why can't we travel at the speed of light

• International edition
• Australia edition
• Europe edition

Why you can't travel at the speed of light

A lbert Einstein is famous for many things, not least his theories of relativity. The first, the special theory of relativity, was the one that began the physicist's reputation for tearing apart the classical worldview that had come before. Special relativity, a way of relating the motion of objects in the universe, led scientists to re-evaluate their assumptions about things as fundamental as time and space. And it led to important revelations about the relationship between energy and matter.

Special relativity was published by Einstein in 1905, in a paper titled "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies". He came to it after picking on a conflict he noticed between the equations for electricity and magnetism, which the physicist James Clerk Maxwell had recently developed, and Isaac Newton's more established laws of motion.

Light, according to Maxwell, was a vibration in the electromagnetic field and it travelled at a constant speed in a vacuum. More than 100 years earlier, Newton had set down his laws of motion and, together with ideas from Galileo Galilei, these showed how the speed of an object would differ depend on who was measuring it and how they were moving relative to the object. A ball you are holding will seem still to you, even when you're in a moving car. But that ball will seem to be moving to anyone standing on the pavement.

But there was a problem in applying Newton's laws of motion to light. In Maxwell's equations, the speed of electromagnetic waves is a constant defined by the properties of the material through which the waves move. There is nothing in there that allows the speed of these waves to be different for different people depending on how they were moving relative to each other. Which is bizarre, if you think about it.

Imagine someone sitting in a stationary train, throwing a ball from where he's sitting to the opposite wall, a few metres further down the train from him. You, standing on the station platform, measure the speed of the ball at the same value as the person on the train.

Now the train starts to move (in the direction of the ball), and you again measure the speed of the ball. You would rightly calculate it as higher – the initial speed (ie, when the train was at rest) plus the forward speed of the train. On the train, meanwhile, the game-player will notice nothing different. Your two values for the speed of the ball will be different; both correct for your frames of reference.

Replace the ball with light and this calculation goes awry. If the person on the train were shining a light at the opposite wall and measured the speed of the particles of light (photons), you and the passenger would both find that the photons had the same speed at all times. In all cases, the speed of the photons would stay at just under 300,000 kilometres per second, as Maxwell's equations say they should.

Einstein took this idea – the invariance of the speed of light – as one of his two postulates for the special theory of relativity. The other postulate was that the laws of physics are the same wherever you are, whether on an plane or standing on a country road. But to keep the speed of light constant at all times and for all observers, in special relativity, space and time become stretchy and variable. Time is not absolute, for example. A moving clock ticks more slowly than a stationary one. Travel at the speed of light and, theoretically, the clock would stop altogether.

How much the time dilates can be calculated by the two equations above. On the right, Δt is the time interval between two events as measured by the person they affect. (In our example above, this would be the person in the train.) On the left, Δt' is the time interval between the same two events but measured by an outside observer in a separate frame of reference (the person on the platform). These two times are related by the Lorentz factor (γ), which in this example is a term that takes into account the velocity (v) of the train relative to the station platform, which is "at rest". In this expression, c is a constant equal to the speed of light in a vacuum.

The length of moving objects also shrink in the direction in which they move. Get to the speed of light (not really possible, but imagine if you could for a moment) and the object's length would shrink to zero.

The contracted length of a moving object relative to a stationary one can be calculated by dividing the proper length by the Lorentz factor – if it were possible for an object to reach the speed of light its length would shrink to zero.

It is important to note that if you were the person moving faster and faster, you would not notice anything: time would tick normally for you and you would not be squashed in length. But anyone watching you from the celestial station platform would be able to measure the differences, as calculated from the Lorentz factor. However, for everyday objects and everyday speeds, the Lorentz factor will be close to 1 – it is only at speeds close to that of light that the relativistic effects need serious attention.

Another feature that emerges from special relativity is that, as something speeds up, its mass increases compared with its mass at rest, with the mass of the moving object determined by multiplying its rest mass by the Lorentz factor. This increase in relativistic mass makes every extra unit of energy you put into speeding up the object less effective at making it actually move faster.

As the speed of the object increases and starts to reach appreciable fractions of the speed of light (c), the portion of energy going into making the object more massive gets bigger and bigger.

This explains why nothing can travel faster than light – at or near light speed, any extra energy you put into an object does not make it move faster but just increases its mass. Mass and energy are the same thing – this is a profoundly important result. But that is another story.

• Albert Einstein
• A short history of equations
• Isaac Newton

More on this story

The ideal gas law – why bubbles expand if you heat them

Sound, light and water waves and how scientists worked out the mathematics

What is the second law of thermodynamics?

What is Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle?

Newton's universal law of gravitation.

What are Maxwell's Equations?

Comments (…), most viewed.

We have completed maintenance on Astronomy.com and action may be required on your account. Learn More

• Login/Register
• Solar System
• Exotic Objects
• Upcoming Events
• Deep-Sky Objects
• Observing Basics
• Telescopes and Equipment
• Astrophotography
• Space Exploration
• Human Spaceflight
• Robotic Spaceflight
• The Magazine

What is the speed of light? Here’s the history, discovery of the cosmic speed limit

On one hand, the speed of light is just a number: 299,792,458 meters per second. And on the other, it’s one of the most important constants that appears in nature and defines the relationship of causality itself.

As far as we can measure, it is a constant. It is the same speed for every observer in the entire universe. This constancy was first established in the late 1800’s with the experiments of Albert Michelson and Edward Morley at Case Western Reserve University . They attempted to measure changes in the speed of light as the Earth orbited around the Sun. They found no such variation, and no experiment ever since then has either.

Observations of the cosmic microwave background, the light released when the universe was 380,000 years old, show that the speed of light hasn’t measurably changed in over 13.8 billion years.

In fact, we now define the speed of light to be a constant, with a precise speed of 299,792,458 meters per second. While it remains a remote possibility in deeply theoretical physics that light may not be a constant, for all known purposes it is a constant, so it’s better to just define it and move on with life.

How was the speed of light first measured?

In 1676 the Danish astronomer Ole Christensen Romer made the first quantitative measurement of how fast light travels. He carefully observed the orbit of Io, the innermost moon of Jupiter. As the Earth circles the Sun in its own orbit, sometimes it approaches Jupiter and sometimes it recedes away from it. When the Earth is approaching Jupiter, the path that light has to travel from Io is shorter than when the Earth is receding away from Jupiter. By carefully measuring the changes to Io’s orbital period, Romer calculated a speed of light of around 220,000 kilometers per second.

Observations continued to improve until by the 19 th century astronomers and physicists had developed the sophistication to get very close to the modern value. In 1865, James Clerk Maxwell made a remarkable discovery. He was investigating the properties of electricity and magnetism, which for decades had remained mysterious in unconnected laboratory experiments around the world. Maxwell found that electricity and magnetism were really two sides of the same coin, both manifestations of a single electromagnetic force.

As Maxwell explored the consequences of his new theory, he found that changing magnetic fields can lead to changing electric fields, which then lead to a new round of changing magnetic fields. The fields leapfrog over each other and can even travel through empty space. When Maxwell went to calculate the speed of these electromagnetic waves, he was surprised to see the speed of light pop out – the first theoretical calculation of this important number.

What is the most precise measurement of the speed of light?

Because it is defined to be a constant, there’s no need to measure it further. The number we’ve defined is it, with no uncertainty, no error bars. It’s done. But the speed of light is just that – a speed. The number we choose to represent it depends on the units we use: kilometers versus miles, seconds versus hours, and so on. In fact, physicists commonly just set the speed of light to be 1 to make their calculations easier. So instead of trying to measure the speed light travels, physicists turn to more precisely measuring other units, like the length of the meter or the duration of the second. In other words, the defined value of the speed of light is used to establish the length of other units like the meter.

How does light slow down?

Yes, the speed of light is always a constant. But it slows down whenever it travels through a medium like air or water. How does this work? There are a few different ways to present an answer to this question, depending on whether you prefer a particle-like picture or a wave-like picture.

In a particle-like picture, light is made of tiny little bullets called photons. All those photons always travel at the speed of light, but as light passes through a medium those photons get all tangled up, bouncing around among all the molecules of the medium. This slows down the overall propagation of light, because it takes more time for the group of photons to make it through.

In a wave-like picture, light is made of electromagnetic waves. When these waves pass through a medium, they get all the charged particles in motion, which in turn generate new electromagnetic waves of their own. These interfere with the original light, forcing it to slow down as it passes through.

Either way, light always travels at the same speed, but matter can interfere with its travel, making it slow down.

Why is the speed of light important?

The speed of light is important because it’s about way more than, well, the speed of light. In the early 1900’s Einstein realized just how special this speed is. The old physics, dominated by the work of Isaac Newton, said that the universe had a fixed reference frame from which we could measure all motion. This is why Michelson and Morley went looking for changes in the speed, because it should change depending on our point of view. But their experiments showed that the speed was always constant, so what gives?

Einstein decided to take this experiment at face value. He assumed that the speed of light is a true, fundamental constant. No matter where you are, no matter how fast you’re moving, you’ll always see the same speed.

This is wild to think about. If you’re traveling at 99% the speed of light and turn on a flashlight, the beam will race ahead of you at…exactly the speed of light, no more, no less. If you’re coming from the opposite direction, you’ll still also measure the exact same speed.

