uci world tour relegation battle

Powered by Outside

UCI president confident WorldTour relegation-promotion system will survive legal challenges

Relegation is 'not nice' but 'it is sport' says david lappartient..

• Share on Facebook
• Share on Reddit

Don't miss a moment of the 2024 Tour de France! Get recaps, insights, and exclusive takes with Velo's daily newsletter. >","name":"in-content-cta","type":"link"}}'>Sign up today! .

WOLLONGONG, Australia (VN) —  UCI president David Lappartient is confident the men’s WorldTour relegation-promotion system will stand up to legal challenges.

Up to two teams could be relegated from the WorldTour at the end of this season if they are unable to secure the points needed to survive, while two ProTeams can gain promotion for 2023. At the moment, Israel-Premier Tech and Lotto Soudal are below the danger line while Arkéa-Samsic and Alpecin-Deceuninck look set to go up.

Israel-Premier Tech boss Sylvan Adams has threatened to sue the UCI if his team is relegated from the WorldTour and says that the governing body should invoke “force majeure” to put a stop to this year’s relegation battle in light of the COVID-19 pandemic that has blighted the globe since 2020.

Speaking to press the at the world championships in Wollongong, Lappartient said that relegation and promotion was all part of the sporting environment, and he wasn’t concerned about any legal challenges.

“We can be challenged, of course, but we are confident that our system can be confirmed,” Lappartient said. “That’s sport. It’s not nice when you are in relegation, but when you are in football if you are last of the premier league you will go down to the second league. You must accept the result. That’s difficult because we know all the efforts of all the teams. We must also leave the door open for new applicants, for new teams to enter.”

• Sylvan Adams pressuring UCI to back-pedal on WorldTour rules: ‘Relegation is death’
• Analysis: The unintended consequences of the UCI’s relegation game
• UCI confirms WorldTour relegation-promotion rules will be enforced

The current system began in 2020 with the points accumulated over the past three seasons counting toward the overall tally. While teams like Arkéa-Samsic have been eagled-eyed in the fight for points from very early on, some of the WorldTour squads appear to have been caught off-guard.

The fight for points has spilled out into the world championships with some teams refusing to release their riders for national team duties so that they can keep racing them in Europe.

Amidst the recent threats of legal action, there was speculation that the UCI may look to expand the WorldTour to 20 teams in order to avoid it. However, this was swiftly denied in a press release earlier this month as the UCI affirmed that the relegation and promotion system would be enforced at the end of the season.

Lappartient said that the system was needed so that the top tier of the sport didn’t become a closed shop with others locked out of it, despite performances. The UCI president added that it was the best option to provide balance for teams and organizers.

“This system was approved four years ago by the UCI management committee in September 2018. After long discussions, and years of discussions to reach this new system. When I was elected in 2017, I said that we needed to fix this,” Lappartient said. “In one year, we were able to reach this agreement by consensus. It means that it has been approved by unanimity. Of course, the organizers wanted to keep the four wildcards, the teams wanted to have the opportunity for second division teams to qualify based on their ranking.

“We finally figured out the system and we said it will start on January 1, 2020, and after we would take the three-year ranking in order to avoid relegation based only on one year. That was at the request of the teams. The other point was to give some teams the opportunity to qualify and potentially enter into the system and for it not to be a closed system. For this, the organizers wanted automatic promotion and relegation. The teams that wanted to stay like there were and we fixed this by saying that the top 18 will be in the WorldTour, whether they are the existing WorldTour teams or some new applicants. So then, we will have the top 18 in the WorldTour at the end.”

Popular on Velo

• Subscribe to newsletter

It's going to be so great to have you with us! We just need your email address to keep in touch.

By submitting the form, I hereby give my consent to the processing of my personal data for the purpose of sending information about products, services and market research of ŠKODA AUTO as well as information about events, competitions, news and sending me festive greetings, including on the basis of how I use products and services. For customer data enrichment purpose ŠKODA AUTO may also share my personal data with third parties, such as Volkswagen Financial Services AG, your preferred dealer and also the importer responsible for your market. The list of third parties can be found here . You can withdraw your consent at any time.  Unsubscribe

WorldTour Relegation Battle Causes Turmoil in Top Teams

Most sports fans surely know what the word relegation means. Most often used in football and rugby, it refers to the mechanism whereby teams in the top league of the sport are dropped to a lower league if they finish last or second from last. They are then replaced by teams from the lower league who qualified via table standings or playoff matches.

As already stated, this mechanism is usually used in sports involving round or oval balls. It has rarely, if ever, been used in cycling. That has now changed. At the end of 2018, UCI President David Lappartient  announced a wide-ranging reform of UCI regulations . These came into force on January 1, 2020, and include the current system of automatic wild cards for the best ProTeams of the previous year (currently Alpecin-Fenix and Arkea-Samsic); a limit of 18 teams that will be granted licenses to race at the top level; and the allocation of WorldTour licenses in 2023 for three-year periods (e.g., 2020-2022, 2023-2025, etc.).

At the end of each three-year period, every team that wishes to hold a WorldTour license must apply or re-apply to the UCI. We are currently in the final year of the first three-year period, which means that the UCI will be looking at applications and issuing licenses for the next three-year period, which begins next year. This means that for the first time, licenses will be awarded for the next to the teams ranked in the UCI’s top 18, based on points won over the past three seasons.

Currently, according to the points counted up by Lanterne Rouge , eight teams are struggling to avoid relegation, with Israel-Premier Tech, Lotto-Soudal and Peter Sagan’s new team, TotalEnergies, sitting below the cutoff point and in real danger of not racing in the top tier from 2023 to 2025. The teams in difficulty are blaming the controversial way points are allocated for their predicament.

To begin with, only the points from the top 10 riders from each team are counted each year. Points from national championships and international events count towards a team’s total but only if these points have been won by a top-10 rider. Points won by other riders – for example, by a rider on a development team associated with a WorldTour team – are not counted. But that’s just the beginning.

Matt White, head sports director of BikeExchange-Jayco – which now sits in 17th place, just two spots above relegation – told Cycling Weekly , “I don’t believe the points system is appropriate. It’s totally stacked in favour of one-day races.” He went on to say: “It doesn’t make any sense that a 1.1 race has such value. Some of these races have three WorldTour teams. How is that worth more than a stage of the  Tour de France ? If one of our guys finishes fourth [in a Tour of the Basque Country stage], a WorldTour race, they get nothing, but they could go to Volta Limburg, a 1.1, finish 10th and get 20 points. It’s crazy.”

