tecnica zero g tour pro 2023 review

Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro Review

This is my review of Tecnica Zero G . In my opinion, it is a varied boot that skiers of all levels will be able to appreciate. It has excellent downhill capabilities as well as the mobility and power needed for any backcountry excursion. They are a true lightweight workhorse that will last for years.

Keep reading to learn more about the pros and cons of this boot, who it is best for, and other similar alternatives to consider.

Quick Summary

Why trust me, a perfect weight, excellent performance, comfort and warmth, easy to use, price and value, what i like, what i dislike, the alternatives, final verdict.

• Where to buy: Amazon
• Best for: Backcountry skiers looking for a lightweight boot with excellent downhill performance.
• Pros: This tried and true design hits every mark. It’s light, rides well downhill, and provides excellent power and control. It also has the strength and long-lasting durability to hold up through months or even years in rough environments.
• Cons: These boots don’t quite have the insulation you would expect out of a touring option. They also can be a bit tricky to get in and out of, and definitely could be better when trekking uphill.
• Alternatives: Scarpa Maestrale RS , Dynafit Hoji , Dalbello Lupo Air

Are these boots easy to use?

The Tecnica Zero G Tour is a relatively intuitive boot. Skiers at every level should be able to get the hang of the fit and buckling system right away.

Are these boots comfortable?

The Zero G Tour Boots have a snug fit, but offer ankle flexibility. However, they aren’t great for extremely cold temperatures.

How heavy are these?

These boots are incredibly lightweight. They come in at six pounds, which makes them great for speeding downhill and exploring the backcountry.

I’ve been hitting the slopes since I was a kid. I enjoy getting out in the snow and have hands-on experience with a wide range of different skiing items. I have spent ample time researching these boots and know a few skiers who have spent a lot of time with them.

Detailed Review of Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro

The Tecnica Zero G Tour is a strong, well-made boot that’s more than useful for downhill skiers. That makes it a touring boot that does a little bit of everything. While it could be better on the uphill climb and insulation, it has a great weight, a smooth performance, and excellent support. The price is also reasonable, which is nice to have for skiers who care about their budget.

Clocking in at six pounds, the Zero G Tour is lightweight and has incredible downhill performance no matter where you like to ski. That alone makes these boots more than worth the cost in my book. The reason these work so well is the slim design that allows the company to pack a wide range of features into a more standard shell. Of course, there are lighter options out there, but it’s hard to find one that’s so reliable.

If you get a lighter shoe, you’ll likely get worse downhill performance and lose some points in control. You can also go heavier, but there’s no guarantee that will add weight to your setup. At six pounds, you get something you can easily take with you into the backcountry without worrying about fatigue. That’s something I always appreciate.

When heading through the backcountry, you’re going to be moving around a lot. That’s why a good boot is so important. The Zero G Tour delivers off-piste because of its lightweight build and strong ankle mobility. These give you plenty of space around the shins, which I appreciate in terms of increasing overall range of motion.

That allows you to speed downhill easily and also get uphill. Though these boots can’t quite match the same uphill mobility seen in other touring shoes, they still give you enough movement where it counts. Their increased stability is another reason they have what it takes to hold up in the backcountry.

In terms of fit, these shoes will be good or bad, depending on the skier. This will always shift from person to person, but I found that most people didn’t have a problem with the way they went on. Just be careful about your size and don’t be afraid to go up a size if needed.

As the Zero G Tour is a lightweight boot, it’s not going to give you a ton of insulation. That’s a bit odd considering they are for the backcountry, where you tend to be more exposed to the elements. This shouldn’t be a deal-breaker for people who ski in warmer or non-freezing conditions, but know that you’re likely going to need warmers if you want to truly venture into harsh environments.

Something I value about these boots is how simple they are to operate. They have a power strap and four buckles that skiers of all levels should be able to use. In addition, the external ski/walk mode is intuitive. It’s easy to lock in and will stay closed throughout the ride. However, as you would expect from an overlap boot, they aren’t easy to put on and take off.

You also don’t get a lot of extra features with these boots. Though some people will see that as a downside, I’ve always been a fan of a more minimalistic approach. Being able to use these without worrying about a lot of extra (and often useless) traits means everything is much more streamlined.

This boot will run you quite a bit of money. Even so, that’s pretty in line with what you would expect out of a high-end model with this type of power, strength, and control. With that in mind, this is a good value item if you need a solid downhill or lightweight boot. It has a lot to offer and will give you a lot of seasons before wearing down.

In my opinion, the best aspect of these boots is their performance. As far as touring options go, it’s hard to get better downhill results. They offer a lot of power and control, all while staying incredibly stable and secure no matter how hard or fast you like to push.

The long-term durability is great as well. It always helps to get a well-made product, and that goes double for something you plan to take off-piste. I am also a big fan of the lightweight construction. At six pounds, these feel absolutely perfect for your touring needs no matter if you want to go on a quick trip or all day journey.

There’s no doubt that the Zero G Tour is an incredible boot. However, it’s not quite perfect. First, they could be much easier to put on and take off. Taking extra time with your footwear is never going to be a full deal breaker, but it’s something to take note of when making your final decision.

The one black mark on these is the insulation. They run cold, and that can be a pretty substantial issue for skiers who already get chilly feet. While the protection is fine for warm runs or hotter areas, if you ski in frigid conditions, you’re going to want a warmer or similar product to help pick up the slack.