This constancy forms the basis of Einstein’s special theory of relativity, which tells us that while all motion is relative – different observers won’t always agree on the length of measurements or the duration of events – some things are truly universal, like the speed of light.

Can you go faster than light speed?

Nope. Nothing can. Any particle with zero mass must travel at light speed. But anything with mass (which is most of the universe) cannot. The problem is relativity. The faster you go, the more energy you have. But we know from Einstein’s relativity that energy and mass are the same thing. So the more energy you have, the more mass you have, which makes it harder for you to go even faster. You can get as close as you want to the speed of light, but to actually crack that barrier takes an infinite amount of energy. So don’t even try.

How is the speed at which light travels related to causality?

If you think you can find a cheat to get around the limitations of light speed, then I need to tell you about its role in special relativity. You see, it’s not just about light. It just so happens that light travels at this special speed, and it was the first thing we discovered to travel at this speed. So it could have had another name. Indeed, a better name for this speed might be “the speed of time.”

Related: Is time travel possible? An astrophysicist explains

We live in a universe of causes and effects. All effects are preceded by a cause, and all causes lead to effects. The speed of light limits how quickly causes can lead to effects. Because it’s a maximum speed limit for any motion or interaction, in a given amount of time there’s a limit to what I can influence. If I want to tap you on the shoulder and you’re right next to me, I can do it right away. But if you’re on the other side of the planet, I have to travel there first. The motion of me traveling to you is limited by the speed of light, so that sets how quickly I can tap you on the shoulder – the speed light travels dictates how quickly a single cause can create an effect.

The ability to go faster than light would allow effects to happen before their causes. In essence, time travel into the past would be possible with faster-than-light travel. Since we view time as the unbroken chain of causes and effects going from the past to the future, breaking the speed of light would break causality, which would seriously undermine our sense of the forward motion of time.

Why does light travel at this speed?

No clue. It appears to us as a fundamental constant of nature. We have no theory of physics that explains its existence or why it has the value that it does. We hope that a future understanding of nature will provide this explanation, but right now all investigations are purely theoretical. For now, we just have to take it as a given.

How do you find a black hole? An astronomer explains the thrilling hunt

2024 Full Moon calendar: Dates, times, types, and names

The science behind the ‘spiders’ on Mars and the Inca City

Planets on parade: This Week in Astronomy with Dave Eicher

The Milky Way, to ancient Egyptians, was probably mixed Nuts

The reasons why numbers go on forever

Astronomy Magazine Annual Index

How to see the next 20 years of eclipses, including the eclipse of a lifetime

IceCube researchers detect a rare type of particle sent from powerful astronomical objects

Why is the speed of light the way it is?

It's just plain weird.

Paul M. Sutter is an astrophysicist at SUNY Stony Brook and the Flatiron Institute, host of Ask a Spaceman and Space Radio , and author of " How to Die in Space ." He contributed this article to Space.com's Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights . 

We all know and love the speed of light — 299,792,458 meters per second — but why does it have the value that it does? Why isn't it some other number? And why do we care so much about some random speed of electromagnetic waves? Why did it become such a cornerstone of physics? 

Well, it's because the speed of light is just plain weird.

Related: Constant speed of light: Einstein's special relativity survives a high-energy test

Putting light to the test

The first person to realize that light does indeed have a speed at all was an astronomer by the name of Ole Romer. In the late 1600s, he was obsessed with some strange motions of the moon Io around Jupiter. Every once in a while, the great planet would block our view of its little moon, causing an eclipse, but the timing between eclipses seemed to change over the course of the year. Either something funky was happening with the orbit of Io — which seemed suspicious — or something else was afoot.

After a couple years of observations, Romer made the connection. When we see Io get eclipsed, we're in a certain position in our own orbit around the sun. But by the next time we see another eclipse, a few days later, we're in a slightly different position, maybe closer or farther away from Jupiter than the last time. If we are farther away than the last time we saw an eclipse, then that means we have to wait a little bit of extra time to see the next one because it takes that much longer for the light to reach us, and the reverse is true if we happen to be a little bit closer to Jupiter.

The only way to explain the variations in the timing of eclipses of Io is if light has a finite speed.

Get the Space.com Newsletter

Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!

Making it mean something

Continued measurements over the course of the next few centuries solidified the measurement of the speed of light, but it wasn't until the mid-1800s when things really started to come together. That's when the physicist James Clerk Maxwell accidentally invented light.

Maxwell had been playing around with the then-poorly-understood phenomena of electricity and magnetism when he discovered a single unified picture that could explain all the disparate observations. Laying the groundwork for what we now understand to be the electromagnetic force , in those equations he discovered that changing electric fields can create magnetic fields, and vice versa. This allows waves of electricity to create waves of magnetism, which go on to make waves of electricity and back and forth and back and forth, leapfrogging over each other, capable of traveling through space.

And when he went to calculate the speed of these so-called electromagnetic waves, Maxwell got the same number that scientists had been measuring as the speed of light for centuries. Ergo, light is made of electromagnetic waves and it travels at that speed, because that is exactly how quickly waves of electricity and magnetism travel through space.

And this was all well and good until Einstein came along a few decades later and realized that the speed of light had nothing to do with light at all. With his special theory of relativity , Einstein realized the true connection between time and space, a unified fabric known as space-time. But as we all know, space is very different than time. A meter or a foot is very different than a second or a year. They appear to be two completely different things.

So how could they possibly be on the same footing?

There needed to be some sort of glue, some connection that allowed us to translate between movement in space and movement in time. In other words, we need to know how much one meter of space, for example, is worth in time. What's the exchange rate? Einstein found that there was a single constant, a certain speed, that could tell us how much space was equivalent to how much time, and vice versa.

Einstein's theories didn't say what that number was, but then he applied special relativity to the old equations of Maxwell and found that this conversion rate is exactly the speed of light.

Of course, this conversion rate, this fundamental constant that unifies space and time, doesn't know what an electromagnetic wave is, and it doesn't even really care. It's just some number, but it turns out that Maxwell had already calculated this number and discovered it without even knowing it. That's because all massless particles are able to travel at this speed, and since light is massless, it can travel at that speed. And so, the speed of light became an important cornerstone of modern physics.

But still, why that number, with that value, and not some other random number? Why did nature pick that one and no other? What's going on?

Related: The genius of Albert Einstein: his life, theories and impact on science

Making it meaningless

Well, the number doesn't really matter. It has units after all: meters per second. And in physics any number that has units attached to it can have any old value it wants, because it means you have to define what the units are. For example, in order to express the speed of light in meters per second, first you need to decide what the heck a meter is and what the heck a second is. And so the definition of the speed of light is tied up with the definitions of length and time.

In physics, we're more concerned with constants that have no units or dimensions — in other words, constants that appear in our physical theories that are just plain numbers. These appear much more fundamental, because they don't depend on any other definition. Another way of saying it is that, if we were to meet some alien civilization , we would have no way of understanding their measurement of the speed of light, but when it comes to dimensionless constants, we can all agree. They're just numbers.

One such number is known as the fine structure constant, which is a combination of the speed of light, Planck's constant , and something known as the permittivity of free space. Its value is approximately 0.007. 0.007 what? Just 0.007. Like I said, it's just a number.

So on one hand, the speed of light can be whatever it wants to be, because it has units and we need to define the units. But on the other hand, the speed of light can't be anything other than exactly what it is, because if you were to change the speed of light, you would change the fine structure constant. But our universe has chosen the fine structure constant to be approximately 0.007, and nothing else. That is simply the universe we live in, and we get no choice about it at all. And since this is fixed and universal, the speed of light has to be exactly what it is.

So why is the fine structure constant exactly the number that it is, and not something else? Good question. We don't know.

Learn more by listening to the episode "Why is the speed of light the way it is?" on the Ask A Spaceman podcast, available on iTunes and on the Web at http://www.askaspaceman.com. Thanks to Robert H, Michael E., @DesRon94, Evan W., Harry A., @twdixon, Hein P., Colin E., and Lothian53 for the questions that led to this piece! Ask your own question on Twitter using #AskASpaceman or by following Paul @PaulMattSutter and facebook.com/PaulMattSutter.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: [email protected].

Paul M. Sutter is an astrophysicist at SUNY Stony Brook and the Flatiron Institute in New York City. Paul received his PhD in Physics from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2011, and spent three years at the Paris Institute of Astrophysics, followed by a research fellowship in Trieste, Italy, His research focuses on many diverse topics, from the emptiest regions of the universe to the earliest moments of the Big Bang to the hunt for the first stars. As an "Agent to the Stars," Paul has passionately engaged the public in science outreach for several years. He is the host of the popular "Ask a Spaceman!" podcast, author of "Your Place in the Universe" and "How to Die in Space" and he frequently appears on TV — including on The Weather Channel, for which he serves as Official Space Specialist.

