head pro tour 630 lite

Head Pro Tour 2.0 Racquet Review

Although it is impossible to state which tennis racquet is the GOAT (greatest of all time), Head's Pro Tour 280 is likely on the shortlist of a great many players. Originally launched in the early '90s as part of Head's Trisys line, the Pro Tour 280 (630 in Europe) became a staple at the elite levels of the game. The most recent version of the Pro Tour 280 is called the Pro Tour 2.0 . Unlike the original Austrian-made Pro Tour 280, the 2.0 has CAP grommets, and the graphite layup lacks Twaron, a dampening aramid used by Head in the late '80s and '90s. According to our playtest team, this update also swings a tad easier than the original, and although it has its own distinct and compelling identity, the Pro Tour 2.0 doesn't forget its roots. With its dense string pattern, 20-mm beam and sub-100-square-inch head, the 2.0 gave our crew the surgical control and sublime ball feedback that has defined so many of Head's vintage player's racquets. Granted, with its 335 swingweight, this racquet can be challenging to swing, but for the advanced ball-striker who craves a rock-solid player's racquet with outstanding control and feel, the Head Pro Tour 2.0 is as good as it gets.

• Nothing we could agree on

Bottom Line

This updated classic feels wonderfully solid at impact, and it drops the ball on a dime.

Groundstrokes - Score: 83

From the baseline, the Head Pro Tour 2.0 is everything you would expect a classic racquet with a pro tour pedigree to feel like: plush, precise and solid as a rock. It's safe to say that Chris , whose closet is overstuffed with vintage Head racquets, was extremely excited to try out this update and compare it to the original. He said, "I really enjoyed hitting this racquet off the ground. I found lots of plow-through power to help me drive the ball deep. The more I played with the Pro Tour 2.0, the more I got used to handling its weight and swingweight. The specs fall right at the upper end of my comfort zone, so there was some adjustment before I felt at home with the racquet. Once dialed in, I loved the control and feel I had on every shot. I felt very connected to the ball with this racquet. The Pro Tour 2.0 reminded me of Head classics. Hitting it side by side with an old Pro Tour 630, the biggest difference was this new Pro Tour 2.0 had a more manageable swingweight. While the feel was not identical, I still felt every bit in touch with my shots. I was placing my backhand slice on a dime. I was also able to hit a low, skidding slice that was tough for opponents to return. Flicking angles and lobs was easier with my regular racquet, but I got more drive and plow through from the Pro Tour 2.0. I had a lot of fun driving heavy shots down the line. The dense stringbed and classic feel gave me the confidence to swing big and aim for small targets."

Although this racquet isn't identical to the vaunted Pro Tour 280 used by some of the game's greatest legends, it does have a similar mold, and Mark simply couldn't ignore its history. He said, "Being that Guga Kuerten and Thomas Muster are two of my favorite players, I feel like I have to play well with Head's update to the classic 280/630 racquets. That said, every time Chris gave me a chance to play with one of the originals, I struggled with their high static and swingweight, so I was both nervous and excited to be brought into this playtest. Within a few baseline exchanges, I could tell that the new Pro Tour 2.0 was a little more tip-light than the earlier Austrian-made versions, and by the end of that first session my inner Muster was out. Shot power is not what I am known for, with ball placement being my predominant strategy, and the directional control I had with this stick was outstanding. As far as power goes, I have to say that the more I played with the Pro Tour 2.0, the more confident I became, and the velocity on my groundstrokes did increase without a drop in consistency."

Volleys - Score: 85

At net, the Pro Tour 2.0 delivered the considerable benefits of mass. Put simply, it doesn't get pushed around when the pace goes up. Needless to say, Mark appreciated what the stability did for his volleys. He explained, "Obviously, a lack of stability at net is not going to be a concern with a racquet weighing 12.2 ounces strung, but when paired with a 335 swingweight, maneuverability might be. Personally, the tip-light balance that Head assigned to the new Pro Tour 2.0 is such that I had no issue getting it into position on time, and its hefty swingweight helped keep most of my volleys flying straight and true."

