bridgestone golf balls tour b330

Get plugged in…

Bridgestone Tour B330, B330-S, B3330-RX, B330-RXS Golf Ball Review

More in accessories:.

50 Words or Less

The most complete line up of Tour-level golf balls on the market.  An option for every swing speed and player preference.

Introduction

When I say that Bridgestone’s Tour B330 family is the most complete in the game, it’s not hyperbole, it’s fact.  What other line up has a ball that perfectly fits PGA Tour winners like Matt Kuchar and Brandt Snedeker, LPGA winners like Paula Creamer and Karrie Webb, as well as the thousands of recreational golfers who buy them in pro shops every week?  By offering a matrix of fitting options for high and low spin and high and low swing speed players, Bridgestone is assured that every golfer can be fit into a Tour B330 ball.

Each ball in the Tour B330 family has a unique feel.  The B330 is the firmest, with a nice “thock” off the putter.  The softest is the B330-RXS which comes off with a more mushy, buttery “thud.”  The B330-S and B330-RX have distinct feels, but it’s hard to definitively say which is softer.  The B330-RX feels similar to the B330, but just marginally softer.  The B330-S has more of a “thud” like the B330-RXS, but just a touch firmer.

In all honesty, if you like any ball in this family, you could probably be happy playing any other ball.  Each one is easily recognizable as a first-tier tour ball, and it’s only on close examination that you can pinpoint the differences in sound and feel between each one.

For long game testing, I hit each ball on a launch monitor with a driver, hybrid, and a long iron.  What I found was perfectly in line with my expectations and past experience with the Bridgestone Tour B330 series.  The B330 was the lowest spinning and firmest.  It’s the ball that’s designed for the big hitter who wants maximum distance.  For me, the B330-S spun just slightly more and was nearly equal to the B330-RX.  The B330-RXS spun the most and had the softest feel off the long clubs.

In terms of ball speed, the difference between the standard and RX models was negligible for me.  However, I’m a poor example of the differences between the two types as my swing speed is very near the dividing line of 105 MPH.  For players with swing speeds substantially above that threshold, ball speeds should be higher with the B330 and B330-S.  I had some players with slower swing speeds (90MPH and below) try these balls with their drivers and they got significantly better returns from the RX and RXS.

In the short game, the “S” balls really separated themselves from the B330 and B330-RX: both spun measurably more on full and partial wedge shots.  Though the difference was clear on the launch monitor, it was less noticeable on the course.  The B330-S definitely feels softer and checked up a little faster than the B330, but it was not as if one spun back and the other ran out.

If you’re a skilled player, I would recommend judging the short game ability of these balls on feel as much as launch monitor spin numbers because any of these balls is more than capable of performing any short game shot.  Though the B330-S and B330-RXS did post higher spin numbers, players who prefer a firmer feel off their wedges should opt for the B330 and B330-RX.

Who This Ball Is For

Anyone who wants to play a Tour ball but doesn’t want to compromise on distance.  There’s a ball in this line up for every player, from the high speed, high spin bomber (B330) to the lower speed player who wants every last RPM (B330-RXS).

To find the perfect Tour B330 model for you, Bridgestone offers a couple of good options.    To find a free, live fitting, check out their calendar of events ( HERE ) to see if they’re coming to your area.  If you can’t make it to an in person fitting, there’s the online Golf Ball Selection Guide ( HERE ) which is pretty slick.  You input some basic information (driver distance, average score, etc) and, based on their fitting database (250,000+ fittings and counting), they make 3 recommendations.  Next to each recommendation, they display the percentage of golfers like you who were fit into each ball.  The online tool fit me to my favorite Tour B330 model, the Tour B330-S.

If you want a tour caliber golf ball that will let you dial in exactly the feel and amount of spin you want in addition to being fit for your swing speed, the Bridgestone Tour B330 family is your best option.  No other golf balls deliver tour performance for amateur-level swing speeds like the B330-RX and B330-RXS, and you need look no further than the hottest golfer on the planet, Matt Kuchar, to see how well the B330-S performs on the world’s biggest stage.

Buy Bridgestone Golf Balls HERE

Recent posts.

• Sub 70 Pro V2 Fairway Wood Review - May 16, 2024
• ARETERA Alpha One Series Shaft Review - May 15, 2024
• Matt Saternus What’s In The Bag 2024 - May 15, 2024

20 Comments

Hi there Matt,

I have been playing whatever ball I could find and now want to start using one ball exclusively. Obviously, the Pro V1 / V1x have been recommended, but I don’t like the price tag. Would you say these Bridgestones (esp B330 and B330S), if properly fit, are the same in performance?

The Bridgestones are every bit as good as the Titleists.

Matt, could you give me more info/specs on then B330RX versus the RX S model balls. (Is Bridgestone still making the “S”?

The main differences are feel and a small amount of short game spin. I would just play the one you like the feel of.

Yes, the S is still in the line up.

Thanks, Matt. ( So “S” is for spin not “soft”….can be confusing these days.)

Is there a difference between the Bridgestone RXS’s that have the name “Bridgestone Golf” vs. the “B” logo? I’ve bought both online and they are in the same new packaging. Both claim to be 2016/2017 version.

I haven’t seen any of the new versions with “Bridgestone Golf” on the ball, but I would tend to trust the packaging (that they’re all the same ball) assuming they were bought from somewhere reputable.

Which ball is comparable to the e7? TrueType disappointed that they are becoming hard to purchase.

There’s nothing in the B330 line that I would compare to the e7. They’re two very different lines of balls.

Follow-up to my May 7th question: According to Bridgestone, the B330RXS”s that I’ve purchased in the same new 2016/2017 packaging are the SAME ball with different printing. At some point the older “Bridgestone Golf” lettering was changed to the new “B” logo. The balls are the same.

Thanks for the info!

I have been using the “S” ball for years and I love it. I have yet to try the “RXS” however. As far as distance off the tee goes, would you say the “S” ball is longer than the “RXS?” I’m a fairly long hitter but sometimes have trouble having spin on my short irons. So I’m thinking about giving the “RXS” a try.

