kbs tour 120 vs project x 5.5

Project X vs KBS Tour V

When it comes to selecting the right golf shaft for your game, two names often stand out: Project X and KBS Tour V. Both of these shafts have garnered a strong following among golfers, but they have distinct characteristics that make them suitable for different player profiles and swing types. In this comparison, we will delve into the features and performance of Project X and KBS Tour V shafts to help you make an informed decision about which one might be the best fit for your golf game.

Project X Shaft

1. background:.

• Project X is a well-known golf shaft brand, and it’s part of True Temper, a leading shaft manufacturer.
• Project X shafts are popular among professional golfers and amateurs alike due to their reputation for stability and consistency.

2. Characteristics:

• Low launch and low spin: Project X shafts are often preferred by golfers who want to reduce spin for more control and distance.
• Firm feel: These shafts typically have a firm feel, which can provide feedback to the golfer and help with shot control.
• Available in various models: Project X offers a range of shaft models (e.g., Project X HZRDUS, Project X LZ) to cater to different swing profiles.

3. Player Profile:

• Project X shafts are generally well-suited for golfers with a faster swing speed who seek to control ball flight and minimize spin.

KBS Tour V Shaft

• KBS (Kim Braly Signature) is another respected name in the golf shaft industry, known for its innovative designs.
• The KBS Tour V is a part of the KBS Tour Series, which is popular among many touring professionals.
• Mid launch and mid spin: KBS Tour V shafts offer a balanced combination of launch and spin, making them versatile for a wide range of golfers.
• Responsive feel: These shafts tend to provide golfers with a responsive feel, aiding in shot shaping and feedback.
• Available in multiple flexes and weights: KBS Tour V comes in various flex options and weights, allowing golfers to fine-tune their shaft choice.
• KBS Tour V shafts are suitable for golfers who desire a versatile shaft that can accommodate different swing speeds and playing styles.

Performance Comparison

1. launch and spin:.

• If you’re seeking a low launch and low spin, the Project X shaft may be more suitable.
• For a mid-launch and mid-spin option, the KBS Tour V offers a balanced performance.

2. Feel and Feedback:

• Project X provides a firm and stable feel, which can be beneficial for those who prefer more control.
• KBS Tour V offers a responsive feel, allowing golfers to better sense the clubhead during their swing.

3. Player Flexibility:

• Project X is tailored for golfers with faster swing speeds and a specific desire for lower spin.
• KBS Tour V is versatile and can accommodate a broader range of golfers, including those with varying swing speeds.

Fitting and Testing

Before making a final decision between Project X and KBS Tour V shafts, it’s essential to emphasize the importance of getting a professional fitting. A club fitting can provide valuable data on your swing speed, launch angle, spin rate, and other crucial factors that will help you choose the right shaft for your specific needs.

Customization

Both Project X and KBS Tour V shafts can be further customized to match your preferences precisely. You can adjust the shaft flex, weight, and even experiment with shaft length to optimize your golf club’s performance. Customization can have a significant impact on your ability to control your shots and maximize your distance.

Cost Considerations

It’s also worth mentioning that there can be differences in the price range of Project X and KBS Tour V shafts. While both brands offer quality products, the cost of each shaft can vary based on the model, customization options, and where you purchase them. Therefore, it’s essential to establish a budget and explore both brands’ offerings within that range.

Long-Term Investment

When selecting a golf shaft, it’s not just about immediate performance but also about the long-term investment. Consider how the shaft will fit into your overall golf equipment setup and whether it complements your other club selections. The right shaft can enhance your consistency and confidence on the course, potentially leading to better scores and more enjoyable rounds.

Shaft Material Comparison

Launch and spin characteristics, length and tip size,  availability in flex options, player preferences.

In the Project X vs. KBS Tour V debate, there’s no one-size-fits-all answer. Both of these shaft brands have their strengths and are trusted by golfers of various skill levels. Your choice should ultimately align with your unique swing characteristics, playing style, and preferences.

Remember that a club fitting by a qualified professional is invaluable in making the right decision. They can provide data-driven insights and recommendations, ensuring that you get the best golf shaft for your game. Whether you end up with Project X or KBS Tour V, the goal is to optimize your golf club’s performance to help you achieve lower scores and greater enjoyment on the golf course.

Anglo Carson, a Certified Golf Instructor, embarked on a remarkable journey, driven by his unwavering love for golf. He founded The Golf Mine with a singular mission - to create a golfing haven where passion knows no boundaries. His lifelong love affair with golf, combined with his expertise as a Certified Golf Instructor, turned into a vision to share his extensive knowledge, inspire, and promote the game he holds dear.

View all posts

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Project X vs KBS Tour: Comparison

Project X is one of the best in the market, True Sports wished so and the players made it come true.

According to a publication by Golfweek USA Today, a large percentage of golfers make use of the True Temper Steel Shafts in their irons on the PGA Tour.

These models are used by Tiger Woods, Justin Thomas, Brooks Koepka and others too, according to Golfweek.

True Temper Sports has an admirable foot in the world of golf today.

For over 70 seventy years, this brand has been in the business of shaft making and has done nothing but soar, the name itself speaks standards.

Being the most trusted brand in golf shafts globally, True Temper strives to keep that trophy in check.

The brand has a warehouse of shaft types to choose from, such as the flagship Dynamic Gold, Project X, AMT, Elevate, Aerotech (for graphite lovers), and Accra shafts made with love for the custom fitters.

Each of these shafts has various types of tweaks from the original model to cater to players with slightly different preferences.

This article discusses the Project X shaft and one of its counterparts, the KBS Tour Shaft.

What to Know About Project X

The project X shafts were designed to provide a stiffer feel and heavy load.

The shaft is ideal for players who don’t like to feel the shaft moving during the swing, as it has minimal deflection. It has a mid-launch low-launch profile with a low spin and fast tempo.

Project X is preferred by strong players who swing strong looking for a stable, penetrating ball.

Project X comes in 5 different flexes: 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0. It also ranks as the second most used shaft after Dynamic Gold.

Compared to the Project X shaft, KBS Tour is soft in the tip but has a thick middle section.

This makes it a lot more different than Project X, which has a stiffer tip and a softer midsection in comparison.

What to Know About KBS Tour

While KBS Tour has a low club head speed, that of Project X is a little bit higher, which also makes a good difference between the two.

KBS Tour might be able to give you a higher launch trajectory as well as a lower spin rate.

The KBS Tour shafts were designed to complement the stoutness of Project X, the shaft has a stiff tip, soft mid-section, and a stiff butt.

It fits better with players who like the Project X profile but find it too stout.

The mid-section allows the shaft to deflect during swing giving it a little bent profile.

The shaft has a mid-launch profile with a medium spin and moderate tempo. KBS Tour is available in four different flex options too.

Project X vs KBS Tour: Which is Better?

Changing golf shafts can make little changes to the stick feel, these little modifications can have an immense effect on golf swings.

The Project X shaft is known and loved for its profile build, but some people really like their shafts being a bit flexible and not too rigid.

