nature tourism objectives

What Is Ecotourism? Definition, Examples, and Pros and Cons

• Chapman University
• Sustainable Fashion
• Art & Media

Ecotourism Definition and Principles

Pros and cons.

• Examples of Ecotourism
• Frequently Asked Questions

Ecotourism is about more than simply visiting natural attractions or natural places; it’s about doing so in a responsible and sustainable manner. The term itself refers to traveling to natural areas with a focus on environmental conservation. The goal is to educate tourists about conservation efforts while offering them the chance to explore nature.

Ecotourism has benefited destinations like Madagascar, Ecuador, Kenya, and Costa Rica, and has helped provide economic growth in some of the world’s most impoverished communities. The global ecotourism market produced $92.2 billion in 2019 and is forecasted to generate $103.8 billion by 2027.

A conservationist by the name of Hector Ceballos-Lascurain is often credited with the first definition of ecotourism in 1987, that is, “tourism that consists in travelling to relatively undisturbed or uncontaminated natural areas with the specific object of studying, admiring and enjoying the scenery and its wild plants and animals, as well as any existing cultural manifestations (both past and present) found in these areas.”

The International Ecotourism Society (TIES), a non-profit organization dedicated to the development of ecotourism since 1990, defines ecotourism as “responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment, sustains the well-being of the local people, and involves interpretation and education [both in its staff and its guests].”

The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) looks at ecotourism as a significant tool for conservation, though it shouldn’t be seen as a fix-all when it comes to conservation challenges:

“There may be some areas that are just not appropriate for ecotourism development and some businesses that just won’t work in the larger tourism market. That is why it is so important to understand the basics of developing and running a successful business, to ensure that your business idea is viable and will be profitable, allowing it to most effectively benefit the surrounding environment and communities.”

Marketing an ecosystem, species, or landscape towards ecotourists helps create value, and that value can help raise funds to protect and conserve those natural resources.

Sustainable ecotourism should be guided by three core principles: conservation, communities, and education.

Conservation

Conservation is arguably the most important component of ecotourism because it should offer long-term, sustainable solutions to enhancing and protecting biodiversity and nature. This is typically achieved through economic incentives paid by tourists seeking a nature-based experience, but can also come from the tourism organizations themselves, research, or direct environmental conservation efforts.

Communities

Ecotourism should increase employment opportunities and empower local communities, helping in the fight against global social issues like poverty and achieving sustainable development.

Interpretation

One of the most overlooked aspects of ecotourism is the education component. Yes, we all want to see these beautiful, natural places, but it also pays to learn about them. Increasing awareness about environmental issues and promoting a greater understanding and appreciation for nature is arguably just as important as conservation.

As one of the fastest growing sectors of the tourism industry, there are bound to be some downsides to ecotourism. Whenever humans interact with animals or even with the environment, it risks the chance of human-wildlife conflict or other negative effects; if done so with respect and responsibility in mind, however, ecotourism can reap enormous benefits to protected areas.

As an industry that relies heavily on the presentation of eco-friendly components to attract customers, ecotourism has the inevitable potential as a vessel for greenwashing. Part of planning a trip rooted in ecotourism is doing research to ensure that an organization is truly providing substantial benefits to the environment rather than exploiting it.

Ecotourism Can Provide Sustainable Income for Local Communities

Sustainably managed ecotourism can support poverty alleviation by providing employment for local communities, which can offer them alternative means of livelihood outside of unsustainable ones (such as poaching).

Research published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that communities in regions surrounding conservation areas in Costa Rica had poverty rates that were 16% lower than in areas that weren’t near protected parks. These protected areas didn’t just benefit from conservation funds due to ecotourism, but also helped to reduce poverty as well.

It Protects Natural Ecosystems

Ecotourism offers unique travel experiences focusing on nature and education, with an emphasis on sustainability and highlighting threatened or endangered species. It combines conservation with local communities and sustainable travel , highlighting principles (and operations) that minimize negative impacts and expose visitors to unique ecosystems and natural areas. When managed correctly, ecotourism can benefit both the traveler and the environment, since the money that goes into ecotourism often goes directly towards protecting the natural areas they visit.

Each year, researchers release findings on how tourist presence affects wildlife, sometimes with varying results. A study measuring levels of the stress hormone cortisol in wild habituated Malaysian orangutans found that the animals were not chronically stressed by the presence of ecotourists. The orangutans lived in the Lower Kinabatangan Wildlife Sanctuary, where a local community-managed organization operates while maintaining strict guidelines to protect them.

Ecotourism May Also Hurt Those Same Natural Ecosystems

Somewhat ironically, sometimes ecotourism can hurt ecosystems just as much as it can help. Another study in the journal Trends in Ecology and Evolution found that ecotourism can alter animal behaviors in ways that put them at risk. If the presence of humans changes the way animals behave, those changes may make them more vulnerable by influencing their reaction to predators or poachers.

It's not just the animals who are at risk. As ecotourism activities become too popular, it can lead to the construction of new infrastructure to accommodate more visitors. Similarly, more crowds mean more pressure on local resources, increased pollution, and a higher chance of damaging the soil and plant quality through erosion. On the social side, these activities may displace Indigenous groups or local communities from their native lands, preventing them from benefiting from the economic opportunities of tourism.

Ecotourism Offers the Opportunity to Experience Nature

Renown conservationist Jane Goodall has a famous quote: “Only if we understand, will we care. Only if we care, will we help. Only if we help, shall all be saved.” It can be difficult to understand something that we haven’t seen with our own eyes, and ecotourism gives travelers the opportunity to gain new experiences in natural areas while learning about the issues they face. 

Ecotourism also educates children about nature, potentially creating new generations of nature lovers that could someday become conservationists themselves. Even adult visitors may learn new ways to improve their ecological footprints .

EXAMPLES OF ECOTOURISM

The East African country has some competitive advantages over its neighbors thanks to its rich natural resources, paired with the fact that it has allocated over 25% of its total area to wildlife national parks and protected areas. Because of this, an estimated 90% of tourists visit to Tanzania seeking out ecotourism activities. Ecotourism, in turn, supports 400,000 jobs and accounts for 17.2% of the national GDP, earning about $1 billion each year as its leading economic sector.

Some of Tanzania’s biggest highlights include the Serengeti, Mount Kilimanjaro , and Zanzibar, though the country still often goes overlooked by American tourists. Visitors can take a walking safari tour in the famous Ngorongoro Conservation area, for example, with fees going to support the local Maasai community.

The country is also known for its chimpanzees , and there are several ecotourism opportunities in Gombe National Park that go directly towards protecting chimpanzee habitats.

Galapagos Islands

It comes as no surprise that the place first made famous by legendary naturalist Charles Darwin would go on to become one of the most sought-after ecotourism destinations on Earth, the Galapagos Islands .

The Directorate of the Galapagos National Park and the Ecuadorian Ministry of Tourism require tour providers to conserve water and energy, recycle waste, source locally produced goods, hire local employees with a fair wage, and offer employees additional training. A total of 97% of the land area on the Galapagos is part of the official national park, and all of its 330 islands have been divided into zones that are either completely free of human impact, protected restoration areas, or reduced impact zones adjacent to tourist-friendly areas.

Local authorities still have to be on their toes, however, since UNESCO lists increased tourism as one of the main threats facing the Galapagos today. The bulk of funding for the conservation and management of the archipelago comes from a combination of governmental institutions and entry fees paid by tourists.

Costa Rica is well-known throughout the world for its emphasis on nature-based tourism, from its numerous animal sanctuaries to its plethora of national parks and reserves. Programs like its “Ecological Blue Flag” program help inform tourists of beaches that have maintained a strict set of eco-friendly criteria.

The country’s forest cover went from 26% in 1983 to over 52% in 2021 thanks to the government’s decision to create more protected areas and promote ecotourism in the country . Now, over a quarter of its total land area is zoned as protected territory.

Costa Rica welcomes 1.7 million travelers per year, and most of them come to experience the country’s vibrant wildlife and diverse ecosystems. Its numerous biological reserves and protected parks hold some of the most extraordinary biodiversity on Earth, so the country takes special care to keep environmental conservation high on its list of priorities. 

New Zealand

In 2019, tourism generated $16.2 billion, or 5.8% of the GDP, in New Zealand. That same year, 8.4% of its citizens were employed in the tourism industry, and tourists generated $3.8 billion in tax revenue.

The country offers a vast number of ecotourism experiences, from animal sanctuaries to natural wildlife on land, sea, and even natural caves. New Zealand’s South Pacific environment, full of sights like glaciers and volcanic landscapes, is actually quite fragile, so the government puts a lot of effort into keeping it safe.

Tongariro National Park, for example, is the oldest national park in the country, and has been named by UNESCO as one of only 28 mixed cultural and natural World Heritage Sites. Its diverse volcanic landscapes and the cultural heritage of the indigenous Maori tribes within the create the perfect combination of community, education, and conservation.

How to Be a Responsible Ecotourist

• Ensure that the organizations you hire provide financial contributions to benefit conservation and find out where your money is going.
• Ask about specific steps the organization takes to protect the environment where they operate, such as recycling or promoting sustainable policies.
• Find out if they include the local community in their activities, such as hiring local guides, giving back, or through initiatives to empower the community.
• Make sure there are educational elements to the program. Does the organization take steps to respect the destination’s culture as well as its biodiversity?
• See if your organization is connected to a non-profit or charity like the International Ecotourism Society .
• Understand that wildlife interactions should be non-invasive and avoid negative impacts on the animals.

Ecotourism activities typically involve visiting and enjoying a natural place without disturbing the landscape or its inhabitants. This might involve going for a hike on a forest trail, mountain biking, surfing, bird watching, camping, or forest bathing . 

Traveling in a way that minimizes carbon emissions, like taking a train or bike instead of flying, may also be part of an ecotourism trip. Because these modes of travel tend to be slower, they may be appreciated as enjoyable and relaxing ecotourism activities.

The Wolf Conservation Center ’s programing in New York State is an example of ecotourism. This non-profit organization is dedicated to the preservation of endangered wolf species. It hosts educational sessions that allow visitors to observe wolves from a safe distance. These programs help to fund the nonprofit organization’s conservation and wildlife rehabilitation efforts.

Stonehouse, Bernard. " Ecotourism ." Environmental Geology: Encyclopedia of Earth Science , 1999, doi:10.1007/1-4020-4494-1_101

" What is Ecotourism? " The International Ecotourism Society .

" Tourism ." International Union for Conservation of Nature .

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1307712111

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033357

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.09.010

https://doi.org/10.5897/JHMT2016.0207

" Galapagos Islands ." UNESCO .

" About Costa Rica ." Embassy of Costa Rica in Washington DC .

https://www.stats.govt.nz/information-releases/tourism-satellite-account-2019

• What Is Sustainable Tourism and Why Is It Important?
• How to Be a Sustainable Traveler: 18 Tips
• Best of Green Awards 2021: Sustainable Travel
• Costa Rica’s Keys to Success as a Sustainable Tourism Pioneer
• What Is Community-Based Tourism? Definition and Popular Destinations
• What Is Voluntourism? Does It Help or Harm Communities?
• What Is Overtourism and Why Is It Such a Big Problem?
• Defeating Deforestation Through Rum, Chocolate, and Ecotourism
• Why Are National Parks Important? Environmental, Social, and Economic Benefits
• Why Bonobos Are Endangered and What We Can Do
• What Is a Wilderness Area? Definition and Examples
• The World’s Smallest Tiger Is Inching Towards Extinction
• Regenerative Travel: What It Is and How It's Outperforming Sustainable Tourism
• Top 8 Agritourism Destinations in the World
• 15 of the Most Beautiful Botanical Gardens in the US
• 15 of the Best City Parks in America

What Is Ecotourism?

Conservation, offering market-linked long-term solutions, ecotourism provides effective economic incentives for conserving and enhancing bio-cultural diversity and helps protect the natural and cultural heritage of our beautiful planet., communities, by increasing local capacity building and employment opportunities, ecotourism is an effective vehicle for empowering local communities around the world to fight against poverty and to achieve sustainable development., interpretation, with an emphasis on enriching personal experiences and environmental awareness through interpretation, ecotourism promotes greater understanding and appreciation for nature, local society, and culture., the definition., ecotourism is now defined as “responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment, sustains the well-being of the local people, and involves interpretation and education” (ties, 2015). education is meant to be inclusive of both staff and guests., principles of ecotourism, ecotourism is about uniting conservation, communities, and sustainable travel. this means that those who implement, participate in and market ecotourism activities should adopt the following ecotourism principles:.

• Minimize physical, social, behavioral, and psychological impacts.
• Build environmental and cultural awareness and respect.
• Provide positive experiences for both visitors and hosts.
• Provide direct financial benefits for conservation.
• Generate financial benefits for both local people and private industry.
• Deliver memorable interpretative experiences to visitors that help raise sensitivity to host countries’ political, environmental, and social climates.
• Design, construct and operate low-impact facilities.
• Recognize the rights and spiritual beliefs of the Indigenous People in your community and work in partnership with them to create empowerment.

Privacy Overview

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.

• WordPress.org
• Documentation

Eco Tourism – Definitions, Types, History, Characteristics, and Functions

Around the world, ecotourism has been hailed as a panacea: a way to fund conservation and scientific research, protect fragile and pristine ecosystems, benefit rural communities, promote development in poor countries, enhance ecological and cultural sensitivity, instill environmental awareness and social conscience in the travel industry, satisfy and educate the discriminating tourist, and, some claim, build world peace.

Ecotourism is a form of tourism that attempts to minimize its impact upon the environment, is ecologically sound, and avoids the negative impacts of many large-scale tourism developments undertaken in the areas which have not previously been developed.

History of Eco Tourism

The origins of the term ‘ ecotourism ‘ are not entirely clear, one of the first to use it appears to have been Hetzer(1965), who identified four ‘ pillars ‘ or principles of responsible tourism: minimizing environmental impacts, respecting host cultures, maximizing the benefits to local people, and maximizing tourist satisfaction. The first of these was held to be the most distinguishing characteristic of ecological tourism.

Other early references to ecotourism are found in Miller’s (1978) work on national park planning for ecodevelopment in Latin America, and documentation produced by Environment Canada in relation to a set of road-based ‘ecotours’ they developed from the mid-1979s through to the early 1980s.

Ecotourism developed ‘within the womb’ of the environmental movement in the 1970s and 1980s . Growing environmental concern coupled with an emerging dissatisfaction with mass tourism led to increased demand for nature-based experiences of an alternative nature.

At the same time, less developed countries began to realize that nature-based tourism offers a means of earning foreign exchange and providing a less destructive use of resources than alternatives such as logging and agriculture.

By the mid-1980s, a number of such countries had identified ecotourism as a means of achieving both conservation and development goals. The first formal definition of ecotourism is generally credited to Ceballos Lascurain in 1987.

Definitions of Eco Tourism

According to Ceballos-Lascurain, ecotourism is the , ” traveling to relatively undisturbed or uncontaminated natural areas with the specific objective of studying, admiring, and enjoying the scenery and its wild plants and animals, as well as any existing cultural manifestation (both past and present) found in these areas.”

Ecotourism Society defines ecotourism as, ” responsible travel to natural areas which conserves the environment and improves the well-being of local people.”

According to the Ecotourism Association of Australia , ” ecotourism is nature-based tourism that involves education and interpretation of the natural environment and is managed to be ecologically sustainable.”

This definition recognizes that ‘natural environment’ includes cultural components and that ‘ecologically sustainable’ involves an appropriate return to the local community and long-term conservation of the resource.

According to Tickell , ecotourism is “travel to enjoy the world’s amazing diversity of natural life and human culture without causing damage to either”.

Ecotourism is ecologically sustainable tourism that fosters environmental and cultural understanding, appreciation and conservation.

Types of Ecotourism

Fennell considers that ecotourism exits within the broader classification of tourism types which, at an initial level, can be divided into the following types:

• Mass Tourism
• Alternative Tourism

Mass tourism we saw as the more traditional form of tourism development where short-term, free-market principles dominate and the maximization of income is paramount. The development of the tourism industry was originally seen as a desirable and relatively ‘clean’ industry for nations and regions to pursue. This was particularly true in terms of benefits in foreign exchange earnings, employment and infrastructural development such as transport networks.

These days we are more prone to vilify or characterize conventional mass tourism as a beast; a monstrosity which has few redeeming qualities for the destination region, their people and their natural resource base.

This is not to deny that ‘ mass tourism ‘ has caused problems, because it has. There has, quite justifiably, been a need to identify an alternative approach to tourism development that lessens the negative consequences of the mass tourism approach.

Thus the ‘ alternative tourism ‘ perspective has become a popular paradigm. This alternative approach has been described as a ‘competing paradigm’ to mass tourism, but it can also be viewed as a complementary approach to tourism. That is, it is not possible to have ‘alternative tourism’ to.

So, the discussion returns to a semantic debate, perhaps it is best to accept that alternative tourism is a natural outcome of the maturing understanding of tourism development and its strengths and weakness. Fennell states that :

Alternative tourism is a generic term that encompasses a whole range of tourism strategies (e.g. appropriate, eco, soft, responsible, people to people, and green tourism) all of which purport to offer a more benign alternative to conventional mass tourism in certain types of destinations.

However, Weaver quite rightly points out that there are also many criticisms of alternative tourism. It is clear that just because alternative tourism has developed as a reaction to the negative consequences of mass tourism it is not necessarily less harmful or better than its alternatives.

Nature of Ecotourism

Tourism activity is expected to grow by 4.3% per annum in real terms between 2008 and 2017. Ecotourism or nature-based tourism has become the fastest growing sector of the tourism industry growing 3 times faster than the industry as a whole.

There can be no doubting of the increasing trends in environmental concern allied with the historically prevalent trend of travel as for, of escape to nature, driven by the pressures of urban living encourage people to seek solitude with nature, therefore, increasing the numbers of visitors to national parks and other protected areas.

There are a number of dimensions to nature-based tourism. All forms of travel to natural areas are not necessarily ecotourism, but this provides a useful step in differentiating nature-based tourism from ecotourism and gives us a number of levels at which to distinguish the relationship between specific tourism activities and nature:

• Those activities or experiences that are dependent on nature.
• Those activities or experiences that are enhanced by nature.
• Those activities or experiences for which the natural setting is incidental.

There are several classes of nature-based tourism, each utilizing a combination of these dimensions. Bird watching, for example, can provide a pleasant and relaxing holiday based around a general interest in nature and the environment. So that without the natural environment it would be difficult to carry out the activity.