Whether the S or RXS is longer depends on how it fits the individual. The only way to know is to try a sleeve for yourself.

What is the difference in tour rxs (new red box) and Rxs (silver box) both have the “B’ logo not the “bridgestone”. I was looking for the silver box but could only find the older box with the “bridgstone” logo. So I bought the red box that says Tour Rxs and does not spin on greens as well for me.

It seems like you’re referring to the Tour B: https://pluggedingolf.com/bridgestone-tour-b-x-tour-b-xs-tour-b-rx-tour-b-rxs-golf-ball-review/

Hey Matt, Thanks for all your good info man. I like how you mad it so simple to read and understand. I have one question. Can you let me demo a sleeve of the rxs b330’s? If I like them I will buy two dozen?

I don’t have any RXS left. I’m sure you can buy a sleeve at your local golf shop, though.

I would like a comparison between the B and the B330 lines, please. Do each have the same amount and pattern of dimples? The 330 line is less expensive, I think because I do not believe they have a urethane cover. Please advise.

The B330 line is the older version of what is now called the Tour B, that’s why it’s less money. Both are urethane covered. I’m not sure about the dimple patterns.

I really benefited from here through ths good post, thanks

Leave a Comment Cancel

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Address

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• FootJoy Pro/SLX BOA Golf Shoes Review
• Sub 70 Pro V2 Fairway Wood Review
• Golf News – May 15, 2024
• ARETERA Alpha One Series Shaft Review
• Matt Saternus What’s In The Bag 2024

Contact Us Advertise Subscribe

Advertise on this site.

Plugged In Golf

Do You Like Free Golf Gear?

Sign up for our weekly newsletter and not only will you get the latest reviews, instruction, and more delivered directly to your inbox, you’ll also be entered into regular giveaways for golf clubs and more.

The Sand Trap

Golf News, Reviews, and Commentary

Bridgestone Tour B330 Series Ball Review

We take a look at Bridgestone’s new like of Tour B330 golf balls, designed with everyone in mind.

Share this with your golf buddies:

• Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Bridgestone’s dedication to innovation has put them at the forefront of technological advancements, and they are often the first to come out with new ideas in the golf ball industry. Although they aren’t always at the top of the “Buzz” column, they consistently put out quality golf balls that are poised to compete with new offerings from the likes of TaylorMade, Nike, and Titleist.

Bridgestone currently offers two main line of golf ball: the Tour B330 line, and the “e” line, in addition to their xFIXx golf ball. The Tour B330 line consists of four different golf balls, with each one fitting a different type of golfer. The Tour B330 line further breaks down into the regular B330 group, and the B330-RX group, which offer golfers of all swing speeds a tour-quality urethane-covered golf ball that promises unmatched performance. Bridgestone is the truly only manufacturer to cater to golfers of all levels. Technology and Design The oldest and arguably most important piece of design behind all of the Tour B330 series is the 330 Seamless Cover Technology. SCT is designed to reduce drag during initial elevation, and hold the ball in the air for a longer time. The seamless design covers the entire golf ball, which results in pinpoint accuracy and added distance. The design of the ball’s cover also is made to encourage a penetrating ball flight that is less affected by the wind. This year’s Tour B330 golf balls also feature a new deconstructed cover that features a new dimple pattern and a softer urethane material.

The Tour B330 and Tour B330-S also feature Bridgestone’s new RD10 resin mantle layers. The RD10 material is built to increase short game spin while simultaneously increasing distance. In fact, 2010 PGA Tour money leader Matt Kuchar played much of last year with a prototype version of this gall ball. The RD10 design also features Gradational Hardness Layering, which aids in increased power transfer between layers and better distance. Now let’s take a look in to how Bridgestone’s B330 series fits the needs of every golfer.

Tour B330 and Tour B330-S The Tour B330 and the Tour B330-S are made for professional level swing speeds, specifically for those who swing the driver over 105 MPH. Both golf balls have four layers, including a Gradational Core, an inner and outer RD10 resin mantle, and a seamless cover. Between the B330 and the B330-S, the B330 is the distance ball, similar to the Titleist ProV1x, the Srixon Z-Star X, the Nike 20XI-X, and the Callaway Tour i(z). The B330 is the spinier golf ball, in line with the Titleist ProV1, the Srixon Z-Star, the Nike 20XI-S, and the Callaway Tour i(s).

Tour B330-RX and Tour B330-RXS The Tour B330-RX and the Tour B330-RXS models are made for those with swings speeds under 105 MPH, which, given that the average golfer’s swing speed is only about 85 MPH, includes most people. Both models are three-piece balls, with a Gradational Core, a mantle later, and seamless cover. The B330-RX and the B330-RXS are really in a field of their own. While many golf ball companies offer golf balls made for slightly-less-than-professional swing speeds (Nike One Vapor, Titleist NXT, Taylor Made Burner Tour, Callaway HX Diablo Tour), they all have ionomer (the generic name for Surlyn) covers, and sacrifice spin and performance for durability and price.

In a move that I am very excited about, Bridgestone also offers the Tour B300-RX in “Optic Yellow,” which is supposed to be much easier to track against the sky, and more visible lying in the grass. You might catch a little heat from your buddies for playing a yellow golf ball, but when you stop that ball on a dime from 200 yards out with your brightly colored B330-RX, they’ll shut up.

Distance and Spin I’ve long struggled to find the golf ball that fit me best, as I find the tradeoff between greenside spin and distance a tough one to make. Recently it was Prov1 vs. ProV1X, before that it was Taylor Made TP Red vs. Taylor Made TP Black, and before that Nike One Black vs. Nike One Platinum. Until last year, that is, when the Taylor Made Penta TP found a permanent spot in my bag. For me it had the greenside abilities of a high-spin ball, and the distance of a low-spin ball. Taylor Made actually removing the decision of picking between two balls seemed to help my game and gave me a nice peace of mind. Thanks to Bridgestone, however, I’ve learned that “decision” doesn’t have to mean “tradeoff.”