The Tecnica Zero G is a great boot for the backcountry, but there are a few other capable options for skiers who like to travel out of bounds. If you’re looking for a similar design with different traits, check out these models:

• Scarpa Maestrale RS – If you want a versatile, well-balanced boot, the Maestrale RS should do the job. It has similar durability to the Zero G, and comes at a similar price point. The ski/walk option isn’t too strong, but the wide/high volume fit is one of the best around. The shell is comfortable as well.
• Dynafit Hoji – The Hoji is a great touring boot that’s both lightweight and has incredible downhill performance. Though it is undoubtedly complicated when compared to the competition, especially the Zero G, the extra features make it perfect for skiers who want a few extra characteristics.
• Dalbello Lupo Air – This model uses a blend of grilamid and polyamide composite carbon to create a lightweight boot that cuts down on weight without losing any performance. It’s easy to switch modes and works extremely well for touring. A good value boot that will give you reliable results with each run.

Though I rarely say it, there’s almost nothing to truly dislike about the Zero G Tour . The look is great, the downhill performance is as good as any other touring boot, and the weight is absolutely perfect. They hold up in just about any condition and give you more than you could ever want in terms of long-term durability. The price is reasonable as well.

Sure, you won’t get the insulation you may need for rough environments, but it should still hold up enough for most non-extreme trips. The boots are able to handle both on and off-piste environments with ease, and are easy to climb with. Even using them is a breeze. If you do a lot of touring, they are absolutely worth consideration.

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Purl ski wax review, 5 best alpine touring bindings, 5 best kids ski bindings.

TheSkiGirl.com is a resource site for skiers of all levels to learn and improve skiing. Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro

• Full Review
• Photo Gallery
• Tester Comments

Our test team is having a hard time comprehending how some brands are managing to pack as much skiing power and stability into small, lightweight packages. Take the Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro--one tester said this: Yeah, this thing is as quick as any race boot, steers as good as any race boot--how the hell did they do this? It's magic, goddamn sorcerer's work there. Race boot quickness and steering? Well, perhaps that's a little bit of hyperbolic tester talk there, but our test team's consensus was that the Zero G Tour Pro might be one of the very best skiing and fitting true backcountry boots we've ever tested.

The Zero G's liner is all new this year and it did the trick for testers who claimed that it was a nearly perfect fit for the human foot and leg. Testers say it fits more narrow than medium in the in-between fit zone that is the 99mm last. It's a close fit everywhere, they said, but without offending typical wide and bony spots. While the liner is low profile and light, it offers enough padding to keep the plastic just far enough away for a warm and comfortable experience on snow. Yes, the new liner is fully moldable and articulated for touring, with two liner pull loops and a minimalist rear spoiler--it also sports expanded use of grindable CAS exterior material for enhanced fitting work if needed, but testers said no, it's good to go out of the box.

The co-molded carbon fiber and Grilamid cuff has much to do with this little micro's bigger-than-expected power reserves--it's light but rigid, and the double-blocking cuff release mechanism increases anchoring strength when locked for skiing but allows free rotation of the cuff when popped loose. Testers loved the Zero G's rare combination of descending power mated with real backcountry travel functionality, packaged in a near-flawless fit. While testers didn't really expect to use it in a race course, or even on hard resort pistes, they said you could get by with its close-to-alpine levels of downhill performance. Quick, strong, light and comfortable --one of Tecnica's best efforts, they agreed.

• “Great snug medium fit with an open toebox--ankles are tight but well-sculpted and comfortable. The calf fit is on the narrow side of medium and the instep's transition up into the base of the shin is smooth and awesome--much better fit than the last Zero G I tried. The only real fit glitch is tightness over the midfoot bump. The new liner breathes new life into this boot. Very comfortable, very skiable--good combination for a mostly backcountry but strong descender. Very intuitive hike mode release with a long range of motion--this is a great touring boot. ” -- Mark Elling
• “Super heel and ankle shape, exceptional rearfoot control. Initial fit and feel is very good, just enough wiggle room in the toebox and snug everywhere else. Boot really settles in nicely within a few runs, seems to absorb the heel and ankle like a marsupial's pouch. Strong, precise and predictable--the Zero G Tour Pro has the ski-ability, fit and feel of a more traditional alpine boot, but super lightweight. Best of test. ” -- Jack Rafferty
• “Warm and comfy, and skis not bad at all for a touring-specific boot. ” -- Pat Sullivan
• “Holy shit, this thing rips! The stance is great, edge engagement is great. Better edge power than any boot in this group. Yeah, this thing is as quick as any race boot, steers as good as any race boot--how the hell did they do this? It's magic, goddamn sorcerer's work there. Tecnica has just taken over this entire category. A little tricky on and off, but otherwise wonderful--walk mode is great and the rockered Vibram sole feels great to walk in. Pretty much loved it. This may be the best boot in its category and is close for best boot of the test, very impressive. ” -- Kevin Gabriel
• “Feels a touch set up to the inside--a little weak to the inside edge. It's fairly strong in BC conditions but not on-piste strong. ” -- Mark Elling
• “Lacking a little power from edge to edge on hard pack. Boot not made to ski hard pack--go find pow. ” -- Pat Sullivan
• “This a 98 or 97mm fit--not a bad thing, just tighter than it should be for a 99mm. Liner is a little thin, maybe kind of cold on the coldest days. ” -- Kevin Gabriel

This boot available at...