China to launch sample-return mission to the moon's far side on May 3

Satellites watch as 4th global coral bleaching event unfolds (image)

Einstein Probe X-ray telescope releases 1st images taken with 'lobster vision'

• voidpotentialenergy This is just my opinion but i think L speed is it's speed because the particle part of it is the fastest it can interact with the quanta distance in quantum fluctuation. Light is particle and wave so the wave happens in the void between quanta. Gravity probably travels in that void and why gravity seems instant. Reply
• rod The space.com article wraps up the discussion with, "So on one hand, the speed of light can be whatever it wants to be, because it has units and we need to define the units. But on the other hand, the speed of light can't be anything other than exactly what it is, because if you were to change the speed of light, you would change the fine structure constant. But our universe has chosen the fine structure constant to be approximately 0.007, and nothing else. That is simply the universe we live in, and we get no choice about it at all. And since this is fixed and universal, the speed of light has to be exactly what it is. So why is the fine structure constant exactly the number that it is, and not something else? Good question. We don't know." It seems that the *universe* made this decision, *But our universe has chosen the fine structure constant to be...* I did not know that the universe was capable of making decisions concerning constants used in physics. E=mc^2 is a serious constant. Look at nuclear weapons development, explosive yields, and stellar evolution burn rates for p-p chain and CNO fusion rates. The report indicates why alpha (fine structure constant) is what it is and c is what it is, *We don't know*. Reply

Admin said: We all know and love the speed of light, but why does it have the value that it does? Why isn't it some other number? And why did it become such a cornerstone of physics? Why is the speed of light the way it is? : Read more

rod said: The space.com article wraps up the discussion with, "So on one hand, the speed of light can be whatever it wants to be, because it has units and we need to define the units. But on the other hand, the speed of light can't be anything other than exactly what it is, because if you were to change the speed of light, you would change the fine structure constant. But our universe has chosen the fine structure constant to be approximately 0.007, and nothing else. That is simply the universe we live in, and we get no choice about it at all. And since this is fixed and universal, the speed of light has to be exactly what it is. So why is the fine structure constant exactly the number that it is, and not something else? Good question. We don't know." It seems that the *universe* made this decision, *But our universe has chosen the fine structure constant to be...* I did not know that the universe was capable of making decisions concerning constants used in physics. E=mc^2 is a serious constant. Look at nuclear weapons development, explosive yields, and stellar evolution burn rates for p-p chain and CNO fusion rates. The report indicates why alpha (fine structure constant) is what it is and c is what it is, *We don't know*.

• rod FYI. When someone says *the universe has chosen*, I am reminded of these five lessons from a 1982 Fed. court trial. The essential characteristics of science are: It is guided by natural law; It has to be explanatory by reference to natural law; It is testable against the empirical world; Its conclusions are tentative, i.e., are not necessarily the final word; and It is falsifiable. Five important points about science. Reply
• Gary If the universe is expanding , how can the speed of light be constant ( miles per second , if each mile is getting longer ) ? Can light's velocity be constant while the universe expands ? So, with the expansion of the universe , doesn't the speed of light need to increase in order to stay at a constant velocity in miles per second ? Or, do the miles in the universe remain the same length as the universe 'adds' miles to its diameter ? Are the miles lengthening or are they simply being added / compounded ? Reply
• Gary Lets say we're in outer space and we shoot a laser through a block of glass. What causes the speed of the laser light to return to the speed it held prior to entering the block of glass ? Is there some medium in the vacuum of space that governs the speed of light ? Do the atoms in the glass push it back up to its original speed. If so, why don't those same atoms constantly push the light while it travels through the block of glass ? Reply

Gary said: Lets say we're in outer space and we shoot a laser through a block of glass. What causes the speed of the laser light to return to the speed it held prior to entering the block of glass ? Is there some medium in the vacuum of space that governs the speed of light ? Do the atoms in the glass push it back up to its original speed. If so, why don't those same atoms constantly push the light while it travels through the block of glass ?

Gary said: If the universe is expanding , how can the speed of light be constant ( miles per second , if each mile is getting longer ) ? Can light's velocity be constant while the universe expands ? So, with the expansion of the universe , doesn't the speed of light need to increase in order to stay at a constant velocity in miles per second ? Or, do the miles in the universe remain the same length as the universe 'adds' miles to its diameter ? Are the miles lengthening or are they simply being added / compounded ?

• View All 31 Comments

Most Popular

• 2 Astrophotographer captures the Running Chicken Nebula in impeccable detail
• 3 China unveils video of its moon base plans, which weirdly includes a NASA space shuttle
• 4 NASA's TESS exoplanet hunter may have spotted its 1st rogue planet
• 5 This spacecraft is headed to NASA's asteroid-crash aftermath — but first, it'll stop by Mars

Can anything travel faster than the speed of light?

Does it matter if it's in a vacuum?

In 1676, by studying the motion of Jupiter's moon Io, Danish astronomer Ole Rømer calculated that light travels at a finite speed. Two years later, building on data gathered by Rømer, Dutch mathematician and scientist Christiaan Huygens became the first person to attempt to determine the actual speed of light, according to the American Museum of Natural History in New York City. Huygens came up with a figure of 131,000 miles per second (211,000 kilometers per second), a number that isn't accurate by today's standards — we now know that the speed of light in the "vacuum" of empty space is about 186,282 miles per second (299,792 km per second) — but his assessment showcased that light travels at an incredible speed.

According to Albert Einstein 's theory of special relativity , light travels so fast that, in a vacuum, nothing in the universe is capable of moving faster. 

"We cannot move through the vacuum of space faster than the speed of light," confirmed Jason Cassibry, an associate professor of aerospace engineering at the Propulsion Research Center, University of Alabama in Huntsville.

Question answered, right? Maybe not. When light is not in a vacuum, does the rule still apply?

Related: How many atoms are in the observable universe?

"Technically, the statement 'nothing can travel faster than the speed of light' isn't quite correct by itself," at least in a non-vacuum setting, Claudia de Rham, a theoretical physicist at Imperial College London, told Live Science in an email. But there are certain caveats to consider, she said. Light exhibits both particle-like and wave-like characteristics, and can therefore be regarded as both a particle (a photon ) and a wave. This is known as wave-particle duality.

If we look at light as a wave, then there are "multiple reasons" why certain waves can travel faster than white (or colorless) light in a medium, de Rham said. One such reason, she said, is that "as light travels through a medium — for instance, glass or water droplets — the different frequencies or colors of light travel at different speeds." The most obvious visual example of this occurs in rainbows, which typically have the long, faster red wavelengths at the top and the short, slower violet wavelengths at the bottom, according to a post by the University of Wisconsin-Madison . 

Sign up for the Live Science daily newsletter now

Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.

When light travels through a vacuum, however, the same is not true. "All light is a type of electromagnetic wave, and they all have the same speed in a vacuum (3 x 10^8 meters per second). This means both radio waves and gamma rays have the same speed," Rhett Allain, a physics professor at Southeastern Louisiana University, told Live Science in an email.

So, according to de Rham, the only thing capable of traveling faster than the speed of light is, somewhat paradoxically, light itself, though only when not in the vacuum of space. Of note, regardless of the medium, light will never exceed its maximum speed of 186,282 miles per second.

Universal look

According to Cassibry, however, there is something else to consider when discussing things moving faster than the speed of light.

"There are parts of the universe that are expanding away from us faster than the speed of light, because space-time is expanding," he said. For example, the Hubble Space Telescope recently spotted 12.9 billion year-old light from a distant star known as Earendel. But, because the universe is expanding at every point, Earendel is moving away from Earth and has been since its formation, so the galaxy is now 28 billion light years away from Earth.

In this case, space-time is expanding, but the material in space-time is still traveling within the bounds of light speed.

Related: Why is space a vacuum?

So, it's clear that nothing travels faster than light that we know of, but is there any situation where it might be possible? Einstein's theory of special relativity, and his subsequent theory of general relativity, is "built under the principle that the notions of space and time are relative," de Rham said. But what does this mean? "If someone [were] able to travel faster than light and carry information with them, their notion of time would be twisted as compared to ours," de Rham said. "There could be situations where the future could affect our past, and then the whole structure of reality would stop making sense."

This would indicate that it would probably not be desirable to make a human travel faster than the speed of light. But could it ever be possible? Will there ever be a time when we are capable of creating craft that could propel materials — and ultimately humans — through space at a pace that outstrips light speed? "Theorists have proposed various types of warp bubbles that could enable faster-than-light travel," Cassibry said.

But is de Rham convinced?

"We can imagine being able to communicate at the speed of light with systems outside our solar system ," de Rham said. "But sending actual physical humans at the speed of light is simply impossible, because we cannot accelerate ourselves to such speed.

"Even in a very idealistic situation where we imagine we could keep accelerating ourselves at a constant rate — ignoring how we could even reach a technology that could keep accelerating us continuously — we would never actually reach the speed of light," she added. "We could get close, but never quite reach it."

Related: How long is a galactic year?

This is a point confirmed by Cassibry. "Neglecting relativity, if you were to accelerate with a rate of 1G [Earth gravity], it would take you a year to reach the speed of light. However, you would never really reach that velocity because as you start to approach lightspeed, your mass energy increases, approaching infinite. "One of the few known possible 'cheat codes' for this limitation is to expand and contract spacetime, thereby pulling your destination closer to you. There seems to be no fundamental limit on the rate at which spacetime can expand or contract, meaning we might be able to get around this velocity limit someday."

— What would happen if the speed of light were much lower?

— What if the speed of sound were as fast as the speed of light?

— How does the rubber pencil illusion work?

Allain is similarly confident that going faster than light is far from likely, but, like Cassibry, noted that if humans want to explore distant planets, it may not actually be necessary to reach such speeds. "The only way we could understand going faster than light would be to use some type of wormhole in space," Allain said. "This wouldn't actually make us go faster than light, but instead give us a shortcut to some other location in space."