Similarly, camping is an activity/experience which often enhanced by nature. Most people would prefer to camp in some type of natural setting rather than on the side of a busy road. Therefore, nature is an integral part of these experiences but not the fundamental motivation for them.

Principles and Guidelines of Ecotourism

Ecotourism attracts people who wish to interact with the environment and, in varying degrees, develop their knowledge, awareness, and appreciation of it. The Ecotourism Society gives the principles and guidelines of ecotourism. These are following as:

•  Prepare travelers to minimize their negative impact while visiting sensitive environments and cultures before departure.
• Prepare traveler for each encounter with local cultures and with native animals and plants.
• Minimize visitors impacts on the on the environment by offering literature, briefing, leading by example, and taking corrective actions.
• Minimize traveler impact on cultures by offering literature, briefings, leading by example, and taking corrective actions.
• Use adequate leadership, and maintain small enough groups to ensure minimum group impact on destination. Avoid areas that are under-managed and over-visited.
• Ensure managers, staff and contract employees know and participate in all aspects of company policy to prevent impacts on the environment and local cultures.
• Give managers, staff and contact employees access to programmes that will upgrade their ability to communicate with and manage clients in sensitive natural and cultural settings.
• Be a contributor to the conservation of the region being visited.
• Provide competitive, local employment in all aspect of business operation.
• Offer site-sensitive accommodations that are not wasteful of local resources or destructive to the environment, which provide ample opportunity for learning about the environment and sensitive interchange with local communities.
• Focuses on personally experiencing natural areas in ways that led to greater understanding and appreciation.

Characteristics of Eco-Tourism

Ecotourism is travel to fragile, pristine, and usually protected areas that strives to be low impact and (often) small scale. It helps educate the traveler, provides funds for conservation, directly benefits the economic development and political empowerment of local communities, and fosters respect for different cultures and for human rights.

Some important characteristics of ecotourism are following as:

1) Involves travel to the natural destination . These destinations are often remote areas, whether inhabited or uninhabited, and are usually under some kind of environmental protection at the national, international, communal, or private travel.

2) Minimize impact . Tourism causes damage. Ecotourism strives to minimize the adverse effects of hotels, trails, and other infrastructure by using either recycled or plentifully available local building material, renewable sources of energy, recycling and safe disposal of waste and garbage, and environmentally and culturally sensitive architectural design.

3) Builds environmental awareness . Ecotourism means education, for both tourist and residents of nearby communities. Well before the tour begins, tour operators should supply travelers with reading material about the country, environment, and local people, as well as a code of conduct for both the traveler and the industry itself. Ecotourism projects should also help educate members of surrounding communities, schoolchildren, and the broader public in the host country.

4) Provides direct financial benefits for conservation . Ecotourism helps raise funds for environmental protection, research, and education through a variety of mechanisms, including park entrance fees; tour company, hotel, airline, and airport taxes. And voluntary contributions.

5) Provides financial benefits and empowerment for local people . Ecotourism holds that national parks and other conservation areas will survive only if, there are happy people around the perimeters. The local community must be involved with and receive income and other tangible benefits (potable water, roads, health clinics, etc.) from the conservation area and its tourist facilities.

6) Respects local culture . Ecotourism is not only “greener” but also less culturally intrusive and exploitative than conventional tourism. Whereas prostitution, black markets, and drug often are byproducts of mass tourism, ecotourism strives to be culturally respectful and the human population of a host country.

7) Supports human rights and democratic movements . The United Nations-sponsored World Tourism Organization proclaims that tourism contributes to “international understanding, peace, prosperity, and universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms for all.

Such sentiments, however, are little reflected in conventional mass tourism. In this way, ecotourism supports humans rights and, to establish international peace.

Functions of Ecotourism

Eco-tourism is nature-based, environmentally educated and sustainably managed. Ross and Wall (1999) outline the five fundamental functions of ecotourism namely:

1. Protection of natural areas 2. Education 3. Generation of money 4. Quality tourism 5. Local participation

Economic Effects of Ecotourism

The job generated by ecotourism provide an important reason for interest in and support for, the phenomenon. These jobs often occur in areas relatively untouched by traditional development efforts and represent tangible economic benefits from natural areas.

Several studies have assessed the local employment benefits of ecotourism; not surprisingly, the level of benefits varies widely as a result of differences in the quality of attraction, access and other factors.

Some important economic effects of ecotourism are following as:

Fiscal Impacts (taxes, fees, expenditures)

Ecotourism not only generates government revenue through business and other general taxes but also through industry-specific channels, such as payment of occupancy and departure taxes.

Reduced access to the resource

Tourism utilizes various resources as inputs into the products and services provided to visitors. In the case of ecotourism, one of these products is nature in a partially or totally preserved state.

Preservation of natural areas often involves reduced local access to resources, such as wood or medicinal plants. In so far as tourism is a partial or sole rationale for preserving an area, it also causes reduced access to resources.

Many destinations have experienced increased price for goods, services, and land due to tourism development, and this is a cost borne by residents of the area who purchase these items.

Effects of the income distribution

In some cases, tourism development exacerbates existing income inequalities within destination communities, while in others it generates new financial elites.

Revenue sharing

At some ecotourism destinations, residents benefit from revenue-sharing programmes that either provide cash payments or, more commonly, funding for community projects such as well or schools.

Environmental Effects of Ecotourism

The impacts of ecotourism depend on what ecotourism is. The critical issue is that ecotourism should involve deliberates steps to minimize impacts, through the choice of activities, equipment, location and timing, group size, education and training, and operational environmental management.

There is now quite an extensive literature on impacts such as trampling, which is easy to quantify experimentally. However, very little is known about impacts such as noise disturbance, soil and water-borne pathogens, and interference with plant and animal population dynamics and genetics, which are likely to have far greater ecological significance.

Some important environmental effects of ecotourism are following as:

• Crushing or clearance of vegetation.
• Soil modification.
• Introduction of weeds and pathogens.
• Water pollution from human waste.
• Air pollution from generator exhausts, noise from machinery, vehicles, and voices.
• Visual impacts.
• Disturbance to wildlife through all of the above, and through food scraps and litter, etc.

A new group of tourism clients has emerged who are demanding different activities, experiences and approaches to tourism from the industry: ‘ these are the ecotourists – people who require environmentally compatible recreational opportunities, where nature rather than humanity predominates ‘.

They are shrugging off the shackles of traditional tourism in search of knowledge and experience. Their interest is not in lounging by hotels pools or hectic sightseeing schedules. They are interested in visiting wilderness, national parks, and tropical forests, and in viewing birds, mammals, trees and wildflowers.

They want to experience new lifestyles and meet people with similar interests to themselves and they want to see their traveling dollars contributing toward conservation and benefiting the local economy.

Ecotourists can be generally characterized as having higher than average incomes, largely holding tertiary qualifications and there tend to be more female ecotourists than men.

According to the International Ecotourism Society, ecotourists are experienced travelers who are more likely to have a college/university degree and have a higher income bracket .

Ecotourists are expecting discovery and enlightenment from their ecotourism experience. Personal growth in emotional, spiritual, as well as intellectual terms, appear to be expected outcomes from ecotourism travel for the majority of these travelers.

Ecotourism Organizations

Ecotourism organizations are the administrative or functional structures that are concerned with ecotourism. Ecotourism organizations help into to minimize the negative impacts and maximize the positive impacts of ecotourism. These organizations can be sorted into three categories:

• Membership non-government organizations (NGOs)
• Public sector or governmental agencies
• Non-membership organizations (NGOs)

Ecotourism organizations, found throughout the world, play important roles ranging from grass-roots advocacy to international policymaking.

International Organizations

In the international arena, many different organizations address ecotourism related issues.   World Tourism Organization (WTO) plays an important role in the development of ecotourism. The United Nations Development Program (UNDP) is another international governmental organization that deals with ecotourism, through its international development assistance programme.

WTO and UNDP are just two examples of how international governmental ecotourism related organizations can play a role in making ecotourism a tool for sustainable development. At the international level NGOs also play a role.

Tourism Concern, a UK based NGO dedicated to ensuring tourism is just and sustainable form of business has worked for many years to make tourism more sustainable.

The US-based TES is dedicated solely to ensuring that ecotourism is a viable tool for biodiversity conservation and community development.

National Organizations

Government plays an important role in the national arena. Government related ecotourism organization active at this level generally come from areas: parks management agencies, universities, tourism ministries, and environment or natural resource ministries.

For example, in Kenya, much of the government related ecotourism activities at the national level is performed by the Kenya Wildlife Services (KYS), a quasi-governmental organization whose mandate is the management of wildlife in the country.

Every country has their national organizations for conservation and preservation of natural resources and ecotourism.

Sub-national Organizations

Below the national level is found regional, state and local areas for action. Ecotourism organizations play a role at each of these levels.  Queensland Tourism and Tourism Saskatchewan are two examples of state-level public sector ecotourism organizations.

In Australia, Queensland Tourism’s environment division publishes a quarterly newsletter titled EcoTrends informing industry, NGOs, universities and the public sector about ecotourism- related events, accreditation recipients, department research and policy.

UN Tourism | Bringing the world closer

Biodiversity.

• ECOTOURISM AND PROTECTED AREAS

share this content

• Share this article on facebook
• Share this article on twitter
• Share this article on linkedin

Ecotourism and Protected areas

According to the UN Tourism's definition, ecotourism refers to forms of tourism which have the following characteristics:

• All nature-based forms of tourism in which the main motivation of the tourists is the observation and appreciation of nature as well as the traditional cultures prevailing in natural areas.
• It contains educational and interpretation features.
• It is generally, but not exclusively organised by specialised tour operators for small groups. Service provider partners at the destinations tend to be small, locally owned businesses.
• It minimises negative impacts upon the natural and socio-cultural environment.
• Generating economic benefits for host communities, organisations and authorities managing natural areas with conservation purposes;
• Providing alternative employment and income opportunities for local communities;
• Increasing awareness towards the conservation of natural and cultural assets, both among locals and tourists.

Source: The British Ecotourism Market, UNWTO 2002

UN Tourism has been involved in the field of ecotourism since the early 1990s and developed a set of guidelines focusing on the strong link between protected area and tourism, with the aim of ensuring that tourism contributes to the purposes of protected areas and does not undermine them.

In the framework of the UN-declared International Year of Ecotourism (IYE) 2002, UN Tourism undertook a wide range of activities, including the organization of regional conferences and the World Ecotourism Summit , and published guidelines and methodologies for ecotourism development and market studies, as well as supported regional and national activities.

At the request of the United Nations General Assembly, the UN Tourism prepared a report on the activities undertaken by States and major international organizations in the framework of the International Year of Ecotourism . Also UN Tourism prepared a series of market reports to increase the knowledge of seven important countries considered “Ecotourism generating markets”.

What is Eco Tourism? Types, Nature, Growth & Development

• Post last modified: 2 October 2021
• Reading time: 16 mins read
• Post category: Tourism

What is Eco Tourism?

Eco tourism can be defined as travel to the natural attraction that contributes to their conservation respect the integrity of local communities and enhance the tourists understanding of the natural attraction its conservation and the local community.

Table of Content

• 1 What is Eco Tourism?
• 2.1 Difference between Ecotourism and Nature-based Travel
• 2.2 Disadvantages of Ecotourism
• 2.3 Emergence of Ecotourism
• 3 Objectives of Ecotourism
• 4 Principles of Eco Tourism
• 5 Growth & Development of Eco Tourism
• 6.1 Coastal Tourism
• 6.2 Island Tourism
• 6.3 Mountain Tourism
• 6.4.1 Rural Countryside
• 6.4.2 Wilderness Areas

It should have a minimum impact on soil, water, air, flora, fauna & biophysical processes that use little energy, cause little pollution, and educate the tourist. Discontinue the welfare of the local & indigenous populations.

Ecotourism as a concept dates back to the 1970s, although it was only defined in 1990 by the International Ecotourism Society, which described ecotourism as, Responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment and improves the wellbeing of local people.

Despite this and other efforts to formalize the concept, ecotourism has always been the victim of terminological ambiguity. Ecotourism is “responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment and sustains the well-being of local people.”

Sometimes it is defined as a sub-category of sustainable tourism or a segment of the larger nature tourism market. It includes an interpretation/learning experience, is delivered to small groups by small-scale businesses, and stresses local ownership, particularly for rural people.

Nature of Ecotourism

The term ecotourism is surrounded by confusion. It has been defined by Blangy and Wood as responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment and sustains the well-being of local people.

However, it is contended here that, regardless of definition, ecotourism is an instigator of change. It is inevitable that the introduction of tourists to areas that were previously seldom visited by outsiders will place new demands upon the environment associated with new actors, new activities, and new facilities.

This will involve the forging of new relationships between people and environment, between peoples with different lifestyles, and between a wide variety of forces for both change and stability. These forces act at a diversity of scales from global to local.

There are likely to be tensions and, in some cases, contradictions between the outcomes desired by the various participants in ecotourism as well as between those directly involved and those indirectly affected by its introduction and operation.

Thus, compromise and trade-offs must be sought between the legitimate aspirations of different people.

Difference between Ecotourism and Nature-based Travel

While nature-based tourism is just traveling to natural places, ecotourism provides local benefits – environmentally, culturally and economically. A nature-based tourist may just go bird watching; an ecotourist goes bird watching with a local guide, stays in a locally operated eco-lodge and contributes to the local economy.

Disadvantages of Ecotourism

Eco tourism can also become problematic if it involves activities, transport facilities or levels of visitation that have major environmental impacts, or if is occurs in areas that are environmentally fragile or with vulnerable communities.

Accordingly, while there are reasons to encourage eco tourism it must be controlled so that it is ecologically and socially sustainable. There must be controls on tour operator’s touristÊs behaviour & tourism developments in natural areas as well as enforcement of regulations and monitoring of impacts.

Emergence of Ecotourism

While eco tourism has been around since the 19th century it has grown considerably in popularity and commercial significance in just the past ten years in response to interest in the environment and exotic and adventure holidays, increase in leisure time and persons, incomes the improved accessibility of many natural attractions, promotions by selected countries and business for economic benefits and a belief that ecotourism will build support for conservation.

Objectives of Ecotourism

• Conserve biological and cultural diversity of the place and plan for sustainable use natural resources.
• Share the benefits of eco tourism developments equitably with local communities and indigenous people and creating awareness campaign among the beneficiaries and disseminating methods for sustainable planning, management, regulation and monitoring.
• To impart nature education to different target groups i.e. children, teachers, bureaucrats, media persons, rural people and politicians and to provide interpretation facilities to generate conservation awareness among the visitors by discovering wonders of nature and its intricate relationship.
• To strengthen the staff and infrastructure for managing the eco tourism and interpretation programmes and creating employment opportunities for local people to cater to the needs of visitors in raising taxi, hotels, engagement in ret houses, lodges etc.
• Involve local people in recycling the revenue from tourism for improvement of resources and facilities in the villages by subsidizing alternate energy devices, improving educational and medical facilities.

Principles of Eco Tourism

All nature based forms of tourism in which main motivation for tourists is to observe and appreciate nature as well as the traditional cultures prevailing in natural areas and their protection. Ecotourism is about uniting conservation, communities and sustainable travel.

This means that those who implement and participate in and market ecotourism activities should adopt the following ecotourism principles.

The basic principles of ecotourism can be described in the following points:

• It contains educational and interpretation features
• It minimises negative impacts upon the natural and socio–cultural environment
• Supports the conservation of natural areas and wildlife
• Ecotourism include designing, constructing and operating low–impact facilities for tourists
• Minimizes air and water pollution as well as tourist waste
• Offers safe and enriching or educational visitor experiences
• Build environmental and cultural awareness and respect
• Provide positive experiences for both visitors and hosts.
• Provide awareness towards the conservation of natural and cultural assets, both among locals and tourists.
• Providing alternative employment and income opportunities for local communities
• Generate financial benefits for both local people and private industry.
• Respects the cultural tradition of the host destination.
• Maintains and enhances the landscape so as to avoid physical or environmental degradation.
• Maximizes opportunities for local prosperity for the host destination in the form of long–term tourism viability, local management control, quality employment, local retention of visitor spending, and fair distribution of economic and social benefits.
• Ecotourism helps in using non–renewable resources efficiently.
• Deliver memorable interpretative experiences to visitors that help raise sensitivity to host countries’ political, environmental, and social climates.

Growth & Development of Eco Tourism

Ecotourism has been developed particularly in East Africa, Central America, North America, Antarctica, The Himalayas, New Zealand, Australia and Parts of Europe. Costa Rica’s National Parks of Europe now receives over 3, 00,000 visitors per day of use per year.

Over 40,000 tourists now visit the Galapagos Islands each year and every Antarctica attends over 5,000 tourists annually, Ecotourism moreover is a major source of Foreign exchange for countries such a Kenya and Costa Rica.

The estimated gross value of Tourism on the Galapagos Islands in 1991 was $ 33 million. It should be a considerable initial and continuing investment in nature protection, facilities, services, promotion and training to the earth such revenues.

The factors influencing the growth of Eco tourism are mainly the development of transport, system, along with the facilities of package tourists which allows people to travel with an easy mind. Tourism has become a status symbol.

All these factors along with better education have helped the growth of Ecotourism. Eco-development refers of a form to planned growth which is concerned mainly with the development of locally available resources within the constraints of the local environments So as to maximize the local capacities of the biosphere to supports human life and passional wastes.

The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has been encouraging the eco-development concept from the angle of villages so that development of the villages through the world takes place on the basic natural resources and human skills locally available.

Eco development implies the creation of a horizontal authority capable of transcending sectoral approaches & dealing with various aspects of development Efficiency of such authority depends upon the active participation of the local population. It is felt that such an approach to ecodevelopment will be helpful in maintaining the ecological balance.

Types of Ecotourism

Following are the main types of ecotourism :

Coastal Tourism

Island tourism, mountain tourism, inland tourism.

The overwhelming attraction of the three S’s Sun, Sea and Sand has subjected coast lines to the fall forces of recreation pressures and mass tourist as witnessed around much of the Mediterranean as well as the North American East coasts, besides the channel and the North Sea area of Europe, Scandinavia and Japan often.

The coast is a fragile ecosystem. For these types of environments, it is difficult to find examples of positive impact where as the detrimental effects are region.

The tourist’s value of the coasts invariable lies in their landscape and amenities character physical offer tend to relate trilogy with the infrastructure of the resort consisting of land buildings on a soft landscape.