Project X LZ became the heeding call to their complaint offering them a shaft that is less stiff and compromising a percentage of the original Project X build.

Project X will be seen flying lower than LZ with less spin and thereby causing lesser dispersion, but this might feel hard to achieve in the hands of a player without much strength and a slow tempo.

The loading zone technology in the LZ was built to compensate for that.

Both products sell for 300+ a set, with little price difference.

Project X is a great product for players seeking pin-point accuracy and if the main and the LZ variant don’t feel just that perfect, Project X has a lot to offer.

Related Posts:

• How Long to Wait After Regripping Golf Clubs?
• Bridgestone B330 RX vs Srixon Z Star: Which Is Better?
• Do Golf Courses Allow Ride Alongs?
• Calcutta Golf Balls: Scam or Legit?
• Golftec vs PGA Superstore Fitting: Which is Better?

Want to Get Better at Golf?

Get "ben hogan's five lessons" and join thousands of others improving their golf skills..

Learn the Fundamentals: Stance and Posture > Golf Grip > The Swing.

This book has LOADS of positive reviews. THOUSANDS OF REVIEWS. A MILLION COPY SOLD. CHEAP!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

TXG: KBS Tour VS Project X vs. Dynamic Gold

More videos.

Club Junkie WITB, league night week 3: Enter the 11-iron

Clement: Laid-off or perfect fade? Across-the-line or perfect draw?

Clement: Stop ripping off your swing with this drill!

Clement: Why your practice swing never sucks

Testing the KBS Tour C-Taper 130, Project X 7.0, True Temper Dynamic Gold X100, and True Temper Dynamic Gold X7 to see the differences in feel, timing, ball flight, spin rate, launch angle, and more!

Clement: Starting beginners with half golf balls (!?)

Me and My Golf: Hole more putts by doing this!

Tour Experience Golf is a club fitting studio located in Toronto, producing in-depth golf equipment videos featuring founder and master club fitter Ian Fraser. Their channel is the definitive destination for unbiased and brand agnostic golf club fitting on YouTube

Scott Francis

Sep 29, 2019 at 1:04 pm

Is he hitting 6 irons or a 7?

Sep 28, 2019 at 12:57 pm

How about Project X LZ 5.5/6.0 vs. Nippon Pro Modus 3 Tour 120 S vs. KBS Tour 120 S?

Bill hacker

Sep 27, 2019 at 9:22 pm

These guys are so full of crap it’s scary

Sep 27, 2019 at 6:14 pm

Cool video, but maybe do another with shafts regular mortals use. I mean almost no one on TOUR uses the X7 (except for Jason Day) or the PX 7.0 (except for Rory). How about PX 6.0 vs DG X100 vs KBS Tour S+?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

You may like

Back by popular demand, it’s BK’s WITB for his third week of league play. Check out the video for the details and WITB logic (such as it is from golf’s most impetuous equipment adjuster!).

Driver: Cobra Darkspeed X (10.5 degrees) Shaft: L.A. Golf A-Series Mid X

3-wood: PXG 0311 Black Ops

Hybrid: Mizuno ST Max

Irons: Cobra King Tec Utility (4), Callaway Apex Pro (5, 6), Callaway Apex CB (7-9), Callaway Apex MB (10, 11)

Wedges: Adams Idea SW, LW

Putter: Ping PLD Anser 2D

Ball: TaylorMade TP5x

Instruction

You hear that one all the time; I wish I could put my practice swing on the ball! We explain the huge importance of what to focus on to allow the ball to be perfectly in the way of your practice swing. Enjoy!

Mitsubishi Diamana WB: Club Junkie takes a technology deep dive

Earlier this week, Mitsubishi announced the return of its iconic Whiteboard profile with the new Diamana WB shaft.

In our launch story , we offered a rundown of the key technology in the new WB — 80-ton Dialead pitch fiber, Aerospace-grade MR70 carbon fiber, Consistent Feel Design, and the Xlink Tech Resin System. To go deeper, however, we enlisted our Resident Club Junkie and bona fide shaft nut, Brian Knudson, to track down someone from Mitsubishi at the PGA Show. Fortunately, Mitsubishi’s Director of Global Aftermarket Sales, Jonathan Alongi, was on hand to answer all of BK’s questions.

Check out their discussion about the new WB, as well as the 20th anniversary of the original design, in the video above — time stamps of key points below, including a definitive answer as to how the surfboard graphic ended up on the original Whiteboard in 2004!

• :40 – Mitsubishi Japan expands to the U.S. in 2004
• :50 – “The shaft that set the standard”
• 1:12 – “The ‘board is back”
• 1:45 – WB or Whiteboard? Or both?
• 1:55 – The first iteration of the sixth generation of Diamana
• 2:10 – Incorporating key technology from a 20-year journey
• 3:10 – Modifying the tip section for more ball speed
• 3:50 – Delivering ball speed in a low-launch, low-spin shaft
• 4:20 – Drilling down on the shaft profile compared to the original Whiteboard
• 5:00 – The most impressive element of the new WB
• 5:30 – Butt, mid, tip specifications
• 6:00 – WB’s iconic graphics and the Diamana legacy — flowers, surfboard, numbering system
• 8:15 – An abundance of available weights and flexes
• 8:55 – More players going lightweight

Check out more photos and see what GolfWRXers are saying about Mitsubishi WB in the forums. 

Justin Thomas on the equipment choice of Scottie Scheffler that he thinks is ‘weird’

‘Absolutely crazy’ – Major champ lays into Patrick Cantlay over his decision on final hole of RBC Heritage

Brandel Chamblee has ‘no doubt’ who started the McIlroy/LIV rumor and why

LET pro gives detailed financial breakdown of first week on tour…and the net result may shock you

Gary Player claims this is what ‘completely ruined’ Tiger Woods’ career

Team McIlowry (Rory McIlroy, Shane Lowry) winning WITBs: 2024 Zurich Classic

TaylorMade signs 15-year-old AJGA Rolex Junior Player of the Year to an NIL contract

LIV star splits with swing coach after working together for 14 years

Get plugged in…

Project X IO Shaft Review

More in reviews:.

50 Words or Less

The Project X IO iron shafts are “Individually Optimized” to specific weights and trajectories for each flex.  Much smoother and more active than standard Project X.  Easy to elevate in the long irons.

Introduction

Every golfer who’s into gear has certain brands that tend to work well for them and others that don’t.  While having these biases is natural, it can cause us to miss some great products.  I’ve never had great success with Project X iron shafts, but I tried to approach the new IO shafts with an open mind, and I’m glad I did.

There’s not too much to say about a steel shaft’s looks, but I do like the brushed chrome finish of the Project X IO shafts.  As is their custom, Project X made the IO stepless which adds to the visual appeal.  The branding is screened onto the shaft, so you don’t have to worry about a sticker getting wrinkled.

If you find someone who doesn’t like the original Project X iron shafts, chances are good that it’s because of the harsh feel.  The feel of the new Project X IO is a 180 degree change from that.  During the transition, the shaft loads smoothly and easily .  In the downswing, there’s a tight, controlled release of energy into the ball.  This feel is more prominent in the long irons; the short irons are less active.

