elastic travel ski bindings

Skiing 201: How Ski Bindings Work

[ Editor’s Note : There’s still a lot of confusion about bindings, and this 201 article is intended to give a general background on how tech and alpine bindings work. Much of this article is taken from Marshal Olson’s review of the Dynafit Beast 16 , and we always intended to give this information its own dedicated space. So now, let’s talk about elastic travel, release values, and more.]

A Little Background on Elastic Travel and Release Value

The elastic travel of a binding is the single most important aspect of a ski binding’s ability to retain or release a skier from the ski.

Elastic travel is the amount of distance a binding can move before the boot clears (i.e., “releases from”) a binding. So, for example, if a binding has a 38mm elastic travel value, it can move 37mm and still retain the boot. In a 20mm travel binding, you can only move 19mm before your boot will release from the binding.

The weight of the binding spring will control how much work it takes to displace the binding a given distance. For example, if you have a 200 pounds-per-inch spring, it would require 200 pounds of force to compress the spring 1 inch, or 25.4mm.

Release Value

You can then further tune the binding’s functionality by adjusting the “Release Value” of the binding—i.e. adjusting your binding up from a setting of, say, 8 to 10.

( Note: “Release value” is often mistakenly conflated with “DIN setting.” A DIN setting of “8” is a release value, but not all bindings are “DIN”—Deutsches Institut für Normung—certified.)

The release value of a binding is a measurement of the amount of “spring preload”—the amount of force required to move the binding initially .

Adjusting the spring preload does not affect how firm a spring is through its travel . The spring constant (lets say 200 pounds per inch) is exactly that—a constant for a spring.

So adding preload—e.g., cranking your bindings up from 8 to 12—simply means that the spring requires a higher force to initially compress it. It does not mean that the spring itself just got 50% stiffer.

In a binding with low elasticity, one must run a higher release value to compensate for the short release action of the binding to prevent unwanted release. By running a high release value on a low-elasticity binding, you are simply preventing the binding from entering its motion as naturally.

Doing this will certainly help to keep you in the binding, but it also introduces a higher likelihood of injury. In other words, cranking up the release value on a low-elasticity binding is a pretty sketchy fix.

A highly elastic binding allows a skier to use the binding at a lower release value, since they are relying on the travel (i.e., elasticity) in the binding to prevent unwanted release.

There is then less need to jack up the preload tension, because more elastic travel can occur, increasing the skier’s ability to recover from an awkward situation before (pre-)releasing. This promotes controlled support for recovery through the range of motion of the binding’s elastic travel, but also promotes a smooth release that is unimpeded by an overly firm initial resistance.

The Ideal Binding Trifecta

In a perfect world, then, one would ski a relatively heavily sprung binding with a minimal release value setting, with maximum elastic travel. This enhances the binding’s ability not only to release the skier from its hold, but also to retain a skier if recovery is possible.

Tech Toe Pieces vs. Alpine Toe Pieces

Traditional tech bindings such as the Dynafit Radical or Dynafit Vertical function very differently than alpine race-heritage bindings, and this difference is apparent on-snow.

Most tech bindings utilize a rigid connection between the toe piece of the binding and the boot tip.

Since the toe piece only has a few millimeters of elasticity (it doesn’t house a release spring), it can only tolerate a few millimeters of travel before release occurs. And since this inelastic connection between the boot and binding is also a metal-on-metal connection, tech binding toe pieces tend to transmit a massive amount of feedback to the skier.

(A few new bindings, which we’ll be reviewing soon — the Dynafit Radical FT 2.0, for example — feature some elastic travel in their toe pieces, but this is still relatively uncommon in the world of tech bindings.)

The toe of a typical tech binding is analogous to riding a fully rigid mountain bike frame: there is no elastic travel to absorb feedback, it offers no controlled support, it doesn’t smooth the ride.

An alpine race-heritage binding has a lateral spring in its toe that controls the motion of the boot relative to the binding/ski, with the boot gliding across an anti-friction device (AFD). In this way the toe of an alpine binding is analogous to a mountain bike with a front shock. The binding offers a much smoother ride without sacrificing any control over the shovel of the ski.

To combat the negligible lateral elastic value in a typical tech binding, many people opt to ski with the toe locked out, or the heel release value cranked far higher than they would on an alpine binding. Either practice artificially inhibits the binding from releasing per the manufacturer’s intentions.

Tech Heel Pieces vs. Alpine Heel Pieces

An alpine binding’s heel piece exerts both forward pressure and downward pressure into the heel of the boot. All alpine bindings have vector forces in both forward and downward directions, even if they are not independently adjustable (e.g. Rossi FKS).

The downward pressure in an alpine binding controls the release of the boot from the binding in a forward fall. This downward pressure prevents either upward or downward free play of the boot relative to the binding and ski by constantly pressing the boot tightly into the binding and brake assembly.

The forward pressure in an alpine binding manages the pressure of your boot into the toe piece of the binding and allows the heel piece to clear out of the way when you have a twisting fall. It also maintains a controlled connection between the boot, binding, and tail of the ski when the ski becomes deeply flexed.

These two forces combine to remove lateral and horizontal free play in the boot and binding system by keeping them under tension—not to mention the obvious safety release functionality.

To use the mountain bike analogy again: an alpine heel piece is the equivalent of adding rear suspension to your bike.

A tech binding only has spring resistance against upward boot motion. In order for the binding to release vertically, you have to overcome the retention spring by opening the two pins enough for the fitting on the heel of the boot to clear them and release. There is not any downward tension or forward tension present in a tech binding at the heel piece.

There is a 5.5mm gap between the heel fitting of the boot and the binding itself. When downward pressure is applied to the heel of the boot, the pins simply slide deeper into the heel fitting and close the gap between the boot and the binding. This free play prevents a skier from accessing the the tail of the ski, and creates a vague and disconnected sensation compared to how an alpine binding feels and behaves.

To compound this issue, the part fit between the pins of the binding and the tech fitting of the boot are imperfect. Since these parts are not held under spring tension, the pins and heel fittings can freely move relative to one another. This creates a further disconnect between skier and ski relative to a conventional alpine binding. On the workbench, you can twist the heel of the boot with the ski held flat and see the boot heel and pins moving relative to one another.

To finish the mountain bike analogy: a traditional tech binding effectively functions like a fully rigid mountain bike with a flat rear tire squirming all over the place. Conversely, an alpine binding functions like a finely tuned, full-suspension trail slayer: smooth, controlled motion on both ends.

NEXT PAGE: So What Does This All Mean On-Snow?

21 comments on “Skiing 201: How Ski Bindings Work”

Excellent article – returning from the side country, I took a nasty inbounds fall at mach speed on hard pack last winter in my Dynafit bindings. For weeks I couldn’t get over how a) easily my binding released b) how easily my knee was tweaked (I rode the patrol sled down the mountain for the first time.) My question is about other rando/AT binding such as the Marker Duke’s and this article. The Duke’s are my inbound binding of choice (I have swappable binding plates) but are they analogous to the classic alpine bindings and their release characteristics or is their a third option (not tech, not classic alpine) not mentioned in the article?

Late answer and maybe known facts already?! Learned after a season on Dynafits that one should always wiggle and slam the ski down a couple of times after attaching the toe, BEFORE attaching the heel, to make sure the pins are well in and no snow or ice is in the way. Foe me this has made a great difference and the nasty fake releases on high speed icy groomers are a thing of the past. To be clear ,:my Look PX din 18 are much preferred on all downhill terrain but Dynafits are still usable when attached “correctly”

Excellent article that helps to clear up some long held misconceptions about bindings. Question for you though, at what level in the DIN range do you think a heavier spring binding becomes necessary, assuming the binding is reasonably well designed w decent elastic travel? For example at a DIN of 10 is a binding such as a Marker Baron acceptable or would you think it necessary to upgrade to the Duke. Ignoring any structural differences such as metal vs plastic, etc.

basic engineering principles dictate that as you increase preload on a spring (i.e. add din). you are making it harder to move INITIALLY. the spring rate (k) is a constant.

generally if you need or want more than 1-2 turns of preload on a spring, you would be better off swapping to a higher stiffness spring.

my hypothesis is that making a boot harder to move initially in the bindings travel makes it more likely to cause injury. DIN means is that it takes the same amount of force to release. it does not account for the spring stiffness and the amount of travel in the release… higher spring stiffness + more travel = less preload needed = smoother initial travel of the binding = less likely to injure oneself.

in binding speak, IMO a duke 6-16din binding would be best served being skied by someone in the 6 to 9-10 din range (the lower 1/3 to 40% of its range). i fully realize that flies directly in the face of conventional wisdom in ski land, but well… you asked my opinion ;)

one should not be married to a DIN value. every binding is different. there are a few variables: spring stiffness (k), spring preload (p) and elasticity/travel (d). i personally ski at a 13.5 on a marker duke, but a 12 on a salomon 920 (12-20 range), and have equal ability to retain in the binding, but more faith in the 920 not hurting me since the motion is so much smoother.

hope that helps?

The article implies that tech bindings do not offer the same level of safety as a standard alpine binding, but it seems to assume that tech bindings also will be run as a higher release value. What do you think of the relative safety of both systems if they are adjusted at similar and conservative release values? Will the safety of the tech system be relatively close to an alpine binding and primarily compromise ski retention and control?

You note that forward pressure ‘allows the heel piece to clear out of the way when you have a twisting fall’. Does this apply to both alpine and tech bindings? Several of the new systems like the G3 Ion are starting to offer systems similar to forward pressure but the main advantages highlighted by G3 seem to be better ski retention in situations where the ski is flexed dramatically.

Thanks and great article! -Kevin-

great question kevin,

a binding’s ability to “retain or release” is described from a physics standpoint as “work done”. this is proportional to Force x Distance. Tech bindings have significantly less elasticity (i.e. less distance), so for comparable work done (i.e. equivalent release values) on the release, you need significantly more force in the spring (i.e. heavier spring), so the spring is much harder to move initially,and this is why inures are more likely.

forward and more specifically downward pressure on the heel makes the ski feel more contacted and less vague while skiing. traditional pin heels only have upward resistance, so there is control if you are doing a bunch of nose-butters, but the ski moves relative the boot with n control when bending, loading, and driving a ski on firm snow. The pins just slide around in the recess of the boot.

anyhow, all just my .02

The pre-load idea is a little misleading. Consider a 4 inch spring with a 200 lb/inch spring rate. You need 200 pounds of force to compress it by an inch, and 400 pounds of force to compress it by 2 inches. Now if you preload the spring by compressing it an inch, it will still take 400 pounds of force to compress it another inch. By preloading the spring, you are effectively increasing the spring rate.

Spring rate is the slope of a Spring curve, let’s assume an ideal spring and -kx (hooke’s law) applies.

A stiffer spring has a steeper slope (larger k value)

A softer spring with lots of preload keeps the same slope (k value) as if it had no preload, but is harder to move initially because you are overcoming the preload displacement (restorative force), and the spring rate.

Or to put it another way, preload is simply shifting where on the x axis along the spring curve the motion is starting. You go from 1600lb of spring potential to 1200lb due to going for 4″ useable to 3″ useable spring travel with a 400lb spring rate. But you still have to overcome the stored potential energy created by the preload to move the spring initially.

Hi marshal, I think that your model assumes that no matter what setting, the elastic travel in binding will always reach maximum compression of the spring. In stating that you only shift the start of motion on the X axis, you may be ignoring that the end of motion before release may be shifted as well. To demonstrate the idea, let’s say that there is limit of elastic travel length that is shorter than the spring. In other words that the releasing part of binding traveled to position where it no longer fixes the boot in the binding, while the spring was not yet fully compressed. By pre-loading the longer spring, you would use different section of the X-axis e.g. instead of 50-150 lbs you would use 100-200 lbs on spring that goes from 0 to 250 lbs before reaching it’s designed range of motion. Now the manual on my Marker TC14 binding say that only ranges up to DIN10 are according to DIN norm and anything higher is on own risk. It might be, that at DIN 10 is like reaching 150-250lbs and any further preload would decrease the range of motion (like 200-250lbs).