Specifically, a rider who wins a stage of a WorldTour stage race, such as the Tour of the Basque Country, would earn 50 UCI points, while the fourth-place rider picks up none. But a rider winning a UCI 1.2 one-day race, which WorldTour teams rarely enter, earns 40 points, and the rider in 10th place collects three points.

No wonder some of the teams are up in arms. They have been forced to balance point-gathering by riding in low-profile races with pleasing their sponsors by participating in prestige WorldTour competitions. “It definitely affects where we’re sending riders,” White said. “We’re doing more one-day races this year than we’ve ever done. We’ve never had pressure from sponsors to do these small one-day races that are usually a chore to get to. We’ve always had the mindset that specific training is more important than going to competitions just to get points, so we’ve had to adjust this year to make sure we get into the top-18.”

Articles you might like

First Strike: UCI’s Yellow Card System Launched at Tour de France Femmes avec Zwift 2024

Naturally, safety has always been crucial in professional cycling — given the sport’s inherent risks and the high speeds at which races are contested. Over the years, various measures have been used to protect riders and other race participants, including improvements in race equipment, stricter…

Reminiscing the Beauty of La Vuelta and Spain as a Cycling Oasis with Alberto Contador

The final Grand Tour of the season, La Vuelta a España, is finally here so it’s naturally the talk of the town of the wider cycling community – including our podcast host Matt Stephens. Matt welcomed none other than Alberto Contador in his virtual studio…

My Path to Winning the 2024 Tour de France Femmes avec Zwift by Kasia Niewiadoma

To be the winner of the 2024 Tour de France Femmes avec Zwift feels surreal—like a dream I’m still trying to wrap my head around. Even though a couple of days have passed since that final climb up Alpe d’Huez, the reality hasn’t fully sunk…

La Vuelta Café Guide for the Sweet-Toothed: Andalusia Edition

Grand Tour after Grand Tour, we see those athletes crushing records and showing us that no matter how hard we try, we won’t get there. At least not at that level. That doesn’t mean we can’t enjoy the finer things in cycling, though. And now,…

• Fantasy Vuelta

World Tour may expand to 20 teams to avoid relegation criticism | UPDATE: UCI rejects changes

The promotion, relegation and maintenance fight has been one of the most critical topics of the year as several teams fight to keep their World Tour status, and over the last few months many have changed their schedules, prevented riders from competing in certain races, and have put out all the stops to prevent relegation.

The current system sees the Top18 teams over the span of the last three years obtain a World Tour license for the 2023-2025 seasons. The points are obtained throughout the year, but favours those focusing on one-day races as many have pointed out, and many have equally criticized. Adding to that, only the 10 best scoring riders of each team have their points counted towards the classification, effectively bringing in further criticism.

Primoz Roglic blames Fred Wright for Vuelta a Espana crash: "The way this crash happened is unacceptable"

Many teams and riders have publicly criticized this classification, but they may get their wish granted: Cycling news have reported that the possibility of the World Tour lineup expanding to 20 teams is being considered. This would be a big change that would see all teams maintain, whilst Alpecin-Deceuninck and Arkéa Samsic rise to World Tour.

Whilst the idea had been shut down in previous months, the rise of complaints and risk of a legal battle with several teams who want to keep their team's future alive and well has seen this become a possibility. The situation is ongoing with no official announcements, however comments are expected from high UCI representatives regarding the topic.

Preview - Vuelta a Espana 2022 stage 20

Update: The claims have made the UCI come forward to reject the possibility of changes. In a press release issues hours after, stating that "these decisions were taken unanimously by the PCC" which includes the riders', teams' and organizers' representatives. The decision to implant the system was unanimously accepted years before and reaffirmed in late 2020, and they will not be changed in the meantime.

The UCI confirmed that "contrary to recent public reporting, no decision to modify the rules in force has been taken" and that "the UCI Licence Commission is charged with awarding UCI WorldTour licences on the basis of the rules in force."

Mads Pedersen: "Three wins is much more than we had hoped for"

Read more about:, place comments.

You are currently seeing only the comments you are notified about, if you want to see all comments from this post, click the button below.

Confirmation

Are you sure you want to report this comment?

UNDER_ARTICLE

Thu 22 Aug 2024

Fri 23 Aug 2024

What is going on with relegation and UCI points and why does everyone care now?

We are moving past squeaky bum time and heading for the drop

• Sign up to our newsletter Newsletter

What's going on with relegation and UCI points?

Relegation from the WorldTour is back in the news, after bubbling away for most of this year in the background, we have almost reached the point of no return for some teams, with opportunities to gain points dwindling.

After the Vuelta a España - for which points do not get awarded until all racing is done - there are just three WorldTour events left this year, all one-day races, 15 .Pro races, 21 .1 races, and the World Championships.

That means 7,783 UCI points are still on offer for the winners of all these races, and the individual stages contained therein, plus thousands more for podium finishes and more minor placings. However, these are unlikely to go to the select few teams who need them most, those that are struggling at the bottom of the UCI's table. 

At present, both Lotto Soudal and Israel-Premier Tech, two current WorldTour teams, face relegation, while Alpecin-Deceuninck and Arkéa Samsic would be promoted to cycling's top table. Lotto can take comfort from the fact that, as things stand, they would still gain access to the Grand Tours next year, but Israel would not, with TotalEnergies occupying this second spot.

There are currently only 619 points between Movistar, BikeExchange, EF Education-EasyPost and Cofidis in the four spots above relegation; Movistar are 288 points ahead of Lotto Soudal, who currently are in the red zone.

Suddenly, things are looking awfully tight at the bottom, and both racing and non-racing decisions are affecting the rankings.

For example, Simon Yates' withdrawal from the Vuelta (because of Covid) has deprived his BikeExchange team of potentially hundreds of crucial points that they would stand to gain from a high finish on general classification.

Get The Leadout Newsletter

The latest race content, interviews, features, reviews and expert buying guides, direct to your inbox!

While the Australian team bounced back with a stage win on Wednesday, through Kaden Groves , the 100 points gained here will do little to quell fears of the drop.

With more and more riders dropping out of the Vuelta after catching the virus, in a year when illness has seemingly had more of an impact than usual, it is points that are being lost, not just results.

