trek 2000 aluminum

Is The Trek 2000 A Good Road Bike?

Table of Contents

Trek road bikes have always been a popular brand in road bike racing. Following the first generation of the Trek 2000 road bike in 1999, there were different versions of the Trek 2000 in 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003.

The Trek 2000, which was entirely hand-built, also competed in a few races at the time. This is a comprehensive review of the Trek 2000 road bike. Is the star model still a good road bike after 15 years?

I recently purchased a used Trek road bike.After a period of riding，We gained some practical experience.

Below we’ll take a look at the Trek 2000’s road performance, as well as its track performance, key components and specs, and its other versions. Finally, we also compare some of the road bikes for sale today to the Trek 2000.

If you’re on a budget, you can check out our Top 9 Best Road Bikes Under 500 [Review] to choose the best road bike.

Road Performance

You’d be correct if you expected more from this “old” road bike. Standard 700C tires, slim 25C tires for fast tarmac speeds. The carbon fiber fork is extremely strong and unbreakable.

Although the road edge section does not provide much shock absorption, it has a very high power transmission ratio when accelerating the ride. On the uphill section of the road, the 3X9 drivetrain makes the rider feel very comfortable.

The steep head tube angle forces the rider out of their comfort zone on downhills and necessitates a different acceleration position to gain a better grip on balance. It takes some getting used to.

It’s a little uncomfortable, but the Trek 2000 is still a good choice when the corner isn’t violent, and it’s still a good choice if you live in the neighborhood.

Track Performance

Even with an expensive race-specific road bike, if it’s just a flat road ride. When compared to the Trek 2000, the difference is only noticeable on longer rides.

On hill rides, the steep head tube angle of the Trek 2000 allows the rider to climb faster. Going downhill increases traction by compressing the body and lowering the center of gravity.

Especially the park’s plastic roads, which are one of my favorite places to ride. The Trek 2000 has a good power transfer ratio and 27 different speeds, allowing the rider to get used to it over a longer period of time, making it a mid-range road bike rather than a pure entry-level road bike.

The track performance is 4.5 out of 5 and is comparable to modern road bikes in the same price range.

Trek 2000 main components and specifications

Aluminum frame.

One of the features that distinguish the Trek 2000 bike as an entry-level race road bike is the use of Alpha SL aluminum.

The cost of construction is slightly higher than that of a steel frame, but it is lighter in weight. It maintains the frame’s rigidity.

The body is blue/silver. Standard Trek insignia. The head tube angle is aggressive.

The Trek 2000 frame design is a very classic race-type frame that can be used for not only road racing but also some triathlons.

The Trek 2000 has a Bontrager Race full carbon fork, which contributes significantly to the Trek 2000’s weight savings.

It is well known that the cheaper the bike, the heavier it is, and the Trek 2000 frame design is still very traditional compared to modern road bikes, with no quick-release hubs, a stiff thru-axle, and a stable front wheel for fast travel on flat roads during fast rides.

3X9 drivetrain

The Trek 2000’s 3X9 flywheel has a much higher gear count for flat road riding than the current 2X flywheel. And having more gears means having more gearing options.

This is fantastic for flat tracks. However, if you’re a beginner, having more gears means having a faster shift reaction time. And the three chainrings in the front section aren’t ideal for time trials.

Of course, for casual riding, the 3X9 drivetrain is a godsend, and who can resist a road bike with more gears?

700Cx25C Tires

The 700 x 25c Bontrager Select is a great tool for accelerated riding despite its lack of tread.

When riding on the road, it can accelerate the ride and accommodate up to 28C rims, which are one of the accessories that can be replaced if you want a more comfortable ride.

There is no attempt to achieve extreme lightness in tire weight, and some riders may prefer the thinner 23C tires, but that will be a great test of your riding skills.

It is extremely easy to fall down when going through corners quickly without enough sidewall, especially when going through corners quickly.

However, the thin tires of the 23C appeal to me for the challenge of faster riding speeds.