Known for his crafty hands on court, Chris turned this solid and buttery-feeling masterpiece into a weapon at net. He said, "The Pro Tour 2.0 was a gem of a racquet at net. Rock-solid and loaded with feel, this racquet had me feeling in control of every volley. The stable response allowed me to relax and let the racquet do the work. I could punch volleys deep with pace, cut a short angle or hit a deft dropper almost at will. The only adjustment I had was on my overheads. The higher swingweight had me driving shots longer with this racquet until I got used to snapping it down faster to help spike my shots shorter in the court."

Serves - Score: 85

Our playtesters found that the Head Pro Tour 2.0 offered a controlled response and more weight behind their serves. While Chris was able to generate some pace on serve, he mostly relied on his slice on both first and second serves. He said, "I like serving with heftier racquets because they plow through the ball well and help me generate power. The weight of the Pro Tour 2.0 delivered lots of useful pace, and when I added spin, I was hitting some nice, heavy serves. My slice serve wide was working very well. I was able to add a lot of pace to that shot and get enough spin to make it drop inside the lines. The slice serve quickly became my favorite to hit with the racquet, and I mixed it in on both first and second serves with good results."

"I prefer racquets that weigh more than 320 grams on serve for easier access to pace on the ball," added Mark . "And I enjoy slightly lighter racquets (maybe 305 grams) from the baseline for the same reason: easier pace. Hence, there is usually some trade-off for me when it comes to racquet selection. That said, the Head Pro Tour 2.0 complemented my serve nicely. It did not add much in the way of velocity, but the pace I typically generate was effortless with this racquet, and as with my groundstrokes, directional control was great on serve."

Returns - Score: 80

As with the other strokes, the Pro Tour 2.0 was not without its challenges on returns, but Chris simply couldn't argue with the stability, precision and feel. He described, "When having to react quickly, it's not always possible to contact the ball perfectly, and it was on those less-than-perfect returns that I really appreciated the forgiving response of the Pro Tour 2.0. When I was better prepared and hitting cleanly, the racquet felt silky smooth. I felt confident hitting aggressively, using lots of pace and going for smaller targets. The heft of the racquet also made it perfect for redirecting the incoming pace of the serve."

For Mark , this stick felt solid and precise on his slice returns. He said, "Directional control (again) was top-notch from this racquet's heft and tight 18x20 pattern, and that made my backhand slice return one of my favorite shots to hit. On a related note, I liked this racquet enough to play with it more than once per day on a couple of occasions, and the first area of my game where it began to feel pretty heavy was on my return of serve."

Overall - Score: 86

Mark - "Head nailed this frame! This has been one of my favorite playtests, with the new Pro Tour 2.0 now becoming one of my favorite frames. Power-wise, I like that most of the energy return is coming from the Pro Tour 2.0's overall weight, which provides a predictable and comfortable response shot after shot. Lastly, I have to say that the switch to a CAP grommet was a good idea, and it helps protect the Pro Tour 2.0's (coolest ever) paint scheme."

Chris - "I love the classic feel of the Pro Tour 2.0. I've always been a fan of the feel of racquets with a full CAP grommet system. The response of this racquet reminds me of some of my favorite vintage Head offerings, such as the classic Prestiges and the Pro Tour 630. Comfort is fantastic due to the plush feel and hefty stability."

Chris - "While it has a lower swingweight than our vintage Pro Tour 630, I can see some players struggling with maneuverability. Having gotten used to lighter and faster-feeling racquets over the last 10-plus years, it took me some adjustment to get back in the groove with the Pro Tour 2.0 ."

Mark - "It did take a little while to get used to the broader Head pallet since I am accustomed to a more quadratic handle shape, but other than adding a leather grip, I do not think I would change a thing about this classic racquet."

Comparing the racquet to others they've tried, our testers said:

Mark - "Head adds another high-quality example to that small group of heavyweight tennis racquets weighing north of 12 ounces. By virtue of its weight, but not its string pattern, we can compare this Head Pro Tour 2.0 to the Wilson Pro Staff RF97 Autograph and the Yonex VCORE Pro 97 (330). And by virtue of overall weight and string pattern, but not head size, both Prince Phantom 93Ps are comparable as well. However, it is the ProKennex Ki Q + Tour Pro (325) that shares the most traits with the Head Pro Tour 2.0 . Of these racquets, I am most challenged with the Pro Staff RF 97 and have the easiest time (and most fun) swinging the Phantoms and the new Pro Tour 2.0 ."