This was seemingly what Tao Geoghegan Hart (Ineos Grenadiers) was getting at in a hastily deleted tweet sent on Wednesday morning: "How can we have a relegation system, risking the future of decade old teams, during these unprecedented times of sickness. Sport is not fair, granted. But this just doesn’t seem right, not now and not like this. I would like to see solidarity between all riders, of all teams."

Solidarity is a tricky concept in the peloton, with the official union, the CPA, famously unloved, and little binding riders together across teams, nationalities, ages, goals and more. This is what made Geoghegan Hart's intervention interesting; his lack of dog in the fight, as Ineos are hardly one of those threatened with relegation.

What those in the teams striving for promotion to the top table, like Alpecin and Arkéa, make of this call for solidarity is a different matter. The relegation system might threaten the future of "decade old teams" but to not have a system would threaten new investment in the sport.

The boss of ProTeam Uno-X, Vegar Kulset, tweeted: "Imagine a Premier League club that, at the end of the season and close to relegation, complains that due to injuries and covid, the relegation system is unfair. And the final argument - we are an old club and do not deserve this."

Away from sickness, Arkéa's push to the WorldTour has been threatened by Nairo Quintana's positive test for tramadol at the Tour de France , which has deprived the French team of 400 UCI points after he was disqualified from the race. His sixth place therefore no longer exists. He has appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, with the potential for court rulings affecting the final UCI points table.

There are squads who have reportedly asked their riders not to attend the World Championships in Australia in order to concentrate on gaining points at smaller races, while tactics to boost point totals - and possibly not risk everything by going for the win - are clear to see.

There are even reports that riders will leave the Vuelta early to target other races for UCI points, which seems to undermine the whole point of competition at the highest level; the system is leading to weird decisions.

As a sport, cycling often struggles to present an overarching narrative, especially to the casual viewer. Individual events mean a lot more than any kind of structure to the season - the Tour de France, Paris-Roubaix and the World Championships are big events across the whole year - while any kind of structure is at best noticed at the end of the year, at worst ignored altogether.

To the casual viewer, as most are, any kind of thinking beyond a single race or a series of events like the cobbled Classics, is alien. Yet for many years there has been a unified attempt at some kind of system or league across the season, to link things up, to make Dwars door Vlaanderen connect with the Tour of Poland, or the UAE Tour with the GP de Quebec.

The current system for men’s cycling, devised by the UCI, the sport’s governing body, is the WorldTour, with the ProSeries sitting below it, the successors to the Super Prestige Pernod and UCI Road World Cup. There are 18 WorldTour teams, the ones you have heard of, and they get to automatically go to the WorldTour races, the ones you have heard of. Below that, there is the ProSeries, of 17 teams, which you have probably heard of, who go to races that you probably know, and sometimes, confusingly, to the races you definitely know. Below this again are Continental teams, who mostly go to the races you don’t really pay attention to.

Understand?

Since the inauguration of the WorldTour, 13 long seasons ago, there has been an end of season ranking, which is normally, rightfully, ignored; it is often either superfluous or odd (Tadej Pogačar and Deceuninck Quick-Step won last year).

Still, the ranking exists. 

This league table matters more than ever this year, because the 18 slots for teams who will form the WorldTour for the next three seasons are up for grabs. Some squads who are currently at the top table face relegation, while ProTeams below eye up their spots, and therefore automatic invites to the biggest races.

All races have UCI points and riders score points based on their finishing positions, this is how the league table is set, although it is only the top ten scorers in a team who actually contribute to the overall total. It is the points total across 2020, 2021 and 2022 that counts.

Points do not just go to winners, they go to top finishers, up to the top 25 in certain races.

If all of this is not confusing enough, different races have different points. You win 1,000 points for winning the Tour de France, for example - lucky Jumbo-Visma - and 125 points for winning the Volta Limburg Classic, as Arnaud de Lie did for Lotto Soudal.

There is one more layer of added complexity, which is that the two teams with the highest points total this year - and this year only - get invites to the Grand Tours for next year, and do not have to hope they get in through a wildcard.

All of this is why team decisions have appeared weird this year, as those squads in danger have become alert to the situation they have found themselves in and kicked into gear. Big name riders have been sent to smaller races to garner points, or multiple riders on one team have finished high up at an inconsequential event.

While the concept of relegation and promotion from the WorldTour makes sense, teams have been left scratching their heads at a system which sees more points awarded for victory in a 1.1 race - the Marcel Kint Classic for example - than a Grand Tour stage win.

Throw the chaos of real life into the mix, and a pandemic, plus the confusing points system, and it has been a messy year.

Thank you for reading 20 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access

Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

*Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription

Join now for unlimited access

Try first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

Adam is Cycling Weekly ’s news editor – his greatest love is road racing but as long as he is cycling on tarmac, he's happy. Before joining Cycling Weekly he spent two years writing for Procycling, where he interviewed riders and wrote about racing. He's usually out and about on the roads of Bristol and its surrounds. Before cycling took over his professional life, he covered ecclesiastical matters at the world’s largest Anglican newspaper and politics at Business Insider. Don't ask how that is related to cycling.

Beicio Cymru asks for help, as data shows sharp drop off in participants in road races

By Adam Becket Published 22 August 24

O’Connor achieves Grand Tour treble with Vuelta stage win and takes over the overall race lead from Primož Roglič

By Tom Thewlis Published 22 August 24

Useful links

• Tour de France
• Giro d'Italia
• Vuelta a España

buyers-guides

• Best road bikes
• Best gravel bikes
• Best smart turbo trainers
• Best cycling computers
• Editor's Choice
• Bike Reviews
• Component Reviews
• Clothing Reviews
• Contact Future's experts
• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Cookies policy
• Advertise with us

Cycling Weekly is part of Future plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site . © Future Publishing Limited Quay House, The Ambury, Bath BA1 1UA. All rights reserved. England and Wales company registration number 2008885.

UCI WorldTour 2023: the forces involved

The UCI WorldTour is back with 35 events and 18 UCI WorldTeams, ready to bring battle throughout 2023. The off-season has made it possible to reshape the personnel and the first changes can be seen as soon as elite racing returns to Australia, on the Santos Tour Down Under, with the recomposition of the peloton following the promotion of Alpecin-Deceuninck and Team Arkéa-Samsic at the end of the 2022 season, while Lotto Dstny and Israel Premier Tech now have ProTeam licenses. A new three-year cycle begins, with teams out to defend or win a spot at the top. What forces are at play?

Jumbo-Visma, UAE Team Emirates, ever stronger?

