-speed LSX core, and durable TPU cover made this ball a standout option for golfers seeking to improve their performance on the course ...
Titleist Tour Speed Ball Review
The Pro V1s feels solid and faster while the Tour Speed feels a little more jumpy, especially with wedges and the putter. On the greens, this produced a quieter sound but the ball still ran out a similar distance. Tour Speed's arrow-based alignment mark, with smaller arrows making up one large double-ended arrow, does a good job at assisting ...
Titleist Tour Speed Golf Ball (2022) Review
Titleist Tour Speed Golf Ball Review: Key Technologies. - Proprietary Titleist Performance Urethane (TPU) Cover is engineered to deliver exceptional greenside spin for short game control. - Reformulated, high speed, high compression 1.550" core generates fast speed on full swing shots to deliver maximum distance.
Titleist Tour Speed golf ball review: What's new for 2022?
The Titleist Tour Speed offers long distance and a strong stable flight all whilst keeping some spin for control in your short game. PROS. Maximum distance. Penetrating flight. Increased short game spin. CONS. Reduced stopping power on long shots. Titleist Tour Speed golf ball review: NCG verdict. I tested the Titleist Tour Speed by collecting ...
Titleist Tour Speed Golf Ball Review
This is an excellent ball and will suit a lot of players. Alongside the Titleist Velocity, Tour Soft and TruFeel, it's a great ball offering an incredibly soft feel and distances that amateurs will love. £37.95. View Deal. Titleist Tour Speed golf ball review: The Details. Available: Now.
Titleist Tour Soft vs Tour Speed Golf Balls: Read our Head to Head
The Tour Speed has a slightly duller finish than the Pro V1 models and the logo is a fraction thicker, as you can see above. ... Subscribe to the Golf Monthly newsletter to stay up to date with all the latest tour news, equipment news, reviews, head-to-heads and buyer's guides from our team of experienced experts.
MEMBER REVIEWS: Titleist Tour Speed Golf Balls! See What Members Are
Thank you to Titleist and GolfWRX for the opportunity to test and review the new Tour Speed golf ball! I received mine on Saturday and played 18 with them today. First, about me: 40 years old, 4.2 HDCP, 105avg driver speed. I play 10-15x/mo, year round, weather permitting. I have been playing Callaway CS/X for years.
Titleist Tour Speed Golf Balls Review: The Perfect Golf Ball for Your Game
The Titleist Tour Speed Golf Ball is a three-piece ball with a urethane cover that promises high speed and low spin in the long game, as well as good feel around the greens. The ball offers solid performance and feel, with a slightly firmer feel than the Pro V1 and a lower-pitched impact sound.
Titleist Tour Speed Review [Data & Testing]
The Titleist Tour Speed is a good all-around golf ball with decent distance technology, good iron spin, and a medium soft feel around the greens. You can't put a Titleist Tour Speed into play and expect the same things you get with a Pro V1.
Titleist Tour Speed Golf Balls [Official Review Thread]
California. Team Titleist Staff. August 13, 2020 at 01:00 PM. Introducing the all-new Titleist Tour Speed golf ball: We are especially excited to share Tour Speed with Team Titleist as you played an integral role in bringing this golf ball to life. Through EXP•01 surveys on MyTitleist, R&D testing at Manchester Lane, and further testing at ...
New Titleist Tour Speed is something completely different and yet
Tour Speed also is targeting a price point a notch closer to affordability compared to the balls the best players in the world have been using. Titleist's urethane cover balls, the dominant Pro ...
Titleist Tour Speed Vs. AVX Golf Balls: In-depth Differences
The Titleist Tour Speed golf ball features a high-speed core design, using a larger and faster core that maximizes speed and minimizes spin. It is constructed with a three-piece thermoplastic urethane technology, making the ball firmer and faster. In contrast, the AVX utilizes an innovative high-speed, low-compression core technology.
Titleist Tour Speed vs Tour Soft Balls: Comparison
Compared to the Tour Speed, the Tour Soft is perfect and better for approach shots. These balls also offer great distance with a mid-low trajectory off the tee, and offer higher launch angle with great greenside spin. Plus, they are designed for high precision spin control without sacrificing performance.
Titleist Tour Speed Vs. Pro V1 Golf Balls: In-depth Differences
Construction-wise, the Tour Speed and Pro V1 are different in their core and cover makeup. The Tour Speed is a three-piece golf ball that includes a high-speed core, a fast ionomer casing layer, and a thermoplastic urethane cover. This construction is designed to give high speed and low long game spin, enhancing the distance achieved.
Titleist Introduces the Next Generation Tour Speed Golf Ball
Features Reformulated High-Speed Core and High Flex Casing Layer with Proprietary Titleist Performance Urethane (TPU) Cover. When the original Tour Speed was introduced two years ago, it was the first Titleist high performance, multilayer golf ball with a proprietary Titleist Performance Urethane (TPU) cover, and immediately provided golfers the fastest, best performing model in its category.
Titleist 2024 Tour Soft Golf Ball Review
The Titleist 2024 Tour Soft offers really strong performance for a mid-priced golf ball. The soft feel will please those who prioritise this, particularly with the scoring clubs, but thanks to a new faster core, ball speeds also remained fairly high. A great alternative to premium golf balls without sacrificing too much.
Fox Transfer Neo Dropper Post Review
Fox offers the Neo in more drops than the RockShox Reverb AXS—200mm, most notably where RockShox tops out at 170mm—and Fox lets riders customize drop force and return speed with air pressure ...
Titleist Tour Speed
Penetrating Flight on Long Game Shots. Optimized Short Game Spin. Soft Feel. Features. Reformulated High Speed Core. Reformulated, Proprietary Casing Layer. Proprietary Titleist Performance Urethane (TPU) Cover. 346 Quadrilateral Dipyramid Dimple Design. Available in White & Yellow.
Tour Edge Hot Launch E524 Driver Review
Final Thoughts - Tour Edge Hot Launch E524 Driver The Tour Edge Hot Launch E524 driver is a solid option for golfers seeking maximum forgiveness and distance without breaking the bank. Its combination of high MOI, offset design, and Houdini Sole technology effectively removes the dreaded slice, while the Diamond Face VFT and Ridgeback spine ...
Key British race forced to make late route change due to 20mph
The Junior Tour of Wales, one of Britain's most important development races, has been forced into a last minute course alteration due to a handful of 20mph zones featuring in the 381 kilometre ...