Performance

Project X bills the new IO shafts as mid trajectory and mid spin which is exactly what I saw in my testing.  The active feel had me thinking they might border on high launching, but I found that their default was an ideal launch with enough spin to hold a green.

For longtime Project X fans, these shafts still offer plenty of control .  I found that it was easy to flight the ball higher or lower.  Though there was enough spin to hold a green, I observed that the spin was low enough to keep shot shapes quite small.  Unless I made an intentionally extreme (or unintentionally poor) swing, there were no slices or hooks.

The Project X IO shafts are available in 5.5, 6.0, and 6.5 flex, which translates roughly to regular, stiff, and X-flex.  As you move up in flex, the shafts get 5 grams heavier, starting at 105 grams in the 5.5.

If you haven’t tried a Project X iron shaft in a while, visit your fitter to check out the new Project X IO.  These shafts are lighter than your typical Tour-style shafts with substantially smoother, more active feel.  They’re a great middle ground for players that want control but don’t want to swing a telephone pole.

Visit Project X Golf HERE

Recent posts.

• New Level SPN Wedge Review - May 9, 2024
• TaylorMade Qi10 Max Fairway Wood Review - May 8, 2024
• Wiley X Sunglasses Review - May 7, 2024

35 Comments

How does this compare to the LZ?

We have a full review of the LZ here: https://pluggedingolf.com/project-x-lz-iron-shaft-review/

I was disappointed in these shafts although it was brief testing. I went from playing regular PX 6.5 and personally like the feel. After a fitting we realized I was leaving some distance and speed on the table which led me to being fit in Project X PXi 6.5. Ive played PXi the past 2 years but unfortunately theyre discontinued and the IO is supposed to be the “replacement”…. Maybe its familiarity with the PXi but head to head the PXi gave me 3mph more ball speed than the IO. Even the c-taper lite 115x gave me more ball speed but slightly higher launch

I definitely agree I love the looks of the IO. I really really hope it was just an off day bc I like the looks so much

How would you say these stack up against the AMT range?

Which AMT shaft are you referring to?

AMT White, sorry!

I haven’t reviewed the AMT White, but it looks from the specs that it would be stiffer than the IO.

Hi Matt, If you compare this shaft with the Nippon NS Pro950GH Neo shaft, which one do you prefer? What’s your opinion about these 2 shafts? Because i’m really doubting which of those 2 shafts to purchase. So i really like to hear your opinion about it. Thanks.

The Project X IO and Nippon 950 neo are vastly different in terms of weight and profile. If you’re between these two I would strongly recommend going and testing them both in a fitting.

I’ve read many articles on the IO shafts and found conflicting information about the stiffness. One article mentioned the flexes are on the soft side, ex. 5.5 is a 5.0 and so on. Is that true?

The IO feels much softer/more active than the standard PX, but I would not say it’s weak to flex. I think it’s probably more accurate to say something along the lines of “a PX player and an IO player are just different golfers and shouldn’t try to swap shafts.”

Hi Matt I’m considering project x 10 or the modus 105 You’ve reviewed both as good shafts if your looking for less weight but which shaft do you prefer and why

I prefer the Modus as it feels better to me and the profile fits what I want.

Good morning Matt,

Back to your last answer…I play and like modus 105 but sometimes feel the stiff flex can get away from me at times.

Do you feel the io might play a little stiffer and would 5.5 be comparable to modus stiff?

Appreciate your insight.

I think the 5.5 is similar to the Modus stiff.

Thanks Matt!

Would you know if soft stepping the IO 6.0 will change the shaft flex from mid to mid-high like the 5.5? Just for comparison I currently play XP105 s300 soft stepped in MP4 irons. I like the feel and flight it gives. Looking to change shafts in the Apex TCB heads.

My understanding is that soft stepping gets you an in between flex, so something like a 5.75. How that would affect your ball flight is something no one could know definitively, unfortunately.

As a former low-mid handicapper who took a twenty year hiatus from golf, I am astonished by the feel and workability of these shafts (110g 6.0 with Mizuno 225, 5-Gw). Whether it be an easy swing or swinging for the fences, I can feel it load and can easily transition through all shot shapes. I’m just getting back into the game, and these shafts have me excited to quickly surpass my decades-old capabilities. As Matt frequently responds. Nothing is more informative than a proper fitting. I almost went with the 115g’s but decided the 110’s will serve me better as a 45 y/o “new” old player. I love them and the 225’s.

My OLD irons are copper ISI’s, and while I’m not trying to blow the cover off the ball, I’m easily 15yards over my Smithsonian Pings and can’t believe the workability… I tried every other comparable shaft in my fittings and am solidly confident I made the right choice.

Hi Matt Thanks for the insight and great review. Any comparison between this shaft and the KBS C-Taper light?

I’ve never tested them head to head, so I couldn’t add anything beyond what’s in my review: https://pluggedingolf.com/kbs-c-taper-lite-shaft-review/

Just from ready this article and having played the KBS C-Taper lite for the past two years. These sound almost identical! Although KBS states high-mid launch with low spin, they share the same characteristics from reading the article. You would have to add attack angle into the equation too.

After playing Titleist Gold DCI irons for the past 30 years (with extra stiff shafts) I was recently fitted and ended up purchasing the Ping I 525 irons with ProjectX IO 6.0 Shafts. Any thoughts on this combo?

If it fits you, it sounds great.

Is this shaft flex 6.0 equivalent to Project X PXI 6.0?

I have the 6.0 PXI’s now which I like but was debating on moving up to 6.5 IO’s for new irons.

Did you sample the 6.0 or 6.5’s? My driver swing speed is around 108mph which i use X flex for that.

I tested the 6.0 that’s shown in the photos. I never spent enough time with the PXi to be able to make an informed comparison between the two.

HI Matt, Great review. I am at a point that I ma trying out a few shaft/head combos for my next set of irons. Currently play, and love, the performance and feel of my KBS Tour 120s shafts. These IO shafts seem similar on paper, can you speak to the feel at impact as compared to the KBS 120s?

It’s been a while since I’ve played any KBS outside of the C-Taper Lite, so I’d be hesitant to offer any kind of definitive comparison.

I am aging KBS tour V 110 stiff, Callaway can’t get th for much new irons but the recommendation is the Projext x IO 110 s based on weight I guess. Any advice before I spend 2k on new clubs?

My advice is always to get fit, especially before spending that much money.

which level of stiffness is comparable to the dynamic gold 105 s300? 5.5 or 6.0?

Generally, 6.0 is correlated to stiff.

Great review Matt!

If you were to pick between LZ and IO which one would you prefer? And why so?

Personally, I would opt for the IO because it’s less active.

Is the project X 10 5.5 comparable to KBS taper light 95 . Can I really feel the weight difference? Otherwise how does the flight compare

Yes, I think that’s a substantial weight difference that you will feel, so, no, I don’t think they’re comparable.