Chris - "I had a blast testing this racquet. Did I find it identical to the original? No. Just as impressive? Yes. I found a ton of classic feel in the Pro Tour 2.0 . The level of control and precision rivaled the original for me, so much so that the most noticeable change boiled down to the differences in swingweight. Our original Pro Tour 630 has been on a stringing machine many, many more times and hit with many, many more times, so the slightly softer, deader response would likely be due to racquet fatigue. Compared to current racquets, I'd compare this Head Pro Tour 2.0 to the Head Graphene 360+ Prestige Midplus, Prince Phantom 93P 18x20 and Dunlop CX 200 Tour 18x20. The current Prestige Midplus is the closest of the bunch since it shares that CAP grommet feel, but it is slightly more flexible and has a lower weight and swingweight."

Playtester Profiles

Chris: 4.5 all-court player currently using the Tecnifibre TF40 305. Chris uses a full-western forehand grip, has a fast swing style and hits a one-handed backhand.

Mark: 5.0 lefty all-court player with a one-handed backhand. He currently plays with the Head Graphene 360+ Gravity Pro.

Review date: May 2020. If you found this review interesting or have further questions or comments please contact us. All content copyright 2020 Tennis Warehouse.

NEED ADVICE?

We can find it for you. We've got a great worldwide tennisnetwork. Please ask us anything. 

COLLECTIONS

• ALL RACKETS

New pro stock

Used pro stock, special rackets, new old stock, previously sold.

• POPULAR COLLECTIONS

Latest products

The choice of team pst, pro stock rackets.

• NEW PRO STOCK
• USED PRO STOCK
• SPECIAL RACKETS

NEW OLD STOCK RACKETS

• PREVIOUSLY SOLD
• Create account

Head Pro Tour 630 Made in Austria

Legendary racket. Back in the days used by Thomas Muster. Still used by many ATP players . Very flexible racquet, low in power. Good for those players who generate most of their own power, and want a fast, manuverable racquet.

If you need more pictures - please contact us at: [email protected]

Specifications

Contact for price.

Head Pro Tour 2.0 Racquet Preview

HEAD has finally re-released the legend, the HEAD Pro Tour 630 / 280. But is it the same? I hope to review this racquet soon.

Tennis nerds and racquet enthusiasts have been asking for the re-release of the HEAD Pro Tour 630 / 280 for a long time. It is still surprising that HEAD obliged. Is this racquet still viable for club and intermediate level players? If you have tried the original version, you know it is a beautiful but demanding racquet. You can watch my take on that version here in my review below or read my post Magic Made in Austria . This re-release is called HEAD Pro Tour 2.0.

HEAD Pro Tour 2.0 vs 630/280. Is it the same thing?

The question many will ask is: is the HEAD Pro Tour 2.0 the same thing as the original? Well, not exactly. The mold is the same, but the racquet does not include Twaron and has a higher stiffness rating (65 vs 58). I base this on the Tennis Warehouse review which you can watch below. The racquet is also made in China and most HEAD classic racquet fans prefer the Made in Austria versions. So there are quite a few differences. We can be pessimistic about that or perhaps see it as a true 2.0 version that is easier to use. I can’t really say until I have tried it.

Here are some pics from racquet collector extraordinaire, Dane Miftari of prostockracquets.com.au

The racquet is available from Tennis Warehouse (US), Tennis Warehouse Europe, and Tennis Only (AUS). I hope to get my hands on one for a review as soon as the courts open up here. Below are the specs from the Tennis Warehouse Europe website .

Specifications

Head pro tour 630 / 280 racquet review.

I review the original Made in Austria version in the video below. This is a great racquet to use, but I generally find it a bit too demanding for match play these days. On the other hand, the updated version has a slightly lower swing weight and higher stiffness (more power?) so it could be a tad easier to use. Still, there is no getting away from that a 95 sq inch head size is on the small scale of things in today’s tennis.

I was always a fan of 95 sq inch racquets, but lately, I have started to appreciate the forgiveness of a 100 sq inch head. Will the HEAD Pro Tour 2.0 be good enough to sway me back in that direction?