Saturation developments at many resorts typify mass tourism and high density use is often found along coastal region of the industrialized countries parts of Mediterranean, California and Florida are supreme examples of this phenomenon.

By their nature islands are liable to all the potential and actual impacts associated with a coastal ecosystem of they are large and hair significant inland areas, they are also prone to the impacts which affect the later.

Very small land, such as those along the Yugoslavian Adriatic coasts, most of the Greek islands and small island states which are the tourist attraction and depends mainly on tourism as an economic activity, can experience impacts particularly specific to their island character.

On such small island resources may be limited, land space may be severally restricted and there may be labour shortage problems. Island with good and cheap transport services after experience high-density use, e.g., Hawai & Majorda where travel time and coasts are relatively high and or the facilities poorly developed, torsion density tends to be low and it is easier to control physical developments.

Eg. Helones & Maldives. The provision of air transport facilities is a necessary pre require a site to tourism development on small islands.

Although mountains and uplands areas have been popular as a tourist attraction for a great many years, mass tourism in such environments is a more recent phenomenon. Seasonality is an important factor in evaluating tourism impacts in mountainous regions.

Mass tourism is generally normal in winter months, for example in the European Alps, South California and Scandinavia, but not in the summer.

Thus the winter’s pressures may exceed the carrying capacity of the resort but the level of summer activities can remain density tourism is the likely norm in higher altitude mountains where trekking is the commonest activity e.g.

The Himalayas & Cordillera Blanca North American Rockies, Peru. Tatos mountains of Eastern Europe & the Caucasus.

Rural Countryside

Wilderness areas.

The countryside used leisure on a massive scale by a person from the towns in the West consequently there is great pressure & the fragile and rural environments in many areas. The countryside visiting encompasses a tremendous variety of activities that can be enjoyed in rural numerous, but they make use of the countryside in a variety of ways.

Countryside recreation according to Allan Patmore is a convenient term for a wide range of leisure time activities whose only common factor is that they take place in the open air on land or water in the countryside.

These are those relatively large natural ingenious where one or several ecosystems are not materially altered by human exploitation and occupation. Some areas are designed national Park by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) and others are regulated in some manner. These exist in more than 120 countries throughout the world.

Please Share This Share this content

• Opens in a new window X
• Opens in a new window Facebook
• Opens in a new window Pinterest
• Opens in a new window LinkedIn
• Opens in a new window Reddit
• Opens in a new window WhatsApp

You Might Also Like

Motivation for travel | theory: plog, maslow, hudman, krippendorf, nickerson, general theory, adventure tourism: history, advantages, disadvantages, destinations in india, health and medical tourism: destinations, measure to development, what is tourism history, attraction, purposes, benefits, modes, technology, journey of a tourist, recreation and leisure: role, facilities, research methods, leave a reply cancel reply.

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Welcome to Toronto School of Management!
• Mission, Vision and Values
• Meet Our Team
• Why Study With Us
• Accreditations, Memberships & Affiliations
• Industry Partnerships
• Awards and Recognition
• Facts and Figures 2021
• Certificate in Business Essentials Co-op
• Diploma in Business Administration Co-op
• Diploma in Digital Business Management Co-op
• Diploma in Digital Marketing Specialist Co-op
• Certificate in Customer Service Excellence Co-op
• Diploma in Hospitality and Tourism Management Co-op
• Diploma in International Hospitality Operations Management Co-op
• Preparatory Course for ACCA Examination
• ACCA Part-Time Courses
• Diploma in Data Analytics Co-op
• Diploma in Cybersecurity Specialist Co-op
• English for Academic Purposes
• Individual Applications
• Partner Referred Applications
• Admission Requirements
• Better Jobs Ontario Program
• English Proficiency
• Start Dates
• Students Fees
• Payment options
• Domestic Students
• International Students
• In-Person Schedule
• Online Schedule
• Get ready for TSOM
• Convocation
• Internship and Job Fairs
• TSOM Calendar
• Special Events
• Toronto School of Management Reviews & Testimonials
• International Student Advisory (ISA)
• Graduation Requirements
• Medical Insurance
• Alumni Community
• Career Services
• Our Hiring Process
• Our Co-op Partners
• Hire TSOM Co-Op Students
• Hire TSOM Graduates
• Meet our Students and Graduates
• FAQs for Students
• FAQs for Employers
• University Canada West
• Niagara College – Toronto
• Trebas Institute
• Arden University
• Yorkville University

What is ecotourism and why is it important?

What is Tourism?

The term “tourism” is used to describe people who visit different locations for various reasons. It’s a huge industry that influences the economies of many countries throughout the world and has become an integral part of the daily lives of millions of people.

Domestic and international travel are just two examples of tourism, but there are many others as well. There are many various motivations for taking a vacation, from seeking rest and relaxation to exploring new cultures and gaining new knowledge or even bettering one’s health. Tourism allows people to escape their regular lives and see the world.

Tourism is a widespread and fast-growing industry and contributes significantly to the world GDP. According to a report published by the World Travel and Tourism Council in 2017, the industry accounted for 10.2% of the global GDP. Tourism entails various categories such as –

• Adventure tourism
• Business tourism
• Culinary tourism
• Cultural tourism
• Medical tourism
• Religious tourism
• Sports Tourism

This blog will focus on the aspect of ecotourism and why it’s important. Read on to find all about this tourism type.

What is ecotourism?

As defined by the International Ecotourism Society, ecotourism refers to “responsible travel that conserves the environment and improves the well-being of local people”. Also called “nature tourism”, the objective of ecotourism is to minimize the impact brought about by tourism on the environment. The idea is to focus on uniting conservation, communities and sustainable development through the means of travel.

Ecotourism is a new kind of tourism that encourages responsible travel to natural places with a focus on protecting the environment, helping local communities stay healthy, and educating visitors on conservation and protection efforts.. It is a holistic approach to tourism that tries to minimize the negative effects of travel while maximizing the benefits it can provide to the environment. According to the World Tourism Organization (UNTWO), ecotourism is defined as a form of tourism with the following characteristics:

•  All nature-based forms of tourism in which the main motivation of the tourists is the observation and appreciation of nature as well as the traditional cultures prevailing in natural areas.
•  It contains educational efforts.
•  It is generally, but not exclusively organised by specialised tour operators for small groups. Service provider partners at the destinations tend to be small, locally owned businesses.
•  It minimises negative impacts upon the natural and socio-cultural environment.
•  It supports the maintenance of natural areas which are used as ecotourism attractions by:
• Generating economic benefits for host communities, organisations and authorities managing natural areas with conservation purposes;
• Providing alternative employment and income opportunities for local communities;
• Increasing awareness towards the conservation of natural and cultural assets, both among locals and tourists.

Ecotourism lies on several key principles, including the following:

• Conservation and preservation: Conservation and preservation of natural places are at the core of ecotourism. This means actively backing and taking part in projects that protect biodiversity, preserve ecosystems, and slow down the damage to the environment.
• Education: Beyond the typical tourist experience, ecotourism aims to teach people about the environment and raise awareness of the need to protect it. Ecotourists learn about local ecosystems, develop their appreciation for nature, and become advocates for conservation thanks to informative programs, guided tours, and hands-on experiences.
• Community engagement: Ecotourism aims to positively impact these communities by offering economic opportunities, promoting local businesses, valuing their cultural traditions, and fostering their involvement in decision-making processes.

Ecotourism Activities

Ecotourism gives people a chance to see the amazing beauty of our world while advocating for wildlife conservation and renewable practices. From discovering pristine landscapes to getting to know the local culture, these experiences are unique and enriching ways to get closer to nature. There are a variety of ecotourism activities that enable tourists to interact with the environment, such as:

• Wildlife volunteering activities
• Responsible and sustainable trips and activities with wildlife
• Agrotourism
• Responsible and sustainable lodging/camping
• Responsible wildlife interactions and conservation activities
• Community-based tourism/cultural immersion
• Nature-based activities such as hiking, walking, tours, etc.
• Educational trips and tours

Tips for Engaging in Ecotourism Activities

We can enjoy the wonders of nature in a way that is ethical and sustainable thanks to ecotourism, which places an emphasis on responsible travel and conservation. Here are some excellent suggestions for engaging in ecotourism:

• Appreciate local traditions and cultures: Consider spending some time learning about local cultures and customs before your trip. Respect local customs, present yourself appropriately, and connect with people there with courtesy.
• Be mindful of wildlife and their natural environments: Keep a respectful distance from wildlife and observe them without getting in the way. Respect protected areas and natural environments by staying on approved pathways to prevent harm to delicate ecosystems and wildlife habitats.
• Support local businesses and communities: Supporting neighbourhood businesses and communities is one of the most effective ways to engage in ecotourism. Engage with local tour companies and guides who are knowledgeable about the area and can provide genuine experiences.
• Educate yourself in your trip: Take advantage of the educational opportunities in your trip. Participate on tours given by authorized local guides who could provide information on the area’s natural and cultural heritage. Take part in educational events, nature presentations, or workshops that will help you understand the environment and conservation activities.
• Reduce waste and recycle: It’s encouraged to carry a reusable water bottle or shopping bag to reduce waste. Choose sustainable substitutes instead of single-use plastics. Recycle wherever possible and dispose of garbage properly in designated bins.

What are the benefits of Ecotourism?

Ecotourism is a type of tourism in which visitors actively take part in conservation efforts and educate themselves about the natural world they visit. The social and environmental benefits of this kind of tourism are highly significant.

• The preservation of natural areas and the protection of wildlife populations are both benefited by ecotourism. Visitors can help the environment by taking part in conservation efforts and contributing to conservation and research efforts financially.
• Creating jobs and bolstering existing enterprises are two ways in which ecotourism contributes to sustainable development in rural areas. This has the potential to boost economic growth.
• Ecotourism provides a more genuine and meaningful form of travel than simply seeing landmarks, museums, and other sites of interest. A better awareness of the natural world can be gained by tourists through ecotourism.
• Ecotourism is a great way for visitors and locals to learn about each other’s cultures and traditions. Travelers can broaden their understanding and admiration of the world by immersing themselves in the practices of the places and people they visit.

Why is ecotourism important?

People who engage in ecotourism need to abide by certain guidelines. The principles of ecotourism are beneficial for the world as a whole, given the constantly deteriorating climatic conditions. Given below are the benefits of ecotourism:

• Ecotourism focuses on unadulterated, pristine natural environments;
• It builds cultural and environmental awareness;
• It encourages positive experience for visitors as well as hosts;
• It minimizes the impact if tourism on the environment;
• It boosts employment and financial opportunities for local people;
• It encourages conservation by providing financial benefits in its favour.

Are you, more often than not, intrigued by the beauty of nature? Do you strongly feel that the nature should be protected? Well then, this is the career for you! Here are some reasons why you should take up ecotourism as a career.

• You will be a part of one of the fastest-growing industries, in terms of size and economy;
• If you are passionate about nature, you will be able to significantly contribute to its well-being;
• You will be responsible for promoting the cultural and economic significance of a tourist destination;
• You will contribute significantly to the increase in employment rate, owing to ecotourism;
• Since tourism is a global industry, you will get the opportunity of working with international counterparts and acquire global exposure.

Scope of ecotourism

Tourism, as a whole, has adversely affected the natural beauty of certain places. This is a consequence of commercializing tourist destinations in order to suit the tourism standards. The constantly deteriorating climate is a wake-up call for tourism enthusiasts. In the face of this adversity, nature tourism has come as a blessing. The impact of ecotourism is positive and beneficial for hosts, travelers as well as the world, in general. Ecotourism, as a career, presents professionals with the opportunity of looking at the world with a different perspective and working towards achieving a better environment to live in.

Ecotourism is catching pace with other forms of tourism and it is happening fast. There are varied types of jobs in ecotourism in different sections of the sector. Some of the job roles are explained below:

• Jobs related to assessment and development of locations: The job roles that come under this category are – Tourism and Human Resources Advisor, Ecotourism Development Specialist, Sustainable Tourism Development Manager, etc. If you assume a role in this sector of ecotourism, your job responsibilities would include determining if a tourist location has the potential for sustainable tourism, impacts of tourism on the biodiversity of the location, and determining how bringing in ecotourism to the location would benefit the local people.
• Jobs related to sustainable management: This sector of ecotourism encompasses jobs like Ecotourism Project Manager, Sustainable Tourism Operator, Nature Tourism Ranger, etc. If you plan to work in this section, you will be responsible for the day-to-day functioning of the ecotourism business. Your job role would require to supervise operations and projects, allocate budget, build partnerships with local communities and develop local capacity.
• Jobs related to communications and marketing: Like any other sector, marketing is an essential component of the ecotourism industry. The job roles that you can take up under this category are – Protected Areas Communications Officer, Tourism Marketing Manager, Tourism Communications Manager, etc. Your job responsibilities would include promotion of the place or firm you work for, using the media platform for campaigning purposes, strategizing marketing campaigns, and attracting customers.

How to start a career in ecotourism

• Educational Qualifications:  students can opt for a diploma in tourism if they have completed secondary school education, are more than 18 years of age and have an IELTS score of 4.5 or above.
• Conferences:  since a major objective of ecotourism is to create cultural and socio-economic awareness, numerous ecotourism and sustainable travel conferences are conducted all over the world. Attending these conferences will give you a better insight into the functioning of ecotourism as an industry.
• Networking:  networking makes up for a large part of being successful. If you want to boost your growth in the industry, you can interact with the prominent people in the industry, connect with them via formal networking sites and engage in community discussions online. This will not only help you understand other people’s perspective but also help you grow in the industry.
• Volunteer:  volunteering for workshops and local community sustainability development will help you get a deeper sense of what local people experience when a wave of tourism hits a place. This will help you to build a strong career in ecotourism with a command over local people’s psyche.
• Internship:  before you take up a permanent job with an ecotourism firm, opt for an internship. Internships are the best way to learn about the business and its functioning. You will also acquire the experience of working under prominent stakeholders of the ecotourism business.

Many aspects of tourism are resonant in ecotourism, with the difference of a noble cause. Various premium institutes offer travel and tourism courses that can help you understand the nitty-gritties of the industry. Toronto School of Management (TSOM) offers two tourism-related courses for students who are passionate about travel. The courses offered by TSOM are:

• Advanced Diploma in Hospitality Management and Tourism Management Co-op
• Diploma in Fundamentals of Hospitality and Tourism Co-op

If you also want to take up a tourism course and are passionate about this, sign up for a course now! To find out more about the courses offered by TSOM, click  here .

• What kinds of jobs are there in ecotourism?

Tour guides, wildlife specialists, environmental instructors, park rangers, and various positions in the sustainable tourism sector are just few of the numerous careers that can be pursued in the ecotourism industry.

• How do I know if ecotourism is a growing industry?

The best way to tell if ecotourism is a growing industry is to look for tour operators and locations that put environmental sustainability first and help local communities.

• What are the biggest challenges of ecotourism?

Ecotourism poses several significant challenges, such as maintaining balance between tourism and conservation efforts, preventing over-tourism, ensuring sustainable development, and ensuring that the rights and interests of local communities are always prioritized.

• What are five good things about ecotourism?

Here are five positive effects that ecotourism provides: it helps conserve natural resources, boosts the economy, creates opportunities for travel and discovery, encourages understanding between cultures, and raises people’s environmental consciousness.

• What are the benefits of eco-tourism for the environment and local communities?

Ecotourism has been identified as a means for encouraging conservation initiatives, preserving natural areas for wildlife, as well as decreasing waste and pollution, which significantly helps the environment. It helps local communities because it encourages sustainable development, creates opportunities for economic growth, and supports initiatives that benefit the community.

• What are some popular eco-tourism destinations around the world?

Popular ecotourism destinations around the world include the Galapagos Islands in Ecuador, the Great Barrier Reef in Australia, the Gunung Mulu National Park in Malaysia, and the Monteverde Cloud Forest in Costa Rica.

10 Replies to “What is ecotourism and why is it important?”

[…] Click to see full answer […]

[…] is an important form of tourism that promotes environmental conservation and benefits local people. It aims to […]

[…] طلب الحذف عرض الإجابة الكاملة على http://www.torontosom.ca […]

[…] Request for deletion View full answer on http://www.torontosom.ca […]

[…] हटाने का अनुरोध पूरा उत्तर देखें http://www.torontosom.ca […]

[…] University of Ibadan: Offers a Bachelor’s degree program in Ecotourism and Wildlife Management. […]

[…] shows that 76% of people want to travel in a way that’s good for the planet in the next year.1 Many travelers are already doing simple things to lower their impact. They’re reusing linens […]

[…] What is ecotourism and why is it important? Sustainable tourism has several social and cultural benefits. By engaging in eco-tourism, you […]

Comments are closed.

Contact Us Today

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Nature Interpretation and Visitor Management Objectives: A Survey of Tourist Attitudes at Maasai Mara National Reserve, Kenya

Sustainability

Nature interpretation has been advocated as a soft and non-obtrusive on-site visitor management strategy to enhance visitor knowledge and understanding of the resource, mitigate visitor impacts, encourage the conservation and improvement of attraction areas, and assist visitors in enjoying their visit. However, the way in which nature interpretation programs are implemented, and the subsequent attitudes created amongst visitors can pose a challenge to the effectiveness of nature interpretation as a visitor management strategy. The situation becomes more complicated with limited resources to implement, monitor, and evaluate nature interpretation in expansive wilderness areas like Masai Mara National Reserve (MMNR). The question therefore is, does nature interpretation in MMNR create favourable attitudes amongst wildlife tourists, consequently leading to enhanced visitor experiences and satisfaction of the support for conservations, or not? This research, therefore, sought to establis...

Related Papers

Jonathan Foley

The current biodiversity and extinction crisis has ignited global concern for human and planetary well-being, culminating in the declaration by the United Nations of 2010 as the International Year of Biodiversity. Concomitant with these developments has been the steady ascent of the ecotourism industry, a subset of the travel and tourism industry that holds some promise for the conservation and enhancement of natural areas. A third strand that may be added that weaves them all together for mutual benefit, is the use of interpretation as a communication strategy that enhances the travel experience for the visitor, stimulating interest and enriching their knowledge of local natural resources. This study examines the role of interpretation within one of the largest protected areas in the Durban area, Shongweni Reserve. Rich in faunal and floral diversity, the reserve hosts a range of active and passive recreational pursuits for local and international visitors. This study examines the ...