Leave a Comment Cancel

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Address

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• ASICS GEL-KAYANO ACE 2 Golf Shoe Review
• Golf News – May 9, 2024
• New Level SPN Wedge Review
• TaylorMade Qi10 Max Fairway Wood Review
• Sunday Golf Big Rig Cart Bag Review

Contact Us Advertise Subscribe

Advertise on this site.

Plugged In Golf

Do You Like Free Golf Gear?

Sign up for our weekly newsletter and not only will you get the latest reviews, instruction, and more delivered directly to your inbox, you’ll also be entered into regular giveaways for golf clubs and more.

• What's Albatross Club?

• Search forums

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.

KBS vs Project X

• Latest Posts
• Recent Activity
• All Things Equipment
• Shafts, Grips & Club Fitting

• Feb 16, 2012

Hey guys new to the site but looking for some opinions on some shafts. I'm a longtime DG s300 guy but looking to try either the KBS tour or Flighted project X. Open forum just wanting to hear some pros and cons from people who play them or have played them. Thanks  

Perkins Rooster

Active member.

Good idea for a thread. I'm looking forward to the responses.  

I have not hit the Project X Flighted, but have heard good things about them from others on the forum. I used to play DG S300 a few years ago, but made the switch to KBS Tour Stiff in my last 2 iron sets. For me, I got slightly smoother feel in a shaft that was a slight bit lighter than the DG S300 along with higher ballflight. I didn't feel like I had to work as hard to hit my 5-iron and 6-iron as high as I did when I was playing the DG shafts. That's just my view. Are you looking for something in particular out of your iron shafts that you're not getting out of the DG S300? If so, post your thoughts and that may help you get pointed in the right direction.  

Living the Dream

I was fitted to PXs about 5 years ago. I don't notice the harsh feeling as much as some but admit I've only really tried KBS very recently. I've hit them a few times indoors and a handful of time borrowing a club or two from playing partners during a round. I definitely see now why people like KBS for the feel (just didn't know what I was missing). Always liked DG but just plain hit the PX much straighter. Anxious to get better side by side testing this weekend - zeroing in on the Ping I20s for my bag and focus will be on PX vs KBS vs stock shaft selection.  

One other note: I've heard the "new" PX if different then the PX before the company was acquired. Interested if anyone has comments. I have the "old" PXs in my R7TP backups that I will never sell or trade and the reason I ask is because I reshafted some RXTs a couple months ago from DGS300s to Flighted PXs to help with height for the long irons but the short irons felt terrible. I thought at the time maybe it was because they were slighted (little stiffer in short irons???) but now realizing it could have been a difference in the shafts from 5 years ago to now. Anybody else have expereince on this??? Thanks for the thread - this is top of mind right now for me as I decide on the shafts for my new irons.  

• Thread starter

Thanks for the post. I'm looking for something a little lighter but w/out loosing the feel. The DG are a little heavier about 10 grams I think but they feel so solid when you hit them. They to me take a little more effort to hit, I hit the ball pretty high as is but I don't mind gaining a little more trajectory.  

barryboymunro

interesting this, i play DG S300 myself and have thought about going to KBS or Prjoect X. will be keeping an eye on this thread  

Project X are good because it gives you the opportunity to choose in between stiffness rather than just regular, stiff or x stiff. Although Project X are know to go slight higher than some other shafts.  

Follow @THPGolf on Social Media

Normanator said: Project X are good because it gives you the opportunity to choose in between stiffness rather than just regular, stiff or x stiff. Although Project X are know to go slight higher than some other shafts. Click to expand...

Chunkylover77

Proud jakenation member.

texasgolfer

In the hole.

I play the Project X Flighted 6.0, and I love them. I played with a buddy today that has the KBS Tour Stiff in his R11 Irons. I loved the feel of his Irons with those shafts. They are both great options, but it would make since to go get fitted if possible.  

• Oct 15, 2012

KBS Tour Shaft V.S. Project X Flighted 5.5 KBS Tour Shaft V.S. Project X Flighted 5.5 Here is my opinion, I have the Project X 5.5 Flighted in my 5-PW which are Mizuno TZoid Pro2"Oldies but Goodies" I have the KBS Tour Stiff 120g Flex in my PING Tour S "52, 56, 60" Other Clubs in my bag: Taylor Made Burner Superfast Driver 9 Degree with Fujikura 47 inch shaft Titleist 910FD 15 Degree with Project X 7C3 Graphite Shaft Adams Idea Pro A12 18 Degree and 23 Degree with Matrix Ozik Stff Graphite Shafts I go back and forth with a Odessey Black Series 2 Putter and a Scotty Cameron Newport 2 Both my putters are 32 inch length 2 Degrees Flat with Super Stroke Putter Grips on each I will tell you that I got the Project X 5.5 Flighted almost 2 years ago and I had them spin allighned which has helped provide very accurate shots for me. The one thing that this shaft did not do for me is bring my ball flight down. What it has done though is provide very accurate shots for me and also provided a good trajectory angle on my shorter irons. I recently just got the Ping Tour S wedges and was able to get them with the KBS Tour Shafts and I will tell you this difference is night and day. The ball flight is more boaring trajectory and the shots are spinning way better than the Project X Shafts I had in my old Cleveland CG 15 wedges. The feel on these shafts is way better than the Project X Shafts. The Project X Shafts in the 7-PW still fly very high and do have a tendency to balloon sometimes. The problem is that my swing is more of a sweeping swing arc and it plays havoc with me on windy days. I actually went to the range and compared my 7 iron trajectory to the Ping Tour S "KBS Tour Shaft" and the 7 iron was higher that the 52 Degree Wedge. I also was custom fit into the Project X Shafts by a professional club fitter at a shop so everything in my swing was reviewed when being fit. If I could do it again I would go with the KBS Tour Shafts because of the feel and the consistent ball flight. I will keep the Project X Flighted because I am probably going to buy a new set of irons in the near future if I can find something that is as good as my Mizuno TZoid Pro 2's:clapp: The KBS Tour are not cosmetically as cool looking as the Project X Shafts but they outperform them and in any 10 or under handicap performance is number 1 priority. My advice would be to try both of them but I would tell you that the KBS Tour Shafts are going to have a better feel to them and lower ball flight. Make sure that you pay close attention to the weight of the club because these shafts are lighter.  

Castor Hades

I'm using DG S300 now...going after KBS Tour's to build my new clubs, didn't even think about PX. Played the KBS before, I like, just my gut that says to stick with them.  

junior golfer

I just can't go from these px 6.5 Tried the r11 with Kbs stiff and was horrible (WAY shorter, softer and too forgiving) I like something that gives me flashing warning lights when I don't swing correctly and the accuracy when I perform is deadly The only downside is that maybe the flight of 9 and pw (maybe even the 8) could come down a little, Could possibly get the flighteds on 8,9 and pw to bring them down but then I'd need the 7.0  

birdiebogey

• Oct 21, 2018

Sorry to bring up this old topic. I have a question regarding these two shafts. I currently have KBS Tour 120 Stiff in my 50, 54 and 58 ping wedges. But my irons are with Project X 6.0 shafts. Since I don't like the feel while swinging my wedges, can I replace all the wedges' shaft with Project X 6.0. Will that change the clubs' swing weight and total weight, rendering the wedges to become inconsistent with the rest of my irons? Thanks for any advices.  