Have you tried the new HEAD Pro Tour 2.0? Or maybe the old one? Let’s hear what you think of it in the comments below.

Jonas Eriksson

Jonas has been known as "tennis nerd" mainly for his obsessing about racquets and gear. Plays this beautiful sport almost every day.

• My Top 3 Control Strings
• My Top 3 Spin Strings

You may also like

Why use heavier racquets, new prince phantom racquets, atp houston string tensions, tecnifibre tf-x1 v2, the babolat pure drive celebrates 30 years, head boom 2024, wilson blade 98 18/20 v9 review, wilson blade v9 racquets, diadem nova v3 review, diadem nova v3 racquets.

It’s so confusing. So it is closer to a 95″ head? I thought since Head’s measurements are now in line with other manufacturers they’d provide the actual size. I have an H22 and that’s supposed to be an actual 98 but when I line it up w my oPT280 (original) it looks the same size. … could it be that head size is that difficult to determine by just lining up two rackets?

Hmm Im curious about this racquet, since I love thin 18×20 racquets. Still love using my TI Radical MP but changing to a Ultra tour 97 now ( still like the feel of the radical more, but I need a new racquet lol ) I bet this Pro Tour will be fun to play, but not a good racquet to play a serious match with. At least for me, its too heavy. Im more intrigued about the new Ultra Pro 97 actually. Cheers!

Hey guys @tennisnerd, so I got mine today and took it out on some private courts to hit. This new version plays a LOT like the PT57E. Maybe a tad plusher but power levels are quite similar. Swings akin to the RF97A but for a baseline slugger. That being said it’s low powered and with the retail strings (head lynx) it comes with lacks some pocketing. Feels like it is strung at 55 ibs. Im sure cutting these out and stringing around 46 ibs should do the trick. Unlike a lot of the old fans of the stick im only 6 years out of college but I played with a PC600 for my college matches. Kinda wish I had this one at that time to give myself some more wiggle room in longer rallies. That being said, not so sure this will be widely accepted by recreational players. Time will tell! Excited to hear your thoughts. Cheers!

I have just ordered one earlier this week and it is expected to be sent on Monday 11th of May. I hope to try it out soon next week when tennis courts in The Netherlands are expected to open up. Then I can also try my other new rackets: Head Graphene 360+ Prestige Mid and Prince 93P 14×18 :-)

Wow my lineup is exactly the same as yours! Enjoy !

Leave a Comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• The Tennisnerd Guide to Gear
• Recommended Racquets
• Recommended Strings
• Recommended Bags
• Racquet Consultation
• Racquet Reviews
• The best tennis racquets for spin and control
• Racquets and strings for beginners and lower-level intermediates
• Arm Friendly Tennis Racquets
• The Best Spin Racquets
• The Best Racquets for Intermediate Players?
• The Best Advanced Player Racquets
• The Best Power Racquets
• Pro Stock Racquets
• Pro Player String Tensions
• String Reviews
• Stringing machines
• Arm-friendly Strings
• Top Ten Tennis Strings Right Now
• The lowest string tension on tour?
• What is the difference between multifilament and poly strings?
• Tennis balls
• Shoe Reviews
• Tennis Tools
• Podcasts and Interviews
• Tennis coaching with Intuitive Tennis
• Travel Blog
• Buying Tennis Tickets
• Tennis Academies in Europe
• Betting Blog
• Madrid Open Betting
• Best Tennis Betting Sites
• How to Bet on Tennis
• Live Betting Tennis
• Tennis Betting Odds Explained
• Betting Tips and Strategies
• Promotions and Bonuses
• ATP Masters 1000
• Betting Predictions
• ATP Rankings
• WTA Rankings
• Pickleball Blog
• Accessories
• College Tennis
• Contributors
• What People Say
• Advertising
• Tennis Friends
• In the Press

Please wait while you are redirected to the right page...

HEAD PT57A Review

A closer look a the head pro tour 630/280 pro stock racket. does it live up to its legendary status.

The HEAD Pro Tour 630/280 tennis racket was introduced in 1994 and is revered by many as the “holy grail” of tennis rackets.

Despite its age, the HEAD Pro Tour 630/280 is still in use by several elite tennis players today, most notably Andy Murray , who uses it under the pro stock racket code PT57A.