Other versions of Trek 2000

Trek 2000 wsd.

The Trek 2000 WSD is the perfect road bike for women riders. The 2000 version of the 2000 WSD still had a 3X8 drivetrain.

The 2000 version of the WSD had a 3X8 drivetrain, but the 2001 and later Trek 2000 WSDs all had a 3X9 drivetrain.

The paint colors were light blue and dark blue. The aluminum micro-adjusted seat post is also different from the Trek 2000.

2006 Trek 2000

The number of rear gears has been increased by 10 speeds, but the other changes are not too big.

Trek 2000 Specs

Trek 2000: what do we like.

• Quality Shimano accessories that will support the bike for years of use
• Durable, maintenance-free aluminum frame
• Carbon brazed dimensional fork
• Standard 700C tires for faster riding
• Multiple frame sizes to fit riders of all heights

What we don’t like?

• Hard saddle
• Pedals need to be upgraded to ride faster

Related Questions

• How much does the Trek 2000 weigh?

19.3 lbs, which is already relatively light for a road bike with an aluminum frame.

• How much does the Trek 2000 cost?

The price of the Trek 2000 varies from version to version. However, the official guide price is $1090-$1500.

• What is the price of a used Trek 2000 bike?

If you are willing to trade in your old bike for a new one, then the price is expected to be around $120.

But at used bike length, it is expected to double. 240 USD is the selling price. This is just the data before release and can be used as a reference.

Comparison Table

Competition, trek domane al 2 vs 2000.

In terms of price, aluminum frame, front, and rear rim brakes, light transmission angle, and carbon fork, the Trek Domane AL 2 is similar to the Trek 2000.

However, there is still a speed disparity. The Trek Domane AL 2 has a 2X8 drivetrain, which is not suitable for a competitive bike, and the compact body design is slightly narrower than the Trek 2000.

As a result, the Trek Domane AL 2 is well-suited to the needs of short commuter riders, which explains why they were able to reserve rack holes at the rear end of the frame, as well as front and rear mudguard mounts.

If you’re thinking about the possibility of racing, then consider the Trek Domane AL 4 Disc, which is more suitable than the Trek Domane AL 2.

But if you’re more of a fast commuter, the Trek Domane AL 2 is available at a very affordable price.

Trek Domane AL 4 Disc vs Trek 2000

Although the Trek Domane AL 4 Disc road bike is a little more expensive to purchase, the Trek Domane AL 4 Disc is better for the rider in terms of the quality of its accessories, and a more sensible way of braking when it comes to racing.

The Trek Domane AL 4 Disc is still made of aluminum, but the overall frame weighs about 4 pounds more than the Trek 2000, making it suitable for endurance races and shorter distances.

The 2X10 drivetrain will give riders a wide enough shift range, and while there is a large flywheel gap compared to the Trek 2000, I don’t believe the 2X10 gears are insufficient. I don’t believe the gears on the 2X10 are sufficient.

Front and rear forcible hydraulic disc brakes allow for faster descents followed by quick braking, allowing you to gain valuable time on downhill trails and corners.

If you enjoy gravel sections and trail riding, you’ll be pleased with the Trek Domane AL 4 Disc’s configuration.

RIDLEY Fenix Road Bike vs Trek 2000

The RIDLEY Fenix Road Bike is the strongest competitor to the Trek 2000 in the list.

A competitive road bike that combines sports aesthetics and cycling, the Gravel Road Bike will see the light of day.

If you own the RIDLEY Fenix you get, carbon fiber frame, carbon fiber fork, 2X11 drivetrain, hydraulic disc brakes, and Vittoria Rubino Pro Tires to keep you rolling on gravel roads.

The RIDLEY Fenix Road Bike has a lighter weight than 2000: around 17 pounds, a clean and tidy look, a steep fork, and the climbing ability to crush the Trek 2000. These are what make the RIDLEY Fenix Road Bike a worthy all-around carbon racing and training bike.