Please note that I do not speak from point of authority or certainty. This is just combination of logical deduction of what was posted here and intuition. But I think it still may provide some value. Also note that example values in lbs are arbitrary just to show general principle on some kind of example.

hi jan, i am sorry but i don’t follow.

i am talking about stored kinetic energy within the spring. this is defined as the surface area under the curve, or the integral of the spring rate — high school newtonian physics.

at the origin, there is no preload, and no stored energy. the more preload, the further along the spring curve, and the more surface area under the curve, so the more stored energy you need to move against.

one can do thought experiments with a mountain bike — consider a 8″ and a 4″ travel bike. if they are the same spring rate, you would need way more preload on the 4″ bike to not bottom out. or you would need a way higher spring rate on the 4″ travel bike to have the same useable travel. the 8″ bike will be far smoother through its travel either way. one can also have an 8″ travel bike with too soft a spring, crank in a ton of preload, but then the bike is harsh on small bumps, and still bottoms out easily.

applied to ski bindings, think of the “travel” above as elasticity value, “spring rate” as the DIN range (i.e. 10din has softer spring than 18din binding), “bottom out” as pre-release, and the preload as the amount of turns into the DIN range one goes from the lowest value (i.e. 4min on the 10din, 8min on the 18din).

if a skier has 9DIN, then they are applying 5x the preload on the 10din max binding, (from 4 min value), as the 18din max value binding (i.e. from 8 min value).

hope that helps.

To better understand this, draw a simple graph. X axis with 4 1″ marks, the y axis is force. Then draw a line at a 45 degree angle from the origin. this is the spring rate (k value/slope of the line). connect the 4 1″ marks on the x axis with your 45 deg line. Each of these areas under the spring rate line is the amount of kinetic energy required to achieve the displacement of the spring. Integrating force -> kinetic energy. Ke= 1/2 * -k * x^2. Sooo… By adding preload to a spring you must input significantly more KE to move the spring initially, but you are not changing the slope and not changing the spring rate. You are overcoming the stored energy within the spring and overcoming the spring rate at the same time, vs a spring with no preload.

great review on the general characteristics between the tech and alpine bindings. marshal, you obviously feel that the typical dynafit type tech binding gives a clearly inferior skiing experience to the alpine binding. what are your thoughts on the kingpin concept? marker has stated that the kingpin is essentially equivalent to their alpine bindings. do you feel that the complex interaction between the pin toe piece and the alpine rear binding can mitigate the ride of a “fully rigid mt bike frame”? i know your opinion would be pure conjecture without skiing on them, but others have stated (with limited testing) that the kingpin rides similar to the beast. btw, i just purchased the wailer 99 and the new 112s, partly based on blister’s reviews. i ski 60-70% resort (family with 2 small kids) and the rest backcountry. the kingpin concept is very appealing with giving the potential solid alpine downhill feel without the fing garbage underneath the foot when hiking (ie duke). obviously, im not going to wait until midwinter for the kingpin to be fully tested before purchasing bindings. currently i have dynafit bindings on all my old skis. thanks again for the great info! rod

i have yet to even see the kingpin in person, but i have a few questions before i get excited:

1. is there both forward and downward pressure from the heel, like an alpine binding? 2. if so, how much? comparable to a griffon? or more like a squire / jr binding? (the beast’s forward pressure is minimal, and has no downward pressure) 3. how many mms of lateral elasticity? (the beast has 2x that of a tech binding, but 1/2 that of a good alpine binding) 4. how many mms of vertical heel elasticity? (beast has 2x that of a tech binding, but 1/2 that of a good alpine binding)

Marshall- I graduated from UW-Madison in ’78. I was reading your bindings article and could use some help. I am 58, 6′ and weigh 208 (lost 50 lbs) in last 1.5 years. I ski 2-3 times a year in colorado for a few days. I am an intermediate skier , don’t like moguls and mostly ski blue and groomed black runs at aspen/snowmass. I have a new pair of salomon BBR 8.9 skis 176 cm. what bindings would you recommend for me? Thank you for your help. Marty

Marshall- I graduated from UW-Madison in ’78. I was reading your bindings article and could use some help. I am 58, 6′ and weigh 208 (lost 50 lbs) in last 1.5 years. I ski 2-3 times a year in colorado for a few days. I am an intermediate skier , don’t like moguls and mostly ski blue and groomed black runs at aspen/snowmass. I have a new pair of salomon BBR 8.9 skis 176 cm. what bindings would you recommend for me? Thank you for your help. Marty

Hi Marshal,

(My question might appear twice, I submitted it and now I don’t see my original post)

If elastic travel is such an important metric, I find it frustrating that it’s not listed with any of the tech specifications for bindings online. Even when you go to the manufacturers website.

Why do you think that’s the case?

Thanks for the shoutout on the recent podcast. I read the above article and comments a few times and I’m still a bit confused. If elastic travel is the most important factor, is there any way to find that for popular alpine bindings? Why doesn’t Blister do reviews of more alpine bindings? I also see in the comments above that if I’m running at a release value of 9 then I will be better off with a 16+ DIN binding rather than 13ish? All the physics talk is way over my head and I’m still a bit lost. Thanks.

Hello, I have such a question: I work at a ski resort. Is it necessary to completely empty the springs in the ski bindings after each winter season? If it stays at full tension, could this cause the springs to fail over time? Thanks in advance.

I know this is an old article, but it’s some pretty important safety-related info, so I thought it was worth commenting to clear up some technical errors. The release value is NOT the force required to initially compress the spring from preload. It is the peak force achieved prior to release – i.e. at peak displacement which is the same figure as the max elasticity. I think Marshall is misunderstanding the role of a spring constant. As you increase preload, you do also increase the peak force at max displacement. You just do so linearly as a function of the spring constant. So yes, the spring doesn’t get a stiffer constant, but the range of the spring that you are utilizing is in a “stiffer” part of the curve. So his rationale for elasticity is working from the wrong end of the curve. Bindings with higher elasticity are able to *absorb/store more energy in the spring before hitting that peak/release force*. For folks visualizing, there’s more area under the force/displacement curve in the high-elasticity binding, and that area is the energy the spring can store. It’s analogous to mountain bike suspension travel (ignoring the damper) – you can set up a 100mm XC fork and a 200mm DH fork to bottom out at the same peak force, and the DH fork will absorb much more energy through the travel, so an impact with the same energy may be dissipated before the DH fork bottoms, while the XC fork bottoms, despite being set up for the same peak force. What this means for us as skiers is a few things. Generally, more elasticity is better and safer, not just when we release, but when we don’t. Arguably more elasticity is less precise because you may spend less time perfectly centered in the preload, but I have yet to hear anyone complain about precision in high-elasticity bindings. Second, is that running a high-DIN binding at the low end will actually ski “softer” than a low DIN binding at that same setting – this is because the stiffer spring (i.e. higher coefficient, i.e. steeper force/displacement curve) is preloaded less to achieve the same peak value, so it’s starting point (i.e. preload) for displacement is *lower than the low DIN binding.* The high-DIN binding will offer better “suspension” but will actually absorb/store less energy on the path to peak force/release value. Up to you to decide which you value more.

Marc: Your comments are really good. The statement “Elastic travel is the single most important aspect…..” has always bothered me and has always been wrong. Elasticity is one aspect of binding design, but it is possible to have a very elastic very soft binding with a lot of easy early movement that I personally don’t think I would trust. I’d love to see see force displacement curves released by each binding manufacturer or perhaps someone out there will take the project on. I haven’t been comfortable with comments that say a 12 or whatever number on one binding is different than a 12 on another. It certainly isn’t supposed to be that way. The whole purpose of the Release Chart is to standardize release values. However, differences in binding design, such as stiffness certainly affect how each binding functions for individual skiers.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

The Best Ski Bindings of 2024

Welcome to a special Buyer’s Guide feature from FREESKIER. Here’s a close-up look at the best ski bindings of the year.  Click here  to explore the entire 2024 FREESKIER Buyer’s Guide.

Marker Duke PT 13

Weight: 1,000 g uphill 1,300 g downhill.

The Duke PT 13 joins the Royal Family for those in search of a hybrid touring binding with a more approachable DIN range offering (4.0 – 13.0). The Duke PT 13 features a Griffon heel piece to help improve step-in performance and ensure you’re locked in while charging through variable terrain—a go-to binding for riders looking to toggle between resort riding and uphill touring on the fly. 

Tyrolia Attack 14 GW

Weight: 1,010 g/ binding.

The Tyrolia Attack 14 GW is a go-to all-mountain binding for high-performance skiers, whether hunting for powder, lapping the park or ripping on-piste. The FR PRO three toe piece can be easily adjusted to different toe heights and more consistent release with an upgraded AFD. This is the binding for skiers looking for a lightweight resort binding with easy entry and precise power transmission.

Dynafit Blacklight Binding

Weight: 280 g/binding 370 g/ brake.

The Dynafit Blacklight binding is a lightweight, minimalist tech binding for ski touring enthusiasts with an ascent-oriented mindset. At 280 g, Blacklight will take you the distance without weighing you down. The newly designed step-in system makes entry into the toe piece 30 percent easier, and the bayonet positive lock increases responsiveness and downhill performance. Blacklight also features two riser heights you can operate easily with your pole.

Look Pivot 15 GW

Weight: 1,245 g/binding.

Best suited for the majority of skiers, the Look Pivot 15 GW combines the durable all-metal construction of the sought-after Pivot binding with a more approachable DIN range. The Pivot 15’s unique turntable heel design provides a responsive connection between boot and ski, power transmission and top-notch shock absorption so you can confidently send booters and drop cliffs. 

Salomon Strive 16 MN

Weight: 1,125 g/binding.

The Salomon Strive 16 MN delivers a stable platform that excels in every situation and snow condition. The Strive 16 features an LDN toe that places the binding closer to the ski, giving riders a quicker, more direct response, enhanced power transmission and a lower center of gravity. Everything you love about the Strive binding is packaged into a lightweight, downhill resort binding. 

The Best Ski Boots of 2024

Your Shopping Cart

• In Store Appointment
• About The Ski Monster
• Ski Bindings
• Alpine Touring
• Ski Boot Outlet
• Snowboard Bindings
• Snowboard Boots
• Snowboard Outlet
• Men's Ski Jackets
• Men's Ski Pants
• Men's Snowboard Jackets
• Men's Snowboard Pants
• Men's Mid Layers
• Men's Soft Shell Jackets
• Men's Base Layers
• Men's Sweatshirts
• Men's T-Shirts
• Men's Outlet
• Women's Ski Jackets
• Women's Ski Pants
• Women's Snowboard Jackets
• Women's Snowboard Pants
• Women's Mid Layers
• Women's Base Layers
• Women's T-Shirts
• Women's Outlet
• Accessories
• Snowboard Bags
• Belts & Suspenders
• Accessories Outlet
• Staff Picks
• Boston Store

Elan Ripstick 88 W Skis 2024 // Women's

Shop by category.

Look Pivot 18 GW Ski Bindings 2023

Exceptional heel retention and great elastic travel, the Look Pivot 18 bindings should complete your perfect "going big" setup. Send It.

This item is out of stock.

Free Shipping

We Price Match

FULL THROTTLE, FULL SEND.

Reviewed by: joe riccio.

The Look Pivot 18 is time-tested, shredder approved, and now with GripWalk compatibility! These bindings are a top choice for hard-charging freeride/freestyle skiers. It's a powerful binding for those who like to throw down in the park, crank up the DIN, or ski in gnarly terrain where popping out is not an option.The Pivot 18 has a metal reinforced toe piece to ensure maximum boot hold when you're sending it, and consistent release when you need it most. The "turntable" heel is the reason most skiers seek out this binding. The heel piece has more elastic travel than any other binding. This allows for better recovery when you're going big in the park or shredding through deep snow. When you're in a situation that requires your ski boots to remain clicked-in, these bindings help give you some peace of mind. 

Why do so many skiers trust Look, and only have Look?

The toe and heel piece operate independently of one and other. The Pivot heel piece also has the most elastic travel of any heel piece out there.  The Salomon STH2 bindings function similarly, but they don’t have the elastic travel in the heel piece.  Basically what this mumbo-jumbo means is the toe piece has 180 degrees of release and can release that way regardless of heel piece movement.  The toe piece releasing quality is one of the many reasons people go with Knee bindings, but for aggressive skiers – knee bindings can cause pre-release.  Pre-release is something that happens less in a pivot binding, you release when you’re supposed to.

Garrett Finn

• DIN Range/ 8-18
• Standing Height/ 16.5mm Toe // 19mm Heel
• Built By/ Look
• Weight/ 1245g Per Binding
• Designed By/ Look

The Test Crew

We test products year round in order to curate the best gear for you.