The first box I cracked open was the plain, old Tour B330. These are the low-spin, distance balls for the fast swingers. If I had to guess which of the four balls would be best for me, I would pick these. I tend to hit down on the ball excessively, which is great with my irons, but it robs my driver of a lot of distance. Because of that, I get significantly more distance with lower spin balls, like the ProV1X. Going in I was expecting this to be the longest of the four balls for me, and man was I right. The Tour B330 was just taking off on me with my driver and my irons. In fact, I gained about half of a club over my usual Penta, and with my driver I was hammering the ball past my usual spots on the fairways.

As expected, the green-grabbing power of the Tour B330-S (which I tried out next) is far superior. I have to say though; I was slightly disappointed with the spin with both golf balls. Don’t get me wrong, I could get them to check up nicely and on pitch shots, but they don’t have quite the same spin as some other balls on the market. I don’t want to overstate this though- if the ProV1’s spin is a 100, the Tour B330-S is a 98. I doubt most people would notice a difference, but in my experience, there is one. On the plus side though, the B330-S balls are also crazy long. Not only is the Tour B330 longer than the other balls out there, the Tour B330-S is too. The B330-S, a high-spin ball, was longer for me than most low-spin balls. As it should be, the B330-S is shorter than the B330, but, man, both are long.

Next I tried out the B330-RX. The RX and the RXS are both designed for golfers with swing speeds under 105 MPH, and my swing speed is usually just over 105, so it wasn’t a stretch for me to test out these golf balls. According to Bridgestone, the B330-RX are B330-RXS are supposed to be much softer than their tour-level counterparts. Distance numbers will vary as well, based on which ball fits you best.

For me, the B330-RX and the B330-RXS didn’t fit as well as the tour-level balls, they were just a bit shorter. Not a lot, about 10 yards with the driver and half of a club with my irons, but enough to notice. Since the B330 and the B330-S were longer than most balls on the market, the B330-RX and B330-RXS were on par with the other golf balls out there. Take that with a grain of salt though, because the B330-RX and B330-RXS are designed for lower swing speeds. For people with an average swing speed, the RX and RXS should be longer than the B330 and B330S and most other urethane balls on the market. Basically, if you find the right ball for you among these four, one or two of them will be long, probably longer than anything else you are going to find.

The B330-RX and B330-RXS do also fall a tiny bit short in the iron spin category, like the B330 and B330-S. Similar to the tour-level balls, it’s not a huge difference, but it is one that I think some people will notice. Luckily, these balls are meant for slower swingers, who aren’t likely to expect to suck golf balls back on the green anyway. In fact, given the fact that their competition is mostly ionomer-covered golf balls, the people that these balls fit best will probably find them to be loaded with spin.

Short Game and Putting With golf balls, there are three aspects to feel: with the irons and woods, with the wedges, and with the putter. Off the long clubs, if you stick to the balls that fit your swing speed, you’ll get great feel. When you start to stray is where you run into some trouble, though that is to be expected. If you swing fast enough for the B330 and B330-S, the B330-RX or B330-RXS are just going to feel mushy, and if you should be playing the B330-RX or B330-RXS, the B330 and B330-S are going to feel a bit to firm for you, especially the B330. But if you play the correct golf ball, the feeling of perfectly matched steel on urethane is pure heaven.

Around the greens, the story is similar. For better players, those who hit down on the ball and make crisp contact, you are going to want to stick with the tour-level balls. But, if you sometimes struggle around the greens to make contact on the middle of the face, the RX and RXS will be right up your alley feel-wise. In both cases, however, the “S” model is softer than its counterpart. All four of the models feel good (it’s hard to find a urethane ball that you can’t say that about), but to find the one that feel best is all about finding the ball that fits you best.

As I mentioned earlier, these balls are slightly lacking in the spin category. To put it in a simple way, the B330 and the B330-RX on a simple, flat pitch shot are both “hop, hop, hop, stop,” while the B330-S and the B330-RXS are both “hop, and stop.” The non-“S” models are both easier to hit bump and runs with, but if you like to fly the ball to the hole and are asking it to stop on a dime, the “S” models are right for you. But, like I mentioned above, because these are competing with ionomer-covered golf balls, most people who these balls fit will be very impressed with how much they spin.

Because they are all three- or four-piece balls with urethane covers, all of them perform admirably with the flatstick. They all have that soft, smooth feel that we have all come to expect with urethane, and the clicking sound that comes with ionomer is completely absent. While that is no big deal for the B330 and B330-S, because the RX and the RXS compete almost exclusively with ionomer-covered balls, they have a huge advantage.

I do have one gripe though. I like to draw a black Sharpie line through the alignment line on the side of the golf ball. Unfortunately, the “Tour B330” logo on the side of the golf ball is a little bulky, and a Sharpie line wasn’t quite thick enough to cover up the entire logo. In addition, many people like the arrows that some companies put next to the logo, but these golf balls are completely devoid of said arrows. A small issue indeed, but one that some people will notice.

Durability To be honest, I don’t expect a whole lot when it comes to durability. If I’m playing in a tournament, I’ll make sure to buy a fresh batch of golf balls and switch them out every few holes, but if I’m just playing for fun, which is most of the time, a little scuff mark doesn’t really get to me. That said, everyone wants to get the most out of their purchases, and the more durable a golf ball is, the longer it lasts before it must be relegated to the shag-bag. For me, ProV1s and Pentas last about a half-dozen holes before they’re scuffed them up enough that it’s worth it to take them out of play.

I should preface this by saying that I play irons that comply to the new USGA Condition of Competition that limits grooves, but I was quite impressed by just how long these golf balls lasted. I’ve played quite a few rounds and made several visits to the practice green since receiving these golf balls, and though I’ve been diligent in swapping them out to keep them fresh, I haven’t had to take a single ball out of play due to excessive scuffing.

Color The B330-RX are available in Optic Yellow, and it was my pleasure to get to try some of those as well. I have pretty decent eyesight, so seeing the ball land in the fairway (or OB, or in the water) is not my problem, but sometimes tracking the ball against the sky, especially when it’s either really sunny or completely overcast, can be tough.