The price point is medium in competitive bikes, not extremely light, but all the performance is up to about 95% of a pro-level road bike, making it a very cost-effective competitive bike.

Schwinn Phocus 1600 vs Trek 2000

The Schwinn Phocus 1600, which is half the price of the Trek 2000, does not appear to satisfy competitive riders.

The Schwinn Phocus 1600 is an aluminum frame with a carbon fiber fork, but it’s a great alternative to the Trek 2000 for first-time riders looking for a more affordable road bike.

This looks a lot like the Trek 2000. The gearing, however, has been compromised, with a 2X8 drivetrain and no it wide-range gearing.

As a result, the Schwinn Phocus 1600 is only available to riders who commute to ride or go out for exercise.

Final Verdict

With its lightweight, durable aluminum frame and ultra-wide gear range, the Trek 2000 is still a mid-range race road bike that has a lot to offer compared to modern new road bikes.

But if you’re not looking for a used road bike, consider the options in our comparison table.

The Trek 2000, with a stable ride and a configuration that allows for fast and accelerated riding, ultimately we think it’s a good road bike and worth buying.

Learn more:

Is The Trek 1000 A Good Road Bike? [Trek 1000 Review]

Is The Trek 1200 A Good Road Bike? [Review]

Is The Trek 1.2 A Good Road Bike? [Review]

Related videos

Related Posts

[Orbea URRUN 10 20mph Review] – Best Used By People Who Enjoy Riding To Get AFeel For The Mountains!

[schwinn admiral hybrid bicycle review] -is schwinn admiral hybrid bicycle worth buying？.

[Specialized Turbo Como 5.0 Review] – Good Choice?

15 of The Best Mountain Bike Saddles You Can Buy

20 INCH FOLDING BIKE BTWIN 120 Review－Fold up and put in “pocket”

2023 Top 10 Best Fun Kids Bike Bells – Will This Bring Joy To Your Child’s Ride?

27.5 vs 29er Mountain Bikes – The Battle Of The Century

Best 20 inch Bikes For 6-13 Years Old Kids Bikes (With Gears)

Best 27.2 Dropper Post

Best 30.9 Dropper Post In

Best 31.6 Dropper Post

Best Mountain Bike Stems-Better Travel Through The Mountains And Forests

Leave a comment cancel reply.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Brochures | Price Lists and Values | Trek History | Trek Timeline | Serial Numbers Component Dates | Gallery | Contact | Buy/Sell Suggestions Refurbish/Upgrade | Bike Resources | Home

*Trek is a trademark of Trek Bicycle Corporation, Waterloo, WI

All copyrights in the TREK brochures, pricelists, owner's manuals and photographs displayed on this website are the sole property of Trek Bicycle Corporation, Waterloo, Wisconsin.

All materials in this site not copyrighted by others are Copyright © 2001-2015 Skip Echert Web Associates , All rights reserved.

• Rider Notes

2003 Trek 2000

An aluminum frame race bike with upper mid-range components and rim brakes. Compare the full range

For This Bike

View more similar bikes →

A bike with lower gearing will be easier to ride up steep hills, while a higher top end means it will pedal faster down hills.

Similar Bikes

(descending)

Add custom gearing

Last updated June 29 Not listed for 2,495 days

Submit Search

• Utility/Hybrid
• Kids/Junior
• Bicycle Czar collection
• Electric Assist

Back to top

• Forum Listing
• Marketplace
• Advanced Search
• Classic Forums
• Retro-Classic

1985 Trek 2000 Aluminum

• Add to quote

What do you all think of a 1985 Trek 2000 as a vintage road bike? Are 1985 Dura Ace componets good quality or desireable to collectors. It is the first year of the Aluminum Trek, I was just wondering if it was worth anything to collectors if it is in good shape.  

I think it was awarded Bicycling Magazine's bicycle of the year.  