Special thanks to all of our sponsors!

• Search Search Search …
• Search Search …

Shop Talk: Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro Boot Review

Being a fan of the fit and performance of Tecnica’s alpine boots, I was excited to see the brand enter the alpine touring category with more “serious” backcountry boots when they launched the Zero G line in 2016. Since then, Tecnica has continued to refine the Zero G lineup, making each iteration lighter and more touring capable than the last while maintaining a high level of performance for the descent. The latest flagship model in the Zero G line is the Tour Pro, which now boasts a lighter, more touring-focused design than its predecessor, the Zero G Guide.

Product Overview

The Zero G Tour Pro is now in its second year of production and has won a number of awards since its release. The shell is composed of Grilamid, a material being utilized in more and more AT boots due to its relatively low weight and stiff nature, and the cuff is a co-injected carbon, which also saves weight while maintaining power and stiffness. This combination of materials results in an overall weight of just 1320 grams (in a 26.5) and a 130 flex. The shell also boasts Tecnica’s C.A.S. technology, giving it a more anatomically correct shape out of the box and makes customization by a trained boot fitter easier due to the dimpled shell structure in key areas. 

In terms of design, the Tour Pro employs a typical two-piece overlap construction, four-buckle closure, and 35 mm power strap with a locking cam and hook to keep the cuff locked in during the descent. Another major departure from the original Zero G Guide is the move from an internal walk mode to a double-locking external system with self-adjusting latches on both the cuff and shell. The external walk mode makes it slightly easier to transition the boot between ski and walk mode, but it also poses the risk of the screws working loose or getting lost. Luckily, Tecnica anticipated this potential hiccup and threw in a couple of extra screws just in case they do happen to work loose.

Some other features I was pleased to see when going through the Tour Pro’s spec sheet was a Vibram sole, light yet durable magnesium buckles, and an ultralight liner with a waterproof, breathable membrane. Tecnica also added a tongue spoiler to help boost the stiffness and power of the boot. It also boasts Tecnica’s Quick Instep technology, which is essentially just a softer plastic at the arch to make the boot easier to get in and out of. This may seem like a small thing, and could easily be written off as a gimmick, but I’ve found it actually does make a noticeable difference—especially after really cold ski days when plastics can turn stiff and unmalleable.

Initial Impressions

Out of the box, I have to say I was impressed with the construction of these boots. They’re noticeably light—especially given their feature set—and it’s clear Tecnica’s engineers put a lot of thought into the design of the Tour Pro. For me, the fit out of the box was surprisingly comfortable, but I imagine I’ll need to take them in to get them further customized after I’ve been able to put a few more days in them. The liner is composed of a fairly stiff foam that’s relatively light and appears to offer a good amount of insulation for those colder days. Of course, only time will tell whether or not that impression holds true, but I can foresee myself swapping out the liners for a pair of Intuitions down the road.

Field Testing

I need to preface this section by saying we’ve had a very slow start to the ski season here in Utah, and our snowpack is currently plagued by a combination of basal facets and a buried layer of near surface facets in more sheltered areas. Not an ideal situation for testing AT boots in steep and more varied terrain, but I’ve skied the boot 2-3 days inbounds and 4-5 days in the backcountry. My few days of touring have consisted solely of low-angle wiggling and meadow skipping, given the current state of our snowpack. Please note: I will be updating this section as I’m able to put this boot through its paces in the full gamut of backcountry conditions—good and bad.

The few days I have been able to take this boot out, I’ve been impressed with just how well they do on the uphill. In terms of uphill efficiency, the Tour Pros are very comparable (if not slightly better) to others I’ve used in the four-buckle, 120+ flex class (Maestrale RS, HOJI Free, and S/Lab MTN). That is to say, for a more “freeride touring boot,” I’m able to get long efficient glides while skinning over long flats, and I really haven’t felt the need for any more cuff rotation than the claimed 55 degrees on the skintrack or during more precarious kick-turns. I’ll admit I was a bit skeptical of the Magnesium buckles when I first got the boots, but I really can’t complain about them so far. As far as the ski/walk mechanism goes, the double-locking latch can get snow in it, but it’s easily cleaned with a quick tap of a pole or scrape with a powder basket. 

I will say that if you’re new to using tech bindings, the lack of Quick Step inserts might increase the “fiddle factor” for you when you’re stepping into tech bindings. However, the benefit of not having the Quick Step inserts is it allows for better compatibility with MNC bindings like the Warden or Shift if you’re planning to pair the boot with Multi-Norm Certified bindings.

Drawbacks and Shortcomings

Given its weight and flex index, it’s hard to dock the Tour Pro on its uphill or downhill performance—both of which have impressed me during my few days in them. Does it tour as well as an ultralight randonnee slipper? Definitely not. But given the boot’s full feature set and 130 flex, it tours really well and actually exceeded my expectations. 

To me, the biggest unknown and potential shortcoming of this boot is its long-term durability, which, to be fair, could be said of any boot. The magnesium buckles are very lightweight, and I’m curious to see how well they hold up after a full season of constantly buckling and unbuckling them between laps. It was good to see Tecnica included extra screws for the external walk mode, but it’s clearly a potential issue that could put a damper on a ski tour. I already put the extra screws in my backcountry repair kit, but I really don’t want to be replacing tiny screws on my boot when I’m deep in the backcountry if I can help it.