Jumbo-Visma, winner of the 2022 UCI WorldTour team classification, have attracted new talent to continue displaying their collective strength in the year’s biggest cycling events. The Dutch formation can now rely on Dylan van Baarle, winner of his first Monument at Paris-Roubaix 2022, the versatile Jan Tratnik and the talented duo of Attila Valter and Wilco Keldermann. They bring further support to established leaders, Jonas Vingegaard, in search of a second Tour de France, Wout van Aert, eager for success in the classics, and Primož Roglič, who will return to the Giro d'Italia three years after his last participation in the Corsa Rosa, where he took third place.

Dear @giroditalia , Let’s see each other again in May. 𝑾𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝒍𝒐𝒗𝒆, @rogla pic.twitter.com/ZfWLnWrWxS — Team Jumbo-Visma cycling (@JumboVismaRoad) December 22, 2022

Such an armada is well needed to contain the competition, not least Tadej Pogačar’s UAE Team Emirates. The Slovenian prodigy can count on a new high-flying climber in Adam Yates. The Emirati formation also recruited Jay Vine, winner of two stages at the 2022 Vuelta and already crowned Australian Champion in the time trial at the start of 2023, as well as Felix Großschartner and Tim Wellens. Pascal Ackermann and Álvaro Hodeg will be aiming for bunch sprints after Fernando Gaviria's departure to Movistar Team.

Like Astana-Qazaqstan Team, whose iconic leader Vincenzo Nibali has bidden farewell to the professional peloton, the Spanish team begins a new cycle after the retirement of Alejandro Valverde. After a strong end to the 2022 season, Enric Mas has the confidence to take over from the Spanish icon when the road rises. In the Kazakh ranks, the next generation is there to be seen in Yevgeniy Fedorov, UCI Under 23 World Champion last year in Wollongong (Australia).

Ineos Grenadiers and Soudal Quick-Step, always aiming for more

The inescapable Ineos Grenadiers will also be at the centre of attention, with the return to the fore of the Colombian Egan Bernal, who should participate in the Tour de France, three years after his historic success and a year and a half after his serious accident during training. The recruitment of Thymen Arensman represents a major new asset in the stage races. With 39 victories in 2022, the British team will try to do even better despite the departures of Richie Porte (retired), Richard Carapaz (EF Education-EasyPost), Dylan van Baarle (Jumbo-Visma) and Eddie Dunbar (Team Jayco-AlUla), in addition to that of Adam Yates towards UAE Team Emirates.

In Belgium, the Wolfpack, which becomes Soudal Quick-Step this year, will aim to return to the top step of the podiums in the classics. The two-time UCI World Champion Julian Alaphilippe aims for the Flanders Classics and the Tour de France. With his new rainbow jersey, Remco Evenepoel will try to win a second consecutive Grand Tour, this time on Italian roads. The Belgian team is reorienting itself by aiming for the general classification in stage races, but it has also attracted Belgian Tim Merlier to lead the sprints alongside Fabio Jakobsen.

Strength on all terrains

After their first Grand Tour overall victory, Bora-Hansgrohe and Jai Hindley will defend their crown in the Giro d'Italia. The German team can shine on all terrains with riders such as Aleksandr Vlasov, Sergio Higuita, Sam Bennett and Nils Politt. Coming from AG2R Citroën Team, Bob Jungels brings more strength to the squad. As for the French team led by Vincent Lavenu, they hope Ben O'Connor can be a regular on stage race podiums. Cofidis is moving forward with similar ambitions for Guillaume Martin.

The American outfit EF Education-EasyPost has a new major asset with the Olympic Champion Richard Carapaz. The men in pink have further strengthened themselves for the classics with the Dane Mikkel Frølich Honoré, coming from Quick-Step.

Bahrain Victorious can always count on Mikel Landa (3rd in the Giro d'Italia and Il Lombardia in 2022) for the mountains and on Matej Mohorič (winner of Milano-Sanremo) in the one-day races, while Sonny Colbrelli has retired after a year marked by a heart problem. The Australian Team Jayco-AlUla (the new name of the BikeExchange-Jayco) team also hopes to shine on all terrains with leaders Michael Matthews, Simon Yates and Dylan Groenewegen.

Intermarché-Wanty Gobert will have the challenging task of following their incredible 2022 season (24 victories) despite the departures of Jan Hirt (Soudal Quick-Step), Alexandr Kristoff (Uno-X Pro Cycling Team) and Quinten Hermans (Alpecin-Deceuninck). Eleven recruits (including Mike Teunissen and Rui Costa[MJU1] ) come to reinforce Biniam Girmay's team.

Seeds of champions

Trek-Segafredo rely on the same strengths as in 2022, with the leaders Mads Pedersen, Jasper Stuyven, Giulio Ciccone and Bauke Mollema. But the American team have also attracted new rising talents such as Thibau Nys, Natnael Tesfatsion and Mathias Vacek to accompany youngsters Filippo Baroncini, Quinn Simmons and Mattias Skjelmose, who are already in the squad.

Marc Madiot's Groupama-FDJ has made room for eight champions in the making from its UCI Continental Team. The most notable newcomers are Lenny Martinez and Romain Grégoire (19 years old). With more experience, David Gaudu is aiming for the podium in the Tour de France, where he should be accompanied by sprinter Arnaud Démare, while Thibaut Pinot is preparing his return to the Giro d'Italia. The French team will rely on Stefan Küng for the time trials and the classics. Valentin Madouas is ready to shine on all terrains.

Led by Romain Bardet, Team DSM brings four young talents from its UCI Continental Team up to the UCI WorldTour, with a keen focus on the Briton Oscar Onley (21), who impressed in the fight against Jonas Vingegaard in the CRO Race (UCI Europe Tour) in 2022. British talents are also arriving in force at Ineos Grenadiers with the winner of the 2022 Baby Giro Léo Hayter, who joins his brother Ethan, and Joshua Tarling, UCI Junior World Champion on the track and on the road.

[MJU1]I cannot find him listed in their team but see he is widely cited as being in the team from 2023.

UCI World Tour Promotion and Relegation Weekly

The weekly look at the UCI promotion and relegation standings. With Alpecin-Fenix and Arkéa-Samsic high on the tables and all but assured promotion, the story is all about which teams face the drop. It’s becoming very tight because relegation candidates Lotto-Soudal are closing in on EF Education and BikeExchange.

What’s Changed Since Last Week?