Elricke van Loggerenberg

South African National Parks is one of South Africa’s main drawcards for ecotourists. One of these parks is the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park (KTP), which is also a World Heritage Site (WHS). Because tourism is key to national parks and WHSs, visitor management strategies such as interpretation are vital for these destinations to provide tourists with better experiences and knowledge. The aim of this research was therefore to determine the interpretation needs and preferences of visitors to KTP. The factor analyses revealed that tourists felt that park guidelines would add the most to a quality experience. Tourists preferred interpretation topics on nature and heritage and would like to receive in-depth information on these topics. Interpretation should also preferably be offered through audio and visual media. These findings impact the development of relevant interpretation services for the park, which will contribute towards visitors’ experiences. The research is original as it exa...

Gijsbert Hoogendoorn

This study examines destination attributes through tourist reviews in the Maasai Mara ecosystem using the Kano model. Overall, positive reviews were dominant, and most tourists were satisfied with the Mara wildlife tourism experiences. However, some attributes led to dissatisfaction. The highest contribution to tourist satisfaction was due to excitement attributes such as witnessing the great migration of the wildebeest. Attributes such as safety and service-related aspects also negatively affected tourist satisfaction. The findings are useful in promoting sustainable wildlife tourism by government, private industry, and community-based tourism organizations.

Tourism: An International Interdisciplinary Journal

Irene Kaberere , Gijsbert Hoogendoorn

Kevin Mearns , Victoria Edwards

In the face of growing pressure placed on the natural environment, the study on which this article is based considered the effectiveness of interpretive provision in mitigating the harmful effects of tourism on the environment. The aim of this research was to determine whether guided or non-guided interpretation is most effective in reaching the stated goals of interpretation. The four key goals of interpretation, namely visitor satisfaction, knowledge gain, attitude change and modification of behaviour intent, were used in the assessment of the relative effectiveness of guided and non-guided interpretation in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Through comparing responses to questionnaires from post-visit samples and observing both guided and non-guided interpretation, the research found that guided interpretation was only marginally more effective in reaching the four key goals of interpretation than the non-guided interpretive media. Guided interpretation was found to be more effective in terms of visitor satisfaction, whilst guided and non-guided interpretation had only marginal differences in effectiveness in relation to knowledge gain, attitude change and intent to modify behaviour. Conservation implications: The necessity of implementing an appropriate interpretation programme within protected areas cannot be overemphasised. The interpretation programme should be designed to include elements of both guided and non-guided interpretation in order to achieve a predetermined goal. The effectiveness of the programme should be evaluated periodically and amended where appropriate.

Asian Journal of Environment-Behaviour Studies

Hong Ching Goh

Protected areas are established for the conservation of unique and pristine environment. Although protected, they are subjected to possible environmental and social impacts due to increasing tourism activities. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Kinabalu Park's environmental interpretation in mitigating these impacts through the assessment of visitors' knowledge. Visitors' knowledge was compared between those who were exposed (post-visit) and not exposed to the interpretive programs (pre-visit). Overall, environmental interpretation in Kinabalu Park contributed to the visitors' knowledge related to general facts as post-visit samples indicated higher level of knowledge. However, there were no differences in their knowledge related to scientific aspect.

Paradigmi XLI

Andrew Benjamin

Connection entails relationality. Aby Warburg's Atlas project is a staging of connections and relations. The question to be addressed at the outset concerns the grounds of connectivity. And thus, what structure and maintains the differing modes of relationality and connection at work within it. While it will be essential to explore detail, the response in Warburg's case is delimited by the body or more specifically by different positionings of the body. Within the context of Warburg's Atlas they are differences that allow for the types of generality or forms of abstraction entailed by his conception of the pathosformel. Excluded from these formal delimitations are the ways bodies are always already the enacted presence of ethnicity, gender, ability, social positioning, etc. Bodies are informed from the start. And yet, those connections are increasingly problematic. As populism as a political position becomes both normalized and naturalized, those forms of enactment are either resisted or refused in the name of abstractions. These abstractions have a double quality. Their power to exclude cannot be disassociated from the absence of any content other than an empty idealization. Hence the counter point-the adumbration of other modes of thinking connection and relationality-cannot be dissociated from the activation of grounds of judgement. Part of that activation is the positioning of "works of art" in public spaces such that their mediation of the everyday cannot be disassociated from their work as art. These positions will be developed within the openings created by the work of the Australian artist Peter Drew.

Sergey Abashin

Engin Sustam

Bu yazı, Kürt sinemasının dekolonyal perspektifi içinde savaşa, şiddete ve kalkışmaya dair anlatısına ve kolektif mücadelenin bir hatırası olarak imgelerin üretilmesinde ortaya çıkan mikropolitik bağlama bakarken, Kürt sinemasının hafıza ve arşivleşmesinin farklı adımlarını analiz edecektir. Dolayısıyla bu makale, Kürt sinemasının tarihinden daha çok bu alana yerleşen filmlerin

The Genoese Army in the War of Austrian Succession ms» (english edition) N. 10, 2016, pp. 47-90.

paolo giacomonepiana

A short description of the organization and the uniforms of the Genoese Army during the War for the Austrian Succession. For reasons of haste the editor of the review has used wrong captions for the illustrations; that have now been changed with the right ones. A rare contemporary image depicting Genoese soldiers recently discovered by Alessandro Giacobbe in Valsia has been added. None of images or text of our book may be reproduced in any format without the expressed written permission of publisher. The publisher remains to disposition of the possible having right for all the doubtful sources images or not identifies. Each issue Euro 3,90; Subscription to 11 issues Euro 40,00.

RELATED PAPERS

Jozef Haczynski

Rasha Mohamed Ali

International Journal of Management Economics and Business

Software: Practice and Experience

Kabiru Maiyama

Thalassas: An International Journal of Marine Sciences

Koray Cabbar

Koutou (THE LARYNX JAPAN)

Toshihiko Iwahashi

Editura Militară, Bucureşti, 388 pagini (12 pagini foto)

Petre Opriş

orovwigho andrew

Galih Mirza

Camosun学位证 卡莫森学院毕业证

Narangerel Davaasuren

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Advertisement

Tourism versus nature conservation: reconciliation of common interests and objectives — an analysis through Picos de Europa National Park

• Published: 16 November 2018
• Volume 15 , pages 2505–2516, ( 2018 )

Cite this article

• Iván López   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7692-1194 1 &
• Mercedes Pardo   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7613-5727 2  

504 Accesses

19 Citations

Explore all metrics

Nature tourism and particularly tourism in national parks have acquired significant importance in contemporary societies. Post-Fordist consumers have reevaluated the meanings of ‘nature’ and ‘natural spaces’ and now avoid standardization to seek singularity. Tourism in national parks is a consequence of this tendency and has both positive and negative aspects. The purpose of this sociological research is to describe the most relevant conflicts in the Picos de Europa National Park (Spain) involving the park’s conservation, local economic development, and tourism. Seven in-depth interviews and three focus groups were addressed to key local stakeholders. In this research were identified three chief areas of existing or potential inter-related conflicts and the main actors interacting with them. The first is on population, particularly, the negative consequences of depopulations on the local socio-economic development and the environment. A second source of conflicts identified is caused by the difficult conciliation between commercial exploitation and conservation of the protected natural area. More precisely, this specific form of tourism positively contributes to the economy of local communities whilst problems can arise for the conservation goals of National Parks. Thirdly, in this research is also analyzed the institutional governance and the inter and intra-governmental conflicts as well as with the Park’s management body. These findings provide important information for the improved management of tourism and conflicting interests in natural parks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Impact of tourism development upon environmental sustainability: a suggested framework for sustainable ecotourism

Planning nature-based solutions: Principles, steps, and insights

Principles for urban nature-based solutions

Act 30/2014, 3rd December, National Parks. https://doi.org/www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2014-12588 (Accessed on 13 Sept 2017). (In Spanish)

Baidal J, Rodríguez Sánchez I, Vera Rebollo J (2013) The evolution of mass tourism destinations: New approaches beyond deterministic models in Benidorm (Spain). Tourism Management 34(1): 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.04.009

Article   Google Scholar  

Berkes F, Folke C, Colding J (eds.) (2000) Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. p 476.

Google Scholar  

Brandon K, Kent HR, Sanderson S (eds.) (1998) Parks in peril: people, politics, and protected areas, Island Press, Washington. p 532.

Buckley R (2012) Sustainable tourism: Research and reality. Annals of Tourism Research 39(2): 528–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2012.02.003

Budowski G (1976) Tourism and environmental conservation: Conflict, coexistence, or symbiosis? Environmental conservation 3(1): 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900017707

Butler R, Boyd S (2000) Tourism and national parks: issues and implications. Wiley, Oxford. p 352.

Carlsen B, Glenton C (2011) What about NA methodological study of sample-size reporting in focus group studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology 11(1): 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-26

Casas Grande J (2005) National Parks: some premises for a necessarily changing time. Boletín EUROPARC 19: 46–51. (In Spanish)

Eagles PF (2009) Governance of recreation and tourism partnerships in parks and protected areas. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 17(2): 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580802495725

EUROPARC (2010) European Charter for Sustainable Tourism in Protected Areas. https://doi.org/www.europarc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/2010-European-Charter-for-Sustainable-Tourism-in-Protected-Areas.pdf (Accessed on 18 September 2017)

Font AR (2000) Mass tourism and the demand for protected natural areas: a travel cost approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39 (1): 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1999.1094

Frost W, Hall MC (2009) Tourism and national parks: International perspectives on development, histories, and change. Routledge, London. p 376.

García EJ, Martín M, Palacios V, et al. (2013) Social Aspects in the Management and Conservation of the Wolf in the National Park of the Picos de Europa. Oviedo: National Park of the Picos de Europa. https://doi.org/parquenacionalpicoseuropa.es/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Aspesctos-sociales-y-gestionlobo-PNPE-2013-1.pdf (Accessed on 18 September 2017). (In Spanish)

González González M, Villoldo Pelayo LA (2004) Contradictions in the administration and sustainable management of natural spaces. The Picos de Europa National Park: real or invented space? Revista Internacional de Marketing Público y no Lucrativo 1(1): 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02896620 (In Spanish)

González Trueba J, Serrano Cañadas E (2008) The valuation of the geomorphological heritage in protected natural spaces. Its application to the National Park of the Picos de Europa. Boletín de la Asociación Española de Geógrafos 47: 175–194. https://doi.org/age.ieg.csic.es/boletin/47/09-GONZALEZ.pdf (In Spanish)

Hirst P, Zeitlin J (1991) Flexible specialization versus post–Fordism: theory, evidence and policy implications. Economy and Society 20(1): 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149100000001

Kellert SR, Mehta JN, Ebbin SA, et al. (2000) Community natural resource management: promise, rhetoric, and reality. Society & Natural Resources 13(8): 705–715. https://doi.org/10.1080/089419200750035575

Kumar K (2009) From post–industrial to post–modern society: New theories of the contemporary world. John Wiley & Sons, Oxford. p 304.

Lewis–Beck MS, Bryman A, Liao TF (2004) The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd. p 1.305.

Book   Google Scholar  

Llaneza L, Rico M, Iglesias JM (2000) The Iberian wolf in the old Covadonga Mountain National Park: situation, damages and social problems. Galemys 12: 79–92. (In Spanish)

Lockwood M (2010) Good governance for terrestrial protected areas: A framework, principles and performance outcomes. Journal of Environmental Management 91(3): 754–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.10.005

López I, Pardo M (2018) Socioeconomic Indicators for the Evaluation and Monitoring of Climate Change in National Parks: An Analysis of the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (Spain). Environments 5(2): 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments5020025

MacDonald D, Crabtree JR, Wiesinger G, et al. (2000) Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: environmental consequences and policy response. Journal of Environmental Management 59(1): 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1999.0335

Manning RE (2002) How much is too much? Carrying capacity of national parks and protected areas. In: Arnberger A, Brandenburg C, Muhar A (eds.), Monitoring and management of visitor flows in recreational and protected areas. The International Conference on Monitoring and Management of Visitors in Recreational and Protected Areas. Vienna: Bodenkultur University. pp 306–313.

MAPAMA (2017) Visitors to National Parks. https://doi.org/www.mapama.gob.es/es/red-parques-nacionales/lared/gestion/visitantes.aspx (Accessed on 14 Sept 2018). (In Spanish)

Mateo–Tomás P, Olea PP (2010) Situation of the sheep and goat livestock in the Picos de Europa Regional Park, León. Ager, Journal of Studies on Depopulation and Rural Development (9): 87–106. https://doi.org/recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/AGER/article/view/12792 (Accessed on 14 Sept 2017). (In Spanish)

Mellon V, Bramwell B (2016) Protected area policies and sustainable tourism: influences, relationships and coevolution. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 24(10): 1369–1386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2015.1125909

Moore SA, Polley A (2007) Defining indicators and standards for tourism impacts in protected areas: Cape Range National Park, Australia. Environmental Management 39(3): 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0191-5

Naughton-Treves L, Holland MB, Brandon K (2005) The role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30(1): 219–252. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.164507

PNPE (2017) https://doi.org/parquenacionalpicoseuropa.es/ (Accessed on 14 Sept 2017). (In Spanish)

Rescia AJ, Pons A, Lomba I, et al. (2008) Reformulating the social-ecological system in a cultural rural mountain landscape in the Picos de Europa region (northern Spain). Landscape and Urban Planning 88: 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.08.001

Sandelowski M (1995) Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health 18(2): 179–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770180211

Stewart DW, Shamdasani PN, Rook DW (2007) Applied Social Research Methods: Focus groups Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412991841

United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) (2017) UNWTO Tourism Highlights: 2014 Edition. https://doi.org/cf.cdn.unwto.org/sites/all/files/pdf/unwto_annual_report_2014.pdf (Accessed on 14 Sept 2017).

United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) (2017) UNWTO Tourism Highlights: 2017 Edition. https://doi.org/www.eunwto.org/doi/pdf/10.18111/9789284419029 (Accessed on 14 Sept 2017).

United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) (2018) UNWTO World Tourism Barometer. Vol. 16 Advance Release. https://doi.org/media.unwto.org/press-release/2018-01-15/2017-international-tourism-results-highest-seven-years (Accessed on 14 June 2018).

Van Wilgen NJ, Mcgeoch MA (2015) Balancing effective conservation with sustainable resource use in protected areas: precluded by knowledge gaps. Environmental Conservation 42(3): 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892914000320

Vaughan D (2000) Tourism and biodiversity: A convergence of Interests? International Affairs 76(2): 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00134

Weaver DB (2006) Sustainable tourism: Theory and practice. Routledge, London. p 240.

Wells M, Bradon K (1992) People and parks: linking protected area management with local communities. Washington, DC: World Bank, World Wildlife Fund and US Agency for International Development. https://doi.org/documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/171421468739524360/People-and-parkslinking-protected-area-management-with-local-communities (Accessed on 14 Sept 2017).

West P, Igoe J, Brockington D (2006) Parks and peoples: the social impact of protected areas. Annual Review of Anthropology 35: 251–277. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123308

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Fundación Biodiversidad. And we would like to acknowledge the anonymous reviewers who helped to improve an earlier version of this manuscript. We are furthermore grateful to Teresa Lobo for the organization of both the interviews and the focus groups, and to Rodrigo Suarez, codirector of Picos de Europa National Park, for facilitating the access to local information.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Psychology and Sociology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, 50009, Spain

Department of Social Analysis, University Carlos III of Madrid, Getafe, 28903, Spain

Mercedes Pardo

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iván López .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

López, I., Pardo, M. Tourism versus nature conservation: reconciliation of common interests and objectives — an analysis through Picos de Europa National Park. J. Mt. Sci. 15 , 2505–2516 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-018-4943-0

Download citation

Received : 19 March 2018

Revised : 26 September 2018

Accepted : 08 October 2018

Published : 16 November 2018

Issue Date : November 2018

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-018-4943-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• National parks
• Environmental conservation
• Nature tourism
• Mountain traditional economy
• Picos de Europa
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Tourism: Meaning, Types, Nature, Components & Importance

Meaning of tourism.

Tourism refers to social, cultural and economic phenomenon entailing the movement of people to foreign countries or places outside their usual environment for leisure or business motives. It is simply an act of travelling to places away from your hometown or usual area. It is quite interesting and thrilled filled activity that peoples have either done or would love to do it. Tourism is a collection of activities, services and industries that together provides better travel experience to peoples travelling away from their home. It comprises of transportation, eating and drinking establishments, accommodation, entertainment, retail shops and other hospitality services provided either to individuals or group of travellers. 

The World Tourism Organization (WTO) has specially defined tourism as a practice of travelling and staying away from your home or usual environment for 1 year or less in case if it is for leisure purposes, or for 24 hours or less if meant for business/professional purposes. Tourism concept is distinct from travel. In order for tourism to happen, some displacement must be there: a person has to travel using any mode of transportation (person can even travel on foot that is nowadays the case for poorest societies and happens even in more developed countries). Also, not all travels can be considered as tourism.

Types Of Tourism

Tourism is mainly of two types based on the purpose of visit and alternative forms of tourism. It can be categorized as international and domestic tourism. 

International tourism involves people travelling outside the boundary of their home country to some other foreign country. For travelling to foreign country, one need to go through several formalities and require documents such as valid passport, visa, foreign exchange, health documents etc. It is also divided into 2 types: Inbound Tourism and Outbound Tourism. 

Inbound Tourism: Inbound tourism refers to tourist belonging to some outside country entering a particular country. Travelling outside the home country to some another country is categorised as inbound tourism for the country where people are travelling. Like for example, when Indian origin tourists travel to Australia, then it will inbound tourism for Australia as foreign tourists have entered the country. 

Outbound Tourism: This refers to people travelling from their origin country to some different country. When tourists move to some foreign place, then it is categorized as outbound tourism for their own country as they are going outside their home country. For example, when Indian tourists travel to Australia, then it will be outbound tourism for India and inbound tourism for Australia. 

Domestic Tourism refers to tourism activities of people within their home country. When people travel to different parts of their home country, then it is covered under the domestic tourism. Travelling within the home country is easier because it does not need formal travel documents and tedious formalities such as compulsory health check-ups and foreign exchange. People when travelling domestically does not face much language issues or foreign exchange issues unlike in case of foreign travels. 