• ?            
• 205.3K members

Top Contributors this Month

1986 Trek 2000

When new, this was the top of the line Trek. Later Trek aluminum frames were welded 6061 aluminum and not nearly as nice. Frame is bonded 7000 series aluminum with internal lugs. This is an early frame so the drop outs are aluminum with stainless steel facing. Over the years, a newer Trek OCLV carbon fork was added, the wheels were changed, and it was converted to 7 speed. The original paint is a bit tired. It is light and responsive, even today, this is a great ride.

Frame: True Temper T2, bonded 7000 series Aluminum, 60cm

Fork/Headset: Trek OCLV Carbon/Dura Ace

Crankset/Bottom Bracket: Shimano Dura Ace 7400/Shimano Dura Ace

Drivetrain/Cog/Chainring/Chain: Shimano 7 speed/13-26/53-39

Derailleurs/Shifters: Shimano Dura Ace 7400/7spd Dura Ace

Handlebars/Stem: Specialized/Specialized

Saddle/Seatpost: Selle Italia Turbo/American Classic

Brakes: Shimano Dura Ace 7400

Front Wheel/Hub/Tire: Shimano 600/Mavic GP4/Tufo Tubular

Rear Wheel/Hub/Tire: Shimano 600/Mavic GP4/Tufo Tubular

More Info: This bike is a bit large for me, hence the low saddle.

Added about 8 years ago by OldRoadieTehachapi . Last updated over 3 years ago.

As of over 3 years ago, OldRoadieTehachapi has indicated that they no longer own this bike.

dietrootbeer says:

so cool! - I love that you have the article and magazine cover

Posted about 8 years ago

OldRoadieTehachapi says:

aluminum-trek , dura-ace , dura-ace-7400 , early-aluminum-trek , original-trek-2000 , road-bike , trek , trek-2000

• View OldRoadieTehachapi's Profile

OldRoadieTehachapi's Other Bikes

• 2000, Trek, 2000

2000 Trek 2000

• Specifications
• Description
• Value Guide

Frame & Fork

Bicycle condition guide.

•  Bicycle Database
•  Compare Bicycles
•  Product Catalog
•  Shop Categories
•  Spoke Calculator

Copyright © BikePedia 2017 | Design by BikePedia.com | All rights reserved

Your cart is empty

Have an account?

Log in to check out faster.

Estimated total

Open Daily | Fremont, Seattle, WA

Cycle & Coffee

Trek Alpha Series 2000 Aluminum Road bike, black, silver & red, 52cm/Small

Couldn't load pickup availability

Small Alpha Series Aluminum Trek road bike, handmade in USA, with red accents throughout. Shimano Tiara groupset (crank, hubs, derailleurs, integrated shifters/levers). Shimano Sora caliper rim brakes. Black Bontrager seat and bottle cage. Cushioned black and red bar tape. Black Salsa stem, and icon drop bars. 3x9 speed drivetrain. Red Aluminum RDR rims and stainless steel spokes. CST Czar 650x23c road tires. 

The bike needs a replacement rear shifter, so expect a slight delay when booking a test ride on this one - we'll update the description once this has been replaced.

Comes with a 30 day guarantee on mechanical issues. Contact us if you'd like to schedule a test ride at our Fremont, Seattle shop along the Burke Gilman trail, or we ship anywhere in the US. Shipped bikes come with some basic assembly required - we recommend you get it assembled by a professional mechanic and you can even have it shipped directly to your local bike shop for your convenience. Receipt of assembly by a mechanic is required for mechanical guarantee claims on shipped bikes.

• Choosing a selection results in a full page refresh.
• Opens in a new window.