• Style chooser
• Nighttime Golfing
• Change width
• Terms and rules
• Privacy policy

KBS Tour V Shaft Review – Specs, Flex, Weight

If you were a fan of the KBS Tour shafts but found them to be a bit too heavy or too stout for your swing then the KBS Tour V shaft should definitely be on your radar.

The KBS Tour V was specifically designed to perform as close as the KBS Tour shafts as possible while at the same time being lighter.

The KBS Tour V promises tight shot dispersion through muted spin and of course, the classic feel and performance of the original KBS Tour shafts. So does it deliver? Find out in the following review!

KBS Tour V Shaft Overview

The aesthetics of the KBS Tour V shaft is very on-brand for the company.

You get the almost obligatory polished chrome finish with the red band in the middle containing all the lettering. And like most KBS shafts, the KBS Tour V is a stepped steel shaft. So the looks aren’t anything special; but they will certainly appeal to you if you prefer the look of a traditional iron shaft.

Overall the feel of the KBS Tour V is more muted than the KBS Tour. There isn’t as much response in it. That doesn’t mean it feels stout. In fact, the KBS Tour V shaft feels much more manageable than the KBS Tour. But there is certainly a lack of feedback in it. The kick point is very hard to suss out unless you take a powerful swing. Then, you can feel it just under the grip.

Still, the transition is very smooth. You can barely feel the shaft release; but you know it’s happening because you get really good ball and club head speed with this shaft. Of course, a lot of the enhanced club head/ball speed will depend on how you swing your irons. For our testing group though, the numbers told the story. Almost all of us were seeing increases over our typical ball/club head speed numbers. The proof is in the pudding as they say.

In the end, we would say that the KBS Tour V favors a more aggressive tempo but it still plays nice with a more deliberate tempo as well. In both cases, you are likely to achieve a nice arcing draw and increased carry and rollout.

Why is the KBS Tour V So Popular?

The KBS Tour V owes a lot of its popularity to the original KBS Tour shaft and the KBS C-Taper shafts.

These are actually more popular than the KBS Tour V; but their success has prompted a lot of people to take a look at the lighter KBS Tour V.

How Does the KBS Tour V Perform?

After our test session, we concluded that the most beneficial thing about the KBS Tour V is distance.

Yes, we were increasing our ball and club head speed with this shaft and yes, that meant better carry. But there are a couple of other dynamics at play here. First of all, the KBS Tour V absolutely delivers on its promise of low spin. Sidespin is muted marvelously so that you get tighter dispersion and good rollout distance.

Secondly, the KBS Tour V is advertised as a mid launching shaft but we saw mostly high-arcing shots in our test session. The higher launch gave most of our testers better overall carry. So when you combine higher launch, muted sidespin and good rollout, you end up with an iron shaft that plays pretty long.

Of course, there is always the concern that low spin will produce too much rollout and that was certainly on our mind during testing. And in fact, some of us did roll off the green and into the weeds. But if you want to limit the amount of irons you need to get greenside, the KBS Tour V is at least worth a look.

KBS Tour V Shaft Specs

What flexes are available what swing speeds do they suit.

Regular flex is available for players in the 80-85 MPH swing speed category.

Stiff is a good choice for 86-90 MPH swingers and extra stiff would suit players in the 91-105 MPH range.

What Weights Are Available? What Swing Speeds Do They Suit?

The 100g version is good for players in the 80-90 MPH range.

The 110g version may suit 91-95 MPH swingers and the 120g version would be good for players in the 96-105 swing speed spectrum.

Why is it So Good?

The KBS Tour V is a good shaft because it allows players with less aggressive tempos to get the distance help they need on the fairway.

KBS Tour V First Impressions

Our first impression was that the KBS Tour V looked like any other KBS shaft.

But when we swung it, we could feel that it actually had less feedback.

Key Features & Performance

The KBS Tour V features large outer diameters and a stiff tip in order to reduce side spin and enhance stability on full swings.

KBS Tour V Irons Review

Like almost all KBS shafts, the KBS Tour V are very stable and accurate – even on your full swings with the long irons. Dispersion is tight as promised and distance is outstanding.

KBS Tour V Wedges Review

The KBS Tour V wasn’t as great in our wedges. The lack of spin made it hard to stay on fast, elevated greens.

KBS Tour V Pros & Cons

• Very accurate
• Good for moderate and fast tempos
• Feels stable on full swings
• Great distance
• Classic KBS looks
• Limited feedback

Overall Score: 95/100

Check out more reviews here:.

Who Should Buy it?

Muted spin? Check! Tight dispersion? Check! Classic KBS feel? Not so much.

The lack of clear feedback was our biggest gripe about this shaft. Some players may also have issues with excessive rollout. Nevertheless, the KBS Tour V is a great distance iron shaft and it is as accurate as promised.

Project X Denali Blue 60TX Shaft Review - Specs, Flex, Weight

Fujikura 2024 Ventus Blue Shaft Review - Specs, Flex, Weight

Project X Cypher Vs HZRDUS Smoke Shaft Comparison

Mitsubishi Tensei Vs Project X Cypher Shaft Comparison

Tour AD DI Hybrid Shaft Review - Specs, Flex, Weight

Nippon Modus 105 Vs Project X 5.5 Shaft Comparison

Dynamic Gold X100 Vs Project X 6.5 Shaft Comparison

Project X 6.5 Vs KBS Tour X Shaft Comparison

Nippon 950 Vs Nippon Modus 105 Shaft Comparison

© 2022  Amazon Associates Program. Golf Blue Heron is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. *Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc., or its affiliates.

• Best Golf Products
• Garmin s60 vs Garmin s40 vs Garmin s20
• Golf Driver Comparisons
• Golf Iron Comparisons
• Home Of Golf
• Putt-A-Bout Indoor Putting Mat Review

+498663883478

[email protected]

Fitting with low launch, low spin shafts: Modus 120, Project X and C-Taper

In this fitting we were dealing with a player who was already looking for a low-launch, low-spin shaft. For him it was important to have maximum control in the lower part of the shaft. This is exactly what these shafts bring with them and have a "stiff tip": Modus 120 in X, C-Taper 120 in S and Project X 6.0. Normally, shafts become softer and softer from end to tip as the diameter of the shaft decreases. However, modern technologies allow for stiffer elements even with thinner diameters. This is exactly what makes shafts so interesting nowadays: there are countless profiles and every shaft is different.

For this player we chose comparatively "soft" shafts as this was explicitly desired. However, all three shafts are well comparable in terms of stiffness and in the category "typical stiff shaft". Soft shafts with a hard tip are no longer a contradiction and the best known advocate of this concept is Modus 120 , because this shaft is particularly soft in the middle section but becomes increasingly stiffer in the tip. This makes the shaft feel relatively soft, but allows maximum control and delivers a low spin, low launch profile. It is not for nothing that the Nippon Modus 120 is one of the most winning shafts on all tours worldwide.