Cassibry, however, is unsure if wormholes will ever be a realistic option.

"Wormholes are theorized to be possible based on a special solution to Einstein's field equations," he said. "Basically, wormholes, if possible, would give you a shortcut from one destination to another. I have no idea if it's possible to construct one, or how we would even go about doing it." Originally published on Live Science.

Joe Phelan is a journalist based in London. His work has appeared in VICE, National Geographic, World Soccer and The Blizzard, and has been a guest on Times Radio. He is drawn to the weird, wonderful and under examined, as well as anything related to life in the Arctic Circle. He holds a bachelor's degree in journalism from the University of Chester. 

Black hole 'traffic jams' are forcing cosmic monsters to collide, new study finds

Researchers just found more than 1,000 new solar system objects hiding in plain sight

2 plants randomly mated up to 1 million years ago to give rise to one of the world's most popular drinks

Most Popular

• 2 James Webb telescope confirms there is something seriously wrong with our understanding of the universe
• 3 Scientists discover once-in-a-billion-year event — 2 lifeforms merging to create a new cell part
• 4 Quantum computing breakthrough could happen with just hundreds, not millions, of qubits using new error-correction system
• 5 DNA analysis spanning 9 generations of people reveals marriage practices of mysterious warrior culture
• 2 Deepest blue hole in the world discovered, with hidden caves and tunnels believed to be inside
• 3 Plato's burial place finally revealed after AI deciphers ancient scroll carbonized in Mount Vesuvius eruption
• 4 Tweak to Schrödinger's cat equation could unite Einstein's relativity and quantum mechanics, study hints
• 5 Earth from space: Lava bleeds down iguana-infested volcano as it spits out toxic gas

Suggested Searches

• Climate Change
• Expedition 64
• Mars perseverance
• SpaceX Crew-2
• International Space Station
• View All Topics A-Z

Humans in Space

Earth & climate, the solar system, the universe, aeronautics, learning resources, news & events.

NASA/JAXA’s XRISM Mission Captures Unmatched Data With Just 36 Pixels

NASA Scientists Gear Up for Solar Storms at Mars

NASA Uses Small Engine to Enhance Sustainable Jet Research

• Search All NASA Missions
• A to Z List of Missions
• Upcoming Launches and Landings
• Spaceships and Rockets
• Communicating with Missions
• James Webb Space Telescope
• Hubble Space Telescope
• Why Go to Space
• Astronauts Home
• Commercial Space
• Destinations
• Living in Space
• Explore Earth Science
• Earth, Our Planet
• Earth Science in Action
• Earth Multimedia
• Earth Science Researchers
• Pluto & Dwarf Planets
• Asteroids, Comets & Meteors
• The Kuiper Belt
• The Oort Cloud
• Skywatching
• The Search for Life in the Universe
• Black Holes
• The Big Bang
• Dark Energy & Dark Matter
• Earth Science
• Planetary Science
• Astrophysics & Space Science
• The Sun & Heliophysics
• Biological & Physical Sciences
• Lunar Science
• Citizen Science
• Astromaterials
• Aeronautics Research
• Human Space Travel Research
• Science in the Air
• NASA Aircraft
• Flight Innovation
• Supersonic Flight
• Air Traffic Solutions
• Green Aviation Tech
• Drones & You
• Technology Transfer & Spinoffs
• Space Travel Technology
• Technology Living in Space
• Manufacturing and Materials
• Science Instruments
• For Kids and Students
• For Educators
• For Colleges and Universities
• For Professionals
• Science for Everyone
• Requests for Exhibits, Artifacts, or Speakers
• STEM Engagement at NASA
• NASA's Impacts
• Centers and Facilities
• Directorates
• Organizations
• People of NASA
• Internships
• Our History
• Doing Business with NASA
• Get Involved
• Aeronáutica
• Ciencias Terrestres
• Sistema Solar
• All NASA News
• Video Series on NASA+
• Newsletters
• Social Media
• Media Resources
• Upcoming Launches & Landings
• Virtual Events
• Sounds and Ringtones
• Interactives
• STEM Multimedia

Two Small NASA Satellites Will Measure Soil Moisture, Volcanic Gases

NASA Balloons Head North of Arctic Circle for Long-Duration Flights

NASA’s Hubble Pauses Science Due to Gyro Issue

NASA Selects Commercial Service Studies to Enable Mars Robotic Science

NASA’s Commercial Partners Deliver Cargo, Crew for Station Science

NASA Shares Lessons of Human Systems Integration with Industry

NASA-Led Study Provides New Global Accounting of Earth’s Rivers

NASA’s ORCA, AirHARP Projects Paved Way for PACE to Reach Space

What’s Up: May 2024 Skywatching Tips from NASA

May’s Night Sky Notes: Stargazing for Beginners

NASA’s Webb Maps Weather on Planet 280 Light-Years Away

Webb Captures Top of Iconic Horsehead Nebula in Unprecedented Detail

NASA Photographer Honored for Thrilling Inverted In-Flight Image

NASA’s Ingenuity Mars Helicopter Team Says Goodbye … for Now

Big Science Drives Wallops’ Upgrades for NASA Suborbital Missions

Tech Today: Stay Safe with Battery Testing for Space

NASA Grant Brings Students at Underserved Institutions to the Stars

Washington State High Schooler Wins 2024 NASA Student Art Contest

NASA STEM Artemis Moon Trees

NASA’s Commitment to Safety Starts with its Culture

NASA Challenge Gives Space Thruster Commercial Boost

Diez maneras en que los estudiantes pueden prepararse para ser astronautas

Astronauta de la NASA Marcos Berríos

Resultados científicos revolucionarios en la estación espacial de 2023

How to travel at (nearly) the speed of light.

One hundred years ago, on May 29, 1919, measurements of a solar eclipse offered proof for Einstein’s theory of general relativity. Even before that, Einstein had developed the theory of special relativity, which revolutionized the way we understand light. To this day, it provides guidance on understanding how particles move through space — a key area of research to keep spacecraft and astronauts safe from radiation.

The theory of special relativity showed that particles of light, photons, travel through a vacuum at a constant pace of 670,616,629 miles per hour — a speed that’s immensely difficult to achieve and impossible to surpass in that environment. Yet all across space, from black holes to our near-Earth environment, particles are, in fact, being accelerated to incredible speeds, some even reaching 99.9% the speed of light.

Scientists suspect magnetic reconnection is one way that particles are accelerated to nearly light speed. This illustration depicts the magnetic fields around Earth, which snap and realign, causing charged particles to be flung away at high speeds. Find out all three ways that this acceleration happens .

Image Credit: NASA

Why Can't We Travel At The Speed of Light?

Enter The Lorentz Factor:

In the mathematics of special relativity, one specific number is always used, and this is called the Lorentz Factor . It, in turn, is a function of an object's speed. In simple terms, its value depends on the object's speed. (Its mathematical formula is seen on the right)

Einstein said in his theory of special relativity that the correct formula for the momentum is mass times velocity times the Lorentz Factor. To understand how momentum works at relativistic speeds, we must first understand the characteristics of this so-called Lorentz Factor. Below is a table of its values at different velocities: At non-relativistic speeds, the Lorentz Factor is equal to one, and since momentum in Special Relativity is equal to the Lorentz Factor times the mass times the velocity, it reduces back to Newton's formula for momentum, which is just mass times velocity. As we increase the speed to relativistic speeds, the momentum will increase even more. This means that we will need a much greater impulse to further increase the speed. Here we can finally see why nothing can travel at the exact speed of light but light itself. The momentum at the speed of light will have increased to infinity and will need an infinite amount of force (not to mention, energy) to get it there.

WATCH: "Can You Go the Speed of Light?"

[su_divider text="Go back to top" size="2"]

For related reading, learn why the speed of light might not actually be constant here , or learn how to test the speed of light (from the comfort of your own home) here .

Share This Article

January 19, 1998

Why isn't the speed of light infinite?

Stephen Reucroft and John Swain, professors of physics at Northeastern University in Boston, Mass, provided the following explanation:

The common experience of turning on a light switch certainly shows that light travels very quickly. But careful experiments reveal that it travels at a finite speed. This speed, which we call "c," is measured to be 300,000,000 meters per second.

The speed of light is strange in that it has the same value independent of the relative velocity between the source and the observer. This fact is an experimental one that can only make sense if relative motion changes the relationship between space and time intervals to keep the distance covered by light per unit time the same for all observers.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing . By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

The fact that space and time must get mixed up to keep the speed of light constant implies that, in some sense, space and time must be the same, despite our habit of measuring space in meters and time in seconds. But if time and space are similar to the extent that they can be converted one into the other, then one needs some quantity to convert the units--namely, something measured in meters per second that can be used to multiply seconds of time to get meters of space. That something, the universal conversion factor, is the speed of light. The reason that it is limited is simply the fact that a finite amount of space is equivalent to a finite amount of time.

Another explanation of light's finite nature can be obtained from thinking about what we mean by light itself. Light, by definition, is an electromagnetic wave, a propagating disturbance in space and time that carries information about the acceleration of charges.

Were there an infinite value for the speed of light, light itself would not exist at all. Mathematically, the wave equation that describes light as an electromagnetic wave would lose its time-dependence.

In physical terms, an electromagnetic wave arises due to the finite time it takes for news of the change of location of an accelerated charge to arrive at a distant point. Think of an electric charge as being like a hedgehog with flexible rubber spikes going out to infinity in all directions. These spikes represent the electric field lines, the lines along which a test charge would move.