This is where these balls excel. To be honest, it’s not a stretch to buy the B330-RX just for the color. It surprised me, that’s for sure. I grew up whacking brightly colored yellow and orange Top Flites around my backyard and hacking it around on the range, so I had some good mojo going into it, but man was I surprised at how much I liked the yellow. I could see the ball against the backdrop of a grey and rainy sky and most importantly, I could see it in the rough. Yellow doesn’t seem like a brilliant color to pick out of deep grass, it is closer to green than white is after all, but you’d be surprised. I have to admit that there might be a bit of an issue with in the fall here in the northeastern U.S. (lots of yellow leaves), but in the summer the yellow balls are just so much faster to find. And, here’s the great thing, you will never play the wrong ball again (unless colored golf balls really take off).

I might not go so far as to play these in tournaments or with a business partner I am trying to impress (though it would be an interesting conversation starter), but by myself or paired up with some random golfers at a muni these will see some major time. My only wish is that Bridgestone offers the rest of their models in Optic Yellow. I’m sure Bridgestone is playing to the expected consumers of the yellow balls, but it would be nice to see them bring the advantages of Optic Yellow to the rest of their line.

Conclusion No matter what type of game you play, Bridgestone has a golf ball for you. Serious players looking to compete at the highest level should check out the Tour B330 or Tour B330-S. Average swingers looking to still get a little grab around the green qualify for the Tour B330-RX or Tour B330-RXS. Need a little help finding your golf balls in the tall grass? The Tour B330-RX in Optic Yellow is you best bet. If you prefer to play pitch shots that fly to the hole and stop on a dime, the Tour B330-S or Tour B330-RXS should be right up you alley. Need to play bump and run shots around the greens? The Tour B330 or Tour B330-RX will give you the flexibility to do so. They really have everyone covered.

I’m not someone who switches equipment everyday (I still play an r7 SuperQuad driver), so for me to make such a quick jump to a new golf ball is really saying something. If you like to have the utmost control over your golf game, premium balls are the way to go. While for some people they might be too expensive (it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to play a $4 ball if you are going to lose two balls per hole), everyone else owes it to themselves to find the golf ball that is right for you.

12 thoughts on “Bridgestone Tour B330 Series Ball Review”

I picked up 12 dozen 330 rx off of Bidding for Good site. Less than $30 per dozen. I have played Pro V’s for a while. My swing speed has fallen off a little and my driver speed is 100-102. I find the rx very much same as Pro V. I play to single digit but more based on great short game vs pure striking. So while a harder longer ball might help my distance I need a little spin around greens as I miss so many. Bridgestone has very active ball testing at shows and ranges. The article has me thinking I need to try out the regular tour 330. Thank You Great article.

• Pingback: Around the web | alexking.org

I play yellow 330 RX because I hit it so far I cannot see where it landed!!??? Jokes aside. A very good ball and a very comparable with Srixon Z Star XV. I think, the colour is better with Bridgestone.

I went out last night and picked up a dozen of the Tour B330’s and the E 6’s. I haven’t used them on the course yet however, I’ve done some putting with both the B330’s and the E 6’s I’ve noticed off the putter that the E 6’s have a softer feel much more preferred for my stroke style. Lastly, correct me if my information is inaccurate but I have learned that Titleist has stolen a lot of design information off bridgestone’s balls. Cant wait to use the B330’s and the E 6’s on the course—further reviews/comments are to be made 🙂

I may need to revisit the Bridgestone path. I tried their balls last year. In fact, I’ve tried pretty much every tour ball apart from the Callaway and the Penta. I got a dozen (6 Tour S, 6 RXS because of their pricepoint) and to be honest, I dropped a little in distance across the board. Side by side, they were consistently shorter than the ProV1x, and I lost about half a club on my irons which on our small greens is the difference between being on or being short. After trying everything (both Z-Stars, Nike etc), I always come back to the ProV1x. Yeah, its a little more expensive, but only $10 or so more a box. WHen I run out, I might try the Bridgys again. My driver speed fluctuates though. If Im swinging good on the day, its usually just over 105, but can be down around the 98-100 mark. HOw do I know this, I’ve spent plenty of time on trackman.

I’ve read several of your golf ball reviews and tend to agree with your assessments. So you actually did replace the Pro V1x in your bag with the Penta? I also like the Penta, and picked up a few dozen (buy 2 get 1 free). I’ve been going back and forth b/w them and the V1x. I like variety.

I agree westcosting89….to me the E6 is the softest feeling ball off the putter (disclosure – I have not tried the B330 RxS ball). Strange sense it is a Surlyn cover…..

With SS around 105 mph, I was just at the S-RX border. I decided to take both to the course to make up my mind.

Driving, the RX was a little bit longer, 5 yds at most. I carry ~240 yds. Irons, the RX was also a little longer, but not more than 2 yds on an 8-iron.

For chipping: no noticeable difference.

Where I saw the most difference was in feel: – in irons, the S felt a little harder, I was getting the mushy feel mentionned in the revieview with the RX, not the S – in putting, I much preferred the RX. Difficult to put words on it, but it feels softer and I think this encourages a very sweet pass through the ball – as it does on irons.

So in the end, I went for the RX.

I looked into this article in interest as i want to try the rx this season and see if i can get a bit less sidespin and more distance, but still keep the decent amt of spin i produce. ….however….OP does not fit the RX line and is more across the line onto the premium tour models… …soooo…i would have liked two authors for a change…i know each article is always one person..but having the op test the higher spin balls…while the other did the slower swing. otherwise reading an opinion on rx line from someone at the higher swing speed threshold is moot. would have loved to hear lower swing speed comments on its results. hopefully more sand trappers will comment to help me.

• Pingback: TaylorMade Penta TP5 Golf Ball Review (Balls, Review) - The Sand Trap

The B330-S is shorter than the “Costco” Callaway Hex Warbird by 10 yards. Bridgestone told me that the B330-S is called a “spin” ball, and you should expect a 10 yard or more loss of distance off the tee.

Up to the 8i they seem to perform about the same distance-wise.

However, the B330-S works much better for 105mph swing speed which promted me to call Bridgestone.