• Unchanged since March, Lotto-Soudal and Israel are the two teams facing relegation but the news is that it’s getting very close. BikeExchange slip to 18th place and have just 230 points over Lotto-Soudal; Education First rise to 17th but there’s little comfort as they’re only 341 points above Lotto-Soudal. The chart below shows just how close things are getting, today’s three-way fight to avoid 19th place can turn into a five-way scrap, watch those lines converge:

• As things stand the automatic invites for the 2023 grand tours would go Lotto-Soudal and TotalEnergies
• Jumbo-Visma hit the jackpot thanks to a 1-2 on GC in the Dauphiné, plus all those stage wins and placings to get 1580 points, next were Bahrain with 503 and Alpecin-Fenix with 430
• Lotto-Soudal got 343 points, EF Education 250, Movistar 140, Israel 71
• At the foot of the weekly table was DSM with 15 points, Bike Exchange got 3 and Trek-Segafredo none

Two points to note this week…

First a cropped screengrab of the commissaire report from from Stage 6 of the Dauphiné, it shows fines for punching and littering, both cash and UCI points, visible a reminder that points can be won by results… and forfeited by breaking the rules.

Valverde is going to Florida Second, Movistar’s Eusebio Unzue is the latest to lament the points scale . He’s wisely calling for reform for the next set of years, and not going on a rant because his team faces the drop. What this and more shows is that for years few people, team owners and fans alike, ever paid attention to the rankings, let alone how they were composed. We probably weren’t supposed to either, to find the points tables you had to root around the UCI website, find the right 280 PDF document, scroll to page-whatever.

But the importance of points for World Tour and ambitious Pro Conti teams isn’t new, the three year promotion/relegation system was announced in 2018 . Sure it’s a hot topic which is why you’re reading this weekly update. But from a structural perspective it’s a bit like a US Presidential candidate clocking that their voting system uses an electoral college derived from absolute majorities on a state-by-state basis, and so campaigning in swing states, especially those that supply many electors, could be a good idea. Given we’re halfway through the third and final year, it’s the equivalent of October in a US campaign and a bit late to remark some races, like US states, have more points than others. Just as politicians flock to “battleground states” like Pennsylvania or Florida, we’re now beginning to see several teams pay very close attention to the races that offer plenty of points. Today’s Mont Ventoux Dénivelé Challenge is a case in point, and a chance for teams with climbers to score points.

Animated bar chart race

Background info If you’re new to the story of promotion and relegation this year and want it explained then click here .

To see how many points are available in each race or category, click here .

38 thoughts on “UCI World Tour Promotion and Relegation Weekly”

You consider the relegation race will go between 6 teams? – Israel – Lotto-Soudal – BikeExchange – EducationFirst – Movistar – Cofidis All those teams have less than 1.000 points more than Lotto.

Personally, I see 7 teams in the relegation battle. – Astana seem safe and also Arkea, with the way they are scoring and the extra points gap. – With the way they are scoring, DSM is not out of the woods yet. They only have 1334 points more than Lotto-Soudal.

If DSM doesn’t get a good classification with Bardet in Tour De France and Ewan starts winning, that gap can rapidly close. Certainly as DSM does not do that many point-rich-races so far this season.

In your scenario, it’s not just between Lotto and DSM, though. EF, BEX, Movistar and Cofidis would also have to finish above DSM for them to be in danger…

Good point. It’s still feasible though. I wouldn’t bet any money on a DSM relegation, but they’re still “in play”. They’ve only scored 2175 points so far this season, which is pretty low.

I think Movistar and Cofidis will end above DSM in the final standings. They have so much more potential and races and the gap is small.

So we’ll have to see how Lotto, BikeExchange and EducationFirst score compared to DSM. But again, DSM is not out of the woods yet. DSM does not start in many point-rich races, so we will have to see how Bardet scores this Tour de France for example.

These are weekly updates, so no need to get too far ahead but more teams can get sucked in, yes. DSM have a good cushion from the past but are struggling to score.

It could be like a track elimination race where a team can keep lurking at the back but pip past the others at the end. It’s hard to know the calendar until the end of the year, eg who can see the Tour of Guangxi happening?

You can get a good idea of what’s remaining via this link: https://www.procyclingstats.com/races.php?nation=&category=1&continent=&pro=0&pro=1&name=&pname=contains&limit=100&filter=Filter&s=upcoming-races

I don’t think the Tour of Guanxi will make that much of a difference.

Quickly added the European races to Excel. – 29 1.1-races remaining – 11 1.Pro-races – 4 1.UWT-races – 11 2.1 races – 9 2.Pro-races – 4 2.UWT-races: Tour de Suisse, Tour de France, Tour de Pologne & Vuelta

Next to that, there are the national championships, the world championships and: Asian races 27.08 – 28.08 Tour of Almaty 2.1 28.08 – 01.09 Tour de Taiwan 2.1 28.09 – 03.10 Tour of Iran (Azarbaijan) 2.1 11.10 – 18.10 Le Tour de Langkawi 2.Pro 13.10 – 18.10 Gree-Tour of Guangxi 2.UWT 16.10 Japan Cup Cycle Road Race 1.Pro

American races: 04.09 Maryland Cycling Classic 1.Pro 09.09 Grand Prix Cycliste de Québec 1.UWT 11.09 Grand Prix Cycliste de Montréal 1.UWT

I see Bike Exchange and Israel in the most trouble – they’re both going backwards (Israel’s 37 year-old stage winner notwithstanding). Bike Exchange, interestingly enough came second on that stage, but should have won that – Matthews blew the sprint.

It’ll be a very interesting battle as the season progresses, thanks to Inrng for highlighting it here. Every time you see Lotto go on a raid or Matthews/Impey trying to make a mid-mountain stage difficult for the sprinters you’ll know this is the motivation.

Regarding: “As things stand the automatic invites for the 2023 grand tours would go Lotto-Soudal and TotalEnergies”

It could be interesting to create another ranking “points scored this season” for the 7 relegation teams. Because if Lotto moves to a safe place, things start to get interesting for that story.

Certainly the race between BikeExchange and Israel for the most points this season. Israel needs to catch up 333 points there. They also need to stay ahead of EducationFirst, although the gap is big there with 823 points.