Tech Bindings with “Alpine” Heels — The Hybrids

(Another post in our mission to help ski touring newcomers figure out the nuances. See Part One here. This post sponsored by our publishing partner Cripple Creek Backcountry . They’re full-service — a good choice if you need TLC for your ski touring shopping dilemmas.)

Good example of “hybrid” tech binding. Marker Kingpin has a “tech” toe but alpine-like heel.

They’re the hybrid grays of the alien binding world. Promising mysterious benefits, but at the same time emptying your pockets and perhaps asking more questions than they answer. (And yes, sometimes it even feels like you’re being experimented on, especially with first-season products).

We’re talking about ski touring bindings that build on the “classic” tech binding platform. That of connecting binding toe and heel by using the boot shell as a “frame,” but in this case such bindings having heel units that often appear at first glance as a ski resort binding than something for the backcountry.

First, a few terms: — “Elastic travel” refers to mechanical parts that move with the resistance of a spring. In the case of ski bindings, more travel distance is often better. — “Accidental release” refers to coming out of a ski binding while on the downhill, unnecessary and unplanned. Often dangerous. Also called “pre-release.” — “Tech Binding” is defined above. — “RV” stands for “release-retention value,” is simply the “safety release” numbers printed on most bindings. This is also known as “DIN.”

Your choices, in alpha order:

Dynafit Beast 14. Click images to enlarge.

Tecton in touring mode, heel lift deployed.

Marker Kingpin boasts more heel upward travel, toe unit is virtually the same as most other tech bindings.

This is where we mention that some of these bindings have what’s known as “TUV Certification” to international standards for ski touring bindings. While such standards are clearly well intentioned (and we make a point of covering them here at WildSnow), in our opinion they’re overly restrictive, incomplete in terms of what they test for, and have odd requirements that can stifle binding design. Our advice at this juncture (2017) is to either entirely ignore or at least mitigate any influence “TUV Certification” has on your shopping decisions. Instead, follow the basics: Don’t buy first-season products; get advice from friends and reputable ski shops; work backwards from your skiing goals to the proper gear; and so on. More about TUV here. Also please see our glossary .

Trab TR2 ski binding.

So, the million snowflake question : Why would you choose a hybrid? Indeed, a confusing world out there and the hybrids in our midst make it worse. Self-evaluate your goals. You want a binding that as closely as possible mixes an alpine ski binding and tech touring binding? Hybrid could be a good choice. Or, have you spent 300 hours studying how ski bindings work, and you’ve determined you’d prefer side release at the toe, instead of heel? Perhaps rock a hybrid that does so. Want a binding that’s designed with bias to aggressive downhill skiing? Perhaps a hybrid, though the intense competition to make these things compete in the weight wars can result in bindings less durable than you’d expect.

Then, the two million snowflake question : Why would you NOT choose a hybrid? In weight, some of the heavier classic tech bindings are somewhat equivalent to the hybrids. Difficult choice in that case, perhaps price? Or preferences in how heel lifters and mode (downhill uphill) changes are executed? But drop down to the minimalist tech bindings, likely without brakes, and you get a clear win in terms of lightening your hoof load. Thus, if you’re going human powered and not auditioning for ski movies, a setup with a proven classic can be pure joy. Also consider that the complex hybrids can be more challenging to manipulate (clicking in, switching modes, etc.) and may also be sensitive to icing issues.

Clearly, weight could be a crucial tradeoff for anyone using these bindings with human power. The facts :

There you go. After all that, if the alien hybrid bindings are still strange to you, leave a question-comment. You’ll get a response.

Below, more photos of the hybrids.

Kingpin toe detail, arrow points to “pin” system used by all tech bindings.

Kingpin heel has vertical travel similar to alpine binding, but it is SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT as it releases to the side at the heel.

Marker Kingpin hybrid tech binding in uphill mode, with heel lift.

View of how the Trab TR2 ski touring binding toe opens to the side for release.

Trab TR2 has super firm heel hold-down due to wider width of jaws as well as no need for binding rotation left-right.

Fritschi Vipec Black to left, has better left-right travel at toe, significant.

Fritschi PR image, Tecton, our notes.

Dynafit Beast 14 appears to have simplified the somewhat complex toe unit of the first version.

Beast 14 toe rotates 5mm, similar in function to Beast 16 as well as Radical 2.0. A clever part of the lock lever keeps the binding from rotating while it’s open, making it easier to step into.

Hybrid pin tech ski touring bindings tend to have heels that appear as alpine bindings.

WildSnow.com publisher emeritus and founder Lou (Louis Dawson) has a 50+ years career in climbing, backcountry skiing and ski mountaineering. He was the first person in history to ski down all 54 Colorado 14,000-foot peaks, has authored numerous books about about backcountry skiing, and has skied from the summit of Denali in Alaska, North America’s highest mountain.

First Creek Cabin, Colorado, 1935 — Morning History Hit

Dynafit tech heel inserts — part 2 — state of the union.

Best Backcountry (Touring) Ski Bindings of 2024

From ultralight tech designs to hybrid set-ups that play double duty at the resort, we break down the best alpine touring bindings of the season.

Switchback Travel ( Brian McCurdy )

We use affiliate links and may receive a small commission on purchases. Read more about us . 

Whether you're new to backcountry skiing or have been earning your turns for decades, selecting an alpine touring binding can be a particularly intimidating task. For the 2024 season, the market is absolutely flooded with options, ranging from ultralight tech bindings for the uphill-focused crowd to capable designs that play double duty in the resort and backcountry. No two models are the same and there’s something for everyone, so the main task is matching your style and needs with the right binding. To help you choose, we've compiled a thorough breakdown of the best touring bindings on the market, including a comparison table and detailed buying advice below the picks. To complete your setup, be sure to check out our articles on the best backcountry skis and backcountry boots .  

Our Team's Backcountry Ski Binding Picks

• Best Overall Backcountry Ski Binding: Salomon MTN Pure
• Best Hybrid Resort/Backcountry Ski Binding: Salomon S/Lab Shift MNC
• Best Ultralight Backcountry Ski Binding: Dynafit Superlite 150
• Best Skimo Race Binding: Dynafit DNA Binding
• Best Budget Backcountry Ski Binding: Tyrolia Ambition 10

Best Overall Backcountry Ski Binding

1. salomon mtn pure ($650).

For the majority of skiers, the best backcountry ski binding is a tech design that deftly balances uphill and downhill performance, weight, ease of use, and durability. With these metrics in mind, the Salomon MTN Pure is our overall favorite, especially for those that put a premium on user-friendliness and well-rounded performance. Tech bindings can come with a steep learning curve, but the MTN is easy to step into and a breeze to transition between ski and tour modes. The binding showcases its simplistic nature with just three release value settings, and you can also opt for the brakeless version (with included leash). Finally, Salomon nailed the build quality with metal-heavy heel and toe pieces that have held up impressively well throughout our testing.

All that said, the MTN Pure isn’t ideal for everyone, and expert skiers in particular might not like the inability to customize the release settings. The Marker Alpinist 12 below performs even better on the descent with a gapless heel piece that lends a smooth feel and consistent release, although it’s not as easy to transition as the Salomon. Alternatively, if you’re looking for a burlier binding that prioritizes power and stability on the downhill (at the cost of added weight), it’s worth stepping up to a tech design with an alpine heel like the Fritchi Tecton below, or choosing a resort-capable model like the popular Salomon Shift. However, whether you’re a recent backcountry convert, experienced powder hound, or somewhere in between, the MTN Pure puts it all together better than most, earning our top spot of the 2024 season... Read in-depth review See the Salomon MTN Pure

Best Hybrid Resort/Backcountry Ski Binding

2. salomon s/lab shift mnc 13 ($600).

Immediately after its release, Salomon's Shift changed the backcountry ski binding landscape. Simply put, it was the first tech binding that provided legitimate performance and safety while hitting big lines or bombing laps at the resort. The magic formula here is a fairly standard alpine-style heel piece paired with a wildly innovative toe piece, which functions like a pin-ready setup for uphill travel and converts into a traditional downhill toe clamp in ski mode. The net result is impressive versatility in terms of performance and boot-sole compatibility: You can wear your downhill boots and put down the power in hardpack and crud, or go lightweight with your touring setup on a backcountry adventure.

What are the downsides to the Shift? The binding’s two-mode toe piece and beefy heel add some weight, so those who like to go far or fast will want to stick with a design like Salomon’s MTN Pure above or the Marker Alpinist below. Additionally, the Shift is not compatible with alpine touring boots that don’t have full toe and heel lugs, which leaves out models like the Dynafit Hoji Pro Tour. Finally, in testing we found that the heel’s locking lever occasionally pops out while in tour mode (also releasing the brakes), and all the Shift’s moving parts can be a bit onerous to operate. As a result, this wouldn’t be our top choice for those skiing exclusively in the backcountry. But these gripes are fairly minor for a game-changing product that still stands out as the best hybrid binding on the market. Of note: Like the MTN Pure above, it’s also sold under the Armada and Atomic brand names, with the only difference being color... Read in-depth review See the Salomon S/Lab Shift MNC

Best Ultralight Backcountry Ski Binding

3. dynafit superlite 150 ($650).

While the majority of backcountry riders will opt for an all-rounder like the Salomon MTN Pure above, decidedly uphill-focused skiers can shed grams and streamline their kit even further with a design like the Dynafit Superlite 150. The Superlite is inspired by the lightest skimo race bindings on the market, but with more versatility for everyday touring and ski mountaineering. As a result, it’s one of the best ultralight yet highly durable options for ski mountaineers and endurance enthusiasts. For the ascent, you get a 10.6-ounce build with two riser heights (plus flat) and the option for brakes. And on the downhill, the Superlite truly stands out in its weight class, with a nice balance of retention and release safety paired with a wide 4-13 DIN range, as well as an all-metal heel (minimizing the chance of breakable parts). 

As with any ultralight gear, there are some trade-offs inherent in the Superlite’s design. The most glaring is that there’s zero room for boot sole length adjustment, making it difficult to share skis or swap out boots (you can purchase a heel adjustment plate separately for an extra $100). Second, the 150’s minimum forward release is 7, which is a bit high for lighter or less aggressive skiers (the lateral release value is still 4-13). And finally, you’ll have to reach down to manually spin the heel piece rather than using your pole, and the tallest riser is just 51 millimeters (some risers extend up to 85mm or more). Despite these compromises, the Superlite 150 is in a league of its own as a fully featured ultralight binding with great downhill performance. Additional Dynafit bindings worth considering include the even lighter-weight Mezzalama (9.4 oz.), which has a lower vertical release value (5-10) and only one riser, and the Blacklight , which is a great value at $500 but substantially heavier at 1 pound 3.8 ounces. See the Dynafit Superlite 150

Best Skimo Race Binding

4. dynafit dna binding ($700).

Skimo is a rapidly growing sport and one of the newest additions to the winter Olympics, debuting in 2026. And while most local races are welcoming to all levels of skiers and splitboarders, you'll need an extraordinarily lightweight setup to be competitive. This is where skimo race bindings come into play, and the Dynafit DNA is our top pick. Using a mix of aluminum, carbon, stainless steel, and synthetic materials, the binding’s toe piece is a pared-down version of the typical pin design—and it’s been tweaked for better retention. Further, the tiny, compact heel piece is particularly unique: It transitions from tour to ski mode with the simple flip of a riser, saving racers precious seconds during competition. Finally, although the binding is small and weighs only ounces, it’s designed to withstand speedy off-piste skiing in all manner of conditions.

Of course, the DNA is a specialty binding that is intended for racing or training on ultra-lightweight skimo race skis. It is not suitable for driving beefier skis or for ski mountaineering or everyday touring settings—if you want a weight-conscious setup for these disciplines, we recommend Dynafit’s race-inspired but more versatile Superlite 150 above or the ATK Trofeo below. Further, a skimo race setup is an expensive investment when you tally up the bindings, ultralight skis, and racing boots (not to mention a lycra suit). Before throwing down for the whole setup, we recommend trying a race or two and making sure it’s something you enjoy. See the Dynafit DNA

Best Budget Backcountry Ski Binding

5. tyrolia ambition 10 ($379).

We'll cut straight to the chase: Backcountry bindings are expensive. In fact, the average model here is about twice as much as a standard alpine binding (our top-ranked Marker Griffon 13 ID is a relatively affordable $270), which—along with boots and skis—can make putting together your initial touring setup rather daunting. One of the best ways to save is by opting for a frame binding, which offers versatility (they pair with a wide range of boots, including alpine models) and downhill performance in an affordable package. Of course, the most obvious downside to frame bindings is weight: The Tyrolia Ambition 10 here clocks in at a whopping 4 pounds 5.1 ounces, which is more than three times the heft of many of our favorite all-around tech bindings.