Final Takeaways

I’m hesitant to give a final conclusion on this boot, given the limited days and conditions I’ve been able to ski with it, so I’ll be updating this later on in the ski season. Given the days I have in it so far, I’m confident in saying that the Zero G Tour Pro is a very capable, well-rounded alpine touring boot that comes about as close to finding the sweet spot between uphill efficiency and downhill performance as any AT boot I’ve used. 

I probably won’t be passing rando racers on the skintrack with this boot, but I know it’ll drive my 108mm touring skis down big lines without worry. It won’t be replacing my alpine boot for inbounds days, but I’ve had a lot of fun skiing inbounds on them, and I’d feel good about travelling with just these boots if I was planning to split my ski trip between the resort and backcountry. In the end, the Tour Pro tours efficiently, skis very well for an AT boot, and appears to have the backbone to ski firm, challenging conditions with confidence. Basically, it does everything I demand from a pair of backcountry boots.

Shop Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro

Additional Links

Custom Boot Fitting in Park City

Ski Boot Alignment

Ski Boot Flex Explained

How to Get Started Backcountry Skiing

Share this:

• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
• Click to print (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
• Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)

You may also like

Smith optics – life is better with integration.

Reading Time: 5 minutes We’ve all been there: you’re out having a great day on the mountain, riding hard, hiking peaks, and carving pow. Then, you […]

Atomic Maverick and Maven Review

Reading Time: 6 minutes The Atomic Maverick and Maven replaces the Vantage line for the 2021/22 season and is a complete reimagining of their all-mountain lineup. […]

Favorite Women’s Spring Ski Jacket: Patagonia Adze Softshell Jacket

Reading Time: < 1 minute Everything you want in a women’s spring ski jacket: low bulk, waterproof wind protection, moisture wicking, breathability, style – the Patagonia Adze […]

Telemark Skiing Tips

Reading Time: 4 minutes Telemark skiing is hard.  Beautiful, fluid and graceful, yes, but this hybrid of cross country and alpine skiing is the equivalent of […]

You must be logged in to post a comment.

• Powder Finder
• Ski resorts near me
• Switzerland
• Ski touring
• Snow Report

Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro

Top 10 ski resorts

• Wilder Kaiser
• Whistler Blackcomb
• Val Thorens
• Serfaus-Fiss-Ladis

Top 10 ski destinations

• Czech Republic
• Ski resorts

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Information.

• Privacy policy
• Content policy

2023-2024 Tecnica Zero G Peak Carbon

Boot: 2023-2024 tecnica zero g peak carbon.

Stated Flex: n/a

Available Sizes: mondo 23.5-30.5

Stated Last (size 26.5 ): 99 mm

Stated Range of Motion: 75°

Blister’s Measured Weight (size 27.5 ):

• Shells, no Liners (left & right): 844 & 854 g
• Liners, no Footbeds: 231 & 227 g 
• Shells + Liners = 1075 & 1081 g

Reviewer: 6”, 200 lbs / 183 cm, 90.7 kg

Test Location: Chugach backcountry, AK

Test Duration: 30+ days

[ Note : Our review was conducted on the 22/23 Zero G Peak Carbon, which returned unchanged for 23/24.]

Stated Forward Lean: 13° (+2° with spoiler)

Ramp Angle: 3°

Size Tested: 27.5

Stated Boot Sole Length (size 27.5 ): 298 mm

Buckles: 2 light aluminum, w/ cable wrapping construction and hiking-locked positions

Power Strap: 40 mm camming ‘“Power Lock” strap

Shell Material:

• Cuff: carbon / Grilamid
• Lower Shell / Shoe: carbon / Grilamid

Liner: “Custom Adaptive Shape (C.A.S.)” Light Liner

Soles: fixed Vibram rubber w/ carbon reinforcement

Binding Compatibility: full pin / tech bindings

Tech Fittings: Dynafit certified

[First Look written by Drew Kelly; Full Review written by Paul Forward.]

As we discussed when it was announced at the beginning of 2022, Tecnica finally made an entrance into the world of very lightweight touring boots, in the form of their Zero G Peak series. 

~1000-gram boots that have at least some explicit focus on downhill performance certainly seem like a growing trend these days — companies like Atomic, Scarpa, La Sportiva, Dynafit, and Salomon now all have models that fit this fairly ambiguous genre. In the past, we’d subjectively say that this “lightweight touring” boot category included boots weighing around 1000 grams to about 1350 g (size 26.5). They were bookended by the even lighter true “skimo” category (often <900 g) and the heavier, stiffer, “freeride touring” category (typically 1300–1700 g). Recently, for a variety of reasons, it seems all those classifications’ distinctive traits have begun intermingling. 

Many folks have been using boots in the “lightweight touring” class as their primary or only touring boot because those boots tend to be a whole lot nicer on the uphill than heavier alternatives with more restricted ranges of motion. And easier uphill travel is a huge plus if you like to put in big days, get as many laps as possible, or just generally want to take some strain off the ascent (which, realistically, makes up 75%+ of a backcountry “skiing” day). With advancements in lightweight boot tech, brands like Tecnica are claiming that boots like the Zero G Peak Carbon offer fewer downhill-performance compromises than previous boots in this class (and especially the even lighter skimo-specific category). There is still a significant uphill and downhill performance gap between the ~1000-g and ~1300+ g classes, but the compromises aren’t quite as dramatic as they used to be.