Pro Stock rackets, like the PT57A, are constructed from better-quality materials and usually strung with unique strings not offered to the general public.

They vary from the racket’s standard sale version in that they are often lighter (awaiting customisation, which makes them much heavier than retail rackets) and have a different balance point.

This enables elite athletes to customise their gear to suit their unique playing styles and preferences, which can significantly impact how well they perform on the court.

I was fortunate to get a Head PT57A in the Graphene Prestige MP paint and took it for a playtest. How did it perform?

Head PT57A Cosmetics

First of all, the racket looks fantastic. I like the paint job, and the racket’s colours matched well. The paint is high quality, as this was a racket made for a professional player. 

Pro Stock rackets tend to use glossy paint to aid the appearance on TV, for example, the Wilson Blade V7 had a matte paint job for retail customers, but all tour players were using glossy paint, which looks better on camera.

Specification and Setup

Head pt57a playtest and review.

First Impressions

The Prestige tennis racket series has a classic feel with smaller head sizes and heavier weights designed to provide players optimal control and precision from all court parts.

Those characteristics fit the bill for me, and the PT57A strikes the perfect mix between the racket style I prefer while still possessing specs that apply to the modern game and one that can be enjoyed by quite a few different playing styles/levels.

Groundstrokes

The control that the PT57A offers is my favourite aspect of the racket. It gives the player control of groundstrokes by requiring good technique and accurate ball hitting to achieve a higher precision.

It works nicely from the baseline if you add enough spin for a little more margin for error. Forgiveness is low, but you are rewarded if you work hard to find the middle of the string bed.

Advanced baseliners typically favour the 18–20 string pattern on the PT57A because their technique allows them to produce power and spin without needing too much assistance from a more open string pattern (16 x 19).

Their racket should support them by giving them a sense of control and accuracy, provided by a denser string pattern. Also, you get a marginally longer string life, which doesn’t necessarily concern pros, but for higher-level club players, it’s beneficial.

You can see the PT57A in action below:

Rackets with higher control and manoeuvrability are more critical for the serve and volley player, and the PT57A Pro Stock racket is perfect for this game style. 

Smaller head sizes and thinner frames are the best for serving and volleying because they provide more accuracy and feel, especially during volleys, and my experience with the PT57A was great.

Some more weight would have benefitted me on faster incoming balls, but the racket delivers crisp volleys, and you get a feel for where the ball will land.

I hit a few volleys with it in the video below:

This PT57A racket also served quite well. I was able to produce a lot of speed. I particularly loved the flat T serve with this racket. I had the impression that I could make an excellent fluid swing.

The racket gave me the feeling I was hitting my serve well, and I also thought I could put quite a bit of topspin on the ball with the kick serve when needed.

On return, the PT57A felt quick and manoeuvrable. I could access power to speed up and deepen my shots.

Since I could produce a lot of spin and the racket seemed solid on quick swings, I had the best results hitting spin returns.

The PT57A offers an exceptional feel from all parts of the court, especially at the net. I could strike with finesse and guide the ball accurately because I felt connected to the ball and confident in my approach.

Who is this Racket For?

The PT57A rackets are for advanced players who prefer feel, control and spin over free power.

If you’re an experienced player who enjoys feel from the stringbed, playing precisely, and being connected to your racket with each shot, then this racket is definitely for you.

Because of that, it’s no wonder elite players praise the PT57A Pro Stock racket, and it’s highly sought after on the aftermarket, with some rackets going for over $500.

However, there is no such thing as a one size fits all for tennis rackets. You must choose the best tennis racket for your style; not everyone should use the PT57A.

However, regardless of level, I do encourage everyone to, if at all possible, try a PT57A or a HEAD Pro Tour 630/280 to properly appreciate that great, “classical” feeling of the ball impacting the strings.

Few tennis rackets compare to the PT57A, and it is a joy to play with. Whether it helps you as a player depends on your overall technique and physical abilities. But irrespective, it will undoubtedly give you a fun-filled hitting session.

Can you buy the PT57A?

Yes, but not directly from the HEAD. Head did re-release a limited edition Head Pro Tour 2.0 in 2021, but they sold out.