For uphill-focused skiers, weight is a major factor and can put a real dent in your efficiency. If you prefer to stay in the tech category, the ATK Kuluar 12 or Dynafit Radical are two of the best budget options (starting around $450-$550). But for casual weekenders, new skiers, or those who plan to split their days between the resort and backcountry, a strong case can be made for an affordable and versatile binding like the Ambition here. But expect a sizable performance drop: in addition to its added heft, the Tyrolia's walkability suffers with a pivot point in front of the toe. Additionally, at 10 on the DIN scale, aggressive riders will be better off with a heavier option like the Salomon Shift above, the Marker F12 or Baron EPF 13, or the 12-DIN Ambition . But the Tyrolia is an affordable choice for beginners, budget-conscious skiers, or riders who don’t want to invest in a tech-compatible boot. See the Tyrolia Ambition 10

Best of the Rest

6. atk raider 13 evo ($700).

ATK’s reputation in the U.S. for producing high-quality and reliable tech bindings has only grown in recent years, and we’re excited to see that the Raider 13 Evo is now available in the U.S. market (it was introduced in Europe last year). A couple design features make the Raider Evo noteworthy, and first is the automatic ski brake. While other Raider models require pressing a button on the heel piece to raise the brake, the new Evo line has a system that raises and locks the brake when you stomp on the heel plate (in tour mode), and it then automatically releases the brake when you rotate the binding to downhill mode. In short, now you don’t have to think about the brake at all. Next, the binding’s toe piece has an adjustable lateral release value (like its heel piece), which means that the binding as a whole can be better-tuned for release, unlike many tech bindings that have an adjustable heel piece and fixed toe. 

Aside from these standout features, the Raider 13 Evo offers a traditional tech design that goes head-to-head with models like the MTN Pure above and Ski Trab Titan Vario.2 below. ATK’s durability is best-in-class with CNC-machined pieces, aircraft-grade aluminum, and a smattering of carbon throughout the components. It’s a big investment at $700 and among the priciest pin bindings here—which is its biggest knock and makes it a little less viable for casual or budget-oriented users. Additionally, weight goes up slightly with the emphasis on metal in the construction. But the latest Raider Evo is undeniably premium and built to last. Note: Black Diamond is a U.S. distributor for ATK, making most of their bindings fairly easy to find stateside. See the ATK Raider 13 Evo

7. Fritschi Tecton 13 ($680)

Switzerland-based Fritschi specializes in backcountry bindings, with a streamlined yet impressive lineup ranging from the entry-level Scout below to the impressive Tecton here. The Tecton defines the “freetouring” category, combining a tech toe (like that of the MTN and Superlite above) with an alpine heel similar to what we see on the Salomon Shift. This hybrid design, which was updated last season to be lighter and even more powerful, balances security and performance on the downhill—nearly on par with many standard resort bindings—with a reasonable uphill weight. With brakes, the Fritschi clocks in at just 2 pounds 12.4 ounces for the pair, more than a full pound less than the Shift above.

If you’re a hard-charging skier or like to spend the odd day at the resort, you might find yourself choosing between the Shift and a binding like the Tecton here. The main distinction between these two models is the toe piece: The Shift’s innovative design means you get a full alpine binding for the descent, which provides superior elasticity and feel and can also be paired with an alpine boot (it also earns it an official TÜV certification for DIN). The Tecton isn’t quite as versatile (it pairs with tech boots only) but still provides impressive performance for a tech binding without the safety compromises inherent in most of these designs (for more, see the section on Release Values in our buying advice). In short, we’d recommend the Shift for those who spend a lot of time inbounds, but the Tecton offers our favorite combination of weight and performance for aggressive skiers who stick to the backcountry. Finally, keep in mind that Fritschi also makes the Vipec Evo , which combines the toe piece of the Tecton with a standard pin heel. See the Fritschi Tecton 13

8. Marker Alpinist 12 ($550)

Marker’s Alpinist 12 goes head-to-head with the Salomon MTN Pure for the best lightweight tech binding here. The two bindings are very similar in terms of both price and weight (keep in mind the brakeless version is listed here), but the Alpinist 12 tacks on a bit of extra tech with its "gapless" (also called a “kiss gap”) heel piece design. This allows the heel to move along a track to compensate for ski flex, rather than the buffer more common in tech bindings, which translates to better downhill performance, including a smoother ride and more consistent release than a model like the MTN Pure. And the real kicker is that the Marker accomplished this at a truly impressive weight: At just 1 pound 9.4 ounces with brakes, the Alpinist undercuts the gapless G3 Ion 12 (2 lb. 8.8 oz.) by a huge margin.

With all that praise, why do we have the Marker ranked here? In short, the Salomon is the more approachable option for the majority of skiers: it’s easier to step into and transition with a 90-degree heel piece rotation (the Alpinist’s is a full 180˚), and provides a bit more assurance in terms of durability with more metal parts (the Marker uses a lot of carbon-reinforced plastic). It’s also a bit lighter when you factor in brakes (sold separately, they'll add about $60 and 7 oz. for the pair). But for the more experienced skier who’s familiar with tech bindings and doesn’t need a gentle learning curve, the Alpinist’s combination of downhill performance and value is truly hard to beat, and Marker even updated their toe piece last season with a rubber “stop pad” and wider platform to make stepping into it easier. Finally, unlike the MTN Pure, which offers only three release settings, you can also tweak the Alpinist’s DIN anywhere between 6 and 12 (or save some cash with the 8-DIN or 10-DIN models). See the Marker Alpinist 12

9. Dynafit ST Rotation 14 ($700)

Dynafit is credited with starting the tech binding craze—some still refer to the category simply as “Dynafit bindings”—and among their core offering is the ST Rotation. Evolving from the popular Radical line, the ST Rotation’s standout feature is its pivoting toe piece, which offers elasticity and consistent release like an alpine binding (unlike the vast majority of tech bindings, this earns the Rotation a TÜV certification for safety). Compared to the aforementioned Radical, it’s easier to step into thanks to a catch that keeps the toe piece gently locked into a centered position. Finally, many will appreciate the ability to choose among release options depending on size and skiing ability: 7-, 10-, or 14-DIN.

The ST Rotation isn’t nearly as light as options like the MTN Pure and Alpinist above, but the next-level downhill performance and safety are well worth it for some. In the end, the Rotation fills a nice gap between the two categories and slots in as one of the most refined touring designs on the market, including easy transitions between ski and tour modes and smooth performance on both the ascent and descent. Finally, we'd be remiss not to mention that Dynafit’s durability and expertise are time-tested, and their bindings seem to take a beating significantly better than most offerings here. See the Dynafit ST Rotation 14

10. Marker Kingpin 13 ($700)

Like the Fritschi Tecton above, the Kingpin is a freetouring binding designed for skiers who don’t like to hold back. It’s also one of the only setups here that earns a TÜV certification for DIN, giving the Kingpin the credentials to stamp its mark in a crowded and highly competitive market. For the descent, you get the safety and secure feeling of a quality 13-DIN alpine binding that releases both vertically and laterally at the heel. On the uphill, the reasonable 3-pound weight easily undercuts most other hybrid models. It’s true that the Kingpin is overkill for all but the most expert-level skiers, but if you’re dropping big lines, it’s one of the most capable tech bindings money can buy.

The Kingpin wasted no time in becoming one of the most popular tech bindings ever made, but it hasn’t kept pace with recent improvements in the market. Compared to the Fritschi Tecton above, it’s a bit heavier and doesn’t include the added release mechanism at the toe, which could be a dealbreaker for aggressive skiers (the Tecton doesn't have an official TÜV certification, but it's very confidence-inspiring overall). And held up against the Shift, you give up alpine boot compatibility and the true alpine toe, which are great features for those who dabble both in and out of bounds. But these are all fairly small nitpicks for such a highly capable design, and there's a reason it's garnered so much attention over the years. Importantly, Marker recently expanded the line to include the Kingpin M-Werks , which combines the trimmed-down toe piece of the Alpinist, the heel of the standard Kingpin, and a host of other upgrades. The result: a drop in weight (2 lb. 14.2 oz.) but a steep $800 price tag.  See the Marker Kingpin 13

11. Ski Trab Titan Vario.2 7-9 ($460)

Designed and manufactured in the resort town of Bormio, Italy, the Titan Vario.2 boasts an excellent combination of performance and retention at a fast-and-light-ready weight. One unique touch is its toe piece, which has its resting state in the clamped position—opposite the market standard. This means you have to depress the lever to step in, but once you’re in, you’re not going anywhere (the jaws also work independently of each other, which further reduces the chance of accidental release). But the biggest news here is the Titan's gapless heel piece, which uses a spring and flexible track to deliver a whopping 43 degrees of elasticity. Added up, you get remarkable downhill capabilities and safety for a tech design at a low weight of just 1 pound 1.6 ounces per pair.

Very few bindings match the cult-like following of Ski Trab’s Titan Vario.2, but there are some notable trade-offs to the niche design. Namely, the Ski Trab can be hard to track down in the U.S. (Skimo.co carries it), the optional brakes max out at 94 millimeters, and the DIN isn't adjustable, despite what the listed 7-9 range might imply (it also comes in fixed 5-7 and 9-11 models). Additionally, the reverse toe piece can take some getting used to, although most tech bindings have some amount of learning curve. But there’s no denying the standout retention, downhill savvy, and durability of the Titan Vario.2, which should be near the top of the list for avid ski mountaineers and endurance enthusiasts who like to charge on the descent.  See the Ski Trab Titan Vario.2 7-9

12. Plum Guide 12 ($499)

As backcountry skiing continues to rise in popularity, the binding market has followed suit. And as we've seen above, many of the best designs consistently come out of the European Alps from names like Dynafit, Ski Trab, ATK, Fritschi—and Plum. Based in France, Plum sells a range of high-quality, all-metal backcountry bindings that run the gamut from ultralight skimo offerings to the Guide 12 here. A best seller that’s been on the market for a decade, the Guide 12 is a proven design with adjustable forward and lateral release values in both the toe and heel pieces, multiple heel riser heights than can be changed on the fly with a ski pole, and a forward/backward adjustable heel that can accommodate a range of boot sole lengths. It’s all wrapped up in a competitively lightweight package that undercuts most competitors (like the MTN Pure, Dynafit Rotation, and ATK Raider 13 Evo) by around $150 to $200.

With an adjustable release value range from 5.5 to 12, the Guide 12 is a sleek and easy-to-operate tech binding that works well for everyone from new backcountry skiers to seasoned veterans and—as its name suggests—ski guides. That said, its downhill performance can’t match other top picks like the Marker Alpinist 12 (with its gapless heel) or Fritschi Tecton 13 (thanks to its alpine-like heel). Another notable issue that we’ve encountered with Plum bindings is finding a local ski shop with the proper jig to mount them (one of our testers had difficulty finding a shop that would mount the Plum Oazo and ended up exchanging it for an ATK binding). This may not be an issue with the Guide 12 because it has a very similar mounting pattern to popular designs like the Dynafit Rotation, but it’s worth double checking beforehand. If you can get the logistics sorted, the Guide 12 is a reliably built, well-rounded tech binding with a loyal following. See the Plum Guide 12

13. G3 Ion 12 ($664)

G3 shook up the tech market with its Ion bindings, which have arguably the most user-friendly design in the business. Tech bindings are known to be finicky when stepping in—particularly in powder—but the Ion’s tall stand height makes it easy to clear out snow with a ski pole, and the pins hook up consistently with your boots thanks to a built-in bumper at the front. Once you’re in, transitioning between modes is pretty seamless and quick: the heel rotates 90 degrees in either direction, and the large riser bars are easy to flip with your pole’s basket or grip. With the Ion 12, we’ve mastered the art of switching into ski mode by levering the heel piece with our pole as we stomp down (and then ripping the skins), and are consistently the first skier in our party ready to hit the slopes at transitions.