And with the rise of fitness-oriented touring, particularly in avalanche-controlled resort settings, this class of boots is similarly appealing, offering efficient uphill performance for those who want to get in some low-impact exercise, while often still being stiff enough to carve casual turns back down groomed slopes.

So, what actually makes a boot like the Zero G Peak Carbon suited to all those types of skiing? Foremost are its low weight and the large range of motion provided by its cuff (stated at 75°). Other uphill-oriented features include its very breathable and thin liner, a trimmed-down buckle system designed to be lightweight on the uphill and efficient during transitions, lightweight carbon reinforcements throughout the lower shell and cuff, minimal heel and toe lugs, and low cuff height. But Tecnica says that downhill performance was still a priority with this boot, and the Zero G Peak Carbon adds some features not often seen in boots this light, such as a partial-overlap lower shell, carbon plate embedded in the sole for added torsional rigidity, and supposedly more easily punchable and grindable shell and liner.

All of this adds up to a boot that’s very interesting on paper, and one that seems to make it even harder to neatly place various ski boots into homogenous categories. Reviewer Paul Forward spent a lot of time in the Zero G Peak Carbon to see where it slotted into the touring-boot market, including many days spent with it on one foot and another boot from this class on the other. Before we get to Paul’s thoughts , here’s some more info about this new line of boots, and the Zero G Peak Carbon in particular.

What Tecnica says about the Zero G Peak Carbon

“ The Pinnacle. The cream of the crop. The Peak. Call it what you want, but rest assured Tecnica’s first sub-1000-gram touring boot lives up to its name. Born from our fit-and-performance-first ethos, the Zero G Peak Carbon is built to be extremely light and efficient on the uphill, yet maintain the power and downhill performance you’ve come to know and expect from a Tecnica boot.

Adapted from our experience in the alpine world, the Zero G Peak Carbon uses a semi-overlap shell design, allowing the boot to wrap the foot better which not only increases comfort but significantly improves downhill performance. 

The Zero G Peak Carbon is a true light-touring boot built the Tecnica way – Fit to bag every peak on your checklist and out-ski your buddies on the way down.”

The Zero G Peak & Zero G Tour Series

The “Zero G” name has been in Tecnica’s lineup for a while now, historically being one of the most popular lineups of boots for backcountry skiers who place a high priority on downhill performance. 

In contrast to the new Zero G Peak series, the longstanding Zero G Tour boots have been and continue to be midweight do-it-all touring boots that balance downhill ski performance and weight savings very impressively, but still with a clear bias toward downhill performance. They range from about 1300 g to 1500 g per boot for a size 26.5, with flex ratings ranging from 105 to 130. The Zero G Tour Pro has been a favorite of ours at Blister for several years in a row, primarily due to how it manages to combine a nice, pretty legit “130” flex pattern with a lower weight and better uphill experience than most similarly stiff boots.

The Zero G Peak boots, despite sharing a very similar name, are completely different — different shells, different liners, etc. The Zero G Peak series is much more uphill-oriented overall, with stated weights all around that 1000-g mark (size 26.5), and no stated flex ratings provided.

The Zero G Peak and Zero G Tour boots do share a stated last width of 99 mm and both series include “women-specific” and “men’s” models. Listed below are the stated weights, stated flex ratings (where applicable), and available sizes for the whole “Zero G” collection, ordered from softest to stiffest.

Women-specific (stated weights for 24.5):

• Zero G Peak W: n/a flex, 905 g (23.5–27.5)
• Zero G Tour W: 105 flex, 1380 g (22.5–27.5)
• Zero G Tour Scout W : 115-flex, 1275 g (22.5–27.5)

Men’s (stated weights for 26.5):

• Zero G Peak: n/a flex, 980 g (24.5–30.5)
• Zero G Peak Carbon: n/a flex, 995 g (23.5–30.5)
• Zero G Tour: 110-flex, 1505 g (24.5–30.5)
• Zero G Tour Scout: 120-flex 1370 g (24.5–30.5)
• Zero G Tour Pro : 130-flex, 1320 g (22.5–30.5)

It’s worth noting that the top-of-the-line Zero G Peak Carbon and Zero G Tour Pro are offered down to the same smallest size as their women-specific equivalents (23.5 & 22.5, respectively), despite being under the “men’s” category on Tecnica’s website. That’s noteworthy for those with smaller feet who are interested in the stiffer, higher-end options in either category.

Weight & Comparisons

The Zero G Peak Carbon sits comfortably on the lighter end of the touring-boot spectrum; in terms of boots that weigh drastically less, it’s pretty much just skimo-specific, race-oriented options. Relative to the midweight class of “freeride touring” boots with stated flex ratings of 120+ (i.e., the bottom half of the list below), the Zero G Peak Carbon is at least 200-300 grams lighter. One of the Zero G Peak Carbon’s main competitors, the Scarpa F1 LT, comes in at a strikingly similar weight, whereas the Salomon S/Lab MTN Summit is just a bit heavier.

Below is a list of our measured weights for some comparable boots, organized from lightest to heaviest. For our measured weights, we list the weights of each shell + the weights of each liner, then the total weight of the shells + liners.