If the charge is jerked, the segments of the spikes close to the charge will move, but those farther out will still point in their original directions. The result is that each spike will get a kink that moves out to infinity. This kink relays the news that the charge has moved to the distant parts of the spikes and corresponds to an electromagnetic wave. If the wave moves infinitely fast, it is as if it were not there at all; the spikes are infinitely stiff and the news gets out to everywhere without any seeming kinks. In other words, there would be no electromagnetic wave, and thus no light.

The previous two arguments are two slightly different ways to say that if you think light is a wave, then it has to be something that propagates and takes time to go from one point to another. In other words, it has to travel at a finite speed. Infinite speed of propagation is an instantaneous magical change in things everywhere all at once, and not a wave at all!

• Newsletters

Why can’t anything travel faster than light?

Roger Rassool

Roger Rassool is a particle physicist at the University of Melbourne. His outreach programs have switched on a new generation to the wonders of physics.

We all know the number one traffic rule of the universe – nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. And that happens to be 299,792.458 kilometres per second. But why is it so?

Before the 1600s most people assumed light moved instantaneously. Galileo was among the first to think that light travelled at a finite speed.

In 1638 he tried to measure it. He and an assistant perched themselves on distant mountaintops with covered lanterns. The idea was that as soon as Galileo’s assistant saw the flash, he uncovered his lantern. Galileo would then time how long it took to see the return flash. The experiment failed dismally! To succeed, Galileo would have had to register a time difference of microseconds. He had no such time keeping device and his reaction time would be way slower than that.

Undaunted, Galileo concluded that light’s movement, “if not instantaneous, is extraordinarily rapid”.

But not long after, in 1676, we got a fair estimate of light’s speed from a young Danish astronomer by the name of Ole Römer. One of the ways sailors at sea checked their clocks was to observe the eclipse of Jupiter by its moon Io. The time for Io to make one complete circuit around Jupiter had been measured at 1.769 days. However there was a minor problem.

Römer observed that the time between eclipses varied slightly depending on the time of year. At times when the Earth was moving away from Jupiter, the time between Io’s eclipses gradually increased; as it moved closer the time decreased. The cumulative effect meant the predicted times could be in error by more than 10 minutes.

Römer realised his observations could be explained by the varying distance between Jupiter and Io, and Earth. The different times for Io’s orbit reflected the different distances light had to travel. It also allowed Römer to estimate the speed of light as 214,000 km/s. Not bad!

The first experimental measurement of the speed of light came 150 years later with Hippolye Fizeau. He came up with an ingenious advance on Galileo’s method. In his experiment, a beam of light was projected onto a rapidly rotating cog-wheel. The teeth of the rotating cog chop the light up into very short pulses. These pulses travelled about 8 kilometres to where Fizeau had positioned a carefully aligned mirror. On the return trip, the reflected light pulse could only reach Fizeau by passing back through one of the gaps in the cog-wheel.

What happened? At slow speeds, the light pulse always got back to Fizeau through the same gap in the cog’s teeth. But as Fizeau turned the wheel faster, at a certain speed the pulse was blocked by the following tooth. Knowing the rotational speed, Fizaeau thus could calculate how long it took for light to travel 16 kilometres – and so how fast the light must be travelling. His remarkable result of 315,000 km/s was within about 5% of our most recent measurements using lasers.

The faster something travels, the more massive it gets, and the more time slows – until you finally reach the speed of light, at which point time stops altogether.

OK. We know that light travels at a finite speed. But why is it finite?

This question gave Albert Einstein pause for thought. If light has a finite speed, what if you strapped a torch to the front of a moving rocket? Wouldn’t the light coming from this torch be travelling faster than the speed of light? Einstein puzzled over this issue with several “Gedankens” (thought experiments) and came up with a crazy solution: the motion of an object must somehow make time slow down. Time was no longer constant and so relativity was born.

Many experiments have carefully tested Einstein’s predictions.

In 1964, Bill Bertozzi at MIT accelerated electrons to a range of speeds. He then measured their kinetic energy and found that as their speeds approached the speed of light, the electrons became heavier and heavier – until the point they became so heavy it was impossible to make them go any faster. The maximum speed he could get the electrons to travel before they became too heavy to accelerate further? The speed of light.

In another crucial test, physicists Joseph Hafele and Richard E. Keating flew synchronised, super-accurate caesium atomic clocks on various trips around the world on commercial airliners. After the journeys, all the moving clocks disagreed with each other and the reference clock back in the lab. Time ran slower for the moving clocks just as Einstein predicted. So the faster something travels, the more massive it gets, and the more time slows – until you finally reach the speed of light, at which point time stops altogether. And if time stops, well then, so does speed. And so nothing can travel faster than the speed of light.

By the way, the next time you use your smart phone be aware that the GPS satellites orbiting Earth have to take the slowing of time (time dilation) into account. Disable these relativistic corrections and the modern world would be lost forever.

Originally published by Cosmos as Why can’t anything travel faster than light?

Please login to favourite this article.

Advertisement

How does a photon know to travel at the speed of light?

25 August 2021

Pobytov/Getty Images

How does a photon “know” to travel at the speed of light?

Elaine Patrick Cyffylliog, Denbighshire, UK

I don’t know, ask Erwin Schrödinger. He was a relative of mine on my mother’s side. He told her mum, but she couldn’t understand it either. We’ve been in the dark ever since.

Yang Guijen Balik Pulau, Penang, Malaysia

The laws of the universe require that all the energy and matter particles occupying its space must abide by its rules – so as to maintain a viable home and playground for all. One of these rules is that if you are a massless particle of electromagnetic origin, and you want to play in vacuum space, then you must move at the speed of light, 299,792,458 metres per second, consistently.

If you are a particle with mass, however, then there are other rules that you can follow.

@kbachmann, via Twitter

Wouldn’t any speed travelled by photons be, by definition, the speed of light?

Ian Glendinning Vienna, Austria

All massless particles always travel at a speed represented by the letter c , whereas massive particles can travel at any speed between zero and c . Since photons are massless, they travel at c , which is called the speed of light because the photon was the first known example of a massless particle.

So the short answer to the question is that a photon knows to travel at the speed of light because it is massless.

Ken Appleby Ledbury, Herefordshire, UK

What we call photons are actually interactions of electromagnetic fields. Between interactions, photons don’t exist. You can’t watch a photon in transit, only detect an excitation of the electromagnetic field when it happens.

Photons don’t exist as particles. There are no particles, just interactions of quantum fields. Maxwell’s equations embody and explain in elegant mathematics the empirical results of Faraday’s experiments into electrostatic and magnetic fields – fields being a novel concept of Faraday’s invention. The equations reveal the existence of electromagnetic waves, which are always observed to travel at the constant speed c , regardless of the motion of emitter, receiver or observer. It was this apparent paradox that Einstein’s special relativity paper resolved, by dispensing with the notions of simultaneity, absolute space and time.

So at root, the answer to your question is just simply that that is reality. That is what we observe. The reasons are illuminated by the equations of electrodynamics, but ultimately it is an empirical observation. At least, so far.

James Bailey Southampton, Hampshire, UK

This question is the wrong way round. A photon is a packet of electromagnetic radiation. A very small part of the spectrum of that radiation (wavelengths of around 400 to 750 nanometres) is detectable with our eyes and we call this light. It is like asking why light takes 1/299,792,458 of a second to travel 1 metre, when in fact we just find it more convenient to define it as that, rather than use the old definition of a metre as a ten-millionth of the distance from the equator to the North Pole.

The really interesting question for me is why does electromagnetic radiation travel at 300,000 kilometres per second, and that brings us back to the question of time that has been raised before. Does light travel through time? If so, what exactly is it that it is travelling through? Or does time itself do the moving and is constantly sweeping past us like the wind while everything else stands still?

Does time actually exist as anything or is it just a convenient invention to allow us to talk about how things are moving?

To answer this question – or ask a new one – email [email protected] .

Questions should be scientific enquiries about everyday phenomena, and both questions and answers should be concise. We reserve the right to edit items for clarity and style. Please include a postal address, daytime telephone number and email address.

New Scientist Ltd retains total editorial control over the published content and reserves all rights to reuse question and answer material that has been submitted by readers in any medium or in any format.

Terms and conditions apply .

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox! We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

More from New Scientist

Explore the latest news, articles and features

We now know exactly how thick the boundary between water and air is

Subscriber-only

GPS jamming traced to Russia after flights over Europe suspended

Environment, european summers will be hotter than predicted because of cleaner air, the unexpected effects of nostalgia on our health and at work, popular articles.

Trending New Scientist articles

Why does time change when traveling close to the speed of light? A physicist explains

Assistant Professor of Physics and Astronomy, Rochester Institute of Technology

Disclosure statement

Michael Lam does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Rochester Institute of Technology provides funding as a member of The Conversation US.

View all partners

• Bahasa Indonesia

Curious Kids is a series for children of all ages. If you have a question you’d like an expert to answer, send it to [email protected] .

Why does time change when traveling close to the speed of light? – Timothy, age 11, Shoreview, Minnesota

Imagine you’re in a car driving across the country watching the landscape. A tree in the distance gets closer to your car, passes right by you, then moves off again in the distance behind you.