Another strong suit of the Ion 12 is its kiss-gap heel design, which translates to great downhill performance (the Marker Alpinist is another pin binding with this feature). However, at 2 pounds 8.8 ounces, the Ion is far from a weight leader. If you're going this heavy, you might as well bump up to an alpine heel design like the 2-pound-12.4-ounce Fritschi Tecton above (even the TÜV-certified Dynafit ST Rotation would be a better option). But the biggest knock against the G3 is durability: We’ve lost track of how many times we’ve heard about the Ion (or its lightweight sibling, the Zed) breaking in the field, which is particularly grim if you’re ski mountaineering or venturing into remote areas. That said, if you’re gentle on your gear and prioritize ease of use above all else, the Ion 12 (also sold in a 10-DIN version ) is worth a look... Read in-depth review See the G3 Ion 12

14. Marker Duke PT 16 ($700)

The immediate popularity of the Salomon Shift has proven that there’s a strong market for all-in-one resort/backcountry bindings, and Marker has thrown its hat into the ring with the Duke PT. Like the Shift, the Marker design is highlighted by an innovative toe piece that functions like a tech design in tour mode and a sturdy alpine binding on the downhill (it’s also compatible with both boot types). The models differ, however, in that the Marker’s alpine toe needs to be moved out of the way for climbing either by flipping it back or removing it completely, while the Salomon’s toe stays in place. This adds time to transitions, although the Duke PT is a decent climber overall, easily beating out frame options in both efficiency and comfort.

Who is the Duke PT best for? With a sturdy heel, 16-DIN release, and the aforementioned alpine toe, the binding is well equipped for aggressive skiers who split their time between resort days and freeride touring. But to be clear, this burly construction does come with a significant weight penalty: With the toe piece in place, the Duke PT is a full 2 pounds heavier than the Salomon Shift (that said, this 16-DIN model has a much higher release value than the 13-DIN Shift). Removing the toe pieces saves you about 1 pound 3.5 ounces for the pair, but the Duke PT still can’t match the Salomon in this department. In the end, ultra-aggressive riders with true big-mountain ambitions may prefer the Duke PT, but the lighter and more streamlined Shift remains the gold standard for most skiers. See the Marker Duke PT 16

15. ATK Trofeo Plus ($470)

You really can’t go wrong with ATK bindings, and we love the Trofeo for its versatility for both skimo racing and ski mountaineering. Like most skimo bindings, the Trofeo Plus is lightweight (the standard version is just 10.2 oz. for the pair) and pared down with a fixed release value, but a number of features make it an attractive option for everyday touring. With the Plus model here, you get a durable all-metal build, ski crampon receptor, and an accessory plate for adjusting the boot sole length. What’s more, the binding offers three height settings (two risers and one flat), which we don’t always see in skimo designs. All in all, the Trofeo is a super lightweight and burly binding that you can accessorize to best meet your ski touring goals.

Who is the best target audience for the Trofeo? Although advertised as a race binding, it’s a great setup for weight-conscious ski mountaineers, similar to the Dynafit Superlite 150 above. In fact, we know a few skiers who rely on the Trofeo as their daily driver, pairing it with skis as wide as 110 millimeters at the waist. But with a fixed DIN, you’ll want to know exactly what (and who) the binding is for, and the max riser height of 44 millimeters is not ideal for steep pitches. In the end, the Superlite 150 is the more well-rounded option, but you can save considerably with the Trofeo here. It’s also worth checking out ATK’s Kuluar 12 , which weighs just a little more at 1 pound 1.6 ounces for the pair and features an adjustable lateral release (up to 12-DIN) and 20 millimeters of boot sole length adjustment.  See the ATK Trofeo Plus

16. Fritschi Scout 11 ($400)

The second frame binding to make our list is the Fritschi Scout. As we saw above with the Tyrolia Ambition above, frame bindings are among the heaviest options available for backcountry skiers, but the trade-off is excellent downhill performance and versatility with a range of boot types. The Scout here is no exception: It's fully DIN-certified, compatible with touring and alpine boots, and checks in at 3 pounds 14.8 ounces, which is almost a half-pound lighter than the Tyrolia. For backcountry-curious resort skiers or those who don’t want to spend upwards of $600 on a tech design, the Scout is a really nice option.

There are a number of other frame bindings worth having on your radar, including the aforementioned Tyrolia Ambition and Marker F10/F12 Tour. All three models have competitive price tags (you’ll spend up for the 12-DIN versions), but the Scout is the lightest of the group by a decent margin (the Ambition 10 and F10 Tour are 4 lb. 5.1 oz. and 4 lb. 13.6 oz., respectively). On the other hand, 11-DIN can be a little low for some, and Fritschi only offers the Scout with the one low release-value range. The Tyrolia gets the edge for us with a $21-lower price point, but the Scout 11 is nevertheless a great option for recreational skiers who go on the occasional tour. See the Fritschi Scout 11

17. Cast Freetour Pivot 15 ($735)

The Salomon Shift dominates the hybrid binding market, but for truly unmatched downhill performance, Cast's Freetour Pivot is worth a look. The unique setup takes Look’s popular Pivot alpine binding—modified so that the toe piece can be removed—and adds Cast's pin-tech touring toe for swapping in on the ascent. In other words, you’re getting one of the most capable and powerful alpine bindings on the market (available in 15- and 18-DIN variations) along with all of the uphill benefits of a tech binding. For the small group of expert skiers for whom the Shift and Marker Duke fall short, the Freetour Pivot is a functional and highly capable solution.

For the rest of us, however, the Cast Freetour Pivot probably isn’t worth the trade-offs. The swappable toe system has a lot of moving parts (don’t lose your spare toe piece) and requires additional time and tweaking at each transition. It also adds considerable weight and heft, checking in 4 pounds 6.5 ounces in tour mode and nearly 7 pounds with the alpine toe. Further, you’re paying a sizable premium at $735, and a DIN of 15 or 18 is overkill for most riders, especially in the backcountry. And if you already own a Pivot binding, the Cast Freetour Upgrade Kit ($300) includes all the parts required for conversion. See the Cast Freetour Pivot 15

Backcountry Ski Binding Comparison Table

Backcountry ski binding buying advice, what is a backcountry ski binding.

• Uphill vs. Downhill Performance
• Backcountry Ski Binding Types
• What's Skimo?
• Release Values and TÜV-Certified DIN

Brakes vs. Leashes

Heel risers and climbing aids, transitioning and ease of use, durability and materials, ski boot compatibility, pairing bindings with skis, buying ski bindings online.

Backcountry ski bindings, otherwise known as AT (alpine touring) bindings, are designed specifically for use when skiing in areas with no chairlift access. They differ from standard downhill (alpine) models in a few ways, the most notable of which is uphill capability. Whereas a downhill ski binding is only built to function with both your toe and heel locked in, a backcountry binding operates in both uphill mode (toe on a hinge) and downhill mode (toe and heel fully locked in). Additionally, they’re designed with an emphasis on weight savings—essential for uphill travel—and many are only compatible with backcountry-specific boots with tech fittings at the toe (there are a few exceptions to this rule). 

Before we go any further, we want to make one thing clear: There is no one-size-fits-all backcountry binding. In other words, there is no one ideal binding for every skier—but there is an ideal binding for each skier. Your choice will come down to a number of factors, including uphill and downhill performance, weight, price, durability, ease of use, retention, safety, and compatibility with your current ski or ski boot. Read below to find out more, and be sure to also check out our top picks above, which line up with many popular backcountry skiing styles.  

  Uphill vs. Downhill Performance

When shopping for a backcountry binding, one of the first questions you’ll want to ask yourself is: Where do I want this to perform best? Given the opposing demands of backcountry travel, bindings will usually excel on either the ascent or the descent, but rarely both. If you’re motivated by long ski traverses, endurance missions, and fast-and-light travel, you’ll want to look for a lightweight tech binding with an efficient pivot point under the toe. There are a few other factors to also keep in mind, including riser heights, ease of transition, and durability for remote environments. Bindings like the Salomon MTN Pure , Ski Trab Titan Vario.2, and Dynafit Superlite 150 are some of our favorites in this category. 

On the other hand, for skiers who endure the uphill for rowdy freeride descents (including those who typically access terrain via sled, snocat, or helicopter), the ideal binding will have an alpine heel and prioritize safety features like lateral toe release and official TÜV certification for DIN. A few tech designs fall into this category—namely the Marker Kingpin—but hybrid bindings like the Salomon S/Lab Shift MNC 13 and Marker Duke PT really shine, with toe pieces that lock down to mimic the connection of an alpine binding. Keep in mind, however, that weight typically matters less for those who prioritize downhill performance, and many of these bindings are notably heavier as a result.  

Backcountry Binding Types

Tech Bindings Also referred to as pin bindings, tech bindings are the most common form of backcountry ski binding and characterized by their skillful combination of uphill and downhill performance. These designs are the lightest of the bunch (most versions range from 1 to 3 lb. for the pair), feature separate heel and toe pieces, and are compatible with tech boots only. Some even swap in an alpine heel (similar to a binding used for resort skiing) for the standard pin heel, which adds a lot of downhill capability without detracting from walkability or tacking on too much weight (the Marker Kingpin 13 , for example, clocks in at 3 lb. 2.4 oz.). Tech bindings are generally offered with either a brake or a leash, and the majority have adjustable boot-sole lengths and customizable release values.

Due to their lightweight builds and pivot point near the ball of the foot that allows for a natural stride, tech bindings are our first choice for skiers who spend most of their time in the backcountry and especially those who want to move efficiently uphill. Downhill performance ranges from serviceable to very good, with the highest-performing models bringing in design features like a kiss-gap/gapless heel, laterally releasing toe piece, or even an alpine heel. You can expect to see an increase in both weight and price with these options, which are primarily designed for particularly heavy or aggressive skiers.

All that said, we’d be remiss not to mention the downsides associated with tech bindings. Given their unique design and intention, they do not have the same release attributes as alpine-style bindings, including frame bindings and hybrid designs. In fact, most tech bindings do not earn a TÜV certification for DIN (the Dynafit ST Rotation and Marker Kingpin are two exceptions). The biggest reason for this is their fixed toe (alpine bindings have a toe that releases with lateral force), which offers no elasticity in the event of a fall and has been implicated in many leg injuries (specifically, spiral tib/fib fractures). For more on the topic, see our section on Release Values and TÜV-Certified DIN below.

Frame Bindings Frame bindings are a crossover category that merge the design of an alpine (downhill) binding with the intention of a tech binding. As a result, you get many features standard to alpine bindings , such as official DIN certification, good downhill performance, and compatibility with most boots (including tech, touring, and alpine styles), along with the ability to detach the heel piece and head uphill. But the biggest selling point here is affordability, with price tags that amount to hundreds of dollars less than tech or hybrid designs.

The most notable compromise with frame bindings is uphill performance: They are very heavy (clocking in anywhere from 3.5 to almost 7 lb.), and the placement of their pivot point in front of your toe results in an unnatural stride and reduced efficiency on the skin track. With more capable tech and hybrid designs on the market than ever before, frame bindings are at risk of becoming obsolete and aren’t our first choice for most skiers. That said, if you’re on a strict budget or ski mostly inbounds, a frame binding could be the best option. 

Hybrid Bindings Hybrid backcountry bindings are a relatively new category and defined by two key designs: the Salomon Shift and Marker Duke PT . Along with an alpine heel, these bindings feature an evolved toe piece that functions like a tech toe on the uphill but converts into a traditional downhill design in ski mode. This means a few things: For one, you get incredible downhill performance and safety with a fully locked-in toe, on par with a standard alpine binding (both the Salomon and Marker are TÜV-certified for DIN). Second, hybrid bindings are incredibly versatile in terms of boot sole compatibility: You can wear your tech boots to seek out remote powder stashes (a pin toe is required for uphill travel) or strap in your alpine boots for a day in the resort. They’re heavier than tech bindings (the Shift is almost 4 lb., while the Duke PT clocks in close to 6 lb.) but are the least compromised option for hard chargers or skiers who split their time between the front and backcountry and want to use the same setup in both environments.

If you’re a particularly large person and/or an aggressive skier, there’s one final option: the Cast Freetour Pivot . Available in 15- and 18-DIN variations, this binding takes the Look Pivot (a popular alpine binding) and adds a swappable tech toe piece for uphill travel. In other words, you get the security and power of a full-on alpine binding along with uphill touring capabilities. The Cast is largely overkill in weight, price, and overall construction for most riders, and the swappable toe pieces can take some time to get used to, but if you already own the Look Pivot or are looking for no-holds-barred security, it’s an intriguing and innovative solution.

What’s Skimo? 