Bend profile comparison

If one takes a look at the bend profiles of the individual shafts, it becomes clear that the differences are small but do exist. While the Nippon Modus 120 certainly has the "most extreme" profile, i.e. with strong deflections, the profile of the Project X is somewhat less extreme. And that of the C-Taper is a bit more straightforward. The C-Taper is also the stiffer shaft because it has a much stiffer mid section.

Below you can see the approximate bending profiles of the shafts in comparison:

Decision for one of the shafts

Our player knows that he wants a shaft that feels soft and has a stiff tip, but he doesn't know which shaft he likes best. A look at the pure values does not reveal too many differences in terms of launch and spin. At best, you could say that the Modus launches a bit higher than the Project X and C-Taper. But the spin is practically identical.

Our player found it a bit easier to accelerate the C-Taper - hence a slightly higher club head speed. On the other hand the strike pattern with the C-Taper was pretty bad. This was best for Project X, which is why the Smash Factor is the highest. Nevertheless, the choice fell on Modus 120 and there are three good reasons for this:

The good hits produced exactly the desired trajectory with a nice draw to the finish. The feeling with the shaft was the most pleasant for the player. With relatively little effort, decent values could be achieved. And an equally important reason is the fact that our player was best able to stop his typical bad shot. This bad shot is a slightly too closed club face and a long pull that misses the green on the left. As can be seen in the overview, this was not the case with Project X, for example. The dispersion with the Modus was minimal and even without balls that went long and left past the flag.

Conclusion: Modus 120 vs. Project X vs. C-Taper

Such a fitting is a lot of fun. A player already has certain expectations on a shaft and wants to find the perfect one. He has three high-quality shafts with a similar profile at his disposal. All three produce very similar values but with different output. The main thing is to work out and optimise the minimal differences. This is very individual. Another player might have come to a completely different result in this test.

If you fluctuate between these shafts and need help in making a decision, the following take-aways might help: The Modus 120 is very soft even as an X and therefore also softer than Project X 6.0 and C-Taper S. In regards to the bend profile the Modus is most "extreme". If you want a soft feel with a stiff tip and want as much feedback as possible in the grip area, the Modus is probably the best choice. The C-Taper on the other hand is much more "neutral" and does not have such a soft mid section.

Take a look at our iron selection where all three shafts can be selected.

KBS $-Taper vs. Modus 120

The KBS $-Taper is a shaft that also belongs to the low launch, low spin shafts and is an option in some fittings. In this test we compare the $-Taper 120 in Stiff with the Modus 120 X. And even though we already choose S and X as flex here, the comparison is not entirely fair. Because the $-Taper is a lot stiffer than the Modus 120 as you can also see here in our iron shaft comparison .

The Nippon Modus 120 is very soft in the middle part and only gets stiff at the tip again. However, this is exactly what gives the soft feel, but still allows control and a low launch. The KBS $-Taper, on the other hand, is much more neutral when it comes to profile - without any big outliers in one direction or the other.

It didn't take long for our player to feel this difference. For him, it was much more relaxed and easier to swing the Modus and the results were also much more accurate. With the $-Taper, our player felt he had to invest more to achieve the same result. Hence a slightly higher club head speed and yet less ball speed. The hit pattern was a little less clean with the $-Taper.

If you look at launch and spin, you will notice that the differences are practically non-existent. The main difference with these shafts is clearly the stiffness. The Modus 120 is an ideal shaft for players who want a high shaft weight but a soft shaft. The $-Taper embodies rather the opposite. For only 120g, it is extremely stiff and can easily keep up with the current 130g shafts in this respect.

Always stay ahead of your competition - get the latest product updates and releases!

Use this popup to embed a mailing list sign up form. Alternatively use it as a simple call to action with a link to a product or a page.

Age verification

By clicking enter you are verifying that you are old enough to consume alcohol.

• Why ExactGolf?

Shopping Cart

Your cart is currently empty..

KBS $-Taper vs. True Temper Project X LZ | Iron Shaft Head-to-Head Comparison

Since iron shafts control the accuracy of a golf swing, it dramatically affects the performance. So, choosing the right one is important. KBS $-Taper and Project X LZ are two of the most popular iron shafts. They have similarities and differences as well.

The key difference between KBS $-Taper and Project X LZ is that the former has a relatively flatter slope, and the latter has a steeper slope. Additionally, X LZ is a bit stiffer and heavier than $-Taper.

And the heaviness of the $-Taper dramatically affects its performance, trajectory, and spin rate. On the other hand, the steep slope of the X LZ impacts the swing. So, stay tuned to make your decision about which one to choose! 

Overview of KBS $-Taper Golf Shafts

$-Taper is a chrome stepped golf iron shaft manufactured by KBS. It was launched in 2017. The KBS Tour $-Taper gives an excellent feel while retaining shot durability and precise dispersion. 

For golfers looking for the finest tour shaft with medium velocity and reduced spin performance, $-Taper is a good choice. This line of golf shafts is better for straighter shots. It also helps the ball to have a strong flight.

Read Also:   C-Taper Lite Vs Modus 105: Which Golf Shaft Will Improve The Game?

Overview of Project X LZ Golf Shafts

Project X LZ is an iron shaft for golf clubs. It was launched in 2013 by True Temper. This equipment can transfer a great amount of energy while hitting, which results in a great amount of shaft.

The great shaft is a result of its proprietary Loading Zone Technology. This helps to modify the weight and stiffness of the shaft. It also enhances the stability of the butt and tip, which helps the golfer to enjoy a signature smooth feel.

Comparison Table: KBS $-Taper vs Project X LZ

It’s crucial to examine the specifics of each of these golf shafts. We would gain a lot more insight into each of their skills by doing that. So, let’s quickly go through each of their features:

Read Also:   KBS $ taper lite vs c taper lite: Which one should you choose?

What are the Differences Between KBS $-Taper and Project X LZ

The previous table might reflect only some of the story behind the differences between these two iron shafts. So, let’s thoroughly compare KBS $-Taper and Project X LZ below.

Build Quality

Interestingly, Project X LZ is made of graphite iron. And KBS $-Taper is made of chrome steel. It also comes in black Physical Vapor Deposition coating (PVD). Since steel shafts provide better agility, KBS $-Taper has the better build.

Design and Aesthetics 

Project X LZ looks better than the KBS $-Taper. It is shiny, stylish, and has charm. So, the $-Taper is a bit more mundane and ordinary looking than X LZ, despite having better materials in the build quality.

Surface Strength

KBS $-Taper is more firm in its outline. This means the strength of this golf shaft is better than Project  X LZ. The surface of the Taper is far more solid and heavy than the LZ.

Read Also:   Elevate Tour vs Elevate 95: Which Golf Shaft Should You Choose? 

Response and Performance

The response in KBS $-Taper feels more natural than Project X LZ. Thus, your performance might drop while using Project X LZ if you are less skilled than an expert. 