They are great balls, and they seem to do the job pretty well.

I will probably look into the RX and the S-RX balls when I purchase some balls.

I have a dozen 330S and a dozen Titleist Vx1s in my bag. The spin on the 330S is unquestionably the best I’ve ever seen. A solid strike from 40 yards with my LW checks up like the thing was dropped from a helicopter. I’ll sacrifice 5 yards off the tee for short game performance like that. So reliable around the greens.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

Notify me of new posts by email.

Review: Bridgestone B330 & B330-s Balls

  I decided that I would use their online fitting survey to pick the ball for me.  After inputting all my information, it spit out that I should be playing the …..(I’ll tell you at the end)

 Bridgestone has a wide variety of balls for various swing speeds and swing needs.  I’ve played Bridgestone balls before and I knew that I needed either the B330 or the B330-S.  My swing speed is too high for the B-330 RX or RXS.  I seemed to over compress those balls and they just didn’t go anywhere for me.  (Great balls for slower swing speeds by the way)

 So I took out the new Tour B-330 to give it a spin.  I noticed instantly that it is a fairly firm ball and really likes high-speed swings to compress.  When the club brings the heat, the ball jumps off its face like a rocket and just goes.  I don’t know if there is a longer ball out there.  I had some very long drives with this ball.  Off the irons it was more of the same, bring the heat, get rewarded, slower swings were kind of hard.  Around the greens the spin was moderate and controllable.  It is on the lower side of premium balls so if you are using non-conforming grooves you will get just the right amount.   The putter found this ball to be just a tad clicky.  It putted well just popped off the face quickly.

 Playing also that day as the B-330S – (a head to head competition).  This one was noticeably softer even off the driver.  It felt like it stayed on the face longer and didn’t need quite the speed to compress.  For my game I found it to be a little straighter, while that may have to do with a more controlled swing too, but either way I found a few more fairways with this one, although it was a few yards behind the B-330.  Off the irons is was a pro, it jumped off with a soft feel and then spun very nicely staying put where I hit it.  Off wedges there was also noticeably more spin, allowing even conforming grooves to spin nicely around the green.  On the putting surface you could once again tell the difference in feel.  It is simply a softer ball.  It felt like it stayed on the putter face longer too because of that soft feel.

   In the head to head competition, the B-330 was longer, firmer and spun less, but I scored better and approached closer with the B-330 S.  I found both balls to be rather durable.  I think the new grooves help, but Bridgestone has always done a good job of making a very durable urethane cover.  The only scuffing came from the cart path, and no ball can withstand that.  While these are the newest version of Bridgestone balls , they aren’t a drastic change from previous versions.  This can be both a positive and a negative.  If you like the older versions, you won’t be disappointed, but if you are looking from some very different you won’t find that either.  The core is said to be a new compound, but to the naked eye you can’t tell.

 I bet you’d never guess which ball Bridgestone’s online fitting suggested—That’s right the B-330 S.  I have a feeling they’ve got this ball fitting down.  If you swing for the fences (and reach them) the B-330 is for you, but for my game the B-330 S is a perfect fit.

Check the price online here

 For more information:  www.bridgestonegolf.com

Quick Hits   +Online Ball Fitting   +Durable   +Variety of ball to fit needs

–Not a major change over previous versions (can be a positive too)

You are now an official member of IGR. Keep an eye out for the perks.

No spam, ever. 🔒

About Us   Submit Your Product Contact

Full Disclosure Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions

© 2024 Independent Golf Reviews

• FAIRWAY WOODS
• ACCESSORIES
• GOLF COURSES

Bridgestone Tour B330 Balls

Bridgestone tour b330 balls .

Bridgestone Tour B330 Golf Balls The Bridgestone Tour B330 Golf Ball features a larger core, softer cover, and Bridgestone's proprietary Dual Dimple technology. The new Dual Dimple offers superior aerodynamics and enhanced wind performance while the larger core produces faster ball speed for longer distance. The urethane cover, now 6% softer than the previous model, also offers enhanced greenside spin control. Additional features: Gradational compression core technology for increased ball speed

USER REVIEWS

An amazingly performing ball even though i don't qualify for the company line of "above 105 mph swing".... Anyway it's not about the speed of swing as it is about the rate of acceleration through the swing. JUST RECENTLY MEASURED I know my iron speed is 87 mph and my driver swing speed is 92 mph. It's a little firmer feeling ball than the ProV at impact but in all other aspects its as good!Its got enough bite and "drops n stops" as well as the ProV too....and it still looks only slightly used after several rounds of play. Kudos to you, Bridgestone!

Great ball. Very similar to the Pro V1. It is the entire package for distance, feel, and durability.

Similar Products Used:

Titleist Pro V1, Callaway Hex Black

In case it matters, I'm a 5 handicap which means I shoot in the 70s AND 80s. So yes, I chose "Shoots in the 70s" cuz it sounds better. :) I'm surprised nobody mentioned the durability of this ball in their reviews. Many of today's high-end golf balls are long while provide some good feel and spin. What this ball has over the ProV1x, for instance, is that it is MUCH more durable. Anytime I hit a ProV with anything near a full sand wedge, it's toast. The B330 barely shows the wear. Sure I don't lose that many golf balls but it doesn't mean I have money to burn. I like being able to play with the same ball all round if I keep it in play. Never can happen with the ProV. Even when pulling some "experienced" water balls out of my bag, the difference is noticeable. And old ProV loses a good club of distance off of a mid-iron while the Bridgestone does not. So this ball makes $$ and sense to use an old cliche. Happy golfing my friends!

Wow ... I don't usually pay too much attention to my golf ball selection, but I played a B330 today, and what a difference. Longer and straigher. I went out and bought two dozen.

I really like this ball because it's kind of like a callaway hx hot, with a lot more bite. When I'm chipping near the green I want my ball to bite, but I still want it to release. I love the pro v1x, but it would bite way to hard at the wrong time and I got tired of the guessing game. When it comes to iron shots it's just like any other tour ball, but off the driver this ball is crazy long.