A wildly popular activity in Europe, skimo has recently gained momentum in the U.S., thanks in part to its inclusion in the 2026 winter Olympics. In short, the sport includes both uphill and downhill racing on skis, with an emphasis on quick transitions between the two. Importantly, skimo and ski mountaineering are incredibly different activities—the former takes place in a controlled environment and generally implies racing; the latter involves traveling unsupported in big mountains, often for multiple days at a time. To illustrate the point, we know some skimo racers who don’t ski in the backcountry at all—rather, they use uphill resort travel as a way to maintain fitness and log vert during winter months.

The most important thing to note about skimo race bindings is that they’re designed specifically for competition and are not recommended for everyday ski touring or ski mountaineering. Skimo race bindings rarely have adjustable release values, and often include just one riser height (and often no flat setting). Historically, they have not included brakes or attachments for ski crampons, though that’s changing with a few models like Dynafit’s DNA (our top pick for skimo) and Low Tech Race 105, as well as Ski Trab’s Gara Titan (another popular race binding). Finally, most skimo bindings should only be used in conjunction with skimo race skis and boots—they’re simply not strong enough to drive wide skis or be driven by stiff boots. 

All backcountry skiers will benefit from a lightweight setup, but ski mountaineers, skimo racers, and fast-and-light enthusiasts in particular will want to minimize weight. Tech bindings are our preferred choice for this group because of their minimalist build: The picks here range from a scant 6.8 ounces for the Dynafit DNA skimo race binding to 3 pounds 2.4 ounces for the Marker Kingpin 13 . Within this category, expect the heavier models to have better retention and release features, higher performance on the downhill, and ease of use. On the other end of the spectrum, frame and hybrid types like the Marker Duke PT (5 lb. 15.2 oz.) are among the heaviest options, but they also offer the best downhill performance, are versatile with a range of ski boots, and excel for skiers who spend most of their time inbounds. In the end, deciding how much weight you're willing to shuttle underfoot will depend on a variety of factors, including your ski objectives, how much durability you need, what boots you plan to wear with your bindings, and more.

Release Values and TÜV-Certified DIN 

Each binding on our list comes with a manufacturer-specified release value (usually a range of values), which provides an idea of the amount of force that must be exerted on the binding before it releases your boot. The numbers generally range from 1 to 18, and the higher you go, the longer the binding will keep you locked in. Lighter and less aggressive skiers typically set lower release values, while heavier and powerful skiers will dial it in higher. Understandably, this is a very important number to get right, as a binding that releases either prematurely or too late can have pretty serious safety ramifications—not to mention impact performance.

Within the alpine skiing world, release value is referred to as DIN (short for Deutsches Institut für Normung) and is measured via a standardized test administered by the TÜV (an international testing group based in Europe). When a binding meets all the requirements laid out by the DIN ISO 13992 specification, it is often referred to as TÜV certified.

While all the hybrid and frame bindings here are TÜV-certified, tech styles are essentially the Wild West with just a few exceptions (namely, the Dynafit ST Rotation and Marker Kingpin). The reason for this is their unique toe and heel pieces, which prioritize durability, lightness, and strength over safety features like elasticity and release mechanisms. While alpine bindings release laterally at the toe, most tech bindings feature a fixed toe and release at the heel instead, which has been attributed to an increase in the risk of leg injuries. In other words, if safety is a priority, it’s not a bad idea to opt for a TÜV-certified binding like the aforementioned Rotation and Kingpin (the Fritschi Tecton also features a lateral toe release) or bump up to a hybrid binding like the Salomon Shift.

Whether you’re skiing at a resort or in the backcountry, it’s a good idea to use either a brake or a leash to keep your skis from going far if they detach from your boot. Most hybrid and frame styles come with built-in brakes, but tech styles often give you the option for leashes instead. On one hand, leashes are lighter and keep your skis much closer to you (brakes don’t always bite on icy terrain). On the other hand, brakes make it easier to step into your ski boot by holding your ski in place and don’t require you to bend over and attach them like a leash does. In our opinion, brakes are the most user-friendly solution for the majority of skiers, but we understand the appeal of leashes, especially for those focused on minimizing weight. If you opt for the latter, the B&D Ski Leash is our favorite: It features a coiled cord that stretches so that you can transition without unclipping and breaks under a certain force (you choose between 40 and 60 lb.), which is a nice safety measure in the event of a serious fall.

Brake Width If you opt for brakes, you’ll likely have your pick between a variety of widths. It’s a good idea to get a width that closely matches the waist width of your touring skis —part of the reason it’s always a good idea to select your skis prior to picking a binding. The typical recommendation is to choose a width that is no more than 10 to 15 millimeters wider than your ski's waist, and not slimmer than a few millimeters (a ski shop can bend the bars ever so slightly). Be sure to avoid buying a brake that is too wide, as it can drag when you’re carving on hardpack.

Heel risers—also known as heel lifts—help reduce strain on your calf muscles and Achilles tendon on steep terrain by elevating your heel and decreasing the range of motion required from your foot and ankle. They can also make it easier to break trail in deep powder by keeping the tips of your skis up. Designs vary between brands and models, but most risers comprise small metal tabs on the binding's heel piece that you can flip into place with a ski pole. On average, the majority of touring bindings have three riser levels: flat (no lift engaged), mid-rise, and high rise.

When you’re skinning across a flat meadow, ideally you’ll be in “flat” mode (not using a riser at all), and your movement will look very similar to classic cross-country skiing. By gliding across flat surfaces, you’re able to cover more distance with fewer steps and minimal effort. However, a big part of backcountry skiing is going uphill. As you ascend moderately steep terrain, engaging the lowest heel riser will lessen the strain on your lower legs and help you maintain an upright and efficient body position (i.e., not leaning forward at the waist). As you get into very steep terrain, using the high-rise position on your heel riser will accomplish the same goal. Importantly, using risers when you don’t need them will shorten your stride and tip your balance forward (like walking in high heels), so a good rule of thumb is to adjust your risers to what feels most natural given the slope angle—and reassess as that changes.

Ski Crampons Another common climbing tool is the ski crampon. Almost all backcountry ski and splitboard bindings have a small tubular slot on the toe piece for attaching a ski crampon. Ski crampons have sharp edges that bite into firm snow as you step down with the ball of your foot. They’re an essential piece of gear for ski mountaineering and springtime volcano skiing in the Pacific Northwest, when you’re likely to start the day on very hard, frozen snow and descend on sun-softened corn. Note: If you’re using ski crampons, you can’t use your binding’s heel riser(s), as you’ll need to be able to flatten your foot against the ski in order to push the crampon into the icy snow surface.

Backcountry bindings are fairly complex pieces of gear, and you’re bound to face some sort of learning curve no matter which design you choose. In general, we’ve found that frame bindings are the easiest to use, while tech and hybrid styles have more moving parts, especially during transitions. For us, a user-friendly binding is one that rotates quickly (ideally, with just the twist of our ski pole ), offers a convenient transition from tour to ski mode without detaching from the boot, and uses risers to alternate between climbing modes (rather than rotations). And some subtler features can go a long way toward increasing efficiency, including easy-to-grab heel pieces that only require 90-degree rotation (we like taller and more rectangular shapes), climbing risers that toggle with your pole’s basket or grip, and rubberized components like the toe lever on the G3 Ion 12 .

More than most gear, backcountry bindings truly take a beating, especially if you like to ski hard or venture deep into the mountains. We ask a lot from these devices, and most of the time, they hold up impressively well (although if you’re a ski mountaineer, it’s likely you have a story of your binding breaking at the least optimal time). Most tech bindings are made with predominantly metal parts, including aircraft-grade aluminum, titanium, and carbon, but we also see a lot of high-tech synthetic materials, especially in the hybrid and frame categories. While an all-metal design is certainly robust and confidence-inspiring (ATK prides itself on this), we’ve found the durability of bindings with plastic components to be almost equally as impressive (and plastic can help shave weight and cost, too). 

More than the quality and type of materials (metal vs. synthetics), it’s important to consider the quantity—that is, the weight of your binding. In other words, you’ll want to ski your binding well within its limits in order to maximize its lifespan (and importantly, take care to match it with an appropriate ski). We dive deeper into this in the next two sections below. 

Ski boot compatibility is a big topic in the alpine binding world, and it's arguably even more consequential for backcountry bindings. However, the good news is that it's fairly easy to break down. Starting with tech bindings, which comprise the majority of the options on our list, you get compatibility only with boots with tech fittings at the toe, which come standard on most modern touring boots. In terms of the boot sole, tech bindings typically work with designs that have ISO 9523 soles or non-compliant soles (often found on streamlined, lightweight models).

Frame bindings and multi-norm hybrid bindings like the Salomon Shift or Marker Duke PT are a different story: With these styles, you can ski a very wide range of boot types. These include most tech boots, crossover downhill/backcountry designs that have GripWalk and Walk to Ride soles, and standard alpine boots that do not have tech fittings (ISO 5355 Alpine). The benefit to this versatility is huge for skiers who want to ski one pair of skis with two separate boots—you can throw down on groomers in your stiff resort boots and strap on your light and flexy backcountry boots for the skin track. Of course, you’ll want to check the details for each binding before you commit to purchasing, as there are always exceptions to the rule (for example, the Salomon Shift does not accommodate a tech boot like the now-discontinued Dynafit Hoji Pro Tour due to its shortened heel and toe lugs). 

Ski gear works best as an integrated system, so it's a good idea to research your skis, boots, and bindings all at once. Outside of the basic compatibility issues between boots and bindings that we touched on above, it’s important to ensure all parts complement one another. Put another way, don’t throw an ultralight tech binding on a heavy powder ski—it’s just a waste of a lot of cool technology (and cash). And the same goes with some of the heavier and more downhill-capable bindings here: We recommend avoiding an ultralight touring ski that isn't powerful or stable enough for carving. To help in the process, see our top picks for backcountry skis .

When ordering skis and bindings online, it’s important to know that the bindings will not arrive mounted (unless you specifically buy them mounted together). If you have a local ski shop or order from a retailer like REI, it’s as simple as paying to get the bindings mounted on the skis (you'll need to bring your boots along, too). The typical cost is around $40 to $70, but REI will do the work for $25 if you purchase from them (this was the price at the REI flagship in Seattle last season, but it does vary by store). It's worth noting that there are some pretty good DIY mounting tutorials online, but given the safety element and risk (you'll be drilling into your own pricey skis), we think it's well worth having a professional technician do the job. Back to Our Top Backcountry Binding Picks   Back to Our Backcountry Binding Comparison Table

Learn More About Backcountry Skiing

Best Backcountry (Touring) Skis of 2024

Salomon S/Lab Shift MNC Binding Review

Backcountry Ski Bindings: Tech vs. Frame vs. Hybrid

Best Backcountry (Touring) Ski Boots of 2024

How to Layer for Backcountry Skiing

Best Avalanche Airbag Packs of 2024

Best Avalanche Beacons of 2024

Backcountry Skiing Checklist

Jason Hummel: An Alpine State of Mind

Mobile Menu

Megamenu - desktop hamburger menu.

• Hiking Gear
• Backpacking Gear
• Biking Gear
• Camping Gear
• Footwear Reviews
• Climbing Gear
• Skiing Gear
• Winter Gear Reviews
• In-Depth Gear Reviews
• Hiking Shoes
• Hiking Boots
• Trail Running Shoes
• Mountain Bike Shoes
• Approach Shoes
• Climbing Shoes
• Beginner Climbing Shoes
• Mountaineering Boots
• Winter Boots
• Rain Jackets
• Down Jackets
• Synthetic Jackets
• Fleece Jackets
• Hardshell Jackets
• Softshell Jackets
• Windbreaker Jackets
• Ski Jackets
• Winter Jackets
• Hiking Pants
• Hiking Socks
• Trekking Poles
• Baby Carriers
• Running Vests
• Backpacking Tents
• Backpacking Packs
• Backpacking Sleeping Bags
• Backpacking Sleeping Pads
• Backpacking Stoves
• Backpacking Food
• Water Filters
• Altimeter Watches
• Handheld GPS
• Mountain Bike Helmets
• Mountain Bikes
• Mountain Bikes Under $1,000
• Mountain Bikes Under $2,000
• Gravel Bikes
• Bike Brands
• Kids' Bikes
• Hitch Bike Racks
• Camping Tents
• Rooftop Tents
• Camping Sleeping Bags
• Camping Mattresses
• Camping Chairs
• Camping Stoves
• Duffel Bags
• Rock Climbing Shoes
• Climbing Helmets
• Climbing Harnesses
• Climbing Quickdraws
• Belay Devices
• Climbing Ropes
• Climbing Backpacks
• Winter Gloves
• 4-Season Tents
• Ski Helmets
• Ski Goggles
• Ski Backpacks
• All-Mountain Skis
• Ski Bindings
• Backcountry Skis
• Backcountry Ski Boots
• Skis for Beginners
• Hardpack Skis
• Mirrorless Cameras
• Full-Frame Cameras
• DSLR Cameras
• Point-and-Shoot Cameras
• Travel Cameras
• DSLR Lenses
• Mirrorless Lenses
• Lofoten Islands
• Lofoten Hiking
• Hardangervidda
• Jotunheimen
• 10 Great Norway Hikes
• Public Huts
• Torres del Paine
• Chalten and Glaciares
• Lake District
• Patagonia National Park
• Milford Sound
• Abel Tasman
• Marlborough
• Great Walks
• Adventure Towns

Add adventure to your inbox

• Privacy Policy
• Terms of Service

© 2024 Switchback Travel. All Rights Reserved. No part of this site may be reproduced without our written permission.