Controllability and Workability 

Project X LZ has a technology that transfers energy more effectively. Consequently, it isn’t easy to control compared to KBS $-Taper. However, project XLZ is much more effective in playing long shots in good hands.

Since Project X LZ is good for long shorts; its swing is bound to be less. It isn’t easy to go for long shorts with many swings. Thus, KBS $-Taper has more swing than Project X LZ.

Butt and Tip

The butt and tip of Project X LZ are more refined than KBS $-Taper. This is why it is a great shaft for maintaining stability for professionals. But for others, it is a bit difficult to do so due to its heavy weight.

KBS $-Taper and Project X LZ: Which Golf shaft to Choose?

Among KBS $-Taper and Project X LZ, it is better to choose KBS $-Taper. $-Taper is more modern and recent compared to Project X LZ. You can have great performances with the Taper, so don’t worry.

However, for those who prefer fewer swings on their golf balls and want a heavy shaft to handle, Project X LZ might be a better choice. It is also better for playing simultaneous straight-long shorts.

In conclusion, despite both being excellent iron shafts, Project X LZ may be better for professionals than KBS $-Taper. And if you’re a keen amateur golfer, you could think about purchasing a KBS $-Taper.

Read Also:   Ventus Red Vs Blue: Everything you need to know

After the final declaration of which one of these two is better for you, you might still be in confusion. But don’t worry. We will answer the questions below, hopefully satisfying your doubts about this topic.

Is Project X LZ 5.5 stiff or regular?

Project X LZ 5.5 is stiff. It is not regular. The 5.5 Project X LZ Steel shafts, which come in normal plus flex and weigh 115g, are stiffer and heavier than most golf shafts.

What are KBS $-Taper used for?

KBS $-Taper is used for medium velocity and reduced spin performance. This line of the iron shaft gives an excellent feel while retaining shot durability and precise dispersion. It is also a modern-day golf shaft which is very suitable to use.

Do any pros use Project X LZ?

It is hard to say if professional golfers other than Nate Lashley use Project X LZ. This line of iron golf shafts is almost a decade old, so it is rare for experts to use this equipment.

Do any pros use KBS $-Taper?

There are no records of professional golfers using the $-Taper. However, some big names on PGA use KBS iron shafts. Such as Dustin Johnson, Justin Thomas, Phil Mickelson, Adam Scott, Gary Woodland, Viktor Hovland, Shane Lowry, Justin Rose, Etc.

Read Also:   Tour Flex Vs Stiff Flex: Which Flex To Choose?

Meet Jalal, a passionate golf writer and the driving force behind Golfertroop.com, your go-to destination for all things golfing! Whether you’re a seasoned golfing veteran or a beginner taking your first swing, Jalal is here to assist you in making the most out of your golfing experience.

Similar Posts

What Size Grips Does Tiger Woods Use? [Unraveling Mystery]

Tiger Woods has been a name for inspiration, especially for new golfers. And that’s perhaps for his distinct use of grip length. So, you aren’t…

Who Makes Lazrus Golf Clubs? [Behind The Brand]

Have you been curious to learn more about golf club manufacturers, particularly Lazrus? Where do they make their golf clubs? What is the history of…

Who Makes Tour Edge Golf Clubs? [Behind the Brand]

Tour Edge is famous in the market for providing high-quality golf clubs according to the player’s interests. Tour Edge has carved out its name as…

TaylorMade P760 vs. P790: Which Golf Irons to Choose?

If we talk about the most demanding and best golf iron sets on the market, TaylorMade p760 and p790 will be at the top of…

Precision Pro NX7 Vs. NX9: Find The Best Rangefinder!

It looks like you are trying to develop and level up your golf game with a perfect piece of range finder which is a trustworthy…

Ping Anser 2 Vs 4: Find the Perfect Golf Putter for You

In the golf market regarding putters, Ping Anser came with a revolution and changed putters forever. Ping Anser 2 and 4 are now the new…

• Remember me Not recommended on shared computers

Forgot your password?

• WRX Club Techs

KBS Tour V vs PX LZ vs PX vs Nippon

By SvenS3 July 2, 2020 in WRX Club Techs

• Reply to this topic
• Start new topic

Recommended Posts

I play the KBS Tour V stiff Shafts at the moment. In the Winter month I tested some Shafts and went with them. 89mph 7 Iron with 170 yards carry on normal swings. Always play 0,25 to 0,5 inch longer. Cut length 7 Iron is 37,25 inch.

I like the Tour V Shafts, but sometimes I feel like they could be smoother or softer. Flex wise they are fine. Dispersion is good, too. It is just a feel that I miss.

Here are some Shafts I tried:

Modus 105 stiff:

They were so much softer compared to the Tour V that they feel like soft noodles. I don't hit them left or right, Dispersion was good but just the feel at impact seems a little too flimsy. From a fitting standpoint I would say they are stable enough, but it seems like the Tour V could handle more aggressive swings better.

Too much Shaft for me. Weight and Flex

Nice Feeling Shaft. Good Dispersion. Only Problem are my half swings from 135 yards and in. I can't control the Shafts properly. I experienced that in the last 10 Years when Shafts are more than 115 gr. my half swing are crap. Give me under 115 gr. and I'm fine. Note: the 115 gr. is uncut Shaft weight.

PX 6.0 non flighted:

Again, too much Shaft for me, 5.5 isn't that better.

Feels weird and go left all the time.

So I did a little research and want to hear you opinions on the following Models:

Nippon 950GH in X Flex (104 gr.) The Raw length is nearly identical to the cut length because they came in 2 inches shorter than all the other Manufactures. So near KBS Tour V cut weight.PX 5.0 non flighted because its in the 110gr. Range PX LZ 5.5 maybe hard stepped just to stay in the 115 gr. Range.Modus 105 S. I´m willing to give them a second try and maybe hardstepp them if it make them a little more stable (feel wise)Nippon 1150GH stiff. Problem could be the cut length would be over 115gr.I'm really intrigued in the 950 X Flex, but it seems like there a not much Information in the Forums about them.

Driver: Callaway Epic MAX LS 9* Tensei AV Raw white 60 S Fairway: Callaway Paratem Triple Diamond 3 Wood HZRDUS Smoke Black 70 6.0

DI: Titleist U500 23* HZRDUS Smoke Black 90 6.0 Irons: Titleist T100 5-Gap Project X LZ 6.5 Wedges: Taylormade Hi Toe 54/60 Project X LZ 6.5 Putter: Odyssey O Works 7 Ball: Vice Pro

Grips: Golf Pride MCC Plus 4 Midsize Teams

Link to comment

Share on other sites.

• Created 3 yr
• Last Reply 2 yr

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

SvenS3 3 posts

Fairways_and_Greens 2 posts

baudi 1 post

Jack Pearsall 1 post

Aug 29 2021

The three shafts I would try based on your list: Modus 130 R, Tour V R, and Modus 105 X. Tour V and Modus 130 have very similar bend profiles. They also play stiff to flex. R flex in Tour V and Modus 130 will play like stiff flex for most. Modus 105 plays soft to flex and has a fairly neutral/traditional bend profile. An X flex will feel closer to a standard S flex.