Overview – Cofidis 4893 points – Lotto 4374 points – Total 3696 points – Movistar 3497 points – BikeExchange 2867 points – Israel 2534 points – DSM 2175 points – EducationFirst 1711 points

You’re very much right. If Lotto and BEX manage to over EF and get a WT license, EF will have to rely on the wild cards based on 2022 points. And as things currently stand, they would lose out to Total Energies and Israel (and not very far ahead of Uno-X). So as 3rd ranked pro-tour team, they will still get automatic wild cards to WT 1-day races, but not to the WT stage races.

This may not be the best news for Carapaz …

According to the UCI, grabbing another rider and then hitting them in a fast moving peloton, followed up by hitting them again 10km further on after the finish line is only worth 4 x (in points and CHF) the penalty for passing a bidon to a spectator (Barguil). Not sure the UCI has really thought through its logic? Mind you, only ten points for coming third on a stage (Barguil again) also seems off, even before deducting the bidon fine. As for Molano, he really needs to be banned.

Has any action been taken against Hugo Page?

According to Molano, his anger was the result of a second instance of dangerous riding by Page that could have caused a huge crash. I presume Page wasn’t censured because there’s no fault attached to being punched, and sudden changes of direction go unpunished unless during a sprint. But maybe the commissaires should have taken a look.

The way Intermarche are going they could afford to lose a few points for offences. We wouldn’t have expected that at the start of the year.

Hugo Page is French in a French race and there is no camera footage on social media. That also plays.

I don’t see how it changes anything… UCI commissaires are not french (and Bardet was DQ in one Paris-Nice without any problems, though he was one of the best french hope).

I think the main thing is that there is no clear footage of whatever Hugo Page allegedly did (would be hard to capture something like that in the middle of the peloton, unless there is a helicopter or drone overhead at exactly the right time).

We’re going to see lots of teams riding to get top tens in grand tours rather than trying to win, as well as seeing a flood of riders to lesser one day races.

Is that beneficial to cycling?

I also wonder how lower division teams and riders feel about big teams snatching results in ‘their’ races. Discouraged?

If there was no promotion/relegation system people would decry Alpecin and Arkéa being in the lower tier while potentially worse teams above them have World Tour status and some would ask if this was good for cycling. As Unzué says, the points system probably needs revising for next time around, but it’s not easy to get the balance right, good luck to the committee doing that.

It might be interesting to check post hoc if this happens to a large extent. With PCS stats it wouldn’t be that hard to sort out. Of course you probably wouldn’t want to compare this year to the last two, since there was a huge amount of disruption to the schedule due to COVID in 2020 and 2021. PCS does stats on the strength of the start lists of the races, and if there’s a significant increase in the quality of the start lists of 1.1 and 1.2 races, and perhaps a decrease in the quality for 1.WT races, then it would be a strong argument for the points system skewing things.

I’m not sure how you notice teams going for top 10’s instead of wins in GTs, or even if that’s a sound strategy – it already seems like that’s a common goal for teams that have little chance for a GT podium to go for a top 10, since there’s a fair bit of prestige there, and the gulf between podium and the lesser places is usually wide. But it’s also a risky strategy, putting the best rider on a weak team in a GT hoping to finish 8th or 9th, when we all know when there’s a big problem such a rider can plummet right out of the top 10 and even end up a DNF late into the race. The sounder points strategy would seem to be to save those riders for 2.Pro or 2.2 races that they can’t do when they’re focused on the GTs.

Riders often ride GTs to protect their top ten – I just think they might be even more risk-averse now. Maybe they won’t try to go up the top ten list, instead not risking their 8th place.

An example of conservatism, I think, was seen in Hugh Carthy in the last two stages of the Giro. He didn’t go for stage wins, instead protecting his top ten position by riding with the favourites. That he was able to ride with the favourites suggested he probably was good enough to go for a stage win.

EF, to continue using them as an example, have a number of riders – e.g., Carthy, Uran, Chaves – who are much better suited for gaining GT top tens than results at one day races (been a long time since Uran and Chaves were doing that, and Carthy never has).

Hugh Carthy has won a single GT stage so far I think (Vuelta 2020), and I believe only a single stage in a WT level shorter stage race. He’s consistently climbing with the best, but very rarely winning. He just doesn’t seem to be that kind of rider. Last year he took 8th in the Giro, this year 9th, three years ago 11th, so I’m not sure how much he was protecting his place, and how much he was riding to his expected maximum GC placing. With his lack of a finishing kick, I’m not sure what else he should be doing.

As for one-day races, today EF took first and second in the Mt. Ventoux Challenge, netting a handy 210 UCI points and notching only their forth win of the season. Even though it’s a lowly 1.1 race, it’s had some excellent podiums in it’s short history. It doesn’t seem like a bad thing at all for teams like EF to take a shot at more of these races.

There are many instances of rides ‘a la Zubeldia’ achieving a lower top ten result through steady defensive efforts, but I don’t think Carthy in the Giro is one. After a poor start to the race, shipping a hatful of time, he switched to stage hunting and was away in the breaks on multiple occasions but each time came up short of the win. However the time he gained and the fading of those above him punted him back into top ten GC contention. So he had a choice to make at the end; switch back to GC or keep rolling the dice for the stage win. Given his evident fatigue after his considerable attacking efforts in the second half of the race I was surprised he was still able to hang with the best climbers on those last two stages.

You can’t really judge that from 1 year of PCS statistics, especially as earlier in the season some races had lots of riders dropping out because of COVID & other sickness issues, etc.

there have always been lots of riders looking for a top ten in a grand tour. It might change one or 2 riders approach at worst. The teams in question don’t have many top ten riders to start with.

My tips for relegated teams are EF and Israel. EF declared that they don’t want to go to second/third tier races which does not seem to be a good strategy. This year they have only 1.7% of the total points of top 24 teams, while in season 2021 it was much higher, 3.2%. (and in 2020 4.8%!). My other prediction: top ProTeams (with automatic wildcards) in 2023 will be Totalenergies and Israel.

This is no criticism of this excellent regular feature. But what does this actually change in racing? Lots of teams – all but one in the end – have always ridden for top 10 GT placings. Prize money has always made racing a little bit more than ‘win or nothing’, though there could be more emphasis on lead-out guys staying in for the points instead of dropping out the way.

Isn’t the biggest deciding factor always which teams, and how many can continue to get funding? Sure, the funding might go if a team looks like falling out the top tier but commercial realities can and do bite way harder and faster than this 3 yr rolling tally.