Nature of Tourism

The nature of tourism is much connected with travelling. It has been the human phenomenon since the beginning of human civilization. This is a sensitive factor for human nature in terms of moving to survive, explore and get to know the unknown things. Humans started travelling as nomads for search of prey and foods, in earlier times. Later on, the agricultural development developed the base for movement of peoples as traveller. After this the industrial revolution made various destinations prominent to travelling. This made the lifestyle of traveller much easier as well as safe to realize their tourism activities. Nature of tourism is further discussed in points below: – 

Tourism and service

Tourism is a service industry comprising of all those sectors of economy that are involved in offering services such as transportation, accommodation, food, beverage, as well as distribution and sales services. The tourism industry has been taken as term of economic growth, productivity, social development, employments income, etc. However, it does not produce any commodity that can be touched or taken home. Therefore, tourism is a hospitality industry and bridge in between peoples. It makes valuable contribution to world’s economy via offering jobs to more and more people than any other industry. 

Tourism is economy contributor

With the help of tourism business, a lot of income is generated within economy in the form of domestic or foreign exchange. A large population gets employed in this industry. Tourism industry is a major contributor to public revenue. Also, nature too can be tapped and friendly relations with other countries can lead to provide benefits for economy. 

Tourism products are highly perishable

The tourism products cannot be transported to customer location. Customers need to move to the products or visit the points of service delivery. For example, hotel rooms, culture, attraction is not possible to be transported from Sri Lanka. ‘Export’ or ‘Export of tourism products’ denote the arrival of tourists or facilities utilized by tourists. 

Tourism assists in educating the mass

Tourism industry plays an effective role in spreading ideas and knowledge among mass population. There is a spontaneous method of learning and exchange of ideas in this industry. Exploration and discovery scope is very high among the adventure tourists. Also, because of tourism, respect for each other’s own life exists. 

Tourism industry is sustainable

There is not any horizon or end to tourism activities. Tourism industry is a long-term industry. It represents non-stop movement of peoples and this incessant move give rise to more and more tourism activities. 

Components of Tourism

Tourism does not operate in isolation, but contains some components without whom it can’t be operated. Tour undertaken by person is affected by distinct elements or components. These components are core parts of tourism and are known as 4 A’s of tourism. 

The four components are: Attraction, Accessibility, Accommodation and Amenities. 

Attraction is considered as the most important component of tourism that creates desire among people to make visits to a specific place or destination. It is anything influencing or inspiring people to make visit/travel. Every country has different type of attraction that attracts in large number of tourists. The lack of attraction cannot pull travellers. Attraction is all those elements, that determines the tourist’s choice to visit one place over others. Peoples can be attracted by different attraction such as trekking, sunrise, waterfall, monument, historical building, cultural sites, national parks, beach resort, flora and fauna, scenic beauty, religious sites etc. The attraction creates flow of tourism to particular area/place and act as magnetic power on pull factor of tourism. 

Attraction can also be classified into two ways: – 

– Core Attraction : Core attraction denotes the basic assets or attributes of particular place/destination. This makes up the main theme of destination. Core attraction may be natural or man-made, cultural recreations, historic or spectator events. 

– Supporting Attraction : It includes the facilities and services that serve the needs of travellers lodging, food service, shopping and local transport, foreign currency exchange and so on. Also, the success of every tourism destination depends not only on its power to attract visitors but also on its ability to hold them. Therefore, a destination must have sufficient attraction such that it is appealing to wider market.

Accessibility

Accessibility is also key component of tourism that denotes reachability to place of destination via distinct modes of transportation. It is simply the way through which tourists can easily reach their destination point. An attraction is not only necessary but it should also be accessible. Tourists reach the place of attraction by using the means of transportation. Therefore, transportation services should be regular, economic, comfortable and safe, as if travel services are better then more will be the tourists coming. Transportation is very crucial and if tourism destination lacks transport facilities, it becomes of little value. 

The passenger transport is categorized into public or private, international air and surface, etc.

– Air Transport : Air transport is the fastest growing means of long-distance tourist transport and served as primary means of transport on many routes. 

– Sea Transport : It plays a major role on short sea routes, waterways and for cruises. 

– Rail Transport : Rail Transport is good for both short and medium distance within the home country or in-between different countries. This assist in reaching destination or for movements at destination. 

More and more tourists will visit a place if it has good modes of transportation available. For example, if we compare rara lake and phewa lake- Rara lake is beautiful destination in western Nepal but only few tourists visit this place due to transportation problem. Whereas, phewa lake is visited by millions of people due to the availability of good transportation.

Accommodation

Accommodation is another component of tourism which is a primary service needed by tourists at the place of destination. It has important role to play in influencing the tourists to choose destination. Accommodation denotes a place where travellers get food and shelter to stay. The tourists can stay in distinct types of accommodation such as staying with relatives, friends, other private accommodation and their own means of accommodation such as tent and caravans. This also include the provision of food and beverages for tourists. 

Tourism arises from the movement of people and stay at the place of destination. Accommodation complements the attraction and every tourist want such accommodation where they can stay comfortably and served good food. They give more priorities to place with good accommodation having all facilities such as hotel, lodges, apartment, bar and restaurant. A huge amount of investments are needed on accommodation that are designed as per the paying capacity of tourists. A well-designed accommodation at nice location with all facilities is also attraction. Tourist must spend at least one night on destination; therefore, accommodation is important. No one is going to visit a place with attraction and accessibility, but no accommodation. 

Amenities are yet another important component of tourism that are extra facilities like service added with attraction, accessibility and accommodation in order to create tourism. They on their own does not generate any tourist flow but their absence may distract the tourists. Amenities are basically the elements which provide pleasure and satisfaction to tourists from destination. Modern amenities are primary elements of tourism and are provided by government, hotel, airlines, travel agencies etc. Different amenities that government provides are visa, entry to archaeological and cultural sites, mountaineering permit, custom facilities etc. The necessary service and facilities for making guest feel comfortable while travelling such as food, rest, sport, communication and entertainment are also included within amenities. For example, sea side resort offer facilities such as swimming, yachting, boating, recreation.

Amenities are both natural and man-made where natural amenities comprise of fishing, trekking, beaches, climbing, viewing, and man-made amenities comprises of cinema, internet, telephone, drama, music, fair and festival, E-mail and fax service.

Importance of Tourism

The tourism industry is important due to the benefits it brings and its role as a commercial activity that creates demand and development for many more industries. Tourism not only contributes towards the economic development, but also generates large number of employment opportunities and revenues. The importance of tourism is well-discussed in points given below: – 

Brings in Influx of Wealth

The biggest advantage tourism provides to every country it that it provides way to economy for receiving influx of wealth. This thing becomes very crucial for nations with newer and weaker economies, and requires the boost. There are numerous countries in Africa that especially need this, and are heavily dependent on tourism sector. Tourists travelling from strong economy countries provide foreign cash that is much stronger than the currency of weak economy countries. This in turn means that tourists are willing to spend more, considering the strength of their money in particular area. Of course, this will bring in more benefits for country. The money spend by tourists not only goes to popular tourist destination and activities, that funds local tour operators and small ventures, but also goes at their general stay.

Large job opportunities

One of the best advantages of tourism industry is that it provides large employment opportunities for locals. Creation of jobs is the most obvious benefit provided to every country. This got spread throughout all industries, from pilots flying the planes for connecting countries to the people washing utensils in restaurant kitchens. Rise of customers during tourist peak season within the wide range of business fields provide enormous benefits. Tourism too creates new jobs for local peoples within the countries, paving the way for opening of new locally run business. More jobs are created from these new businesses both within the travel and tourism sector. 

Building infrastructure

An important benefit of tourism industry is construction and improvement of infrastructural facilities within the country. With the help of wealth inflow from tourists and local communities, large expenses for building up of roads, school, parks, hospital and community areas can be easily afforded. A booming tourism industry won’t be able to survive in country having absence of right infrastructure, as tourists face difficulties in moving around and there won’t be much activities available. For example, if country’s roads are badly damaged and cannot be driven on then tourist won’t be able to move to places where they want to. 

Source of diverse income

Most of the countries are heavily reliant on different industries operating within them, and when these industries fall short then entire economy broke down. Tourism is one of the industries that is much reliable and provides regular flow of income to countries. This means that sometimes the main industry of country can be tourism industry. Tourism remains heavy unlike the other one that changes with seasons. The tourism industry helps in easing the strain caused by suffering industries, and assist in minimizing the massive negative effect this has on overall economy of country. 

Environmental protection

The environmental health is nowadays taken seriously by entire world. Due to this, there is a demand for destinations to be environment friendly. Business involved in tourism activities are taking efforts to make themselves stand out by being more responsible to environment offering eco-tours. These businesses then impact the wellness of environment and improves ways of treating massive habitats. Now, key natural areas remain unharmed and conserved due to their value to tourism industry. Practice of eco-friendly tours and accommodations motivate tourists to respect the untouched sites they are visiting, that helps in keeping these sites and their inhabitants unharmed.

Gender equality

Women fill up the majority of positions in tourism industry among most parts of the world. Unfortunately, they tend to hold more jobs at lower designations and many of them even perform unpaid jobs in their family tourism businesses. That said, the gap in wages is smaller as per the UN Women. Women are earning 14.7% less as compared to men and fill more management roles than in other fields. Tourism industry carries lots of opportunities and strategies that has great potential to further empower women. 

Preserves heritage

Another important advantage of tourism is the preservation of culture and heritage. There are lots of tourist who visit the destination specially to see the local heritage. And due to this, many destinations will take all possible steps to preserve their heritage. This can involve putting restrictions in place or limiting the number of tourists, if necessary. It is also an example of careful planning of tourism and sustainable management of tourism.

Related posts:

• International Business: Nature, Characteristics, Features
• Role and Importance of Transportation in Business
• Compensation Management: Meaning, Components, Objectives and Factors Influencing It
• Scope and Importance of International Business
• Impact of Coronavirus on Indian Economy
• Logistics Management: Meaning, Nature, Scope, Objectives and, Importance

Add CommerceMates to your Homescreen!

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• My Account Login
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Open access
• Published: 28 June 2024

A study of the evolutionary game of carbon offset involving tourism stakeholders under incentive and constraint mechanisms

• Qianna Li 1 , 3 ,
• Changjiang Xiong 2 &
• Juan Yao 3  

Scientific Reports volume  14 , Article number:  14935 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

110 Accesses

Metrics details

• Climate-change adaptation
• Climate-change mitigation
• Climate-change policy
• Environmental economics
• Psychology and behaviour
• Socioeconomic scenarios

Tourism carbon offsetting is a crucial pathway to achieving peak carbon and carbon neutrality in the tourism industry. Accurately grasping the collaborative evolutionary mechanisms among local governments, tourism enterprises, and tourists is key to promoting the implementation of tourism carbon offsetting. By constructing an evolutionary game model involving local governments, tourism enterprises, and tourists in carbon offsetting, this study uses MATLAB to simulate the evolutionary stable strategies under various conditions. Additionally, it dynamically simulates the collaborative strategies of the three parties under the influence of local government incentive and constraint mechanisms. The results indicate that under strong governmental constraint mechanisms, there is a promotion of active participation in carbon offsetting by local governments, tourism enterprises, and tourists. Incentive policies at certain levels also play a positive guiding role. As incentives increase, local subsidies and intervention costs also rise, leading to an evolution towards less enthusiastic participation among the three parties. Appropriately balanced government incentives and penalties are beneficial in achieving an equilibrium of benefits among multiple stakeholders involved in carbon offsetting, thus helping to attain carbon neutrality goals.

Similar content being viewed by others

Evolutionary game analysis of environmental pollution control under the government regulation

Research on distribution strategy of logistics enterprise alliance based on three-party evolution game

A collective risk dilemma for tourism restrictions under the COVID-19 context

Literature review.

Tourism heavily relies on natural resources and the ecological environment, making its impact on climate change significant and increasingly concerning 1 . According to the World Tourism Organization and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNWTO & UNE), the tourism sector’s carbon emissions are projected to increase by 152% by 2035, contributing 188% to global warming 2 . In 2021, the UNWTO issued The Glasgow Declaration , committing to halving global tourism CO 2 emissions by 2030 and achieving carbon neutrality by 2050 3 . The question of how to put into action to achieve the global carbon peaking carbon neutral target has become a focal point. Carbon offset has been widely noticed as an effective mechanism to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and achieve carbon reduction targets. In the tourism sector, carbon emitters offset their own carbon emissions in an economic or non-economic way 4 . For example, they pay to comply with the emission cap 5 , or reduce carbon emissions by planting trees and low carbon behaviors 6 . Carbon offset involves a number of stakeholders in the implementation process, and only when the stakeholders reach a consensus on their collective behaviors can they achieve the goal of carbon reduction. It is evident that carbon offset in the tourism industry is an effective institutional arrangement for achieving carbon reduction in tourist destinations and carbon neutrality in the tourism industry.

Currently, there are few studies utilizing evolutionary game models to explore cooperative mechanisms among stakeholders involved in carbon offsetting. Therefore, with the premise of bounded rationality and maximization of self-interest for stakeholders’ strategic choices, this paper constructs an evolutionary game model involving local governments, tourism enterprises, and tourists. It analyzes the equilibrium conditions of the tripartite game and simulates the system’s evolutionary stable strategies under different circumstances. These insights will provide valuable references and enlightenment for the formulation and implementation of tourism carbon offset policies.

• Tourism carbon offset

The term “carbon offset” was introduced in the Kyoto Protocol in 1997 as a cooperative mechanism to help countries reduce greenhouse gas emissions 7 , offsetting domestic emissions through the purchase of carbon credits in the carbon market 8 . As a way to “neutralize” emissions, it has received extensive attention from scholars, and the academic community has mainly focused on forest carbon offset 9 , 10 , agricultural carbon offset 11 , fishery carbon offset 12 , watershed carbon offset 13 , and tourism carbon offset 14 , 15 , 16 .

Scholars have explored the efficacy and feasibility of implementing tourism carbon offset policies, with diverging perspectives. Scott et al. argued against the implementation of such policies, citing cost and reputational risks 17 . It is clearly unfair to limit the development opportunities of developing countries to maintain the interests of the developed groups 18 . On the other hand, an objective perception of the environment takes an opposing view, scholars have emphasized the significant environmental impact of air travel and the need for carbon offset policies. arguing that tourism has a significant impact on climate change and may continue to increase 4 . In particular, air travel contributes to 8% of the global carbon footprint, leading to a significant environmental impact and the need for carbon offset policies. The question of responsibility for carbon offset arises: most tourists believe that governments and airlines should take responsibility for the climate change caused by tourism 19 .

Meanwhile, Gössling proposed a carbon offset model, whereby emissions from one sector can be offset by reductions in another, such as afforestation or renewable energy 18 , offering an acceptable solution for travelers and the tourism industry, contributing to low carbon awareness, and providing broad social benefits 20 . With the increasing implementation of carbon offset models, more countries and organizations recognize the significant role that carbon offset can play in coordinating regional ecological conservation and promoting environmentally friendly economic development 21 . Particularly in the context of the ‘two-carbon’ goal, reconciling environmental issues arising from human tourism activities with the climate policy objectives of the international community has become a priority, with emphasis placed on low carbon and environmental protection in different areas 22 . Research has focused on sectors such as aviation, hotels, and accommodations 23 , 24 , with the aviation sector in particular receiving attention in academic circles for identifying ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions without negatively affecting tourism activity. Measures being discussed include air passenger taxes, emission trading schemes, emissions taxes, fuel taxes or VAT, technological changes (improved fuel efficiency, alternative fuels), and structural changes (restructuring of public transport, capacity management) 25 , 26 .

Research on tourism carbon offset decision-making behavior mainly focuses on stakeholder subjects such as governments, residents, tourists, and tourism enterprises. Sautter classifies tourism stakeholders into government departments, tourists, residents, employees, local merchants, competitors, activist groups, and so on 27 . while Sward adds pressure groups, public interest organizations, experts, and the media 28 . Some scholars also distinguish between core and peripheral interest subjects according to different spatial regions 29 . For instance, research on rural tourism focuses on the relationship between communities and scenic spots, tourism enterprises, and tourists, whereas tourist attractions and resorts emphasize the relationship between scenic spots and government, travel agencies, enterprises, and tourists. Eco-regions, such as forest parks and heritage sites, concentrate on the relationship between local governments and operating companies, scenic spot management agencies, practitioners, tourists, and residents. These relationships often face contradictions and conflicts due to economic needs, different values, and inadequate management systems 30 , 31 , 32 . Therefore, effectively coordinating the relationship between different stakeholders and maximizing their participation in carbon offset is the key and challenging aspect of carbon emission reduction governance.

Low-carbon tourism and the evolutionary game of carbon reduction

Traditional game theory assumes that decision-makers are perfectly rational and that information between decision-makers is not fully transparent, which is difficult to achieve in real life 33 . In contrast, evolutionary games consider decision makers to be finitely rational and can dynamically study the strategies of multiple actors, analyzing the effects of different factors on the change process of decision makers’ decisions 34 . As a result, scholars have constructed evolutionary game models to analyze the interests between carbon pollution stakeholders in different countries or regions, with a focus on low-carbon tourism and tourism carbon reduction 35 . Low-carbon tourism is a new way to reduce carbon emissions 36 , and it involves tourists, government departments, community residents, and tourism enterprises. Tourism enterprises are the implementers of low-carbon tourism, with the use of renewable energy and energy conservation as their top priority. Government departments play a coordinating and guiding role, promoting environmental awareness through improved carbon sink mechanisms, monitoring mechanisms, and management bodies 37 . Local communities are the participants and beneficiaries, while tourists are the experiencers of low-carbon tourism 38 . The respective positions of stakeholders and their interrelationships have become the content of low-carbon tourism research. It is found that the decisions of enterprises and tourism consumers are influenced by each other. The government can effectively increase the enthusiasm of tourism consumers and enterprises to participate in low-carbon tourism by setting reasonable subsidies and penalties for tourism consumers and enterprises 39 .

Carbon emission reduction is essential for achieving peak and neutral carbon targets, and quantification is necessary for the development of carbon offset schemes. In public goods games like carbon reduction, the use of incentives and disincentives to solve the cooperation dilemma of stakeholders has garnered scholarly attention 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 . Using the evolutionary game model, it has been inferred that carbon emission reward and penalty mechanisms are effective in promoting low-carbon development among enterprises. If the penalty for tourism enterprises exceeding carbon emissions is too low, and the cost of local government supervision is too high, the government may abandon regulation 44 . The intervention of the central government plays a non-negligible role in the implementation of carbon offset policies between regions, and the implementation cost and intensity of incentive and constraint mechanisms will affect the time required for the implementation of carbon offset policies in the region 21 . The optimized dynamic punishment incentive mechanism can effectively inhibit the fluctuation of interest selection strategy 45 , and government subsidies can improve the total social welfare, but the lower limit of subsidies should not be too high 46 . These studies have shown that properly designed incentives and constraints can effectively promote low-carbon development and carbon-offsetting policies. These findings can help policymakers develop effective carbon reduction strategies and facilitate the transition to a low-carbon economy.