• South Africa
• Turkmenistan
• South Korea
• Philippines
• Timor Leste
• Afghanistan
• Saudi Arabia
• United Arab Emirates
• Northern Ireland
• Isle Of Man
• Bosnia and Herzegovina
• North Macedonia
• Liechtenstein
• Netherlands
• Switzerland
• Czech Republic
• Antigua And Barbuda
• British Virgin Islands
• Cayman Islands
• Dominican Republic
• Puerto Rico
• Saint Barthelemy
• Saint Kitts and Nevis
• Saint Lucia
• Saint Martin & Sint Maarten
• Trinidad And Tobago
• Turks And Caicos
• US Virgin Islands
• Falkland Islands
• French Guiana
• El Salvador
• United States
• New Zealand
• Papua New Guinea
• Cook Islands
• French Polynesia
• Accessories
• Bags & Backpacks
• Horseback Riding
• Photography
• Maintenance
• Airport Hotels
• Bed & Breakfast
• Budget Hotels
• Business Hotels
• Family Friendly Hotels
• Gay Friendly Hotels
• Luxury Hotels
• Pet Friendly Hotels
• Pool Hotels
• Romantic Hotels
• 13 Best Ski Bindings
• Travel Gear

Ski bindings and boots are both very important gear, but to most, the former isn’t as interesting to choose and it can feel like another few hundred dollars to slap on top of your winter budget. But since having a proper set of bindings is just as important to your performance and safety as any other piece of gear, you have to choose the best pair! Finding the right ski bindings for your riding style and ability can have a major impact on your skiing experience. With so many technical details and options, it can be overwhelming to figure out which pair to get. Should you get ski bindings for park, or should you get a pair for the backcountry? Well, fret not! Aside from showing you all the best options out there, we also have ski bindings buying guide specially made for you!

For those who are also looking for other skiing gear, you can check out our list of the best all-mountain skis , best Quicksilver ski goggles , and the 13 best ski boots bags !  

How To Choose The Best Ski Bindings

Need ski bindings buying guide before visiting the ski resorts in Vermont ? Great, as we’re going to show you some of the most important features that will determine which bindings are ideal for you!

DIN settings

DIN settings are the industry-wide standard for setting the amount of force required for a binding to release. It’s an important safety consideration as having your skis unintentionally release during a landing is no good. Usually, higher skill levels are associated with higher DIN numbers. The higher the DIN, the more force is required for the binding to release.

• 3-11 DIN: For older youth and beginner adults.
• 3-12 DIN: For heavier youth or lightweight intermediate skiers.
• 6-14 DIN: For advanced to expert lightweight skiers or heavier intermediate to advanced skiers.
• 6-18 DIN: For expert, aggressive skiers.

Thus, we recommend choosing bindings with a DIN range that suits your skill level.

Sole norms & binding compatibility

Ski bindings and boots should match each other well. That said, there are 3 main types of soles that are generally seen in the ski boot industry, which are the Alpine boot sole, the GripWalk boot sole, and the WTR (walk-to-ride) boot sole. Some bindings are highly versatile and compatible with all of them, while others may fit with only one sole type. So, make sure to always keep this in mind when you’re planning to buy a pair of ski bindings.

Ski binding types

• Alpine bindings: Alpine bindings or downhill bindings are for all classic downhill skiers. They’re very easy to use and can accommodate all traditional downhill ski boots. It’s best for anything and everything on a resort day.
• Tech bindings: This type is great for those who want to spend hours traveling uphill as they’re more lightweight. They’re best for multiday or long-distance ski touring and occasional in-bounds use.
• Alpine touring frame bindings: These bindings are a crossover category that aims to take the best attributes from both alpine and backcountry offerings. Their framed design offers excellent power transmission for bombing downhill, but when switched into touring mode, the free heel and climbing bars allow you to skin uphill. Plus, they can accommodate a wide range of boots.

Most bindings have brakes that are nothing more than 2 metal arms along the sides of the binding that dig into the snow when no boot is clicked in. This prevents your skis from sliding away before they’re on and it also keeps them from taking off down the hill without you in the case of a crash in which the bindings release. It’s important to know which brake widths are available for a given binding to make sure that they offer a size that’s great for your skis. That said, most companies recommend the brakes to be set at a maximum of 20mm wider than your skis.

• Elastic travel

The elastic travel is a measurement given in mm, often separately for the toe and heel pieces. It describes how much a boot can move within the binding before the binding releases. Greater elastic travel is definitely a big benefit, especially for advanced skiers hitting big features with potentially rough landings.

How much should I spend on ski bindings?

Your ski bindings and boots should have the same intended ability level. Usually, beginner bindings will cost around 100USD to 200USD. Expert level bindings can be over 500USD. Depending on where you buy them, you may need to pay a bit extra to have your bindings mounted to your skis.

What does GW mean in ski bindings?

GW stands for GripWalk. It’s a type of boot soles, which include traditional alpine, GripWalk, and AT, which stands for Alpine Touring.

Tyrolia Attack2 11GW Bindings

If you already own a pair of ski boots for beginners , the next step is to find ski bindings for beginners, like the Tyrolia Attack2 11GW Bindings . Aside from having an enticing price tag, these bindings are perfect for beginners putting together their ski package for the first time and those looking for ski bindings for park. They’re lightweight but have a solid feel that will boost confidence! Although they can’t take the brunt of powerful skiers ripping slopes, for casual resort-goers, they’re more than ideal.

We also like the curved rubber sole that makes walking very comfortable and improves natural roll. Everyone knows having compatible ski bindings and boots is very important. That said, with their new FR PRO2 toe piece, you can easily adjust these bindings to fit both alpine and GripWalk ski boots. Besides being versatile, these tough bindings are also available in 3 different colors to choose from.

What We Love

An affordable and versatile pick for beginners and those who want a pair of ski bindings for park.

• Very affordable
• Integrated stiff pads
• Curved rubber sole
• Compatible with GripWalk and alpine soles
• Low DIN range

Check Price & Info

Marker Baron EPF 13 Ski Bindings

We bet those coming over from the alpine side will love the Marker Baron EPF 13 Ski Bindings . These bindings are frame-style freeride bindings that feature a walk option and are compatible with alpine and touring boots. This option right here is ideal for more aggressive skiers that are less concerned with weight and more concerned with DIN and power transfer.

These bindings sit on a wide chassis, allowing you to drive big mountain skis without much worry, as freestyle skiers and heavy huckers are accustomed to. Yes, they’re not the lightest bindings, but they still manage to offer great power and control on the downhill. Like most alpine touring bindings, these ones let you adjust the heel riser to the slope angle, with 2 climbing modes at 7 and 13 degrees. Best of all, the newly designed toepiece is constructed with a unique anti-ice rail on top.

A great option for resort skiers who want to explore the side country without simply hiking in boots.

• Great for downhill
• Compatible with alpine and touring boots
• Suitable for aggressive skiers
• Adjustable heel riser
• Anti-ice rail toepiece
• Heavier than most options

G3 Zed 12 Ski Bindings

Are you just getting into backcountry touring? If so, then feel free to check out the G3 Zed 12 Ski Bindings ! They’re a pair of lightweight, high-performance bindings loaded with features that you can count on as you learn more and more about traveling uphill. Ski bindings and boots can be very expensive. But thankfully, these bindings cost less than most boots out there, which is always nice. By the way, if you need other cheap skiing gear, check out the 13 best ski goggles under 100 and the 13 best ski helmets under 100 !

One of the things that make beginners love them is their ease of entry and dedicated Boot Stop. You won’t have to worry about snow building up when you have to re-engage in the deep snow! Weighing in at less than 2lbs, they use 7,000 hot-forged aluminum to maximize the strength-to-weight ratio. With a freeride mount width, wide center support of the heel turret, and high release values, you’ll be surprised by their power transfer and precision to the ski.

They’re strong and reliable ski bindings for beginners available at an affordable price.

• Inexpensive
• Beginner-friendly
• Ease of entry and dedicated Boot Stop
• Lightweight but sturdy
• Powerful transfer
• Limited only for beginners

Salomon S/Lab Shift MNC 13 Ski Bindings

We can’t complete this list without these amazing bindings. The Salomon S/Lab Shift MNC13 Ski Bindings are among the best, and they immediately changed the backcountry ski binding landscape after their release. These bindings were the first tech binding that provided legitimate performance and safety while hitting big lines at the resort. One of the best things about these bindings is their downhill performance. They ski downhill just like resort bindings, and most people notice no difference between them and typical resort bindings.

Assuming that these bindings will be mainly used for resort skiing, they’re pretty easy to use! In fact, you can use them exactly like how you use other alpine bindings. You step in, go, step out, and stop. Super easy! Apart from that, we also like how durable they actually are! They do cost significantly more than most basic resort bindings. However, they’re truly worth investing in.

Resort bindings that can be used for occasional human-powered action.

• Great uphill and downhill performance in a single binding
• Compatible with most soles
• Easy to use
• Durable construction
• Pretty heavy

LOOK Pivot 14 AW Ski Bindings

Thanks to the Multi-Directional Release technology, the LOOK Pivot 14 AW Ski Bindings manage to set themselves apart from their competitions. These bindings boast a mechanical upward release that functions independently from the heel for the most effective and reliable release protection in case of a fall. Meanwhile, the 7 points of contact with the boot assure that you’re not sacrificing any energy transition or driving power.

These impressive shoes also deliver loads of elastic travel, both laterally and vertically. With 28mm of elastic travel on the heel and 45mm and 180-degree release on the toe, these bindings can absorb shock on chatter or jumps and cut back on unwanted pre-release. Plus, a shorter mounting zone provides less swing weight to improve response and a deeper, more consistent ski flex.

One of the top bindings out there due to the elastic heel and low height that keeps you close to the ski.

• Mechanical upward release
• 7 points of contact
• Broad DIN range
• Less swing weight
• Non-swappable brakes

Atomic STH WTR 16 Ski Bindings

When you use the Atomic STH WTR 16 Ski Bindings , you’ll feel like gliding 2 armored tanks on your feet, for real! Thanks to their oversized mounting platform and low-profile chassis, these bindings can give you the maximum amount of control and power distribution. Once you use these bindings, nothing will be able to stop you and you’ll ski with nothing but confidence.

You can be as aggressive as you want out there, as they will definitely hold up. It’s no secret that ski bindings and boots have to suit each other well. That said, with the adjustable toe height, these bindings can accommodate both Alpine and WTR boots up to 28mm. Intended for advanced skiers, these bindings also feature natural ski flex and progressive transfer pads, which are special inserts placed beneath the toe and heel to increase damping and forgiveness.

A premium model for expert skiers who want total trust in their bindings.

• Highly comfortable
• Excellent power distribution
• Comes with a 2-year warranty
• Suitable for expert skiers
• Natural ski flex and progressive transfer pads
• A bit heavy and pricey

LOOK Pivot 12 GW Ski Bindings

Here are bindings that are often preferred by the freeride skiers, the LOOK Pivot 12 GW Ski Bindings . But despite that, they’re great for all-mountain too. These amazing bindings keep you locked onto your skis for all the fun stuff including big landings but release in the sketchy situations when you need them to. What’s great about them is their pivot turntable design that provides 7 points of contact between your boot heel and the binding. Thus, you’ll have amazing contact, ski feeling, and power transmission. Oh, they’re also compatible with GripWalk and alpine boot sole.

If you’ve read the ski bindings buying guide on the internet, you’ve probably known that these bindings are made for intermediate to expert skiers. The wide DIN range makes them versatile in terms of ski level and style. Meanwhile, the 28mm of elastic travel in the heel and 40mm of travel in the toe will prevent the pre-release of the binding. Those travels are pretty elastic too, allowing the boot to move more before the torque causes release.