It doesn’t change too much with the racing but it can heighten the interest, seeing riders sprinting for some 1.1 like the Grote Prijs van der Kanaal, or attacking in the Giro del Campanilismo now comes with an extra layer of significance but for cycling insiders who follow these things. Otherwise there’s not much change in the racing, the Tour de France this summer will still be all the big teams going for it. But it will be doubly stressful for those struggling, a secondary/tertiary story.

Yes, this is exactly how I look at it. It adds an extra layer of intrigue and complexity and competition, especially for people in the know.

UCI points for intermediate sprints could guarantee a decent breakaway on those boring flat stages.

If Education First drops, they might still get one of the free wild cards next season, but at the end of that season there is a high chance they stop, as the contracts of all their racers (and sponsors?) stops.

IIRC, EF is signed on as their main sponsor for at least one more year, so I don’t think they’d fold immediately. They have a women’s WT team as well now, and given the fast growing nature of that side of the sport, sponsors might not look at just the men’s side of things when investing. EF are a unique team. They were very important in navigating the conversation in the immediate aftermath of Lance etc, and they continue to be an interesting team. I really question their decision not to race the x.1 / x.pro race circuit, though. They have some young riders who really need the race experience, and they obviously need the points. The ironic thing is that the first 1.1 race they entered this season, they went one – two on the podium!!

One question about the relegation system; is “18 teams” an absolutely set-in-stone number? I’ve read a number of articles recently that skirt around the issue by saying “if the UCI decides on 18 teams…” Is it possible the UCI could go with, say, 20 teams in the end? Or increase the number of teams that get automatic invites? I really think they need to institute a “parachute” system for relegated teams (like the Premier League in football, for example) that will insure that relegation is not a death sentence for a team. Many teams are on precarious footing as it stands, and not every team has a petrochemical conglomerate or ethically dubious sultanate as their sponsor…

For now it is 18 teams, rule 2.15.011 a spells this out “The 18 top-ranked teams… having applied for a UCI WorldTour licence” so as long as everyone has their paperwork in (there are different deadlines to renew vs to apply for promotion) then it’s 18 for 2023-2025 as things stand.

There is a parachute system of sorts as the relegated WT teams have a head start in the race for automatic wild cards given their places in every WT race the previous season.

And they have the same advantage during the 3 years where they are part of the WT, so if they get relegated it’s probably already at least partially their own fault they didn’t perform well enough… (if we rule out some extreme case of bad luck).

What does the top team get at the end? Do they get something on their jersey for next year?

Does inrng think the top team will celebrate and make a big show of being top. Do JV, QS or Ineos talk of the ranking or is it only a discussion point for teams in the relegation zone?

I thought the season points (noy the 3 year poins) determine the starting order of the cars behind the peloton?

For the rest just bragging rights i guess.

There’s a prize for topping the annual rankings and Jumbo-Visma lead this and the three year rankings now (just). Being number one is a good marketing thing but for most teams, sponsors and riders it’s more how you won these points that mattered, the races you won and all that. As said here over the years, the rankings don’t really tell us who is the best rider or the best team, they reflect what a committee is trying to say about the relative importance of different races.

EducationFirst does a super deal in Mont Ventoux.

Guerreiro and Chaves on 1 and 2. They take 213 points on Lotto/BikeExchange and 208 on Israel.

Education First now have 554 points on Lotto-Soudal and 324 on BikeExhange.

Gap with Israel (only important in case of relegation) closes from 823 to 615.

EF should be automatically relegated for that awful hat and sunnies combo Chaves was wearing the other day on the Dauphine

Cyril Guimard has been studying the Inner Ring blog! In a quiet interlude during his Equipe 21 Tour de Suisse commentary we have been treated to a long and detailed study of promotion/relegation question. He’s a keen supporter of the broad principle.

Not sure he’s a reader but he’s a shrewd pundit.

I imagine most would support the broad principle, the differences come from the details.

Comments are closed.

Spanish Superstar Torres Destroys Widar | Tour de l’Avenir 2024 Stage 4

• Uncategorized

Climbing Supertalent Marion Bunel Performs Again

• Race Recaps

18-Year-Olds Challenge Geraint Thomas’ 2018 Record

Roglič Snatches The Win In Extreme Heat | Vuelta a España 2024 Stage 4

• wout van aert
• WorldTour Ranking
• WorldTour Calendar
• world tour relegation
• women cycling power
• watts analysis
• warren barguil

WorldTour 2020-22 Team Points Ranking – Updated Daily

On this page, you will find the WorldTour 2020-22 ranking of teams’ UCI points, which is updated daily by Raúl Banqueri . The brilliant feature art will be continually updated and is produced by Louemans .

Please bookmark this page if you find it useful and need to refer to it often. An overview of the promotion and relegation system of cycling can be found in this article .

Want to stay safe on public WiFi or change your virtual location? Surfshark VPN has you covered. Go to https://surfshark.deals/ROUGE for 83% off a Surfshark VPN and 3 extra months free using code ROUGE.

Triennium Ranking

The following graph represents the points earned by the top 22 teams in the world in the current WorldTeam licensing cycle, from 2020 to 2022. The 18 teams with the most points at the end of the 2022 season will earn WorldTeam licences for the next cycle, from 2023 to 2025.

2023 Wildcard Ranking

The relegated teams will have the opportunity to obtain one of the two automatic invitations to the 2023 WorldTour races. These invitations are awarded on the basis of the 2022 annual ranking and are competed for by the ProTeams against the relegated WorldTour teams. The following daily updated graph shows the status of this battle, adding also the points of the teams at risk of relegation.

Useful Resources

To give you an idea of the size of the differences in UCI points, we also show you the UCI points scale in the table below. We recommend you to download it in high resolution from here .

We also share the UCI calendar for the second half of the season. You can download it in high resolution from here .

Every two weeks, we analyse the performance of the teams involved in the WorldTour relegation battle in an extensive article. Below, you can find all our latest work:

• The Final Relegation Battle 2022 Analysis
• Lotto Soudal Gives Up and will be Relegated with Israel-Premier Tech
• Israel – Premier Tech is Virtually Relegated whilst the World Championships Save EF & BikeExchange
• Teams Lobby the UCI, Mas Liberates Movistar & Israel – Premier Tech Struggle Again
• Nairo Quintana’s Disqualification Raises Huge Questions as Arkéa Lose Points
• Israel-Premier Tech Open their Wallet after BikeExchange Take Off
• DSM and Arkéa Escape Danger while Movistar Descends into Trouble
• Lotto Draws Level with BikeExchange whilst Israel Surge
• Lotto’s Bull Charges to Safety as Mas’ crashes Scare an Angry Movistar
• EF Education Flounder as Lotto Approach Salvation
• Lotto starts its comeback and BikeExchange prays for Yates
• Lotto’s Desperation Intensifies as Valverde Carries Movistar
• Movistar Fall after Mas’ Crash as Cofidis Surge Clear of Israel
• Girmay Saves Intermarché, Cofidis Rise to Safety & Israel Plummet
• Yates’ Magic Boosts BikeExchange whilst Israel Slide to Danger
• Arkéa Reign Supreme with DSM in Freefall
• The Fight for Survival

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Notify me of new posts by email.