Ok. I am going to deal with the negative remarks first. have you all noticed you shoot in the 80s, 90s, and 100s? Please take note, I am NOT dissing your ability to play. The thing is, the B330 is meant for TOUR FAST SWING SPEEDS, meaning JB Holmes, Sergio Garcia, Tiger Woods, Phil Mickelson, and other people with HIGH swing speeds. Yes. I know they don't use the B330. But I am giving you an example of the swing speed NEEDED to make this ball perform at its highest. My average club head speed is 114 miles per hour. Yes, this ball is a tad firmer than the Pro V1, but I actually like that. It comes a little hotter off of the face with green side shots, which is also a plus for ME. Good spin control, I can actually control how much it backs up on a LEVEL green. It actually feels like you're hitting something with your driver, which I also like. I'm a HyperAgressive(You low handicappers know what I'm talking about ;]) golfer so I like to feel what I hit. Yet, it retains its great softness and feel with irons and wedges and the putter. If you don't swing of approximately 109 miles per hour, YOU WILL NOT COMPRESS THIS BALL! go with the B330S or the B330RX. Those are fantastic balls as well. Each B330 is designed for a different swing speed, while the E series is for trajectory and swing speed. First, find out your swing speed, then pick the right ball for you. Stop complaining about not being able to compress the ball, not being able to spin it, and losing distance. It's YOUR fault, not the ball's.

Taylormade TP Red and TP Black, Nike One Platinum and Black, Titleist Prov V1 and Prov 1X, Callaway Tour I and IX, Hogan, B330S, E5, E6, Tre Soft(Sp?).

Ordered a dozen of these from lostgolfballs.com on recommendation from a friend and i'm so glad he recommended it. Went and played my home course today and my drives were exploding off the clubhead, giving me a good 15 yards more distance than what i'm used to. I've read that these have players with faster swing speeds in mind, and i fit that category so i can't make recommendations to everyone, but for me, it played well. I got good spin off my wedges; they stuck greens well, gave me all i could ask for. I still prefer the Ben Hogan Apex Tours but for now, this is easier to find, and a good way to go

Customer Service

Ben Hogan Apex Tour, Callaway HX 56, Nike One Platinum, Pro-V1, Wilson Staff Zip, Precept U-tri Tour, Srixon Z-urc, and several others

This is in response to the gentleman below who was complaining about loss of distance with this ball. The B330 has been designed for the fastest swings, typically 110 or even 115mph and more. There's no way that this ball will give optimal performance if, like most, one's swing is in the 90-100 mph range. If this the case, better try the B330S or even the new B330RX.

I was given a dozen for my birthday. I was looking for a Titleist replacement. I have played the ball for a month and have found it less responsive than expected. Supposedly this ball is a tour ball like the Pro V1. It feels harder and does not stop as well as the Pro V1 or even the NXT Tour I have been using. The cover also scuffs easily. I will keep looking for a Titlesis replacement or stay with the NXT Tour.

Titleist NXT Tour; Titleist Pro V1

Took the Bridgestone challenge at the Stanford St. Jude tournament this year. They had a booth set up, so I took a few swings. I used their driver, which was nowhere near the same setup as my own, and hit in front of about 50 people watching, so needless to say the test conditions weren't the best. They recommended this ball, so I got on ebay and got some to try. Typically my distance off the tee is 270 to 300, regardless of the ball. I can usually stop any kind of ball on my approaches, so how did I let myself get talked into a spin ball? Anyway, off the tee I was giving up at least 20 yards with this ball, when I am usually the long hitter of the group. My biggest bash off the tee is now only around 260, which is not acceptable for me. These balls peel easily. If I hit a really crisp short iron shot I could expect to mark the ball. They do check up very nice and are a joy around the green, and the putt very well. If distance is vital to your ego or scorecard, you may try another ball. If you can give up a few dollars and a few yards off the tee, and need some help getting your ball to stop, pick up a few and try them out.

Can't say much for the customer service, but the guy that fitted me at the booth wasn't that friendly.

Every ball ever made.

Hot Deals See All Hot Deals >>

• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

golfreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com

Bridgestone 2022 Tour B RX Golf Ball Review

Our verdict on the Bridgestone 2022 Tour B RX golf ball, which was designed for players with more moderate swing speeds

• Sign up to Golf Monthly Newsletter Newsletter

For golfers with more moderate swing speeds, Bridgestone's Tour B RX golf ball has plenty to offer on the course. It delivers on its promise of distance while also providing the greenside control that golfers expect from a premium golf ball. And it’s as good in the wind as anything we’ve tested.

Impressive distance in the long game

Ample greenside control

Performed well in the wind

Exceptional durability

Maybe not the best fit for high swing speed golfers

Why you can trust Golf Monthly Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test .

With the Bridgestone 2022 Tour B RXS review already in the books, let’s turn our attention to the Tour B RX, which like its stablemate was created as a premium golf ball for players who swing a driver at less than 105 mph. The B RXS was a smashing success for me and my 100 mph driver swing during on-course testing. How did the B RX measure up? Quite well, actually.

In the simplest of terms, while both are among the best Bridgestone golf balls , the B RX would be classified as the “distance” ball and the B RXS as the “spin” ball for golfers with more moderate swing speeds. And from a distance standpoint, the B RX more than held its own during testing I conducted and full rounds I played.

Going up against the B RXS, as well as the TaylorMade TP5x and Titleist Pro V1x , which are the two balls I have played most frequently the last couple of years, the B RX proved to be every bit as long as its competition both off the tee and when hitting full iron shots. 

The Bridgestone Tour B RX golf ball delivered impressive distance and a piercing trajectory off the tee.

The lone difference I saw in the long game between the B RX and the balls I tested it against was that, for me, it produced a noticeably flatter, more penetrating ball flight with the driver. Iron height and stopping power proved to be comparable between all four balls during testing.

In terms of short game performance, the B RX definitely did not spin as much around the greens as the B RXS, and it also delivered a slightly firmer feel on chip and pitch shots. In fairness, however, that should be viewed as a credit to the B RXS, as the B RX was highly competitive in terms of spin and feel when compared to the Pro V1x and I felt it provided similar feel and more greenside control than the TP5x.