Scarpa Alien RS (28.0 / 27.5): 779 & 781 + 209 & 210 = 988 & 991 g

Tecnica Zero G Peak Carbon (27.5): 844 & 854 + 231 & 227 = 1075 & 1081 g

Scarpa F1 LT (28.0 / 27.5): 1106 & 1101 g

Atomic Backland Carbon (27.5): 882 & 884 + 228 & 230 = 1110 & 1114 g

Salomon S/Lab MTN Summit (27.5): 963 & 971.5 + 212.5 & 215 = 1187 & 1178 g

Salomon S/Lab X-Alp (28.0): 1010 & 1010 + 222 & 222 = 1232 7 1232 g

Fischer Transalp Pro (26.5): 1053 & 1053 + 262 & 263 = 1315 & 1316 g

Scarpa Maestrale RS (24.5 / 25.0): 1053 & 1057 + 244 & 245 = 1297 & 1302 g

Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro (26.5): 1099 & 1100 + 211 & 210 = 1310 & 1327 g

Dynafit Hoji Pro Tour (26.5): 1169 & 1174 + 214 & 215 = 1383 & 1389 g

Salomon MTN Explore (26.5): 1126 & 1135 + 281 & 281 = 1407 & 1416 g

Scarpa Maestrale XT (26.5 / 27.0): 1258 & 1258 + 247 & 252 = 1505 & 1510 g

FULL REVIEW

Paul Forward (6’0″, 200 lbs / 183 cm, 90.7 kg): As always, the “Fit” sections of our ski boot reviews are mostly meant to provide a general idea of the shell fit from our perspective — they’ll never aim nor be able to replace the guidance of a bootfitter. PLEASE go to an experienced bootfitter to figure out which boots will work best for your feet (and if you aren’t sure which shops / bootfitters to visit, check out our Blister Recommended Shops).

With that said, below is how the Zero G Peak Carbon feels on my feet. For reference, I’ve had a few boot fitters comment on my foot shape and the general conclusion is that I have:

• A fairly low-volume ankle and heel
• A higher than average instep / arch
• Good ankle flexion
• Moderate width across metatarsal heads

My experience with the Zero G Peak Carbon is that it has a fairly low-volume heel and ankle, medium to high instep area, and a medium-width toe box. My primary problem area in most boots is my instep; it has been the barrier that’s kept me from enjoying many boots in the past. After a quick liner mold with some extra padding over my instep, I found the Zero G Peak Carbon to be quite comfortable. As with pretty much all boots, I leave the lower buckle open when climbing, but I can buckle it for the descent and keep it closed, even for long, flat skates back to the car when needed. The heel and ankle are pleasantly low volume and I’ve only had a little bit of heel movement. In the Zero G Tour Pro, my main other issue was in the fifth metatarsal and “sixth toe” area; in the Zero G Peak Carbon, I did not need to do any work there. For what it’s worth, I’ve had pretty good luck punching Grilamid boots like the Zero G Peak Carbon, but make sure whoever does it has experience with these thin, light shells.

Fit Comparisons

As we’ll get into below, how a given boot fits your particular feet can play a huge role in how it will feel and perform. While that’s the case with any ski boot, I think it’s worth emphasizing for this class of 1000-1200-g touring boots, which I’ll cover more in the “Downhill Performance” section.

With that said, here’s how I’d describe the fit differences between several boots in this class, based on how they feel on my feet:

Salomon S/Lab MTN Summit : The MTN Summit feels a little shorter and has a little more instep pressure for me but, aside from that, it feels higher volume than the Zero G Peak Carbon everywhere else.

Scarpa F1 LT : I feel like the lower shell of the F1 LT is made for my foot — it requires nothing more than a quick liner mold to be perfectly comfortable. Relative to the Zero G Peak Carbon, the F1 LT feels a little tighter overall through the midfoot, but the forefoot and heel seem pretty similar to me.

Dynafit TLT8 : This is a very different fit than the Zero G Peak Carbon and is higher volume throughout the entire boot.

Atomic Backland Carbon : I’m basing this on the 19/20–21/22 BOA version that I’ve used, but my understanding is that, aside from it being a buckle now instead of a BOA, the shell is essentially the same. Overall, the Backland shell feels higher volume throughout and a touch longer in the shell, compared to the Peak Carbon.

Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro : This boot is obviously in a completely different class. but since it’s Tecnica’s other touring boot, I’ll include it here. For my foot, the Peak Carbon feels more contoured to my foot shape, with a slightly closer fit through the heel and ankle and a touch more volume in the toe box. For my Zero G Tour Pro, I had to do 6th toe punches in both boots for long days of touring.

Uphill Performance

I’ve now been in these boots for the better part of a whole season, plus the late spring of 2022, and have already made some turns in them this year. Overall, the Zero G Peak Carbon continues to be one of the best boots I’ve ever used for long days of climbing and general travel in the backcountry. Its range of motion is more than adequate for any ski or binding setup that I’ve used.

I’ve been spending more and more time on “race style” bindings that have very low heel risers, and even with little help in that regard from the binding, I’ve had little trouble ascending steep skintracks using the Zero G Peak Carbon. Overall, if this boot fits your foot, I think it will perform on the ascent as well or better than any non-race-specific touring boot on the market; I don’t have experience in the race-specific boot category, but if we exclude that class, the Zero G Peak Carbon is one of the most impressive boots I’ve used in terms of skinning / walking.