Of course, you know that tree isn’t actually getting up and walking toward or away from you. It’s you in the car who’s moving toward the tree. The tree is moving only in comparison, or relative, to you – that’s what we physicists call relativity . If you had a friend standing by the tree, they would see you moving toward them at the same speed that you see them moving toward you.

In his 1632 book “ Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems ,” the astronomer Galileo Galilei first described the principle of relativity – the idea that the universe should behave the same way at all times, even if two people experience an event differently because one is moving in respect to the other.

If you are in a car and toss a ball up in the air, the physical laws acting on it, such as the force of gravity, should be the same as the ones acting on an observer watching from the side of the road. However, while you see the ball as moving up and back down, someone on the side of the road will see it moving toward or away from them as well as up and down.

Special relativity and the speed of light

Albert Einstein much later proposed the idea of what’s now known as special relativity to explain some confusing observations that didn’t have an intuitive explanation at the time. Einstein used the work of many physicists and astronomers in the late 1800s to put together his theory in 1905, starting with two key ingredients: the principle of relativity and the strange observation that the speed of light is the same for every observer and nothing can move faster. Everyone measuring the speed of light will get the same result, no matter where they are or how fast they are moving.

Let’s say you’re in the car driving at 60 miles per hour and your friend is standing by the tree. When they throw a ball toward you at a speed of what they perceive to be 60 miles per hour, you might logically think that you would observe your friend and the tree moving toward you at 60 miles per hour and the ball moving toward you at 120 miles per hour. While that’s really close to the correct value, it’s actually slightly wrong.

This discrepancy between what you might expect by adding the two numbers and the true answer grows as one or both of you move closer to the speed of light. If you were traveling in a rocket moving at 75% of the speed of light and your friend throws the ball at the same speed, you would not see the ball moving toward you at 150% of the speed of light. This is because nothing can move faster than light – the ball would still appear to be moving toward you at less than the speed of light. While this all may seem very strange, there is lots of experimental evidence to back up these observations.

Time dilation and the twin paradox

Speed is not the only factor that changes relative to who is making the observation. Another consequence of relativity is the concept of time dilation , whereby people measure different amounts of time passing depending on how fast they move relative to one another.

Each person experiences time normally relative to themselves. But the person moving faster experiences less time passing for them than the person moving slower. It’s only when they reconnect and compare their watches that they realize that one watch says less time has passed while the other says more.

This leads to one of the strangest results of relativity – the twin paradox , which says that if one of a pair of twins makes a trip into space on a high-speed rocket, they will return to Earth to find their twin has aged faster than they have. It’s important to note that time behaves “normally” as perceived by each twin (exactly as you are experiencing time now), even if their measurements disagree.

You might be wondering: If each twin sees themselves as stationary and the other as moving toward them, wouldn’t they each measure the other as aging faster? The answer is no, because they can’t both be older relative to the other twin.

The twin on the spaceship is not only moving at a particular speed where the frame of references stay the same but also accelerating compared with the twin on Earth. Unlike speeds that are relative to the observer, accelerations are absolute. If you step on a scale, the weight you are measuring is actually your acceleration due to gravity. This measurement stays the same regardless of the speed at which the Earth is moving through the solar system, or the solar system is moving through the galaxy or the galaxy through the universe.

Neither twin experiences any strangeness with their watches as one moves closer to the speed of light – they both experience time as normally as you or I do. It’s only when they meet up and compare their observations that they will see a difference – one that is perfectly defined by the mathematics of relativity.

Hello, curious kids! Do you have a question you’d like an expert to answer? Ask an adult to send your question to [email protected] . Please tell us your name, age and the city where you live.

And since curiosity has no age limit – adults, let us know what you’re wondering, too. We won’t be able to answer every question, but we will do our best.

• General Relativity
• Special Relativity
• Time dilation
• Speed of light
• Albert Einstein
• Curious Kids
• Theory of relativity
• Curious Kids US

Assistant Editor - 1 year cadetship

Program Development Officer - Business Processes

Executive Dean, Faculty of Health

Lecturer/Senior Lecturer, Earth System Science (School of Science)

Sydney Horizon Educators (Identified)

How Light Travels: The Reason Why Telescopes Can See the Invisible Parts of Our Universe

Due to how light travels, we can only see the most eye-popping details of space—like nebulas, supernovas, and black holes—with specialized telescopes.

• Our eyes can see only a tiny fraction of these wavelengths , but our instruments enable us to learn far more.
• Here, we outline how various telescopes detect different wavelengths of light from space.

Light travels only one way: in a straight line. But the path it takes from Point A to Point B is always a waveform, with higher-energy light traveling in shorter wavelengths. Photons , which are tiny parcels of energy, have been traveling across the universe since they first exploded from the Big Bang . They always travel through the vacuum of space at 186,400 miles per second—the speed of light—which is faster than anything else.

Too bad we can glimpse only about 0.0035 percent of the light in the universe with our naked eyes. Humans can perceive just a tiny sliver of the electromagnetic spectrum: wavelengths from about 380–750 nanometers. This is what we call the visible part of the electromagnetic spectrum. The universe may be lovely to look at in this band, but our vision skips right over vast ranges of wavelengths that are either shorter or longer than this limited range. On either side of the visible band lies evidence of interstellar gas clouds, the hottest stars in the universe, gas clouds between galaxies , the gas that rushes into black holes, and much more.

Fortunately, telescopes allow us to see what would otherwise remain hidden. To perceive gas clouds between stars and galaxies, we use detectors that can capture infrared wavelengths. Super-hot stars require instruments that see short, ultraviolet wavelengths. To see the gas clouds between galaxies, we need X-ray detectors.

We’ve been using telescopes designed to reveal the invisible parts of the cosmos for more than 60 years. Because Earth’s atmosphere absorbs most wavelengths of light, many of our telescopes must observe the cosmos from orbit or outer space.

Here’s a snapshot of how we use specialized detectors to explore how light travels across the universe.

Infrared Waves

We can’t see infrared waves, but we can feel them as heat . A sensitive detector like the James Webb Space Telescope can discern this thermal energy from far across the universe. But we use infrared in more down-to-Earth ways as well. For example, remote-control devices work by sending infrared signals at about 940 nanometers to your television or stereo. These heat waves also emanate from incubators to help hatch a chick or keep a pet reptile warm. As a warm being, you radiate infrared waves too; a person using night vision goggles can see you, because the goggles turn infrared energy into false-color optical energy that your eyes can perceive. Infrared telescopes let us see outer space in a similar way.

Astronomers began the first sky surveys with infrared telescopes in the 1960s and 1970s. Webb , launched in 2021, takes advantage of the infrared spectrum to probe the deepest regions of the universe. Orbiting the sun at a truly cold expanse—about one million miles from Earth—Webb has three infrared detectors with the ability to peer farther back in time than any other telescope has so far.

Its primary imaging device, the Near Infrared Camera (NIRCam), observes the universe through detectors tuned to incoming wavelengths ranging from 0.6 to 5 microns, ideal for seeing light from the universe’s earliest stars and galaxies. Webb’s Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI) covers the wavelength range from 5 to 28 microns, its sensitive detectors collecting the redshifted light of distant galaxies. Conveniently for us, infrared passes more cleanly through deep space gas and dust clouds, revealing the objects behind them; for this and many other reasons, the infrared spectrum has gained a crucial foothold in our cosmic investigations. Earth-orbiting satellites like NASA’s Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope ( WFIRST ) observe deep space via longer infrared wavelengths, too.

Yet, when stars first form, they mostly issue ultraviolet light . So why don’t we use ultraviolet detectors to find distant galaxies? It’s because the universe has been stretching since its beginning, and the light that travels through it has been stretching, too; every planet, star, and galaxy continually moves away from everything else. By the time light from GLASS-z13—formed 300 million years after the Big Bang—reaches our telescopes, it has been traveling for more than 13 billion years , a vast distance all the way from a younger universe. The light may have started as ultraviolet waves, but over vast scales of time and space, it ended up as infrared. So, this fledgling galaxy appears as a red dot to NIRCam. We are gazing back in time at a galaxy that is rushing away from us.

Radio Waves

If we could see the night sky only through radio waves, we would notice swaths of supernovae , pulsars, quasars, and gassy star-forming regions instead of the usual pinprick fairy lights of stars and planets.

Tools like the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico can do the job our eyes can’t: detect some of the longest electromagnetic waves in the universe. Radio waves are typically the length of a football field, but they can be even longer than our planet’s diameter. Though the 1,000-foot-wide dish at Arecibo collapsed in 2020 due to structural problems, other large telescopes carry on the work of looking at radio waves from space. Large radio telescopes are special because they actually employ many smaller dishes, integrating their data to produce a really sharp image.

Unlike optical astronomy, ground-based radio telescopes don’t need to contend with clouds and rain. They can make out the composition, structure, and motion of planets and stars no matter the weather. However, the dishes of radio telescopes need to be much larger than optical ones to generate a comparable image, since radio waves are so long. The Parkes Observatory’s dish is 64 meters wide, but its imaging is comparable to a small backyard optical telescope, according to NASA .

Eight different radio telescopes all over the world coordinated their observations for the Event Horizon Telescope in 2019 to put together the eye-opening image of a black hole in the heart of the M87 galaxy (above).