You don't have them listed, but I would also try Dynamic Gold 120 and 105 in the S300 flex.

Cobra Aerojet LS 10.5* - Hzrdus Black Gen 4 60 6.5 / Aerojet LS 3 - AD TP 7X / SZ Tour 5 - AD TP 8X / Apex 21 4H - AD IZ 95X / Cobra Tour 5-P, RTX6 50 M KBS $ Taper HT S+ / 56F - KBS 610S / 60M KBS Hi Rev 2.0 S/ White Hot OG #7 CH / Maxfli Tour

Thanks for your time. I tried a bunch of the Shafts you listed, but don't want to be to long in my description.

Modus 105 X: Was pretty sure that this would be my Shaft. Its not. I find the X Flex much much stiffer than the S Flex. Tried them against each other. Found that I have to hit it hard to load the X Flex. Complete Opposite to the S Flex.

Modus 130 X: Had them in Callaway Apex MB 18. Feel was good. They launched too high in the Wind and I'm a half club short with them. Again, too much weight.

DG 105 S: Launched very high and distance loss in the short irons.

DG 120 S and X: It´s ok, typical DG Feel (which I like) but I always hit DG high.

So I'm really only interrested in the listed Shafts from the first post.

What's In The Bag (As of April 2023, post-MAX change + new putter)

Driver:   Tour Edge EXS 10.5 ° (base loft) ; weights neutral   ||    FWs:    Calla Rogue 4W + 7W

Hybrid:   Calla Big Bertha OS 4H at 22 °   ||    Irons:    Calla Mavrik MAX 5i-PW

Wedges*:   Calla MD3: 48 ° ... MD4: 54 ° , 58 °   ||    Putter Ψ :  SeeMore FGP + SuperStroke 1.0PT, 33" shaft

Ball:  1. Srixon Q-Star Tour / 2. Calla SuperHot (Orange preferred)  ||    Bag: Sun Mountain Three 5 stand bag

    * MD4 54°/10 S-Grind replaced MD3 54 ° /12 W-Grind .

      Ψ    Backups:

• Ping Sigma G Tyne (face-balanced) + Evnroll Gravity Grip |
• Slotline Inertial SL-583F w/ SuperStroke 2.MidSlim (50 gr. weight removed) |

Fairways_and_Greens

Modus 125 is a smoother version of the dynamic gold, and the super preening blue is even better if you can find them. I'd try the Modus 120 in x before you write them off.

TSR3 9° Tensei Black 65X TSi2 15° ATX Green 75TX 917F 18° ATX Green 85X ZX5 MkII 4-5 / ZX7 MkII 6-P  Modus 120X ZipCore 50° Modus 120X

Vokey SM9 54S/60M Modus 125 Wedge Nike Neo

No Safts over 115 Gr. raw length. So no Modus 125 and no Modus 120 X.

Softstepping 4,5,6 is a good idea.

I got the Point with the PX 5.0. Seems like they will be near 5.5 and than they are to boardy.

Anyone hit 950 GH in X flex against 1050 in S or Modus 105 in S ?

Drivingrangehero

I spun up the DG120 pretty good.

I hit XP 115’s and like them a lot, they are very similar to the Dynalite Gold XP

mid launch, mid spin for me.

114 gram in S300

117 gram in X100 I believe.

S300’s are plenty for me and my swing speed with a 7 iron is 94-95 mph

Sounds like you have it figured out yourself. Good luck.

An alternative could be the c-taper lite in x flex soft stepped

• 3 months later...

Jack Pearsall

rifle fcm 5.5 flighted  

Taylormade M5 Tour 10.5* 

Taylormade 300 Series 15*

Taylormade Sim2 Max 18*

Titleist 818H2  21*

Titleist 718 TMB 4 24*

Titleist 718 AP2  5-PW

Mizuno T20  54*   58*

Taylormade Spider GT  #3

• 10 months later...

If you want a "smoother" feeling KBS shaft that feels like driving a Cadillac, there is nothing smoother than the $-TAPER or $-TAPER HT ("heavy-tip", lower balanced shaft version).

The $-TAPERs are way more expensive in price per shaft though.

I currently game the $-TAPER HT 120 shafts in all my irons except for the wedges.

However, in my 50*-degree gap wedge, I am presently testing out the Tour V 125 S+ wedge shaft, and it's definitely not a shaft designed to make a player feel all smooth, warm and fuzzy.

The Tour V is definitely a bit of a beast, but for a strong enough player, it also plays much like a point-and-shoot sniper rifle.

At the end of the day, it's tough to argue with good results on the scorecard.

Try the $-TAPERs in a couple of different shaft weights just to see how they feel for comparison, but unless there is some extraordinary improvement seen in the simulator numbers, stick with what already works in the Tour Vs.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

×   Pasted as rich text.    Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.    Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.    Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

• Insert image from URL
• Submit Reply

Recently Browsing    0 members

• No registered users viewing this page.

2024 Wells Fargo Championship - Discussion and Links to Photos

GolfWRX_Spotted posted a topic in Tour and Pre-Release Equipment , Monday at 07:55 PM

2024 CJ Cup Byron Nelson - Discussion and Links to Photos

GolfWRX_Spotted posted a topic in Tour and Pre-Release Equipment , April 29

2024 Zurich Classic - Discussion and Links to Photos

GolfWRX_Spotted posted a topic in Tour and Pre-Release Equipment , April 22

2024 RBC Heritage - Discussion and Links to Photos

GolfWRX_Spotted posted a topic in Tour and Pre-Release Equipment , April 15

2024 Masters - Discussion and Links to Photos

GolfWRX_Spotted posted a topic in Tour and Pre-Release Equipment , April 10

Popular Now

By kskills Started 1 hour ago

By Flyers99 Started 2 hours ago

By CaymanS Started 4 hours ago

By AgentM21 Started 8 hours ago

By poor_putting Started Friday at 09:13 PM

Welcome. Register Here.

Come on in, the water is fine...

Recent B/S/T

hibcam · Started 4 minutes ago

dwmiller19 · Started 41 minutes ago

kskills · Started 1 hour ago

me05501 · Started 1 hour ago

Jayho · Started 2 hours ago

GolfWRX_Spotted · Started December 5, 2023

• Existing user? Sign In

The Bag Room

• Tour & Pre-Release Equipment
• Golf Sims/GPS/RFs/Apps
• Golf Style and Accessories

The Club House

• General Golf Talk
• Classic Golf And Golfers
• Courses, Memberships and Travel
• Groups, Tourneys, and Partners Matching

WRX Academy

• Instruction & Academy
• Rules of Golf and Etiquette
• Swing Videos and Comments

Classifieds & ProShops

• Deal/No Deal

Website Help

• Forum Support
• BST AD Help Forum

My Activity Streams

• BST/Deal Activity
• All Activity
• Unread - No BST/19th
• Subscriptions

Classifieds

• For Sale Forum
• Wanted to Buy
• Mall of Pro Shops
• Where Did My Ad Go?
• Trade In Tool
• Create New...