Trek 2000 Alpha Series SL

• Serial: U 0360 1T 170 18L 18818
• Manufacturer: Trek
• Model: 2000 Alpha Series SL
• Primary colors: Black, Red, and Silver, gray or bare metal
• Frame size: S
• Frame Material: Aluminum

Distinguishing features

Road Bike with skinny tires, 20 inch wheels, curved handlebars

• ALL (67 Forums)
• WHEELS & TIRES
• SPECIALIZED
• CYCLOCROSS BIKES
• TIRES & WHEELS

Trek 2000 2002 Road Bike

• USER REVIEWS

I find this bike very comfortable and forgiving, the carbon fork takes some of the jolts. I did have to change the seat and pedals, but I would expect this anyway. Pest Control Vallejo

None so far.

Tiagra components.

Nickel 2, I'm sorry about your friends tragedy. However i won't blame it on the bike. Here is what I learned. I crashed my steel frame carbon fork Bianci head on into a culver. The frame buckled in two place but by God's grace I walked away and the bike seemed "fine". Then my local bike shop said don't ever ride that bike again as the carbon fork could totally colapse without warning with tragic results. I thought, "Oh great, they want me to buy a new bike". Then by buddy, who has a whole bike shop in his basement, told me the exact same thing not knowing what the bike shop told me that already. I bought a new frame. When ever a carbon fork has been wrecked it MUST be replaced even if it looks fine. I hope this helps/saves someone. Ride safe out there!

Front struts may shear without warning resulting in serious injury and perhaps death.

My friend and coworker was thrown head first into a paved road surface when the front wheel supports on his Trek carbon fiber bike sheared about 3 inches below the handlebar yoke. He is an experienced rider and was riding to work when the bike failed. He has now been unresponsive in a coma for more than a month. His wife and two daughters miss him. DO NOT BUY THIS BIKE! You or someone you love may experience a similar sudden injury.

Strong frame design. Bike feels very solid even over less than optimal terrain.

Takes some forcing to execute tight turns. Rear wheel fish tails and slides a little too easily on wet surfaces.

Being over 6 feet tall in japan left me with only a few choices. After switching out the seat post (and later the seat itself) and adding a higher and longer stem the bike fits like a glove. Tight turns are a little tricky, but that's partly due to my higher center of gravity. The original seat was a bit uncomfortable due to shape. Shifting is smooth and quiet but on occasion has a tendency to not be able to decide what gear it wants to be in (rear). I've put about 2k miles in 2 years on it, had two minor accidents, but the bike shrugged it off (scratched up the left shifter something fierce though).

Solid frame and comfortable geometry, components have good durability, carbon forks limit vibrations well

spokes on the back wheel have started breaking, which I hear is common after a year or so of moderate to high use. It will require a rebuild or new wheels. The seat was not very comfortable, but it is a less expensive bike model

This is a very good bike for the price. I have put about 3000 miles on mine in 2 years. It is not as light or smooth as other frames that I've test rode, and the components are not high end. But for the price, this is a solid ride that has kept me up with much nicer bikes in training and racing.

Similar Products Used:

none long term, test rode trek madone sl and 5.2 for a day each

All the parts I have upgraded.

This is a revised review. I changed a few things on the bike, since the last review I posted. I purchased a pair of Cane Creek Aerohead wheelsets, connex stainless chain,11/8" King headset and a Reynolds Pro fork. I was not going to change the fork and headset, but the paint and the epoxy coating flaked off the Trek fork. The head tube is set up for 11/8", so I decided to change it. The dealer wanted me to send the old fork back for repair or replacement, Trek will decide on the outcome. I decided not to waite for Trek's decession so I purchased a new fork. Wow what a deferance with the new fork.

Solid ride, shifts effortlessly (rear).

mixed componenets, but have had no real problems. occasinal grinding in 1st gear from the front derailer. but it is a triple ring..(I guess I could adjust it, but rearly use 1st, so no biggie)

I like this bike. I am jsut starting out training for triathlons. (well have been training since last year) Last year I was riding a Trek 7200 comfort bike and hopped on this baby and, whowa! she is quick, and tough. I weigh 180 lbs and have had no problems with the stock wheels. I find this bike very comfortable and forgiving, the carbon fork takes some of the jolts. I did have to change the seat and pedals, but I would expect this anyway.