Ultraviolet Waves

You may be most familiar with ultraviolet, or UV rays, in warnings to use sunscreen . The sun is our greatest local emitter of these higher-frequency, shorter wavelengths just beyond the human visible spectrum, ranging from 100 to 400 nanometers. The Hubble Space Telescope has been our main instrument for observing UV light from space, including young stars forming in Spiral Galaxy NGC 3627, the auroras of Jupiter, and a giant cloud of hydrogen evaporating from an exoplanet that is reacting to its star’s extreme radiation.

Our sun and other stars emit a full range of UV light, telling astronomers how relatively hot or cool they are according to the subdivisions of ultraviolet radiation: near ultraviolet, middle ultraviolet, far ultraviolet, and extreme ultraviolet. Applying a false-color visible light composite lets us see with our own eyes the differences in a star’s gas temperatures.

Hubble’s Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) breaks down ultraviolet light into specific present colors with filters. “Science visuals developers assign primary colors and reconstruct the data into a picture our eyes can clearly identify,” according to the Hubble website . Using image-processing software, astronomers and even amateur enthusiasts can turn the UV data into images that are not only beautiful, but also informative.

X-Ray Light

Since 1999, the orbiting Chandra X-Ray Observatory is the most sensitive radio telescope ever built. During one observation that lasted a few hours, its X-ray vision saw only four photons from a galaxy 240 million light-years away, but it was enough to ascertain a novel type of exploding star . The observatory, located 86,500 miles above Earth, can produce detailed, full-color images of hot X-ray-emitting objects, like supernovas, clusters of galaxies and gases, and jets of energy surrounding black holes that are millions of degrees Celsius. It can also measure the intensity of an individual X-ray wavelength, which ranges from just 0.01 to 10 nanometers. Its four sensitive mirrors pick up energetic photons and then electronic detectors at the end of a 30-foot optical apparatus focus the beams of X-rays.

Closer to home, the Aurora Borealis at the poles emits X-rays too. And down on Earth, this high-frequency, low-wavelength light passes easily through the soft tissue of our bodies, but not our bones, yielding stellar X-ray images of our skeletons and teeth.

Visible Light

Visible color gives astronomers essential clues to a whole world of information about a star, including temperature, distance, mass, and chemical composition. The Hubble Telescope, perched 340 miles above our planet, has been a major source of visible light images of the cosmos since 1990.

Hotter objects, like young stars, radiate energy at shorter wavelengths of light; that’s why younger stars at temperatures up to 12,000 degrees Celsius, like the star Rigel, look blue to us. Astronomers can also tell the mass of a star from its color. Because mass corresponds to temperature, observers know that hot blue stars are at least three times the mass of the sun. For instance, the extremely hot, luminous blue variable star Eta Carina’s bulk is 150 times the mass of our sun, and it radiates 1,000,000 times our sun’s energy.

Our comparatively older, dimmer sun is about 5,500 degrees Celsius, so it appears yellow. At the other end of the scale, the old star Betelgeuse has been blowing off its outer layer for the past few years, and it looks red because it’s only about 3,000 degrees Celsius.

A View of Earth

Scientists use different wavelengths of light to study phenomena closer to home, too.

Detectors in orbit can distinguish between geophysical and environmental features on Earth’s changing surface, such as volcanic action. For example, infrared light used alongside visible light detection reveals areas covered in snow, volcanic ash, and vegetation. The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer ( MODIS ) infrared instrument onboard the Aqua and Terra satellites monitors forest fire smoke and locates the source of a fire so humans don’t have to fly through smoke to evaluate the situation.

Next year, a satellite will be launched to gauge forest biomass using a special radar wavelength of about 70 centimeters that can penetrate the leafy canopy.

💡 Why is the sky blue? During the day, oxygen and nitrogen in Earth’s atmosphere scatters electromagnetic energy at the wavelengths of blue light (450–485 nanometers). At sunset, the sun’s light makes a longer journey through the atmosphere before greeting your eyes. Along the way, more of the sun’s light is scattered out of the blue spectrum and deeper into yellow and red.

Before joining Popular Mechanics , Manasee Wagh worked as a newspaper reporter, a science journalist, a tech writer, and a computer engineer. She’s always looking for ways to combine the three greatest joys in her life: science, travel, and food.

.css-cuqpxl:before{padding-right:0.3125rem;content:'//';display:inline;} Pop Mech Pro: Science .css-xtujxj:before{padding-left:0.3125rem;content:'//';display:inline;}

The CIA’s Secret Plan to Use Mind Control

The Universe Could Be Eternal, This Theory Says

Immortality Is Impossible Until We Beat Physics

How Vacuum Energy Could Help Us Reach Light Speed

Could the Chair You Sit on Have a Soul?

Here’s How We Could Live in Trees

The Engine Driving Our Oceans Could Die by 2100

Can AI Help Solve Math’s Thorniest Mysteries?

You Can Give Your Body Back to Nature When You Die

How Does UFO Footage Play Tricks on Your Mind?

Why Doesn’t the Living Human Body ‘Go Bad’?

• Search Please fill out this field.
• Manage Your Subscription
• Give a Gift Subscription
• Sweepstakes
• Space Travel + Astronomy

Here's What Actually Happens When You Travel at the Speed of Light, According to NASA

NASA created a fun video to answer all of our burning questions about near-light-speed travel.

Ever wish you could travel at the speed of light to your favorite destinations ? Once you see the reality of that speed, you may rethink everything.

"There are some important things you should probably know about approaching the speed of light," NASA's video, Guide to Near-light-speed Travel , explains. "First, a lot of weird things can happen, like time and space getting all bent out of shape."

According to the video, if you're traveling at nearly the speed of light, the clock inside your rocket would show it takes less time to travel to your destination than it would on Earth. But, since the clocks at home would be moving at a standard rate you'd return home to everyone else being quite a bit older.

"Also, because you're going so fast, what would otherwise be just a few hydrogen atoms that you'd run into quickly becomes a lot of dangerous particles. So you should probably have shields that keep them from frying your ship and also you."

Finally, the video tackles the fact that even if you were moving at the speed of light, the "universe is also a very big place, so you might be in for some surprises." For example, your rocket's clock will say it takes about nine months to get from Earth to the edge of the solar system. An Earth clock would say it took about a year and a half. Fortunately, NASA astronauts have a slew of tips for avoiding jet lag along the way.

"If you want to get to farther out vacation spots," the video explains, "you'll probably need more than a few extra snacks. A trip to the Andromeda Galaxy, our nearest large neighbor galaxy, can take over one million years. And a trip to the farthest known galaxy where it currently sits might take over 15 billion years, which is more vacation time than I think I'll ever have."

The video doesn't explain how your rocket will travel at the speed of light. Our technology just isn't there yet, but maybe the aliens will share that tech with us soon. Until then, you can track the first crew launch of Artemis II , a rocket that will fly around the moon in 2024 before making its first lunar landing in 2025.

share this!

January 11, 2021

There's no way to measure the speed of light in a single direction

by Brian Koberlein, Universe Today

Special relativity is one of the most strongly validated theories humanity has ever devised. It is central to everything from space travel and GPS to our electrical power grid. Central to relativity is the fact that the speed of light in a vacuum is an absolute constant. The problem is, that fact has never been proven.

When Einstein proposed the theory of relativity, it was to explain why light always had the same speed . In the late 1800s, it was thought that since light travels as a wave, it must be carried by some kind of invisible material known as the "luminiferous aether." The reasoning was that waves require a medium, such as sound in air or water waves in water. But if the aether exists, then the observed speed of light must change as the Earth moves through the aether. But measurements to observe aether drift came up null. The speed of light appeared to be constant.

Einstein found that the problem was in assuming that space and time were absolute and the speed of light could vary. If instead, you assumed the speed of light was absolute, space and time must be affected by relative motion. It's a radical idea, but it's supported by every measurement of light's constant speed.

But several physicists have pointed out that while relativity assumes the vacuum speed of light is a universal constant, it also shows the speed can never be measured. Specifically, relativity forbids you from measuring the time it takes light to travel from point A to point B. To measure the speed of light in one direction, you'd need a synchronized stopwatch at each end, but relative motion affects the rate of your clocks relative to the speed of light. You can't synchronize them without knowing the speed of light, which you can't know without measuring. What you can do is use a single stopwatch to measure the round trip time from A to B back to A, and this is what every measurement of the speed of light does.

Since all the round-trip speed of light measurements give a constant result, you might figure you can just divide the time by two and call it a day. This is exactly what Einstein did. He assumed the time there and back was the same. Our experiments agree with that assumption, but they also agree with the idea that the speed of light coming toward us is 10 times faster than its speed going away from us. Light doesn't have to have a constant speed in all directions, it just has to have a constant "average" round-trip speed. Relativity still holds if the speed of light is anisotropic.

If the speed of light varies with its direction of motion, then we would see the universe in a different way. When we look at distant galaxies, we are looking back in time because light takes time to reach us. If distant light reached us quickly in some direction, we would see the universe in that direction as older and more expanded. The faster light reaches us, the less "back in time" we would see. Since we observe a uniform cosmos in all directions, surely that shows the speed of light is constant.

Well, not quite, as a new study shows. It turns out that if the speed of light varies with direction, so does length contraction and time dilation. The team considered the effects of anisotropic light on a simple relativistic model known as the Milne universe. It's basically a toy universe similar in structure to the observed universe, but without all the matter and energy. They found that the anisotropy of light would cause anisotropic relativity effects in time dilation and cosmic expansion. These effects would cancel out the observable aspects of a varying light speed. In other words, even if the universe was anisotropic due to a varied speed of light , it would still appear homogeneous.