In summary, current research has focused on the game between the parties involved in low-carbon tourism behavior and tourism carbon reduction behavior. However, few studies use evolutionary game models to explore the cooperative mechanisms of stakeholder carbon offsets. Therefore, it is necessary to study the cooperative evolutionary strategies of stakeholders’ participation in tourism carbon offset and to identify solutions for implementing tourism carbon offset policies. The structure of this paper is as follows: Section One reviews the research progress on the involvement of stakeholders in low-carbon tourism, tourism carbon reduction, and the carbon offset game. Section Two constructs a tripartite evolutionary game model involving local governments, tourists, and tourism enterprises, applies the Lyapunov criterion to derive the system’s evolutionarily stable strategies under various conditions, and analyzes the stability of the tripartite evolutionary equilibrium points. Section Three simulates the stable equilibrium strategies for the three parties participating in carbon offsets under government incentives and constraints. Section Four summarizes the research findings and proposes relevant policy recommendations. The marginal contributions of this study include the following two points: First, against the backdrop where the tourism industry will become the main battleground for energy conservation and emission reduction globally, it explores cooperative strategies among stakeholders involved in tourism carbon offset activities, including tourists, government agencies, and tourism enterprises. The strategies they adopt will directly impact the effectiveness of energy conservation and emission reduction in the tourism industry, thereby enriching the theory of carbon neutrality in tourism. Second, it defines the effective range of constraints and incentives for government implementation of tourism carbon policies, driving the system towards different stable states. This has significant reference value for managers to scientifically and reasonably formulate tourism carbon offset mechanisms.

Tripartite evolutionary game modeling

Basic assumptions, the hypothesis of tourism carbon offset participants.

This paper simplifies the complex tourism carbon offset relationship system, based on the criteria of the highest carbon emission impact and carbon governance contribution 47 . Three representative subjects of tourists, tourism enterprises and local governments are selected to form a multivariate collaborative governance game model 48 . Under the model of tourism carbon offsetting, local governments, tourism enterprises and tourists are limited rational economic agents, all aiming to realize their own maximum interests 39 . Local governments give primary consideration to the realization of overall and long-term interests, as well as prioritizing the image of the government. On the other hand, tourism enterprises prioritize short-term and vested interests and strive to maximize profits or minimize costs. Similarly, tourists pursue short-term and vested experiences of quality services, and maximize utility or minimize consumption costs as a code of conduct 39 . As limited rational subjects, the strategic behavioral choices of local governments, tourism enterprises and tourists tend to be optimal strategies.

The hypothesis of strategy types in tourism carbon offset

It is hypothesized that following the implementation of tourism carbon offset practices by the central government, local governments, tourism enterprises, and tourists can adopt different strategies. Specifically, local governments can choose to enforce strong (x 1 ) or weak (x 2 ) enforcement strategies. Similarly, Tourism enterprises can choose between proactive response (y 1 ) and passive response (y 2 ), while tourists have the options of participating (z 1 ) or not participating (z 2 ).

It is important to note that x, y, and z are all within the range of 0 to 1, indicating that the stakeholders’ strategies are not absolute but are relative to their interests and circumstances. By adopting these strategies, local governments, tourism enterprises, and tourists aim to maximize their benefits while minimizing costs 49 .

Payment function assumptions

Local governments: When the local government chooses strong enforcement, it will reward tourism enterprises that actively respond to carbon offsets (W 1 ) and tourists that actively participate in carbon offsets (W 2 ) 39 . and at the same time, the local government needs to pay for the enforcement cost of the regulatory process (C 1 ) 50 . Local governments can reap hidden environmental benefits (R 1 ) 51 and image benefits (V) 52 from carbon offsets. When the government plays the function of environmental governance, there is the phenomenon of “the law does not punish numerous offenders” 53 , i.e., due to the existence of penalty costs, managers tend to impose smaller penalties or difficult to impose penalties on group violations, while the penalties for individual violations tend to be larger, and therefore penalize the tourism enterprises that are passive (F 1 ) 54 . Meanwhile, when governments choose to implement negatively, if tourists choose a non-participation strategy and tourism enterprises choose a negative response strategy, the local government does not need to pay the enforcement cost, but the local government may suffer a loss of government reputation and credibility due to failure to fulfill the tasks assigned by the central government (I), and bear the environmental risk cost (L) 54 .

Tourism enterprises: When a tourism company chooses a positive coping strategy, it will obtain a low carbon benefit (R 3 ) 55 , and needs to pay the operating cost (C 3 ), but at the same time, it can obtain the corresponding carbon offsetting incentive (W 1 ) 39 . When a tourism enterprise chooses a negative coping strategy, it will obtain a gain (R 2 ) (R 2  < R 3 ), in the short term, the production enterprise can obtain a considerable gain at the expense of the government and the public’s environmental interests 56 , but in the long term, when a tourism enterprise chooses a negative coping strategy, it will provide tourism products and services that do not comply with the national dual-carbon target policy orientation and market demand, and then its gain will decline. In addition, the enterprises need to pay the common operating costs (C 2 ) (C 3  > C 2 ) 50 .

Tourists: When tourists choose to actively participate in carbon offsetting, they pay the corresponding participation cost (C 4 ) and obtain carbon offsetting incentives from the local government (W 2 ) 39 . Tourists pursue the experience utility of low-carbon tourism in tourism consumption activities, and obtain the environmental utility (U 1 ) 57 . Tourists choose not to participate in the strategy, pay the corresponding tourism cost (C 5 ) (C 5  < C 4 ), and obtain the environmental utility as (U 2 ) (U 1  > U 2 ) 58 .

The payoff matrix of the tripartite evolutionary game is shown in Table 1 , which illustrates the possible outcomes and payoffs for each stakeholder in the tourism carbon offset process. These payoff functions provide insights into the strategic choices made by stakeholders and help understand the dynamics of carbon offset in the tourism industry.

Game model construction

Evolutionary game modeling of local governments.

The expected benefits \(E_{11}\) and \(E_{12}\) for local governments choosing strong and weak enforcement, and the average benefits \(\overline{{E_{1} }}\) respectively are:

From this, the first-order derivatives of the replicator dynamics equations for local government \(F(x)\) , \(x\) can be obtained \(\frac{dF(x)}{{dx}}\) .

At the same time, making \(G\left( y \right) = - C_{1} - yW_{1} - zW_{2} + \left( {1 - y} \right)F_{1}\) ,

Seeking. \(G\left( {\text{y}} \right){\prime} = - W_{1} - F_{1} + {\text{zV}}\) ,

According to stability theory, for local governments, the process of behavioral strategy adjustment tends to a steady state when and only when \(F(x) = 0\) and \(\frac{dF(x)}{{dx}} < 0\) holds simultaneously.

According to the above assumptions, local governments are mainly pursuing overall and long-term interests, and the image gains obtained by local governments choosing strong enforcement are objective. Assuming that tourism enterprises opt for a proactive response and tourists decide to participate, let us hypothesize that \(- W_{1} - F_{1} + zV > 0\) . It follows that \(G(y)\) is a monotonically increasing function, yielding the solution:

Discussed in three scenarios:

The \(y = \frac{{F_{1} - C_{1} - zW_{2} }}{{W_{1} + F_{1} - zV}}\) , \(G(y) = 0\) , then \(F(x) = 0\) , \(x\) take any number, are stable states.

The \(y > \frac{{F_{1} - C_{1} - zW_{2} }}{{W_{1} + F_{1} - zV}}\) , \(G(y) < 0\) , then \(\frac{dF(x)}{{dx}}\left| {_{x = 0} } \right. < 0\) , \(\frac{dF(x)}{{dx}}\left| {_{x = 1} } \right. > 0\) , \(x = 0\) are evolutionary stability points and the local government’s strategy choice is weak enforcement.

The \(y < \frac{{F_{1} - C_{1} - zW_{2} }}{{W_{1} + F_{1} - zV}}\) , \(G(y) > 0\) , then \(\frac{dF(x)}{{dx}}\left| {_{x = 0} } \right. > 0\) , \(\frac{dF(x)}{{dx}}\left| {_{x = 1} } \right. < 0\) , \(x = 1\) are evolutionary stability points and the local government’s strategy choice is strong enforcement.

Based on the above analysis, the following proposition is obtained.

Proposition 1

The behavioral strategy of local governments evolves towards weak enforcement as they offer greater incentives to tourism enterprises and tourists.

with all other parameters held constant, will make \(y > \frac{{F_{1} - C_{1} - zW_{2} }}{{W_{1} + F_{1} - zV}}\) , as \(W_{1}\) and \(W_{2}\) increase, eventually stabilize at \(x = {0}\) , i.e. the local government’s strategic behavior is chosen to be weakly enforced. As the incentives offered by local governments to tourism enterprises and tourists increase, there is a higher likelihood that tourism enterprises will respond positively and tourists will participate in carbon offset. However, as incentives continue to grow and local governments become financially overburdened, they may have a higher expectation for active participation from tourism enterprises and tourists in the tourism industry’s carbon offset process, particularly in the context of weak enforcement measures.

Proposition 2

The behavioral strategy of local governments evolves towards weak enforcement when the cost of implementing carbon offsets for tourism is higher.

with other parameters unchanged, will make \(y > \frac{{F_{1} - C_{1} - zW_{2} }}{{W_{1} + F_{1} - zV}}\) , as \(C_{1}\) increases, will eventually stabilize at \(x = {0}\) , i.e. the strategic behavior of the local government is chosen to be weakly implemented. The process of implementing tourism carbon offset, including planning, policy design, and supervision, adds to the governing costs of local governments and may result in lost opportunities for development. As a limited rational economic entity, when local governments have low expectations for tourism carbon offset, they may choose a weak implementation strategy. This highlights the need for increased efforts to guide and encourage local governments to participate in carbon offset initiatives, while also considering the economic costs and benefits involved.

Proposition 3

The behavioral strategy of local governments evolves towards strong enforcement as they impose greater penalties on tourism enterprises.

With other parameters unchanged, will make \(y < \frac{{F_{1} - C_{1} - zW_{2} }}{{W_{1} + F_{1} - zV}}\) , as \(F_{1}\) increases, will eventually stabilize at \(x = {1}\) , i.e. the strategic behavior of the local government is chosen to be strongly enforced. On one hand, higher penalties imposed by local governments on tourism enterprises can lead to lower participation in tourism carbon offset, necessitating increased regulation, active guidance, and urging from local governments to encourage tourism enterprises to participate. On the other hand, the increased penalties can generate fiscal revenue for the local government, which can be used to cover some implementation costs or converted into carbon offset funds to incentivize other proactive stakeholders, such as providing subsidies for tourists, offering incentives for scientific research institutions, and so on.

Proposition 4

The greater the image gain for local governments, the more their behavioral strategy evolves towards a strong enforcement strategy.

With other parameters unchanged, will make \(y < \frac{{F_{1} - C_{1} - zW_{2} }}{{W_{1} + F_{1} - zV}}\) , as \(V\) increases, will eventually stabilize at \(x = {1}\) , i.e. the strategic behavior of the local government is chosen to be strongly enforced. In general, with effective guidance and regulation from local governments, the probability of tourism enterprises responding positively to carbon offset policies will increase, leading to an increase in tourist participation. As a result, local governments will be able to successfully achieve the carbon peaking and carbon–neutral targets set by the central government, enhancing their credibility and reputation. This will also encourage local governments to adopt a strong implementation strategy for carbon offset policies.

Evolutionary game model for tourism enterprises

The expected benefits \(E_{21}\) and \(E_{22}\) of active and passive responses by tourism enterprises and the average benefits \(\overline{{{\rm E}_{2} }}\) respectively are

From this, the first-order derivatives of the replicator dynamics equations for tourism enterprises \(F(y)\) , \(y\) can be obtained \(\frac{dF(y)}{{dy}}\) .

At the same time, making \(G(x) = C_{2} - C_{3} - R_{2} + R_{3} + xW_{1} + xF_{1}\) ,

Since \(\frac{dG(x)}{{dx}} = W_{1} + F_{1} > 0\) , \(G(x)\) are monotonically increasing functions, then \(x = \frac{{C_{3} - C_{2} + R_{2} - R_{3} }}{{W_{1} + F_{1} }}\) .

Let \(x_{0} = x = \frac{{C_{3} - C_{2} + R_{2} - R_{3} }}{{W_{1} + F_{1} }}\) , be discussed in three cases.

The When \(x_{0} = x\) , \(G(x) = 0\) , then \(F(y) = 0\) , \(y\) take any number of stable states.

The When \(x_{0} > x\) \(G(x) > 0\) , then \(\frac{dF(y)}{{dy}}\left| {_{y = 0} } \right. < 0\) , \(\frac{dF(y)}{{dy}}\left| {_{y = 1} } \right. > 0\) , \(y = 0\) are evolutionary stability points and the tourism enterprises ‘s strategic choice is to respond negatively.

The When \(x_{0} < x\) \(G(x) < 0\) , then \(\frac{dF(y)}{{dy}}\left| {_{y = 0} } \right. > 0\) , \(\frac{dF(y)}{{dy}}\left| {_{y = 1} } \right. < 0\) , \(y = 1\) are evolutionary stability points and the tourism enterprises ‘s strategy choice is to respond positively.

Proposition 5

The greater the incentives offered by local governments to tourism enterprises, the more their strategic behavior evolves towards positive coping strategies.

With other parameters unchanged, will make \({\text{x}} = \frac{{C_{3} - C_{2} + R_{2} - R_{3} }}{{W_{1} + F_{1} }}\) , as \(W_{1}\) increases, will eventually stabilize at \(y = {1}\) , i.e. the strategic behavior of tourism enterprises choose to respond positively. The incentives provided by local governments to tourism enterprises can significantly reduce the costs associated with active response. Some tourism enterprises may even use these incentive funds to invest in technological transformation, upgrade their operations, or develop new products and projects. As a result, tourism enterprises may be more willing to adopt a proactive response strategy.

Proposition 6

The greater the penalties imposed by local governments on tourism enterprises, the more their strategic behavior evolves toward an active coping strategy.

With other parameters unchanged, will make \(x < \frac{{C_{3} - C_{2} + R_{2} - R_{3} }}{{W_{1} + F_{1} }}\) , as \(F_{1}\) increases, will eventually stabilize at \(y = {1}\) , i.e. the strategic behavior of the tourism enterprises is chosen to respond positively. It is rational for tourism enterprises to choose a negative response strategy when their operating costs are low, their revenues are high, and their profits are substantial. However, when the local government increases penalties for non-compliance, the tourism enterprises ‘s profits will be reduced and its social image will be affected, which may prompt the operator to reconsider its response strategy.

Proposition 7

The smaller the difference between the operating profit of a tourism enterprises choosing a negative coping strategy and the operating profit of a positive coping strategy, the smaller the evolution of its strategic behavior towards a positive coping strategy.

With other parameters held constant, will make \(x < \frac{{C_{3} - C_{2} + R_{2} - R_{3} }}{{W_{1} + F_{1} }}\) , as the value of \(C_{3} - C_{2} + R_{2} - R_{3}\) decreases, eventually, stabilize at \(y = {1}\) , i.e. the strategic behavior of the tourism operator chooses to respond positively. As the expected gains from carbon offset in the tourism industry increase, such as through technological transformation and upgrading, enhancing market competitiveness, and fostering a green corporate culture, tourism enterprises are more likely to adopt a positive coping strategy. However, if the benefits from traditional business practices are deemed to be greater, tourism enterprises may resort to negative coping strategies.

Evolutionary game model for tourists

The expected benefits \(E_{31}\) and \(E_{32}\) for tourists choosing to participate and not to participate, and the average benefits \(\overline{{E_{3} }}\) respectively are:

From this, the first-order derivatives of the replicator dynamics equations for the tourist \(F(z)\) , \(z\) can be obtained \(\frac{dF(z)}{{dz}}\) .

At the same time, making \(I(x) = - C_{4} + C_{5} + U_{1} - U_{2} + xW_{2}\) ,

Since \(\frac{dI(x)}{{dx}} = W_{2} > 0\) , \(I(x)\) are monotonically increasing functions, then \(x = \frac{{C_{4} - C_{5} - U_{1} + U_{2} }}{{W_{2} }}\) .

Let \(x_{0} = x = \frac{{C_{4} - C_{5} - U_{1} + U_{2} }}{{W_{2} }}\) , be discussed in three cases.

The \(x_{0} = x\) , \(I(x) = 0\) , then \(F(z) = 0\) , \(z\) take any number, are stable states.

The When \(x_{0} > x\) \(I(x) > 0\) , then \(\frac{dF(z)}{{dz}}\left| {_{z = 0} } \right. < 0\) , \(\frac{dF(z)}{{dz}}\left| {_{z = 1} } \right. > 0\) , \(z = 0\) are evolutionary stability points and the tourist’s strategy choice is non-participation.

The When \(x_{0} < x\) \(I(x) < 0\) , then \(\frac{dF(z)}{{dz}}\left| {_{z = 0} } \right. > 0\) , \(\frac{dF(z)}{{dz}}\left| {_{z = 1} } \right. < 0\) , \(z = 1\) are evolutionary stability points and the tourist’s strategy choice is participation.

Proposition 8

The greater the incentives offered by local governments to tourists, the more their strategic behavior evolves toward a participation strategy.

Holding other parameters constant, will make \(x < \frac{{C_{4} - C_{5} - U_{1} + U_{2} }}{{W_{2} }}\) , as \(W_{2}\) increases, eventually stabilize at \(z = {1}\) , i.e. the tourist’s strategic behavior choice is participation. Likewise, the opportunity cost for tourists to participate in carbon offset tends to increase. However, incentives offered by local governments can significantly reduce this cost, thereby motivating tourists to choose to participate in carbon offset.

Proposition 9

The smaller the difference between the utility of the tourist’s choice of the non-participation strategy and the utility of the choice of the participation strategy, the more his strategic behavior evolves towards the participation strategy.

With other parameters held constant, will make \(x < \frac{{C_{4} - C_{5} - U_{1} + U_{2} }}{{W_{2} }}\) , as the value of \(\frac{{C_{4} - C_{5} - U_{1} + U_{2} }}{{W_{2} }}\) decreases, eventually stabilizing at \(z = 1\) , i.e. the tourist’s strategic behavior choice is participation. Through participating in carbon offset, tourists can obtain a greater sense of engagement and experience, as well as other benefits. However, if tourists do not participate in carbon offset, their behavior tends towards a non-participation strategy, as they can still achieve the same level of utility while reducing the cost of their tourism consumption.