Transitions

I’ve done exactly one uphill / downhill race in my life and it was about 20 years ago — on telemark gear — so I’m definitely not someone who’s pulling out the stopwatch at every single transition. That said, I usually make a few laps when I’m out and I like a fairly quick and easy transition. All things considered, I’ve found the Zero G Peak Carbon to be one of the fastest and easiest boots I’ve used for transitions. Its buckles are easy to operate with gloves on, as are the power strap and walk-mechanism lever in the back. The Zero G Peak Carbon’s low-volume cuff is also pretty nice for pulling pant gaiters up and down as needed, with minimal drag / friction.

Of all the closure-mechanism combos out there, I think the Zero G Peak’s is my favorite. When wearing boots with BOA dials, I find myself loosening / tightening it at the top and bottom of every run; with boots with velcro strap / buckle combos, I’m always trying to get it in the right spot before closing the cam-buckle; and even with boots like Dynafit’s Hoji Lock models, where the closures are connected to the walk mechanism, I always end up undoing and redoing all the buckles anyway.

In the Zero G Peak Carbon, I flip two buckles, I only have to adjust the top one, and tightening / loosening the cam-style power strap is also quite easy. Kudos to Tecnica for their simple and solid closure mechanisms.

I’ll also mention here that the little secondary closure on the Peak Carbon’s walk mode (i.e., the little hook attached to the paracord) is much appreciated. On boots with more pared-down, simpler walk mechanism closures, such as the Atomic Backland or Scarpa F1 LT, I’ve intermittently had significant ice-up issues preventing the lever from fully engaging into ski mode.

Downhill Performance

When I wrote my initial Flash Review of the Zero G Peak Carbon , I had just skied a couple of runs with it on one foot and the Salomon S/Lab MTN Summit on the other. My impression after that experience was that the S/Lab MTN Summit offered a little bit more power for driving bigger skis in variable conditions. I maintained that impression throughout the remainder of that spring.

Then, last winter, I continued spending a significant portion of my touring days with the S/Lab MTN Summit or  Scarpa F1 LT  on one foot and the Zero G Peak Carbon on the other. I did this in all manner of snow conditions, and with skis ranging from 95 mm underfoot to over 125 mm underfoot. My primary takeaway is that the fit of the boots in this category matters much more than which model you choose. Throughout last season and the beginning of this winter, I haven’t been able to replicate the feeling that the S/Lab MTN Summit was a notably more powerful boot. The S/Lab MTN Summit may have slightly better damping characteristics and is maybe ~5% stiffer in terms of pure forward flex. But after many days spent with one of these boots on each foot and skiing all manner of snow conditions, I was not able to identify a dramatic difference.

For those who are not accustomed to this category of boot at all, I’ll try to provide some context, given the similarities between the models I’m discussing, and how different they are from most 1300+ gram “freetouring” boots. The Zero G Peak Carbon, S/Lab MTN Summit, and Scarpa F1 LT are all capable of skiing fairly fast on a large variety of skis. As a 200-pound guy who usually skis with 15-20 lb pack for ski touring, I can say that these boots have plenty of support for most of the skiing that I do. On big terrain (steeper, more open, higher speeds) and especially in more variable conditions, I can definitely find a speed limit with these boots; I feel less confident going very fast through runouts in them than heavier, more downhill-oriented alternatives.

Living in Alaska, I do have access to a lot of very consequential terrain; as a result, there are still days when I’ll opt for my stiffer, heavier, more confidence-inspiring  Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro  (or other similar boots). However, the goal for the vast majority of the ski touring that I do is spending a long day out skiing as much powder as I can in a wide variety of terrain. And for that type of skiing, I almost always opt for the Zero G Peak Carbon or something similar.

As I alluded to above, the times when these boots show the most vulnerability are in variable conditions. If the snow is refrozen, bumpy, or significantly choppy, I definitely have to pay more attention to remaining control and it’s easier to feel the need to slow down in boots like the Zero G Peak Carbon, relative to heavier alternatives. That said, for most of the time and for my preferences, the increase in comfort and the dramatic loss of weight on the ascent are well worth having to be a little bit more careful in certain situations on the descent. And in good conditions, I can ski almost as fast as I want in most terrain.

The shells of the Zero G Peak Carbon have held up well so far, with over 30 days of touring over the past three seasons. The Zero G Peak Carbon seems at least as durable as any other “lightweight” touring boot; still, they do have thin rubber soles and a minimalist construction, so rocky environments will take their toll, as with any boot in this weight class.

The only issue I had during my testing was that one of the Zero G Peak Carbon’s pre-production liners ripped internally while putting them on. Eventually, I received a pair of updated liners that apparently go out with the current version of the Zero G Peak Carbon and was able to finish my review. The new liners have stitching in different locations; I’ve had no issues so far with the new ones and don’t expect to, based on the design change.

Who’s lt For?

If the fit is right, the Zero G Peak Carbon offers the best performance-to-weight ratio of any boot in this class that I’ve used, making it a very compelling choice for those who want a light, efficient, and comfortable touring boot that can still ski pretty well (with my caveats, above, in mind).