I also found that when hitting partial wedge shots with the B RX from a range of roughly 40-70 yards that I had to play for a bit more release when compared to the B RXS, especially on shots played from the rough. The stopping power on those types of shots, however, was similar to the other balls I used during testing.

While the Tour B RX is known for distance, it also performed well around the greens when chipping and pitching.

I’d also add that I really enjoyed the feel of the B RX on the greens. The ball is soft but not too soft in that regard, as you still get some feedback when putting, both in terms of feel and acoustics. It was just a touch firmer than the B RXS in that regard but in a good way in my opinion.

As far as other performance attributes that the Tour B RX offers, like the B RXS, it was excellent in the wind. It was quite breezy on one of the days that I played and the B RX was simply exceptional in terms of ball flight stability, as good as anything I’ve tried in recent years. And as was also the case with the B RXS, the RX’s cover proved to be extremely durable, both in terms of wear and maintaining its color after significant play and practice.

Add it all up and the Tour B RX, which retails for $49.99, scored high marks across the board. For players who are looking for a premium golf ball but don't generate Tour-level speed, it's definitely worth a try. Personally, I would give a slight edge to the B RXS based on the testing I did with both balls, but I could easily game the B RX and imagine that other golfers who conducted similar testing might prefer it over the B RXS. Regardless, both deserve to be considered among the best golf balls on the market today.

Get the Golf Monthly Newsletter

Subscribe to the Golf Monthly newsletter to stay up to date with all the latest tour news, equipment news, reviews, head-to-heads and buyer’s guides from our team of experienced experts.

Chris joined Golf Monthly in February of 2022, becoming the organization’s first full-time staff writer in the United States. In his role at Golf Monthly, Chris reviews a broad spectrum of golf equipment, ranging from the latest in golf clubs to what’s new in the world of golf technology. His vast experience in the game allows him to look beyond the marketing hype to judge the merits of the latest equipment for golfers of all ability levels. As for the trend in golf equipment that Chris has been most impressed with in recent years, the Players Distance Iron category would earn that distinction, as golfers now have far better options for irons that provide the assistance that so many need in terms of distance and forgiveness without forcing them to sacrifice look and feel.

On a personal level, Chris played college golf and was a three-year letterwinner and two-year captain at Lynchburg College in Virginia and later spent two years as the assistant golf coach at the University of Virginia. The vast majority of his professional career, however, has been spent as a sports writer and editor. In the early phases of his career, he covered college football, college basketball, and golf for different newspapers and websites before turning his attention solely to golf in 2011. Over the course of the past decade, Chris managed the Instruction Blog for GolfChannel.com and more recently created equipment-related content for TGW.com and 2ndSwing.com.

An avid player, Chris currently maintains a handicap index of 2.4 and has a career-low round of 66, which he has shot on three occasions. He lives about 20 miles north of Atlanta in Roswell, Georgia, with his wife, Stacey, and is a member at Atlanta National Golf Club.

Chris is currently playing:

Driver: Callaway Epic Sub Zero, 10.5*

Fairway wood : TaylorMade M3, 17*

Hybrid : Callaway Apex UW, 19*

Irons : Mizuno JPX 921 Forged, 4-PW

Gap wedge : Cleveland RTX 4, 50*

Sand wedge : Titleist Vokey SM6, 56M

Lob wedge : Titleist Vokey SM8, 60L

Putter : SeeMore Nashville Z3C

Ball : TaylorMade TP5x 

Zalatoris revealed to The Athletic that there were talks of players going to The PGA of America following the tragic news of a PGA worker passing away

By Matt Cradock Published 17 May 24

The LPGA Tour has explained players have withdrawn because of either injury or illness, and stresses it is monitoring the situation

By Mike Hall Published 17 May 24

The American not only delivered on the course in the second round of the Major but also offered plenty of value in his press conference that followed

• Contact Future's experts
• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Accessibility statement
• Cookies policy
• Advertise with us

Golf Monthly is part of Future plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site . © Future Publishing Limited Quay House, The Ambury, Bath BA1 1UA. All rights reserved. England and Wales company registration number 2008885.

• Order Status
• My Golf Ball Subscription
• Return Policy
• (800) 372-2557
• [email protected]

Bridgestone Tour B330 Golf Balls - 2013 Model

This item is temporarily out of stock. If you would like to be notified when it is back in stock, please enter your email address below

Product Description

• Gradational compression core technology for increased ball speed
• Dual Mantle design for reduced spin and higher launch off the driver and long irons
• Tour proven Urethane cover for excellent greenside control
• 330 dual dimple technology for a consistent flight

Image Unavailable

• To view this video download Flash Player

Bridgestone B330 Tour Mix Golf Golf Balls

Customers also viewed these products.

Product Description

Founded in 1992, PG Golf has been recovering, processing, and marketing pre-owned, used, and recycled golf balls each year to golfers worldwide. PG Golf has the world's largest inventory of the best brands, ready to ship immediately. Rigorous quality control checkpoints guarantee that balls are precisely graded and sorted for sale. 26 years of exceptional service.

Product information

Technical details, additional information, videos for this product.

Click to play video

Bridgestone Tour B RX Golf Balls Demo

Demos and Reviews

Looking for specific info?

Customer reviews.

Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.

To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.

No customer reviews

• Amazon Newsletter
• About Amazon
• Accessibility
• Sustainability
• Press Center
• Investor Relations
• Amazon Devices
• Amazon Science
• Sell on Amazon
• Sell apps on Amazon
• Supply to Amazon
• Protect & Build Your Brand
• Become an Affiliate
• Become a Delivery Driver
• Start a Package Delivery Business
• Advertise Your Products
• Self-Publish with Us
• Become an Amazon Hub Partner
• › See More Ways to Make Money
• Amazon Visa
• Amazon Store Card
• Amazon Secured Card
• Amazon Business Card
• Shop with Points
• Credit Card Marketplace
• Reload Your Balance
• Amazon Currency Converter
• Your Account
• Your Orders
• Shipping Rates & Policies
• Amazon Prime
• Returns & Replacements
• Manage Your Content and Devices
• Recalls and Product Safety Alerts
• Conditions of Use
• Privacy Notice
• Consumer Health Data Privacy Disclosure
• Your Ads Privacy Choices

Things to Do in Monino, Russia - Monino Attractions

Things to do in monino.