Tripartite evolutionary stability analysis

The above are the equilibrium conditions for each independent game agent to reach a stable strategy. To explore the equilibrium state of the final stable strategy under the joint effect of the three parties, the first method of Lyapunov is employed here to analyze the asymptotic stability of the tripartite replicator dynamics equations. This involves examining the distribution of the eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix of the tripartite replicator dynamics equations to determine the stability of the system at a particular point.

Setting \(F(x) = {0,}\,F(y) = {0,}\,F(z) = {0}\) reveals eight pure strategy Nash equilibrium points in the game process among local governments, tourism enterprises, and tourists, denoted as \(E_{a} = (0,0,0)\) , \(E_{b} = (1,0,0)\) , \(E_{c} = (0,1,0)\) , \(E_{d} = (0,0,1)\) , \(E_{e} = (1,1,0)\) , \(E_{f} = (1,0,1)\) , \(E_{g} = (0,1,1)\) and \(E_{h} = (1,1,1)\) . By calculating the first partial derivatives of \(F(x)\) , \(F(y)\) , and \(F(z)\) , the Jacobian matrix can be obtained:

To analyze the stability of the equilibrium points in the evolutionary game of tourism carbon offset, we substitute the eight pure strategy Nash equilibrium points into the Jacobi matrix and obtain the eigenvalues. which are shown in Table 2 .

Based on the Lyapunov discriminant, an equilibrium point is asymptotically stable if all eigenvalues of the Jacobi matrix are negative. If all eigenvalues are positive, the equilibrium point is unstable, and if there are one or two positive eigenvalues, the equilibrium point is a saddle point 59 . According to the matrix eigenvalues of each equilibrium point in Table 2 , the eigenvalues of the equilibrium points \(E_{a} (0,0,0)\) and \(E_{h} (1,1,1)\) are both negative, as shown in Table 3 , so \(E_{a} (0,0,0)\) and \(E_{h} (1,1,1)\) are stable points. The two scenarios are discussed below:

In Scenario 1, when \(F_{1} < C_{1} , R_{3} - C_{3} < R_{2} - C_{2}\) and \(U_{1} - C_{4} < U_{2} - C_{5}\) , the tripartite evolution stable strategy is (0, 0, 0), which corresponds to weak enforcement, negative response, and non-participation. In the short term, local governments will opt for a weak enforcement strategy if the costs of strong enforcement exceed the penalties imposed on tourism enterprises. Tourism enterprises will choose a negative response strategy if the net profit from active response is less than that from the negative response. Additionally, tourism enterprises will choose not to participate if the net utility from tourism enterprises participation is less than the net utility from non-participation.

In Scenario 2, If \(- C_{2} - F_{1} + R_{2} < R_{3} - C_{3} + W_{1}\) and \(U_{2} - C_{5} < U_{1} - C_{4} + W_{2}\) , the evolutionary stabilization strategy for all tripartite is (1, 1, 1), meaning they will choose to implement strong enforcement, active response, and participation in carbon offset. In the long run, local governments will choose the strong enforcement strategy when the perceived image gain is greater than the sum of the operating costs and the financial expenditure of the incentive. Tourism enterprises will choose the active response strategy when the local government incentive funds are sufficient to cover the net profit loss resulting from choosing to be active in carbon offset. If the local government incentive funding is higher than the net utility loss caused by tourists participating in carbon offset, tourists will choose the participation strategy.

Simulation analysis of the tripartite evolutionary game

Numerical simulation can verify the feasibility and accuracy of the conclusions of the game, while reflecting the evolution of the game of each subject under different parameter conditions, and intuitively reflecting the size of the trend of the influence between the variables 60 . Therefore, MatlabR2021a software is used to numerically simulate the model to more intuitively analyze the impact of the strength of local government incentives and constraints on the behavioral decisions of other subjects. We take the optimal steady state situation E h (1, 1, 1) as the basis, consider the interaction between the parameters, and assign values to the model parameters. In terms of setting the values of the parameters related to the limited rationality factor, referring to the research of Van 61 and Liu 49 , the limited rationality individual’s pursuit of risk in the face of loss is stronger and more sensitive than gain, and the cost of irresponsible environmental behavior is much lower than the cost of responsible environmental behavior 62 , so the coefficients are set to C1 = 0.65, C2 = 0.4, C3 = 0.7, C4 = 0.55, and C5 = 0.2. The subject’s responsible environmental behavior is continuously affected by the policy, so the subject’s responsible environmental behavior is more sensitive than gain, and the cost of responsible behavior is much lower than cost of responsible behavior. According to Wang 63 and Senbil’s 64 research, in order to take into account social stability and economic development, local governments usually do not punish enterprises for irresponsible environmental behavior too much, and due to the constraints of regulatory costs, they do not punish the public for irresponsible environmental behavior. The probability of punishing the public for environmentally irresponsible behavior is also low due to the constraints of regulatory costs. The value of incentives for the public as a group is also lower than that for individuals with clear goals. Based on the relevant literature and the obtained stabilization conditions, the parameter values for the decision influence coefficients are set as follows: W1 = 0.6; W2 = 0.45; F1 = 0.6.

Evolutionary path of the tripartite game

By substituting the arrays into the model, the simulation results presented in Fig.  1 reveal that the evolutionarily stable state of the system is (1, 1, 1), which aligns with the conclusion of scenario 2. The simulation analysis confirms the stability of the subject’s strategies, thereby validating the model. To avoid the impact of the initial strategies of the parties on the evolution of the system and to facilitate comparison of the evolution of the tripartite strategy ratio, the initial probabilities of the local government, tourism enterprises, and tourists are assumed to be 0.5. Building on this, the influence of local government constraints ( F 1 ) and incentives (W 1 and W 2 ) on the evolutionary strategy of the game’s subject are analyzed.

System evolution path diagram.

Influence of constraint strength on the evolutionary outcome of the system

To investigate the influence of variations in the enforcement intensity of local governments on the outcomes of system evolution, we assume the values of F 1 are set at 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, and 0.8, respectively. The simulation results are presented in Fig.  2 . As the intensity of local government penalties increases, the evolutionary paths of the three parties shift from (0, 0, 0) to (1, 1, 1), with the critical value of F 1 ranging between 0.4 and 0.5. When the penalty intensity is below this critical threshold, x, y, and z converge to 0. At this point, local governments opt for a weak enforcement strategy, tourism enterprises adopt a passive response strategy, and tourists choose a non-participation strategy. When the penalty intensity exceeds this critical value, x, y, and z converge to 1. At this juncture, local governments adopt a strong enforcement strategy, tourism enterprises engage in proactive response strategies, and tourists opt to participate. The results of the evolution indicate that the constraint mechanism is a crucial factor in altering the evolutionary path of the system. The system will evolve towards (1, 1, 1) only when the penalty intensity exceeds a certain critical value.

Effect of changes in F 1 on the evolutionary outcome of the system.

Effect of incentive intensity on the evolutionary outcome of the system

To investigate the impact of local government incentives on tourism enterprises on the system’s evolutionary results, different values of W 1 are assumed, ranging from 0.4 to 0.8, and the simulation results are presented in Fig.  3 . When the incentive is below 0.6, the reward system promotes the active participation of local government, tourism enterprises, and tourists in carbon offset activities, and the evolutionary path of the tripartite progresses from (1, 1, 1) to (0, 0, 0) as the incentive of the local government increases. The critical value of W 1 is found to be between 0.6 and 0.7, and when the incentive is higher than this critical value, x, y, and z converge to 0. When the local government’s incentive to tourism enterprises becomes too high, it can further increase the financial burden on the local government, and in the absence of incentives, tourism enterprises and tourists may be reluctant to participate. When the incentives are below this threshold, x, y, and z converge to 1, indicating that the local government chooses a strong enforcement strategy, tourism enterprises opt for an active response strategy, and tourists choose a participation strategy. These evolutionary results highlight the importance of the incentive mechanism of the local government towards tourism enterprises in changing the system’s evolutionary path. Therefore, controlling the incentive strength at a certain critical value is crucial for the system to evolve towards (1, 1, 1).

Effect of changes in W1 on the evolutionary outcome of the system.

To investigate the influence of changes in the intensity of local government rewards for tourists on the evolutionary outcomes of the system, we assumed values of W 2 to be 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, and 0.8, respectively. The simulation results are presented in Fig.  4 . As the local government incentives increase, the evolutionary path of the tripartite transitions from (1, 1, 1) to (0, 0, 0), with the critical value of W 2 ranging between 0.6 and 0.7. When the reward exceeds this critical value, x, y, and z converge to 0, indicating that excessive local government rewards for tourists could also increase the financial burden on the local government. At this point, the local government is likely to choose a weak enforcement strategy, while tourists may be reluctant to participate in carbon offset. Consequently, tourism enterprises may adopt a negative coping strategy. On the other hand, when the incentive is below this threshold, x, y, and z converge to one. At this point, the local government adopts a strong enforcement strategy, the tourism enterprises chooses a positive coping strategy, and the tourist participates actively. The evolutionary results demonstrate that the local government’s incentive mechanism for tourists is a crucial factor that shapes the evolutionary path of the system, and the system will only evolve when the incentive strength is controlled at a certain critical value.

Effect of W2 changes on system evolutionary outcomes.

Conclusions and discussion

This paper obtains the following conclusions by constructing a game model of local government, tourism operators and tourists’ tripartite participation in the evolution of carbon offsetting, and analyzing the effective interval of incentive and constraint mechanisms through simulation:

In the tourism carbon offset game relationship, local governments, tourism enterprises and tourists are core stakeholders and their strategic decisions are interdependent. When the local government’s incentives for tourism enterprises and tourists are larger, the implementation cost is higher, and the local government’s carbon offset strategy evolves toward weak implementation; when the penalty for tourism enterprises is larger and the image gain is obtained, the local government evolves toward strong implementation. Strong constraints and weak incentives of local governments are effective carbon offsetting means.

The constraint and incentive mechanisms have different effects on the evolution of the stabilization strategy of the whole system. Under the weak constraint mechanism, i.e., when the penalty is lower than 0.5, the tripartite show negative participation; as the local government’s penalty increases, the faster the system evolves to the (1, 1, 1) stabilization strategy, the more the tripartite ‘ participation increases, and the critical value of the penalty is between 0.4 and 0.5.

The critical point of the local government’s reward for enterprises and tourists is between 0.6 and 0.7, and when the reward is below this level or less, the tripartite will actively participate in carbon offsetting. The faster the system evolves to a (0, 0, 0) stable strategy when the reward is stronger, i.e., under strong incentives, as the reward continues to increase, the local government will choose a weak implementation strategy due to the financial burden, which in turn leads to the negative participation of tourism enterprises and tourists as well. Therefore, in the implementation process of tourism carbon offsetting, scientific design of constraint and incentive mechanism can effectively improve the enthusiasm of local governments, tourism operators and tourists.

Ecological compensation plays an important role in regulating the relationship between human activities and the ecological environment 65 , 66 . Similarly, it is feasible to regulate the relationship between tourism development and climate change through carbon offsets. Stakeholders such as the government, tourism enterprises and tourists play different roles in tourism carbon offsetting, and their differentiated interest objectives lead to different strategic choices, so the phenomenon of collective action dilemma of tourism carbon offsetting is inevitable. As for the collective action dilemma in the governance of public affairs such as environmental pollution control, biodiversity protection and natural resources utilization, studies by Zhou 67 and Yuling 68 show that the intervention of government incentive and constraint regulation can effectively regulate the behavioral strategies of stakeholders to evolve in a positive direction. Due to the externality of carbon offsetting behavior, without government incentives and constraints regulation, the increase of additional costs in the early stage of the implementation of tourism carbon offsetting is unavoidable, which will lead to the lack of active participation of tourism enterprises and tourists, i.e., energy saving and emission reduction in the market failure 69 . The intervention of government incentives and constraints regulation will have a positive effect on the stability of the tourism carbon offsetting system, which is conducive to increasing the positive participation of tourism enterprises and tourists. However, there is a maximum threshold for incentive and a minimum threshold for constraint. This conclusion can cause us to think that the government, as a representative of public interest and an implementer of environmental protection work, should increase the responsibility of tourism enterprises and tourists in the carbon offsetting process through the policy tool of combining rewards and punishments, but it should avoid too much administrative intervention 70 , and the short-sighted effect of measuring the effectiveness of the implementation of the policy tool by economic benefits only, and should dynamically adjust the policy of penalties and incentives to synergistically push forward the low-carbon transformation and ecological and environmental benefits of the tourism industry. The penalty and incentive policies should be dynamically adjusted to synergistically promote the low-carbon transformation of the tourism industry and the improvement of ecological and environmental benefits.

Based on the findings of the above study, the following management insights are suggested:

Firstly, a penalty mechanism for non-compliance should be established. Penalties for tourism enterprises’ negative response to carbon offsets should be increased, and the amount of fines imposed on tourism enterprises should be higher than the additional revenue gained from their negative response, thus raising the cost of negative response by tourism enterprises. Information on penalties imposed on non-compliant tourism enterprises should be disseminated through news media or official government websites on information sharing platforms for public display, increasing exposure of non-compliance to create a social deterrent effect, and incorporating penalty information into the industry credit system. Creating a healthy and orderly industry development environment will help improve the decision-making behavior of tourism enterprises and promote the active implementation of carbon offset policies.

Secondly, an incentive support mechanism should be established. An important factor in the low level of low-carbon development in China’s tourism industry is the lack of innovation capacity. Throughout the process of project innovation and participation, tourism enterprises’ operating costs and tourists’ consumption costs will further increase. As new projects are characterized by high investment and low benefits in the initial application stage, it is difficult to achieve scale in project innovation, and coupled with the instability of the tourism market, tourism enterprises have little profit margin or even loss, tourists’ experience is not strong and consumption is not cost-effective. Therefore, the local government should improve the incentive support mechanism according to its financial capacity, adopt a flexible incentive approach, and set a reasonable incentive amount to reduce the operating costs of tourism enterprises and the consumption costs of tourists.

Thirdly, a low-carbon development propaganda and education mechanism should be established. China’s targets for reaching carbon peak and carbon neutrality were set recently and have limited coverage, resulting in insufficient public awareness and understanding of these concepts. Carbon peaking and carbon neutrality should be integrated into the training systems for ecological civilization education of staff at all levels of government departments, achieving institutionalization of government-led low-carbon education. Carbon neutrality should also be incorporated into the daily operation and safety management system of enterprises, making low-carbon education for enterprises a daily practice. Carbon neutrality should be incorporated into the national education system to standardize low-carbon education for schools and the community management system, making low-carbon education for the public a regular practice. Integrate carbon peaking and carbon neutrality into community management systems to normalize public education on low-carbon practices.

Tourism carbon offsetting is an important means to address tourism carbon emissions, involving multiple stakeholders such as government (central government, local government), tourism enterprises, community residents, tourists, news media, financial institutions and research institutes. This paper focuses on the evolutionary game among local governments, tourism enterprises and tourists. The research team is constrained by the systematic complexity and technical difficulty of the four-way evolutionary game, and the article has certain limitations in the selection of interest subjects and does not consider the impact of the top-level design of the central government on tourism carbon offset. The central government is the commissioner and guide of tourism carbon offset policy, with the functions of providing institutional guarantee, financial support, carbon trading market and platform building. At the same time, it has strong financial, administrative and legal resources, with a strong ability to draw resources, social integration and policy implementation. The strategy intensity and type of strategy of the central government will also directly affect the behavior of other stakeholders. In the future, the central government, local governments, tourism enterprises and tourists will be simultaneously included in the evolutionary game model to explore the influence of the central government in carbon offsetting on the carbon offsetting decisions of other stakeholders through administrative means, legal measures and industrial policies.

Data availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the first author (Q.L.) upon reasonable request. Data used in the present study is publicly available at https://tieba.baidu.com/p/8906794432?pid=149826017281&cid=0#149826017281 .

Wu, C. Z. & Ouyang, Y. J. Environmental responsibility of tourism under the “double carbon” goal. Tour. Tribune 37 , 8–10 (2002).

Google Scholar  

UNWTO-UNEP-WMO. Climate change and tourism--responding to global challenges. Madrid: UNWTO, UNEP& WMO , 169–172 (2008).

Tian, L. & Liu, L. Strategic choice of carbon neutrality in the tourism industry. Tour. Tribune 37 , 6–8 (2022).

MathSciNet   Google Scholar  

Cheng, Z. H., Cheng, J. H. & Zhang, O. J. Research on low-carbon tourism cognition and influencing factors of tourists in Wutai Mountain scenic area. Tour. Forum 33 , 50–60 (2018).

Lenzen, M. et al. The carbon footprint of global tourism. Nat. Clim. Chang. 8 , 522–528 (2018).

Article   ADS   Google Scholar  

Gössling, S. Carbon neutral destinations: A conceptual analysis. J. Sustain. Tour. 17 , 17–37 (2009).

Article   Google Scholar  

Angéline, C. & Moïse, T. D. Hybridizations and reconfigurations in the roles of actors in voluntary carbon offsetting. Local Environ. 27 , 1007–1028 (2022).

Bumpus, G. A. & Liverman, D. M. Accumulation by decarbonization and the governance of carbon offset. Econ. Geogr. 84 , 127–155 (2008).

Kaushal, K. R. & Rosendahl, K. E. Optimal discounting of forest offsets in the carbon market. Land Econ. 97 , 436–454 (2021).

van Kooten, G. C. & Johnston, C. M. The economics of forest carbon offsets. Ann. Rev. Resour. Econ. 8 , 227–246 (2016).

González-R, J., Kling, C. L. & Valcu, A. An overview of carbon offsets from agriculture. Ann. Rev. Resour. Econ. 4 , 145–160 (2012).

Gaines, S. D. et al. Improved fisheries management could offset many negative effects of climate change. Sci. Adv. 4 , 1378 (2018).

Vázquez-González, C. et al. Mangrove and freshwater wetland conservation through carbon offsets: A cost-benefit analysis for establishing environmental policies. Environ. Manag. 59 , 274–290 (2016).

Ritchie, B. W., Kemperman, A. & Dolnicar, S. Which types of product attributes lead to aviation voluntary carbon offsetting among air passengers?. Tour. Manag. 85 , 104276 (2021).