So you’ll have to find it on the aftermarket; they sometimes crop up on eBay and sites like ProStockTennis , but they’re rare, and you’ll need to part with the best part of $500 / £500 for one in good condition. 

Other than that, you are reliant on knowing someone who still uses the racket or has it in their collection and hoping they will let you borrow it!

Tennis Racket Finder Tool

Are you looking for a new racket? Use our easy-to-use racket finder tool that lets you filter every racket on the market by specs, price, and playing style.

Final Thoughts

The Head PT57A has a terrific feel, swings quickly for its weight, and has a strong, comfortable feeling, regulated power, and stability.

From every part of the court, I enjoyed the racket. Whether hitting with spin or flattening out the ball, I liked the control and accuracy the PT57A provided me (mainly on my volleys).

While there are no universal specs for Pro Stock rackets, as they are heavily customised after manufacturing, I think the optimal weight for this racket is between 330 and 350 grams.

The PT57A I was using during this playtest was 315 grams unstrung, and I had the feeling I didn’t have enough power on some shots and it would be perfect if the racket were a bit heavier.

Overall, this is a true player’s racket for skilled players and will give you an incredible feeling when hitting the sweet spot. Try it if you can!

• Not enough power on this particular PT57A (315g)

Power - 7.5

Control - 9, manoeuvrability - 8, stability - 9, comfort - 8.5, touch/feel - 8.5, serves - 8.5, groundstrokes - 8.8, slice - 8.3, volleys - 9, returns - 8.5.

A true player's racket for skilled players and will give you a great feeling when hitting the sweet spot. Try it if you can!

Join 12k Tennis Fans Who Get Our Updates

News, racket reviews, guides and more.

Indian Wells Draw 2023

Head lynx review, related articles.

Yonex Percept 100D Review

Andrey Rublev’s Racket

Yonex Percept 97D Review

Yonex Fusionrev 5 Review

One comment, leave a reply cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Best Price Guarantee
• Free Shipping Over $99*

Your cart is currently empty.

Head Gravity Tour Lite 2023

• Description
• Shipping & Returns

The all new Head Gravity Tour Lite 2023 comes with the same massive sweetspot shape and distinctive flip design but is lighter and a lot more maneuverable. It also combines HEAD's latest technologies that work together for an ultimate paddle experience. The Hybrid Hitting Surface provides a truly superior blend of power, comfort, control and stability, while its HEAD's Sweetspot Power Core takes care of the unique soft and powerful impact feel. With its Extreme 3D Spin and Handle Stabilizer Technology, the premium Head Gravity Tour Lite 2023 model is perfect for power players who are looking for a slightly lighter version and more maneuverability.

Head Gravity Tour Lite 2023 Pickleball Paddle Specs:

• Weight: 7.6 oz.
• Surface Texture: Rough
• Surface Material:  Graphite
• Core Material: Polymer
• Core Thickness: 14 mm
• Paddle Length: 16.0 in.
• Paddle Width: 8.1 in.
• Handle Length: 5 in.
• Edge Guard: Yes
• Colour: Orange
• Grip: Head HydroSorb Pro
• USA Pickleball Approved
• Product Code: 200013

Related Products

Recently Viewed Products

Customer Login:

is added to your shopping cart.

JavaScript seems to be disabled in your browser. For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser.

Choose your location

• Austria Deutsch
• Belgium Français
• Bulgaria English
• Croatia English
• Cyprus English
• Czech Republic Čeština
• Denmark English
• Estonia English
• Finland English
• France Français
• Germany Deutsch
• Greece English
• Hungary English
• Ireland English
• Italy Italiano
• Latvia English
• Liechtenstein Deutsch
• Lithuania English
• Luxembourg Français
• Malta English
• Monaco Français
• Netherlands Nederlands
• Norway English
• Poland Polski
• Portugal English
• Romania English
• Slovakia English
• Slovenia English
• Spain Spanish
• Sweden English
• Switzerland Deutsch | Français | Italiano
• United Kingdom English

North America

• Canada English | Français

Rest of the world

• Australia English
• International English
• Japan Japanese

The History of the HEAD Radical Series

Celebrating 30 years of ‘The People’s Racquet’

First designed for a "rebellious" Andre Agassi in the early 1990s, the RADICAL continues to live up to its name. Thirty years after it was first launched, the racquet is still disrupting the tennis world.