• 5.0 of 5 bubbles
• Good for Kids
• Budget-friendly
• Hidden Gems
• Good for Big Groups
• Adventurous
• Good for a Rainy Day
• Good for Couples
• Honeymoon spot
• Good for Adrenaline Seekers
• Things to do ranked using Tripadvisor data including reviews, ratings, photos, and popularity.

1. The Central Air Force Museum

2. Church of St. George

Time in Elektrostal , Moscow Oblast, Russia now

• Tokyo 01:12PM
• Beijing 12:12PM
• Kyiv 07:12AM
• Paris 06:12AM
• London 05:12AM
• New York 12:12AM
• Los Angeles 09:12PM

Time zone info for Elektrostal

• The time in Elektrostal is 8 hours ahead of the time in New York when New York is on standard time, and 7 hours ahead of the time in New York when New York is on daylight saving time.
• Elektrostal does not change between summer time and winter time.
• The IANA time zone identifier for Elektrostal is Europe/Moscow.

Time difference from Elektrostal

Sunrise, sunset, day length and solar time for elektrostal.

• Sunrise: 04:04AM
• Sunset: 08:41PM
• Day length: 16h 37m
• Solar noon: 12:23PM
• The current local time in Elektrostal is 23 minutes ahead of apparent solar time.

Elektrostal on the map

• Location: Moscow Oblast, Russia
• Latitude: 55.79. Longitude: 38.46
• Population: 144,000

Best restaurants in Elektrostal

• #1 Tolsty medved - Steakhouses food
• #2 Ermitazh - European and japanese food
• #3 Pechka - European and french food

Find best places to eat in Elektrostal

• Best dinner restaurants in Elektrostal
• Best fast food restaurants in Elektrostal
• Best vegetarian restaurants in Elektrostal

The 50 largest cities in Russia

• Yekaterinburg
• Novosibirsk
• Vladivostok

• Tours to Russia
• Practicalities
• Russia in Lists

Rusmania • Deep into Russia

Out of the Centre

Savvino-storozhevsky monastery and museum.

Zvenigorod's most famous sight is the Savvino-Storozhevsky Monastery, which was founded in 1398 by the monk Savva from the Troitse-Sergieva Lavra, at the invitation and with the support of Prince Yury Dmitrievich of Zvenigorod. Savva was later canonised as St Sabbas (Savva) of Storozhev. The monastery late flourished under the reign of Tsar Alexis, who chose the monastery as his family church and often went on pilgrimage there and made lots of donations to it. Most of the monastery’s buildings date from this time. The monastery is heavily fortified with thick walls and six towers, the most impressive of which is the Krasny Tower which also serves as the eastern entrance. The monastery was closed in 1918 and only reopened in 1995. In 1998 Patriarch Alexius II took part in a service to return the relics of St Sabbas to the monastery. Today the monastery has the status of a stauropegic monastery, which is second in status to a lavra. In addition to being a working monastery, it also holds the Zvenigorod Historical, Architectural and Art Museum.

Belfry and Neighbouring Churches

Located near the main entrance is the monastery's belfry which is perhaps the calling card of the monastery due to its uniqueness. It was built in the 1650s and the St Sergius of Radonezh’s Church was opened on the middle tier in the mid-17th century, although it was originally dedicated to the Trinity. The belfry's 35-tonne Great Bladgovestny Bell fell in 1941 and was only restored and returned in 2003. Attached to the belfry is a large refectory and the Transfiguration Church, both of which were built on the orders of Tsar Alexis in the 1650s.  

To the left of the belfry is another, smaller, refectory which is attached to the Trinity Gate-Church, which was also constructed in the 1650s on the orders of Tsar Alexis who made it his own family church. The church is elaborately decorated with colourful trims and underneath the archway is a beautiful 19th century fresco.

Nativity of Virgin Mary Cathedral

The Nativity of Virgin Mary Cathedral is the oldest building in the monastery and among the oldest buildings in the Moscow Region. It was built between 1404 and 1405 during the lifetime of St Sabbas and using the funds of Prince Yury of Zvenigorod. The white-stone cathedral is a standard four-pillar design with a single golden dome. After the death of St Sabbas he was interred in the cathedral and a new altar dedicated to him was added.

Under the reign of Tsar Alexis the cathedral was decorated with frescoes by Stepan Ryazanets, some of which remain today. Tsar Alexis also presented the cathedral with a five-tier iconostasis, the top row of icons have been preserved.

Tsaritsa's Chambers

The Nativity of Virgin Mary Cathedral is located between the Tsaritsa's Chambers of the left and the Palace of Tsar Alexis on the right. The Tsaritsa's Chambers were built in the mid-17th century for the wife of Tsar Alexey - Tsaritsa Maria Ilinichna Miloskavskaya. The design of the building is influenced by the ancient Russian architectural style. Is prettier than the Tsar's chambers opposite, being red in colour with elaborately decorated window frames and entrance.

At present the Tsaritsa's Chambers houses the Zvenigorod Historical, Architectural and Art Museum. Among its displays is an accurate recreation of the interior of a noble lady's chambers including furniture, decorations and a decorated tiled oven, and an exhibition on the history of Zvenigorod and the monastery.

Palace of Tsar Alexis

The Palace of Tsar Alexis was built in the 1650s and is now one of the best surviving examples of non-religious architecture of that era. It was built especially for Tsar Alexis who often visited the monastery on religious pilgrimages. Its most striking feature is its pretty row of nine chimney spouts which resemble towers.

Plan your next trip to Russia

Ready-to-book tours.

Your holiday in Russia starts here. Choose and book your tour to Russia.

REQUEST A CUSTOMISED TRIP

Looking for something unique? Create the trip of your dreams with the help of our experts.