Frame,105 components

Wheels,tires,cheap chain,seatpost, and seat

I highly recommend getting a Trek bike, the customer service is excellant and the frames are great. A shorter stem was installed at the bike shop, the bike shop has been great. I upgrated a few components, seatpost carbon fiber u.s.e., seat,pedals Wellgo R2, and carbon fiber headset spacers,and lightweight tubes. As for the rest of the bike is stock. Its quick and responsive around curves. For a 63c size its light at 20 pounds. It could be lighter and roll faster if wheels and tires were changed. The drivetrain is adequate, the chain will be replaced and upgraded.

Schwinn,Trek

Carbon Fiber fork. Good shifters and wheels. Light bike for the price. Mine weighs 21 lbs.

Should not have mixed components, could have came with carbon seatpost, and higher-end tires.

Nice Bike for the price. Enjoy it very much. For older riders, as I am (54), I recommend the triple ring. It is light, and as "stock" requires few upgrades. The only improvements that could be made are all "105" components and a carbon fiber seatpost. Although the list price was $1299 (I didn't pay this), I traded in an old Trek 420 (I upgraded) and a Trek Mountain Bike, I feel I got a very good deal with some cash "boot".

An old Trek 420 which I upgraded.

Corners as though on rails. It is light. And if you are not hardcore, the third chain helps! It is BEAUTIFUL.

Vibration, but hey it is aluminum. the seat post could/shoulkd be replaced. Pedals.

I am not a racing rider yet! I have had my Trek 2000 for 2 months now. Have been riding it 2-3 times a week on rides of 30-50 miles, and have been in one race with it already. A duathlon. I can honstly say that it is great fun to ride a real bicycle again. Yes, like majority of Americans in their 20s and 30s and 40s, I started my 30s buying a mountain bike and trying to enjoy the nature. Though it is really fun to be in the trails when they are quiet, mountain biking is NOT a natural sport. And it indeed requires much more upper body strength than regular biking. You also are constantly putting yourself in danger. Ok, mountain biking is ok, and I shall still do it. But my God, my Trek 2000 has let me realize how fast I can be and what joy riding a road bike is, minus the stupid drivers here in the South. I am fast! I am killing guys younger than me, who have been doing this for a while, because I have a body (150-160) 5''10" made for this. I love the hills, no hill has stopped me yet, though I am sure that will happen. I use the third chain rarely, but it is good for me to know it is there! This thing corners beautifully. Magical cornering ability. And on downhills, just bend baby and go as fast as 40-45 miles easy. Ok, I do not like the base pedals, but they will do for now. And it is an aluminum, so when you go over potholes, use the mountain biking skills and raise yourself from the saddle, or keep your jaws open :) May be a carbon seat post will help. I love the color. This is a good starter bike and I shall recommend it to anyone who is not a racer. No it is not meant to be a carbon or titanium bike, and certainly the components are adequate but could be better. Well, I probably shall wait for another year before I buy my Trek carbon 5200. Can not wait!

Get the latest road bike reviews, news, race results, and much more by signing up for the Roadbikereview Newsletter

Hot Deals See All Hot Deals >>

Get the latest roadbike reviews, news, race results, and much more by signing up for the Roadbikereview Newsletter

• EDITORIAL REVIEWS
• CLASSIFIEDS

ABOUT ROADBIKEREVIEW

• TERMS OF USE
• PRIVACY POLICY
• ADVERTISING

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2024 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.

Laser-induced acoustic pressure waves generated by irregularly shaped absorbing objects

Steven L. Jacques 1,2 , Guenther Paltauf 2,3

1 Oregon Medical Laser Center, Providence St. Vincent Medical Center, Portland, OR

2 Oregon Graduate Institute of Science and Techonology, Portland, OR

3 Institut für Experimentalphysik, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Austria

Internet Poster, Saratov Fall Meeting, 2000

Introduction

Mathematics of optoacoustics.