From Agassi to Andy Murray to Taylor Fritz and from Sloane Stephens to Diego Schwartzman, some of the sport’s most creative and groundbreaking athletes have endorsed the RADICAL racquet series. With HEAD relaunching the series in 2023, with an upgrade that includes state-of-the-art Auxetic technology for sensational impact feel, we look back at the history of a racquet that is now as iconic as the man who inspired it.

2023: Auxetic RADICAL

Upgraded with state-of-the-art Auxetic technology,  the new RADICAL racquet for 2023  offers sensational impact feel and increased confidence in your game. There's no shot you can't play with 'The People's Racquet', which supplies outstanding versatility and playability.

A new, bold and asymmetrical design illustrates the modernity and innovation of the RADICAL, which has a number of exclusive technologies, including sound grommets, which enhance your power through greater string movement while optimizing sound and vibrations. While the variable beam cross-section perfectly balances power, control and spin, the dense 16/19 string pattern supplies an optimal mix of control and power. 

1995: RADICAL TOUR 630 and RADICAL TOUR 690

The RADICAL was updated with Twintube technology and with a striking black and white design which earned it a new nickname, 'The Zebra'. Agassi liked how HEAD were forever innovating. "HEAD were a great partner. They were always willing to explore ways of making me better," said Agassi, who would win the gold medal at the 1996 Olympics Games with his RADICAL racquet. "I was always looking for ways to make the racquet stronger, and to absorb pace better. And there were some materials that changed along the way, and tinkering of weight and balance."

"If it looked the part and performed the part, I was pretty happy with it. HEAD built a racquet that was like an extension of your hand and from the first day I never looked back." 

• Скидки дня
• Справка и помощь
• Адрес доставки Идет загрузка... Ошибка: повторите попытку ОК
• Продажи
• Список отслеживания Развернуть список отслеживаемых товаров Идет загрузка... Войдите в систему , чтобы просмотреть свои сведения о пользователе
• Краткий обзор
• Недавно просмотренные
• Ставки/предложения
• Список отслеживания
• История покупок
• Купить опять
• Объявления о товарах
• Сохраненные запросы поиска
• Сохраненные продавцы
• Сообщения
• Уведомление
• Развернуть корзину Идет загрузка... Произошла ошибка. Чтобы узнать подробнее, посмотрите корзину.

Oops! Looks like we're having trouble connecting to our server.

Refresh your browser window to try again.

Head Pro Tour 630 & Radical Tour?

• Thread starter jetlee2k
• Start date May 5, 2009
• May 5, 2009

jayserinos99

Hall of fame.

They're based off the same mold. I CAPped a Radical Tour/Trisys 260 and because of the balance (closer to even at 4-5pt HL), it felt loggish for me to swing. Great plowthrough though. IMO they're different because the 260 is a bit stiffer/solid? than the PT630. There's a flex with the PT630 that the 260 doesn't have as much.  

so the difference is the balance? and the stiffness.. I got to check it on the court tomorrow and see.. May be that's the difference..  

IMO balance is one of the biggest differences. I'm not the expert here, but although both are made with Graphite/Twaron composition, it may be in different quantities and different layups to change the stiffness and playing characteristics as well.  

Peter Szucs

• May 6, 2009

The Radical Tour has very similar very rich feel, its lighter with less hl balance and stiffer.. overall very similar output with regards to solidity, stability and power.  

• May 7, 2009

jetlee2k said: so the difference is the balance? and the stiffness.. I got to check it on the court tomorrow and see.. May be that's the difference.. Click to expand...

jetlee2k said: I am cleaning up my mid plus frames and I saw some interesting stuff.. I have a few Head Radical Tour which look identical to PRO Tour so I CAP them all up and weight.. here are some pictures The CAP radical Tour & PT630 CAP weight about 320g (no leather grip, no string). Put on string and leather grip, dampener it weight up to 350g. I took them both out for a spin and quite to my surprise both play alot & alot better with the CAP on.. Very stable ground strokes & solid in the volleys.. I felt both are identical in term of playing and feel.. so is that Radical Tour just difference name or the ones I have just a paint job of the actuall PT630.. I will show the overlay pictures of both next.. Click to expand...