So it seems simple cosmology isn't able to prove Einstein's assumption about the speed of light either. Sometimes, the most basic ideas in science are the most difficult to prove.

Provided by Universe Today

Explore further

Feedback to editors

Why do male chicks play more than females? Study finds answers in distant ancestor

28 minutes ago

Archaea can be 'picky eaters': Study shows a group of parasitic microbes can change host metabolism

8 hours ago

EPA underestimates methane emissions from landfills and urban areas, researchers find

This Texas veterinarian helped crack the mystery of bird flu in cows

9 hours ago

Researchers discover key functions of therapeutically promising jumbo viruses

Marine sharks and rays 'use' urea to delay reproduction, finds study

Researchers unlock potential of 2D magnetic devices for future computing

Researchers build new device that is a foundation for quantum computing

Satellite images of plants' fluorescence can predict crop yields

10 hours ago

New work reveals the 'quantumness' of gravity

Relevant physicsforums posts, density fluctuations and the color of the sky, calculating vacuum -- these numbers do not make sense.

18 hours ago

Circular motion as a result of the Lorentz force

Apr 30, 2024

Any alternatives to Tracker from physlets?

Question about the nature of an implosion of a vacuum chamber.

Apr 28, 2024

Increasing tone while mixing sugar in water

More from Other Physics Topics

Related Stories

Video: NASA's guide to near-light-speed travel

Aug 21, 2020

Controlling the speed of light bullets

Dec 14, 2020

How are galaxies moving away faster than light?

Oct 13, 2015

Time travel into the future is totally possible

May 14, 2020

Gravitational lenses measure universe expansion

Nov 17, 2020

Fastest star ever seen is moving at 8% the speed of light

Aug 14, 2020

Recommended for you

Laser excitation of Th-229 nucleus: New findings suggest classical quantum physics and nuclear physics can be combined

Apr 29, 2024

Laser imaging could offer early detection for at-risk artwork

Topologically controlled multiskyrmions: Researchers propose a new family of quasiparticles

New tech enables deep tissue imaging during surgery

Large Hadron Collider experiment zeroes in on magnetic monopoles

Apr 26, 2024

Let us know if there is a problem with our content

Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page. For general inquiries, please use our contact form . For general feedback, use the public comments section below (please adhere to guidelines ).

Please select the most appropriate category to facilitate processing of your request

Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors.

Your feedback is important to us. However, we do not guarantee individual replies due to the high volume of messages.

E-mail the story

Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient's address will be used for any other purpose. The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Phys.org in any form.

Newsletter sign up

Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time and we'll never share your details to third parties.

More information Privacy policy

Donate and enjoy an ad-free experience

We keep our content available to everyone. Consider supporting Science X's mission by getting a premium account.

E-mail newsletter

WECB Radio, Emerson College, 120 Boylston St., Boston, MA 02216

[email protected]

617-824-8372

617-824-8852

Why Can’t We Go Faster Than Light?

April 27, 2024

Imagine you’re in a car, pedal to the metal, racing down the highway, but no matter how hard you push, you can’t surpass the speed of the car next to you, which is effortlessly cruising at the same pace. Now, replace the car with light, and you have a real cosmic conundrum: why can’t anything go faster than light?

The Theory of Relativity

Back in 1905, Albert Einstein turned the world of physics upside down with his theory of relativity. This wasn’t just about E=mc² or the bending of space-time; it was about something that touches everything we do: the speed of light, which is roughly 299,792 kilometers per second. According to relativity, no matter how fast you’re moving towards or away from a light source, you will always measure the speed of light at the same constant velocity.

This leads us to a mind-boggling realization. As objects speed up, their mass increases. At the speed of light, their mass would become infinite. So, to move an object at the speed of light would require infinite energy, which, quite frankly, is impossible with our current understanding of physics.

Can We Go Faster Than Light?

Short answer: No. But here’s why it’s a fascinating question.

Relativity doesn’t just govern high-speed travel; it impacts how we view everything in motion. For instance, imagine watching a truck on the highway while you’re driving in the opposite direction. To an outside observer, both you and the truck have specific relative speeds. If you were to take a picture from above, without any effects like Doppler shifts, both vehicles would appear to be moving at their respective speeds, unchanged by the observer’s perspective.

This principle scales up to cosmic proportions. If we attempted to push an object to light speed, its mass would balloon, demanding an unachievable amount of energy to continue accelerating. This doesn’t just mean we can’t build a spaceship to outrun light; it also provides a fundamental check on the limits of physical movement in our universe.

The Mysterious Speed of Light

The speed of light isn’t just another universal speed limit; it’s a cornerstone of our understanding of the universe. Historically, this speed has puzzled scientists and philosophers alike, leading to various theories about the nature of light and speed.

Some suggest that light’s speed is an unbreakable rule, a cosmic speed limit set by nature. Others speculate that it might be more about our current understanding of physics, suggesting that there might be methods to surpass this speed that we simply haven’t discovered yet.

And then there’s a third, more speculative possibility: that achieving or exceeding the speed of light might be theoretically possible under conditions of infinite energy, hinting at phenomena or entities in the universe that could naturally exceed this speed, though such scenarios are purely theoretical at this stage.

The Role of Mass

Understanding why we can’t exceed the speed of light also involves understanding mass. Mass is essentially how much “stuff” is in an object. The heavier the object, the harder it is to get it moving. The ultimate speed an object can reach is bound by its mass.

This ties back to the idea of force, which in physics is anything that changes the motion of objects. More massive objects require more force to change their state or speed. This is why, no matter how powerful the engine, a heavier car can’t accelerate as quickly as a lighter one. And at the cosmic scale, trying to accelerate an object to light speed would require infinite force, which isn’t feasible.

So, while the dream of zooming past light remains just that—a dream—the limitations set by the speed of light are fundamental to our understanding of the universe. It shapes everything from the possible to the impossible and stretches across the vast expanse of cosmological theories and space travel dreams. Light speed is the ultimate boundary, a frontier that, at least for now, remains tantalizingly out of reach.

Previous post

Meet Sarah Jensen, a dynamic 30-year-old American web content writer, whose expertise shines in the realms of entertainment including film, TV series, technology, and logic games. Based in the creative hub of Austin, Texas, Sarah’s passion for all things entertainment and tech is matched only by her skill in conveying that enthusiasm through her writing.

• Uncategorized

May 1, 2024

We are a 100% student-run and creatively independent internet radio station of Emerson College.

For over 70 years we have provided students with both a creative outlet and a valuable learning experience for radio, communications, audio engineering, music journalism, live events, marketing, and more.

Emerson College, 120 Boylston St., Boston, MA 02216 [email protected] 617-824-8372 - 617-824-8852

Copyright © 2024

What If Humans Traveled at the Speed of Light? Here's What Happens

S pace is always ripe for theoretical thought exercises, such as the intriguing question, “What would happen if humans traveled at the speed of light?”

Knewz.com has learned that humans would probably not realize we were moving at the speed of light because we cannot feel constant velocity.

However, the main problem would be accelerating to the 671 million miles per hour that light travels, according to an interview published by Space.com .

Rapid acceleration can be extremely painful and even deadly to humans, and we can only handle forces of four to six times the pull of gravity (4 to 6 gs). That makes the 6,000 gs of accelerating to the speed of light completely untenable.

Even more reasonable gs from endeavors like taking off on a space rocket or flying a fighter jet can kill a person because the force makes it difficult for the body to pump blood from the feet to the brain, which is why passing out is such a threat for pilots.

“Your blood will have a hard time pumping to your extremities,” said Michael Pravica, a professor of physics at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, in the article.

If the g-force does not subside, the person will die because the blood is no longer transporting oxygen throughout the body.

That being said, 6,000 gs would flatten the person like a pancake before that ever became an issue.

The article posited that humans could potentially travel at the speed of light if they accelerated slowly. At the rate of a free fall (1 g), it would take 11 months to reach the speed of light.

Unfortunately, physics still presents a problem, specifically Einstein’s theory of relativity. As objects travel closer to the speed of light, their mass starts to grow, and the theory has proven that it would require infinite mass to travel at the speed of light.

This problem of physics is why humans have never managed to get anything to travel at the speed of light. Scientists have pushed sub-atomic particles to move at 99.9% the speed of light, but never 100%.

As humans are much larger than sub-atomic particles, the amount of energy required to push a human even to 99.9% the speed of light would be “extremely improbable” said Pravica.

However, suppose we allow ourselves to break physics and enable a person to travel at the speed of light, Einstein's theory of relativity argues that the person would age incredibly slowly thanks to time dilation.

Additionally, despite aging slower, people moving at normal speed would appear to be moving in slow motion. So, the speed-of-light travellers would simultaneously be moving much faster than their slow-motion peers while also aging slower.

One fascinating idea is that the speed of light is a foundation of modern physics, but there is no true rule that light must be the fastest object in the universe, according to Discover Magazine .

Our current understanding of physics puts light as the limit of speed, but humans in the distant future could theoretically experience a breakthrough and discover a means to travel faster than the speed of light.

While the idea is fun to ponder, there are significant hurdles that essentially guarantee humans will not be able to travel at the speed of light anytime in the foreseeable future.