Relegation watch - Movistar drop to 18th in UCI WorldTour team rankings

Automatic invites for top two ProTeams pit Israel-Premier Tech against TotalEnergies

In the week since the end of the Tour de France, there have been four races that have had an impact on the UCI World Rankings for 2020-2022, the all-important number that will determine which 18 teams will be eligible for the WorldTour in 2023. With some key results from BikeExchange-Jayco and EF Education-EasyPost, it's Movistar who find themselves dipping to the bottom of the 'safe' zone.

This week's movement is thanks largely to the idiosyncrasies of the rules where only the top 10 scoring riders of the year count toward the team rankings. Read more about how the UCI WorldTour points system works . Lotto Soudal and Israel-Premier Tech remain in the relegation zone, although the Belgian team took advantage of the Tour de Wallonie on home soil to continue to claw their way out of the danger zone, earning 110 points thanks to Arnaud De Lie's stage win and Maxim Van Gils' seventh place and Harm Vanhoucke's 12th in the overall.

WorldTour relegation watch - Israel-Premier Tech's survival strategy WorldTour relegation watch - Lotto Soudal's win-based philosophy UCI points system 'madness' and 'unfair' says Movistar boss

Israel-Premier Tech, in comparison, gained only 64 points in the same period mainly because the riders who scored the most weren't in their top 10. Giacomo Nizzolo's results, a stage win at the 2.1-ranked Vuelta a Castilla y Leon and 15th on GC, and Carl Frederik Hagen's minor placings counted, but Jenthe Bierman's 30 points for eighth on GC did not. Omer Goldstein's ninth place moved him onto the team's top 10 and earned 40 points - dropping Krists Neiland's points out of their total. Lotto Soudal and Israel-Premier Tech are separated by a thin margin of just 157 points but they have over 4,000 on TotalEnergies, whose hopes of moving into the WorldTour are fading fast. The next rung up - 18th place - is 763 points away and now held by the Movistar Team.

The rest of the WorldTour teams can't let their guard down but they should be breathing a little easier now that the gap to 19th is growing. EF Education-EasyPost, Cofidis, BikeExchange-Jayco and Movistar are separated by just 180 points but that gap will yawn out during the Vuelta a España unless Lotto Soudal or Israel can pull off a major GC result.

Movistar dipped below both BikeExchange-Jayco and EF Education-EasyPost into 18th because only four of their top 10 riders scored points. With some major home races coming up, like the Vuelta a Burgos and the Vuelta a España, they will more than likely build on their tally and not drop that far in the rankings.

After struggling during the Tour de France, the team were mid-pack this week thanks to Alex Aranburu's 50 points between Circuito de Getxo (40 for sixth) and his second in stage 1 of Tour de Wallonie, worth 10. Alejandro Valverde picked up 25 in Getxo for ninth, and Anthony Pedrero gained 24 for 19th in San Sebastian.

BikeExchange-Jayco, meanwhile, had a strong week with Simon Yates winning the overall Vuelta a Castilla y Leon and a stage and a sixth place in the Clasica San Sebastian that together earned 279 of the team's 287 points this week. They lead Movistar by an estimated 68 points.

Get The Leadout Newsletter

The latest race content, interviews, features, reviews and expert buying guides, direct to your inbox!

EF Education-EasyPost built upon their Tour de France momentum by climbing over Cofidis into 15th, although it's by a miniscule 6 points. Georg Steinhauser's 25th place at Circuito de Getxo (3 pt), James Shaw's 70 for sixth in Tour de Wallonie and Jonathan Caicedo's 60 from Castilla y Leon didn't count since they're not in the team's top 10.

Rigoberto Urán's 80 points for ninth place in San Sebastian, Esteban Chavez's 27 points between Castilla y Leon (3 for 25th on GC) and Ben Healy's 10 points for 15th on GC in Wallonie made up their point haul this week.

The real battle will be fought for which two ProTeams will be the top two ranked at the end of 2022 and get the honour of automatic invitations to the major races like the Tour de France. It's been Arkéa-Samsic and Alpecin-Deceuninck for the past two years but those two teams soared up the 2020-2023 rankings and will more than likely be in the WorldTour.

Whoever is relegated, assuming they will continue as a ProTeam, as Lotto Soudal have indicated they would, will be up against the wall for results through October - and not only results in general, but results from their top 10 riders.

Lotto Soudal are in a comfortable position this year, currently 12th in the 2022 rankings and an 852-point lead over the next-ranked current ProTeam, TotalEnergies. Israel-Premier Tech have 433 points to make up to get over the French team. The Vuelta a España will be extremely important for the team's future.

Movistar, BikeExchange-Jayco, EF Education-EasyPost, Team DSM and Astana are all behind TotalEnergies so far this year - all the more motivation to keep an eye on the points and not dip behind Lotto Soudal in the three-year stats.

Thank you for reading 5 articles in the past 30 days*

Join now for unlimited access

Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

*Read any 5 articles for free in each 30-day period, this automatically resets

After your trial you will be billed £4.99 $7.99 €5.99 per month, cancel anytime. Or sign up for one year for just £49 $79 €59

Try your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

Laura Weislo has been with Cyclingnews since 2006 after making a switch from a career in science. As Managing Editor, she coordinates coverage for North American events and global news. As former elite-level road racer who dabbled in cyclo-cross and track, Laura has a passion for all three disciplines. When not working she likes to go camping and explore lesser traveled roads, paths and gravel tracks. Laura specialises in covering doping, anti-doping, UCI governance and performing data analysis.

Vuelta a España tech gallery - Superlight paint, dinosaur names, and aero computer shrouds

Notable feats and failures make 8 significant impressions at 2024 Tour de France Femmes

Robert Stannard signs with Bahrain Victorious after accepting doping sanction

Most Popular