Bionic Poster

• May 8, 2009

dr325i said: Hey, what is the difference between the two PT630's you have? In the last picture (stacked up) I have the last one (bottom) -- what is different about the one above except for the graphics? Thanks! Click to expand...

dr325i said: Anyone??????? Click to expand...

Professional

• Aug 20, 2012

Is the radical tour more polarized than the pro tour? On the tennis warehouse racket finder it says that the radical tour weighs 346g when strung, had a swingweight of 339 and is 7 points head light compared to 340g for the pro tour, a SW of 327 and 6 points head light Most people seem to say that they are pretty much the same racket apart from the flex but surely the specs say different  

seb23 said: Is the radical tour more polarized than the pro tour? On the tennis warehouse racket finder it says that the radical tour weighs 346g when strung, had a swingweight of 339 and is 7 points head light compared to 340g for the pro tour, a SW of 327 and 6 points head light Most people seem to say that they are pretty much the same racket apart from the flex but surely the specs say different Click to expand...

• Aug 21, 2012

t135 said: I played with both of them when I was younger. The 260 had more power than the 280, and had a more head heavy balance. This was the originals made in Austria during the first couple years of production. I had always wished there was a racquet model in between them. The satellite tour twin tube was a fair compromise of sorts. Wish I had a couple of them now to hit with for fun. Click to expand...

I have both and play with them from time to time, for "hitting sessions" without keeping score. The Radical Tour is more stiff for sure.  

tandayu said: Many production variations... Some with the bumper guard (trek font) has same weight or heavier than the one with full cap version. Just enjoy what you have and customize it according to your preference Click to expand...

• Aug 22, 2012

Long Face said: I have both and play with them from time to time, for "hitting sessions" without keeping score. The Radical Tour is more stiff for sure. Click to expand...

• Sep 4, 2012

do prestige 98 caps fit the radical tour 260 (bumble bee)?  

PKfan1 said: do prestige 98 caps fit the radical tour 260 (bumble bee)? Click to expand...

• Sep 12, 2012

I wonder if this is the same mold as IG Radical Pro?..  

maxpotapov said: I wonder if this is the same mold as IG Radical Pro?.. Click to expand...

My Daughter was sponsored by Head and tested the 'Tour' range in about 1995. There were 3 racquets in the series that she tried out, The Pro Tour[blue] , the Radical Tour [yellow] and the Lite Tour[green]. The lite was a nice racquet but lacked the weight of the other two and we both felt is was a little underpowered. The Pro and Radical were the same weight, the difference was the Radical was stiffer. In the end we both preferred the stiffer Radical and that's what she settled on. Interestingly in the price list I have from 1995 they list the pro tour as either a 690 or 630 head size the same as the radicals, cant say that I have ever seen a blue 690 though, maybe it was a typo? By the way in the racquet blurbs they have Goran marketed as the Prestige user,Agassi as the Radical and Muster as the Pro user Cheers Greg  

GregN said: My Daughter was sponsored by Head and tested the 'Tour' range in about 1995. There were 3 racquets in the series that she tried out, The Pro Tour[blue] , the Radical Tour [yellow] and the Lite Tour[green]. The lite was a nice racquet but lacked the weight of the other two and we both felt is was a little underpowered. The Pro and Radical were the same weight, the difference was the Radical was stiffer. In the end we both preferred the stiffer Radical and that's what she settled on. Interestingly in the price list I have from 1995 they list the pro tour as either a 690 or 630 head size the same as the radicals, cant say that I have ever seen a blue 690 though, maybe it was a typo? By the way in the racquet blurbs they have Goran marketed as the Prestige user,Agassi as the Radical and Muster as the Pro user Cheers Greg Click to expand...

• Sep 18, 2012

vsbabolat said: That was not a typo. There was the Pro Tour 690. I still have my price list from the 95' too. Click to expand...

Songs For A Dead Pilot

• Jul 22, 2019

vsbabolat said: There was the Pro Tour 690. Click to expand...

Similar threads

• jonas-the-ball-basher
• Apr 4, 2005

• Dec 1, 2018
• Apr 14, 2004

• Nov 2, 2018

• Dec 15, 2011