Raffaelli, R., Franch, M., Menapace, L. & Cerroni, S. Are tourists willing to pay for decarbonizing tourism? Two applications of indirect questioning in discrete choice experiments. J. Environ. Planning Manag. 65 , 1240–1260 (2022).

Kang, B. Y. & Zhu, M. F. Study on Influencing factors of tourists’ willingness to pay for carbon offsets from the perspective of ecotourism: A case study of Giant Panda National Park in China. J. Arid Land Resour. Environ. 36 , 16–22 (2002).

Scott, D., Gössling, S., Hall, C. M. & Peters, P. Can tourism be part of the decarbonized global economy? The costs and risks of alternate carbon reduction policy pathways. J. Sustain. Tour. 24 , 1–21 (2015).

Gössling, S., Broderick, J. & Upham, P. Voluntary carbon offsetting schemes for aviation: Efficiency, credibility and sustainable tourism. J. Sustain. Tour. 15 , 223–248 (2007).

Dodds, R., Leung, M. & Smith, W. Assessing awareness of carbon offsetting by travelers and travel agents. Anatolia 19 , 135–148 (2008).

Adam, M. B. & Leonard, O. Constructing carbon offsets: The obstacles to quantifying emission reductions. Energy Policy 38 , 533–546 (2009).

Peng, Q., Xu, W. & Xiao, Y. Can carbon offset policies be effectively implemented in all regions of China? An evolutionary game analysis of decision-making dynamics of local governments. Sustainability 14 , 1591 (2022).

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Gössling, S. et al. The future of tourism: Can tourism growth and climate policy be reconciled? A mitigation perspective. Tour. Recreat. Res. 35 , 119–130 (2010).

Zheng, S., Ge, Y. E., Fu, X. & Jiang, C. Voluntary carbon offset and airline alliance. Transp. Res. Part B 123 , 110–126 (2019).

Kathy, D. K. The role of carbon offsets in achieving carbon neutrality. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 26 , 1179–1199 (2014).

Choi, A. S. & Ritchie, B. W. Willingness-to-pay for flying carbon neutral in Australia: An exploratory study of offsetter profiles. J. Sustain. Tour 22 , 1236–1256 (2014).

Peters, P. M. and Middel, J. Historical and future development of air transport fuel efficiency. In Proc. of the International Conference on Transport and Climate Change, ( Oxford 6, 25-29, 2006).

Sautter, E. T. & Leisen, B. Managing stakeholders: A tourism planning model. Ann. Tour. Res. 26 , 312–328 (1999).

Swarbrooke, J. Sustainable Tourism Management (CAB International, UK, 1999). https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851993140.0000 .

Book   Google Scholar  

Gong, J. H. & Xie, L. H. An analysis of stakeholder network of heritage tourism sites in negative reports. Tour. Tribune 36 , 67–80 (2021).

Dredge, D. Place change and tourism development conflict: Evaluating public interest. Tour. Manag. 31 , 104–112 (2010).

Brown, G. & Raymond, C. M. Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping. Landscape Urban Planning 122 , 196–208 (2014).

Li, H. Q., Zou, A. Q. & Yao, Q. Evolutionary game analysis of stakeholder behavior in rural tourism development. Rural. Econ. 2020 , 83–88 (2020).

Gao, X. et al. An evolutionary game analysis of governments’ decision-making behaviors and factors influencing watershed ecological compensation in China. J. Environ. Manag. 251 , 109592 (2019).

Mulazzani, L., Manrique, R. & Malorgio, G. The role of strategic behaviour in ecosystem service modelling: Integrating Bayesian networks with game theory. Ecol. Econ. 141 , 234–244 (2017).

Koelble, T. A. Ecology, economy and empowerment: Eco-tourism and the game lodge industry in South Africa. Bus. Polit. 13 , 1–24 (2011).

Huang, W. S. On low-carbon tourism and the establishment of low-carbon tourism scenic spots. Ecol. Econ. 2009 , 100–102 (2009).

Valls, F. & Sardá, R. Tourism expert perceptions for evaluating climate change impacts on the Euro-Mediterranean tourism industry. Tour. Rev. 64 , 41–51 (2009).

Wu, R. L., Xiong, S. M. & Liu, Y. B. Research on low-carbon tourism development strategies based on stakeholder perspective. Bus. Times 141 , 120–122 (2013).

Liu, X. L. & Li, J. Y. An evolutionary game analysis of government, tourism enterprises and tourism consumers-based on low carbon perspective. Account. Econ. Res. 3 , 117–127 (2017).

ADS   Google Scholar  

Du, C., Jia, D., Jin, L. & Shi, L. The impact of neutral reward on cooperation in a public good game. Eur. Phys. J. B 91 , 234 (2018).

Article   ADS   CAS   Google Scholar  

Pfattheicher, S., Keller, J. & Knezevic, G. Sadism, the intuitive system, and antisocial punishment in the public goods game. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull 43 , 337–346 (2017).

Jordan, J. J., Hoffman, M., Bloom, P. & Rand, D. Third-party punishment as a costly signal of trustworthiness. Nature 530 , 473–476 (2016).

Article   ADS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Yang, H. X. & Chen, X. Promoting cooperation by punishing minorities. Appl. Math. Comput. 316 , 460–466 (2018).

Zhao, L. M., Chen, C. C. & Liu, J. Y. The evolutionary game between local governments and tourism enterprises in a low carbon economy. J. Tour. 30 , 72–82 (2015).

Wang, W., Feng, L., Zheng, T. & Liu, Y. The sustainability of ecotourism stakeholders in ecologically fragile areas: Implications for cleaner production. J. Clean. Product. 279 , 123606 (2020).

Li, Z. Y., Qian, B. H., Zhang, R. Y., Niu, Y. & Xu, J. L. A game model of green tourism supply chain considering government subsidies. Control Eng. 29 , 895–902 (2022).

Xiao, L. & Zhao, L. M. Relationship pattern and game analysis of stakeholders in China’s low-carbon tourism system. J. Tianjin Univ. 16 (2), 105–108 (2014).

Baloch, Q. B. et al. Impact of tourism development upon environmental sustainability: A suggested framework for sustainable ecotourism. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res Int. 30 , 5917–5930 (2023).

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Liu, X., Sun, X. Y. & Wu, S. J. An evolutionary game analysis of corporate carbon emissions under dual governance system: From the perspective of initial intention differentiation. Syst. Eng. 37 , 31–47 (2019).

Pan, H. S., Li, Y. & Liu, H. Z. An evolutionary game analysis of ecological governance actions of central and local governments: From the perspective of fiscal decentralization. Acta Ecol. Sinica 39 , 1772–1783 (2019).

Pan, H. S. & Liu, H. Z. Evolutionary game analysis of cross-regional forest ecological compensation: Based on the perspective of main functional area. Acta Ecol. Sinica 39 , 4560–4569 (2019).

Sun, Z., Zhuang, J. C. & Li, J. Research on the brand promotion path of rural tourism destinations under market-oriented operation. Oper. Res. Manag. 32 , 226–232 (2023).

Jiang, Y. Reflection and reconstruction of government environmental legal responsibility. J. China Univ. Geosci. 2 , 33–40 (2020).

Zhao, H., Liu, X. & Wang, Y. Evolutionary game analysis of opportunistic behavior of Sponge City PPP projects: A perceived value perspective. Sci. Rep. 12 , 87–98 (2022).

Zou, W. R. & Zeng, G. P. Research on sustainable development of rural tourism from the perspective of multi-game. J. Hubei Univ. Arts Sci. 43 , 30–37 (2022).

CAS   Google Scholar  

Carson, S. J., Madhok, A. & Wu, T. Uncertainty, opportunism, and governance: The effects of volatility and ambiguity on formal and relational contracting. Acad. Manag. J 49 , 1058–1077 (2006).

Chen, Z. Z., Zhao, L. M. & Xu, J. Research on low-carbon cooperation of tourism supply chain based on differential game. Tour. Tribune 31 , 38–49 (2016).

Luo, J. J. Information disclosure, incentive constraint and tourism carbon emission regulation: A game analysis based on Bayes’ Rule. J. Central South Univ. Forest Technol. 41 , 174–181 (2021).

Cui, M. Three party evolution game analysis of environmental protection credit regulation in the context of collaborative governance. Syst. Eng. Theory Pract. 41 , 713–726 (2021).

Feng, L. P. et al. Analysis on timing of government intervention in online public opinion of emergencies based on three-party game model. Inf. Theory Pract. 10 , 142–150 (2021).

van de Kaa, E. J. Prospect theory and choice behaviour strategies: Review and synthesis of concepts from social and transport sciences. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res 10 , 299–329 (2010).

Lv, W. Q. & Wang, Y. J. Evolution and promotion of environmental responsibility behavior of rural tourism destination residents based on psychological accounts. Tour. Sci. 37 , 23–42 (2023).

Wang, X. T. et al. Study on rural residents’ participation behavior in cooperative management of solid waste: An analysis based on psychological perception and environmental intervention. Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin 28 , 459–468 (2019).

Senbil, M. & Kitamura, R. Reference points in commuter departure time choice: A prospect theoretic test of alternative decision frames. Intell. Transp. Syst. 8 , 19–31 (2004).

Zhang, Q. et al. Gains or losses? A quantitative estimation of environmental and economic effects of an ecological compensation policy. Ecol. Appl. 31 , 2341 (2021).

Lu, Y. et al. Evaluation of the implementation effect of the ecological compensation policy in the Poyang lake river basin based on difference-in-difference method. Sustainability 13 , 8667 (2021).

Zhou, K., Wang, Q. & Tang, J. N. Evolutionary game analysis of environmental pollution control under the government regulation. Sci. Reports 12 , 474 (2024).

Yuling, W. et al. Evolutionary game analysis of the utilization of construction waste resources based on prospect theory. Sustainability 15 , 2577–2577 (2023).

Bento, A. M., Kanbur, R. & Leard, B. Designing efficient markets for carbon offsets with distributional constraints. Social Sci. Electron. 70 , 51–71 (2015).

Chu, T. et al. Study on the path of “carbon neutrality’’ in home appliance industry considering consumers’ carbon responsibility. Syst. Eng. Theory Pract. 4 , 1–25 (2024).

Download references

This study was funded by grants from The National Social Science Foundation of China, “A study on the measurement and regulation mechanism of tourism consumption of ecosystem services in Xinjiang Tianshan World Natural Heritage Reserve” (no. 41961046). And supported by the project “Research on carbon compensation mechanism of tourism from the perspective of carbon neutrality: A case study of Tianshan World Natural Heritage Site” (No. 2023YB37).

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

College of Economics and Management, Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang, 641000, China

Institute of Finance and Economics, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, 200433, China

Changjiang Xiong

College of Economics and Management, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, 830052, China

Qianna Li & Juan Yao

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Validation, Writing-original draft. Q.L. Super-vision, Writing-original draft. C.X. Super-vision, Writing-review and editing. J.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changjiang Xiong .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Li, Q., Xiong, C. & Yao, J. A study of the evolutionary game of carbon offset involving tourism stakeholders under incentive and constraint mechanisms. Sci Rep 14 , 14935 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65964-8

Download citation

Received : 08 November 2023

Accepted : 25 June 2024

Published : 28 June 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65964-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Evolutionary game
• Local government
• Tourism firms

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines . If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

The New Equation

Tech powered

27th CEO Survey

Perspectives in Risk

Loading Results

No Match Found

Future-proofing talent to deliver sustainable growth in the GCC

• Publication
• 3 minute read
• July 01, 2024

Bridging the Middle East's skills gap demands urgent upskilling initiatives. Organisations must adopt concerted strategies, such as capability assessments, to navigate this challenge.

Despite recent geo-political headwinds and slower global growth rates, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries have remained remarkably resilient. With ambitious national agendas in place, transformation remains front and centre in the region, driven by expansion in the non-oil sectors and a robust demand in tourism, real estate, transportation, and manufacturing.

The profound effects of massive transformation programmes, as demonstrated by KSA Vision 2030, UAE Vision 2031, and Qatar Vision 2030, combined with accelerating technological and demographic change, have led to a shortage of skilled individuals. Leaders recognise that having well-equipped individuals, with the right skills, at the right time and in the right positions is essential for the region’s sustainable prosperity. Organisations also acknowledge that a skills shortage can pose multiple risks to achieving their strategic objectives, such as delivery delays on major transformation programmes, and compromised delivery quality resulting in subpar outcomes.

Currently, there’s a stark mismatch between skills people have and those required for driving transformation at all levels in the region. This may be due to tight project deadlines that limit opportunities for upskilling, the absence of customised training programmes for the region, challenges faced by educational institutions in adapting to rapid changes, hindering their ability to prepare new generations with necessary skills, and the lack of tools and mechanisms for organisations to measure and address the capability gap effectively. 

In the last six years, PwC Middle East assessed over 10,000 employees across more than 20 public sector organisations in the GCC region, and the results revealed notable gaps and significant opportunities for intervention.

of total employees assessed, had the required level of capabilities to operate in their roles, with the remaining requiring upskilling in order to carry on their day-to-day activities effectively, and contribute to achieving their organisations’ strategic objectives. This implies that almost three-quarters of employees in these organisations lacked the skills for their roles, and without intervention, this gap would only widen over time.

Capability assessment as a driver for upskilling

Capability assessment can be a powerful driver for upskilling within organisations. By effectively assessing the skills, competencies, and potential of employees, leaders can identify areas where upskilling is needed to enhance individual and collective performance, and ensure development is focused on the right areas. 

It can help identify employees with high potential for growth and advancement within the organisation. By evaluating critical skills, employers can identify individuals who have the capacity to take on more challenging roles in the future. This insight can guide upskilling efforts by focusing on high-potential employees, preparing them for leadership and specialised roles.

Furthermore, capability assessment can provide valuable data to inform strategic workforce planning. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the current workforce, leaders can align upskilling efforts with the strategic goals of the organisation. This ensures that upskilling is not only driven by individual needs, but also supports the overall vision and objectives of the business.

Once capability assessment has identified the areas in which employees need upskilling, organisations can implement targeted upskilling programmes to develop the necessary skills and competencies. 

Capability assessment can support a culture of continuous learning and development. By regularly assessing employee skills and competencies, employers communicate the value of ongoing learning and create an environment where employees are encouraged to pursue upskilling opportunities. This helps create a workforce that is adaptable and proactive in acquiring new skills, ultimately contributing to the overall agility, competitiveness, and success of the organisation.

Case Study: Future-proofing KSA Leaders to achieve transformational objectives

In 2022, a KSA governmental entity launched a transformation initiative that aimed at revisiting its mandate, revamping its strategy, and operating model. Prior to implementing the new strategy and operating model, the leadership at this government entity wanted to forecast and identify skills required to undertake this change and provide its leaders with an equal opportunity to upskill themselves and increase their readiness for the transformation programme. A high-level leadership development approach was set to understand the current leadership capabilities, identify gaps and development areas, and develop targeted high-impact development journeys that would bridge the gaps efficiently and effectively. 

Once the high-level approach was agreed upon, the PwC team went on a thorough research journey to detail the approach. Subsequently, this resulted in the creation of a niche assessment and upskilling model relieving the organisation from the cost and time burdens associated with individually assessing all its leaders (almost 5000 employees at that time). This innovative approach is what is called the “ organisational-level assessment approach. ”

The organisational-level assessment approach used statistical methods, ensuring that a study conducted on a random sample of 600 participants , with a confidence level of 95% and a margin of error of 4%, could reliably represent the entire population. 

This initiative started with the identification of the random sample size and composition, ensuring that the random sample includes participants of different managerial levels, backgrounds, and sectors. Subsequently, the most critical competencies for the transformation programme were identified. These were then used as a cornerstone for the capability assessment exercise in which the participants’ capabilities were assessed against. Furthermore, these were used to identify the upskilling journeys at a later stage of the initiative.

To conduct the assessments, a full-fledged capability assessment centre had to be established, layouts were designed and selected for the assessment centre. It was equipped with the technological enablers needed to make the capability assessment a success. Furthermore, a mix of capability assessment tools were selected, through a rigorous market study that analysed the advantages and disadvantages of the tools available in the market.

Once the assessment process started,  each leader attended an assessment session. The assessment tools used included technical interviews, group case studies, and psychometric tests. Each tool assessed a set of critical competencies and multiple data points were gathered for each competency, enhancing the accuracy of collected data.

After conducting the capability assessment, results for the sample were analysed, and insights were driven around major capability gaps for the population as a whole, and at an organisational level. After the capability gaps were prioritised based on size and complexity, upskilling journeys were created for each managerial level to bridge the gaps and increase leaders’ readiness for the transformation programme, with the readiness estimated to increase from 60% to 90%.

Challenges when Leveraging Capability Assessments for Upskilling

As mentioned in this report, upskilling initiatives using capability assessment can reap great benefits when conducted correctly. However, when these initiatives fail to deliver according to plan, they can lead to a loss in time and money.

Having an unclear purpose

Difficulty selecting capability assessment tools

Navigating logistical challenges

The choice of specialised assessors

Lack of or inaccuracy of employee data

Maintaining confidentiality of assessment results

Delay in utilising results in decision-making

Join the movement

As the region transitions to a knowledge economy, organisations have a significant role in prioritising workplace upskilling. Despite efforts by educational and training institutions to bridge the gap, there is still a distance to cover. Employees are increasingly looking to their employers to provide essential training for future readiness.

At PwC Middle East, we have helped organisations across the region in making accurate talent management decisions by establishing assessment centres and evaluating more than 10,000 employees across the public sector. Through the transfer of knowledge to their respective teams, we have taken necessary measures to ensure the longevity and sustainability of these centres beyond our involvement. Our collaboration with PwC’s Academy Middle East has also helped develop and deliver targeted training programmes, providing end-to-end solutions.

Additionally, our EMEA initiative to set up the Centre for Transformative Leadership, which we launched in 2023, will help us draw on the knowledge from International experts to develop region-specific solutions. This initiative will facilitate knowledge exchange and collective effort to address the upskilling challenge, paving the way for improved leadership capabilities and enhanced organisational performance across the region.”

Eyhab Abdeen Middle East People & Organisation Leader

Find out more about these challenges and how to overcome them in our report

If you would like to find out more about what we at PwC are doing. Get in touch.

Eyhab Abdeen

Middle East Workforce Partner, Dubai, PwC Middle East

Sarah AlTayeh

Middle East Workforce Transformation, Senior Manager, PwC Middle East

© 2017 - 2024 PwC. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the PwC network and/or one or more of its member firms, each of which is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details.

• Cookie policy
• About site provider