These bindings deliver impressive performance all over the mountain and on a variety of skis.

• Alpine and GripWalk sole compatible
• Amazing energy transmission
• Safe, consistent release
• Long elastic travel
• The brakes aren’t swappable

Salomon Warden MNC 13 Ski Bindings

Offering versatile performance, the Salomon Warden MNC 13 Ski Bindings are easily one of the best options out there. Ski bindings and boots have to match each other well. Thankfully, these bindings are compatible with an impressive range of boots. They’ll save you from buying new boots to fit them unless you want to! These bindings are compatible with both alpine and touring sole standards. Plus, adjustments are relatively easy with a manual toe height and automatic wing adjustment.

That’s not all, as these impressive bindings can also serve a wide variety of skiing levels! However, we have to admit that they’re best suited for intermediate skiers. The extra-wide toe pedals transfer power effectively to the edges and make these bindings super ideal for larger skis. Moreover, the sliding pedal is spring mounted and allows for some lateral movement. It also ensures that any booth with a normalized sole will release in case of a fall.

These are all-around bindings that are great for most skiers despite their skiing skills.

• Offer a versatile fit
• Extra-wide toe pedal
• Easily adjustable
• Great for all skiers despite their skill level
• Alpine, WTR, and GripWalk sole compatible
• Manual toe adjustment

Salomon STH2 WTR 13 Ski Bindings

With the Salomon STH2 WTR 13 Ski Bindings , you can expect great power transfer thanks to the low profile and extra-wide toe pedal of these freeride bindings. We like the fact that they offer a great amount of elastic level, which is 52mm in the heel and 16mm in the toe, which helps prevent pre-release. Not to mention, the wide range of DIN also allows you to adjust the release to suit your own needs.

Apart from that, these amazing bindings are also known for their ease of use. When you’re looking for ski bindings buying guide, they’ll probably tell you to find a pair that’s easy to use, especially if you’re new to skiing. That said, these bindings are super easy to click into even in deep snow conditions. The shape makes it really easy to clear snow from around the bindings. The ease of use is made even more attractive by the compatibility with walk-to-ride sole norms.

They’re definitely the go-to option for deep powder.

• Alpine and walk-to-ride sole compatible
• Amazing elastic level
• Wide range of DIN
• Really easy to use
• Some pre-release problems at higher DIN

Marker Duke PT 16 Ski Bindings

Both of your ski bindings and boots should be of high quality. If you still haven’t found a great pair of the former, then take a look at the Marker Duke PT 16 Ski Bindings . The Duke was one of the very first bindings available on the market, and the newest incarnation is a forerunner of the latest hybrid technology. These bindings have a full pin binding setup that an alpine toe can be mounted on top of. The toe piece can be flipped up for ascents or is totally removable if you prefer to save weight at the risk of dropping them on the skin track.

Yes, it can feel disconcerting to look at the detached toe piece. However, one can’t deny that the overall construction is top-notch. These bindings are catered to the skiers who ski the resort and may go for a short tour out of the gates, and they’re also compatible with different ski boot platforms. You can basically slide anything from 4-buckle race boots to full-on touring boots into these bindings as long as they have heel and toe lugs.

They’re high-quality bindings for touring and downhill that most skiers love.

• Full pin binding setup
• Removable toe piece
• Impressive construction
• Compatible with different ski boot platforms
• Easy to get in and out
• Risk of losing the toe piece if you take it off

We think it’s safe to say that the LOOK Pivot 14 AW Ski Bindings are the most easily recognized series in skiing, as they’re used by some of the world’s best skiers! If you read the ski bindings buying guide, many will recommend you this pair. That’s because only a few come close to these bindings in terms of safety, power transmission, and ski control.

The turntable design of these bindings connect them with the ski at 7 points of contact, minimizing the footprint of the bindings on the surface of the ski, and naturally increasing flex and control. They also feature industry-leading elastic travel, which can absorb impact and help prevent knee injuries as well as pre-releasing. Even better, they’re compatible with both traditional alpine boot soles and GripWalk boot soles.

A high-quality pair of ski bindings that give you maximum control so you can turn corners with pop.

• Top-notch safety
• Great power transmission
• Increased flex and control
• Industry-leading elastic level
• Limited adjustment range

Marker Jester 16 ID Ski Bindings

Marker is one of the most trusted titans of the binding scene. The “Royal Family” line of bindings has set the standard for alpine and frame bindings for decades. That said, those looking for downhill bindings should go take a look at the Marker Jester 16 ID Ski Bindings . They’ve been favored by big, aggressive freeride skiers who need their ski bindings to hold their boots firmly. On top of that, these ski bindings for park will add a degree of security for those worried about hitting big jumps in the park.

The biggest update of these bindings compared to the previous versions is their expanded boot sole compatibility. Now, they pretty much work with any alpine boots and some touring boots, which is great! After all, ski bindings and boots have to work well together so you can have a great skiing session. Part of the toe and heel housing has also been rebuilt with magnesium to save on weight and add a little more stiffness for driving power. We also love that they have a wide enough DIN range to be acceptable for nearly any adult. Yes, they are cheaper options on the market, but none of them do quite the job that these bindings can when it comes to freeride playfulness and stomp-power.

Highly durable bindings with impressive construction without adding much weight.

• Extremely durable
• Hold boots firmly
• Expanded boot sole compatibility
• Wide DIN range
• Great for aggressive skiers
• Might be overkill for some skiers

Marker Griffon 13 ID Ski Bindings

In terms of sheer slope presence, the Marker Griffon 13 ID Ski Bindings are one of the most beloved ski bindings on the market. This great skiing gear splits the difference between performance and weight really well. On top of that,  these bindings are among the most affordable options on the market right now worthy of your attention and money. For most riders, these ski bindings for park can be taken anywhere they go. They come with a full DIN range from 4-13, so there’s plenty of opportunities for new skiers to grow into their binding as their skills and demands progress.

The “ID” in the name refers to the Marker’s boot compatibility, which is among the widest out there. So, if you have these ski bindings and boots from Marker, you’ll definitely have a blast! Meanwhile, the toe piece is set up to accommodate anything from the standard ISO 5355 downhill model to GripWalk, Walk-to-Ride, and even touring-specific soles. Plus, the brakes are pretty easy to swap for varying ski widths and available in sizes that should accommodate the vast majority of all-mountain shapes.

A really affordable and practical pair of alpine ski bindings for park that’s straightforward.

• Affordable price
• Compatible with Marker’s boots
• Easy-to-swap brakes
• Varying sizes
• They don’t have enough power if you want to drop big cliffs and ski with the best

Author:  Craig Connors

As a travel enthusiast and experienced adventurer, I have spent years exploring the world and discovering hidden gems in every corner of the globe. From backpacking through Europe to trekking in the Himalayas, I have chased my passion for travel and embraced every opportunity to learn about different cultures and ways of life. Now, as a travel writer and website author, I channel my love of exploration into creating informative and inspiring content for fellow travelers. Whether you're planning a solo trip to a remote destination or seeking family-friendly activities in a bustling city, I am dedicated to providing you with the tools and knowledge you need to make the most of your journey. With a keen eye for detail and a love of storytelling, I bring each destination to life through vivid descriptions and engaging narratives, highlighting the unique experiences and attractions that make each place so special. So join me on this journey of discovery, and let's explore the world together!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Mon: Closed Tue - Sat: 10:00am - 6:00pm Sun: 12:00pm - 5:00pm

• Account Account
• Subtotal : $ 0.00 Checkout Cart

Availability

• In Stock 50
• Alpine Ski Bindings (24)
• Alpine Touring Ski Bindings (7)
• Telemark Ski Bindings (7)
• Cross Country Ski Bindings (14)
• Ski Binding Parts & Accessories (5)
• Rossignol 11
• 22 Designs 7
• Rottefella 7
• Show More Brands
• Black Diamond 2
• Show Fewer Brands
• Not Designated 8
• Show More Sizes
• 75 – 95mm 1
• 83 – 93mm 1
• 90 – 100mm 2
• 95 – 115mm 3
• One Size 13
• Show Fewer Sizes
• Up to $10 5
• $10 to $19.99 2
• $20 to $49.99 2
• $50 to $124.99 13
• $125 to $199.99 6
• $200 to $499.99 23
• $500 to $749.99 5
• Snow Sports

Sun Glasses

Winter Sports

Follett’s Mountain Sports

Owned by Mike Follett since 1971, each member of our staff is a seasoned, knowledgeable mechanic and rider with the expertise to help with anything when it comes to bikes, skateboards, skis, snowboards, sunglasses and riding equipment. We’re all eager to share the knowledge so please stop by and if nothing else, just chat with one of our friendly staff members about anything and everything bikes, skis and boards.

Not only do we offer a full-service bike and ski shop but we also have the largest in-stock selection of bikes, skis, skateboards and quality sunglasses in the Lewiston, Clarkston, Moscow and Pullman areas. Need to rent? No problem. We have seasonal bike and ski/snowboard package rentals as well.

We only carry the most trusted brands of bikes and e-bikes such as Specialized, Giant, and more plus bike and ski racks from Yakima. We also carry child trailers from Burley and Sunlite. We carry BMX by Sunday, Cult, and Subrosa along with after-market parts and accessories. Whether you’re just getting started or a seasoned trail rider, our experienced staff can help you determine which bike is going to work for you. Our techs are here to service your bike and get you back on the trail.

We’ve got you, and your eyes, covered! We have a huge selection of quality sunglass brands like Maui Jim, Oakley, Smith, Zeal, Costa, and Suncloud.

We carry everything you need for shredding the slopes with Burton, Never Summer, Oakley, Flow, Obermeyer, Rossignol, Salomon, Look, Smith, Dakine, and Scott.

Why shop anywhere else? We’ve got the equipment, the knowledge and the personalized service that only comes from shopping where you live!

Get In Touch

• All Ski Resorts
• Best Ski Resorts & Test Reports
• Snow Reports
• Accommodation
• Change region
• Novo-Peredelkino – Moscow
• Test winners
• Ski resort lies in multiple regions Novo-Peredelkino – Moscow
• This ski resort is also located in:
• Eastern Europe ,
• Largest ski resorts
• Most ski lifts
• Biggest elevation difference
• Highest ski resorts
• Highest base stations
• Most inexpensive ski resorts
• Glacier ski resorts
• Indoor ski areas
• Piste maps/trail maps
• Ski resort size
• Slope offering
• Snow reliability
• Slope grooming
• Accessibility, parking
• Orientation
• Cleanliness
• Environmental friendliness
• Friendliness
• Accommodation offering
• Families/children
• Advanced skiers, freeriders
• Cross-country skiing, trails
• Open slopes
• Open ski lifts
• Mountain snow depth
• Base snow depth
• Season begin
• Ski weather
• Live streams
• 8 pers. chairlifts
• 6 pers. chairlifts
• Gondola lifts for 8+ pers.
• Combined installation
• Tricable ropeway
• Aerial tramway/ Reversible ropeway
• Cog railways
• 1 pers. chairlifts
• Moving carpets
• Val Gardena
• Val di Fiemme
• Val di Sole

Nearest airport/train station Novo-Peredelkino – Moscow

By plane and/or train to the ski resort novo-peredelkino – moscow.

• Weather report
• Low priced accommodation/hotels
• Ski-in/ski-out
• Holiday apartments
• Bed and breakfasts
• Holiday homes
• Plane & Train
• Driving map

Nearest airport Novo-Peredelkino – Moscow

Arrival by plane to the ski resort Novo-Peredelkino – Moscow:

• Moscow (SVO), Russia »
• Moscow (DME), Russia »

Train connection Novo-Peredelkino – Moscow

• No direct train connection
• Approx. 49 km distance to the ski resort
• Approx. 0 hours 52 minutes driving time
• from : Moscow (SVO), Russia
• to : Skilift Novo-Peredelkino, Staroorlovskaya ulitsa, 119297 Gorod Moskva, Russia
• Approx. 54 km distance to the ski resort
• Approx. 1 hours 0 minutes driving time
• from : Moscow (DME), Russia

Feedback/changes to Skiresort.info

URL being transmitted: https://www.skiresort.info/ski-resort/novo-peredelkino-moscow/arrival-plane-train/

5-star ski resort in Austria (Österreich)

Tiers am Rosengarten

• Legal notice
• Advertisement on Skiresort.info