That said, the marginal differences in performance between the Zero G Peak Carbon, Salomon S/Lab MTN Summit, and Scarpa F1 LT are small enough that fit should be the primary deciding factor. Weight and features should come second, and the differences in actual flex patterns should likely be the lowest priority since the top boots in this category have very similar flex patterns in the grand scheme of the boot market. In my opinion, these boots offer enough power for the vast majority of the touring conditions and skiing style that most people are doing, all while being very ergonomic and efficient on the ascent, and weighing notably less than the more downhill-oriented alternatives.

Bottom Line

After spending many days over the course of many seasons in many pairs of different lightweight touring boots, the Tecnica Zero G Peak Carbon has gradually become my go-to boot for most of my ski touring.

I will continue to emphasize that how the Zero G Peak Carbon (or any of its competitors) fits your particular feet should be your main focus when deciding on a boot in this class. But that aside, it’s an extremely efficient and comfortable boot on the uphill while still offering a level of skiing performance that’s very rare in the ~1-kilogram class.

19 comments on “2023-2024 Tecnica Zero G Peak Carbon”

Hallo…welche eigenschaften hat der zero g peak im steilen gelände auf der kante im schrägen bereich….lg arthur

Any thoughts on the Peak vs the Peak Carbon? How big of a difference does it make in how the boot skis?

In the Skialper test, they say it’s just a hair softer, not a big difference and probably skis better for people who are not very heavy and tall.

Awesome! Would be cool if yall could get on the new skorpius from la sportiva. I used to use a zgtr and the skorpius really is just so much better for me and my use case – walking a long time, transitioning frequently, skiing decent snow in mellow terrain. The ROM is amazing, even with the top velco buckle attached and hooked, so all it requires is a single closure to transition + the ski to walk mode lever. I leave the boa moderately tightened for both up and down and removed the power strap. Skis nicely as well! Annoying to get in and out of for sure though.

Thanks Edward! I would love to ski the Skorpius and will keep trying to make that happen.

Any notes on relative fit of this shell?? And can the carbon infused grilamid take a punch? Thanks!

I’m also interested in fit notes, especially as compared to the Salomon. I realize that the only way to really understand is to try it on my foot, but I’m curious as to how Tecnica lasted this boot even though I’m not in the market right now.

The challenge with punching Carbon-infused Grilamid is that it requires a lot of heat, and there is a somewhat narrow window between the heat-deflection and melting temperatures of the material. For Grivory’s 30% carbon LC 3H material HDT-C (the lowest rated deflection temperature at 8 MPa stress) is 125C and it melts at 178C ( https://www.emsgrivory.com/fileadmin/ems-grivory/documents/brochures/3001_en_Grilamid-L-PA12.pdf ). So the real question becomes: How good is your boot tech at applying heat to manage temperature within that window?

Trying to clarify what I said: “Punchability” isn’t a simple yes/no binary.

Every thermoplastic, even carbon-reinforced ones, has combinations of stress and temperature in which it will plastically yield without rupturing (from too much force/stress) or melting (from too much temperature). The operative question for any given material is how close to one or both of those adverse outcomes you have to work, and that determines how tightly you have to control both force and temperature to get the job done. For “realistic” bending forces Grilamid+carbon forces you to work very hot (and somewhat close to the melting temperature) to get the job done.

So I’m sure there are some boot techs out there who find they can work with it, and others who are afraid to touch the stuff.

Patrick, when tried the Salomon and the ZG peak on, they fit completely different. I would have a hard time imagining that anyone would be able to ski both of hem.

So exactly what part of Paul measures 6″?

(somebody had a “Stonehenge Moment” entering his personal stats at the top of the review)

Paul, how was walking on flats with them? When I tried them on, it seemed like the back of the lower shell came up quite high. It felt like that was pushing my foot forward when pretend skinning on the flat.

Did you have any issues with that?

It sounds like you didn’t compare them to the Backland Carbon boots?

The Zero G Tour Pro is probably one of the best skiing boots in its weight class because of its high cuff and relatively progressive flex but it also has the worst walk mode. Yeah it walks better than 4-buckle boots but the rearward ROM is horrendous compared to any other boot under 1300g. It is especially bad at walking in relatively flat terrain. There are much beefier boots out there now like the Atomic Backland 120 XTD that manage to walk significantly better than the Zero G Tour Pro.

Ben, it sounds like you are talking about the Zero G TOUR ? This review is for the Zero G PEAK. Confusing naming, just like Atomic’s Backland. If you are talking about the TOUR I agree, got rid of it for that reason.

You are comparing Zero G Tour Pro with Atomic Backland 120 XTD – but they are IMO not in the same category. Yes – they have similar weight but construction wise Backland is similar to Zero G Peak. I havent read review on Backland but although it walks significantly worse, i bet it skis significantly better than Backland. Looks like we have a new category between lightweight touring boots and free touring boots – Backland is uphill oriented boot in that category and Zero G Tour is downhill oriented boot in this in-between category :)

Paul, it’s amazing how much your foot sounds similar to mine. After struggling with so many different boots, I ended up picking up a pair of these boots last season and spent about 20 days in them. I ended up finishing the Gothic mountain tour in them as well, and would like to make a few comments.

First, entry into this boot is very difficult. For those of us who have a high end step and limited ankle flexion, getting in and out of this boot is quite difficult. Even more so if you upgrade the liners. I ended up making the mistake of doing an intuition wrap liner. I have a pair of the intuition wraps in my standard Zero G tour boots. While I’m able to get in and out of those, the wrap liner in the Peak makes it a total struggle getting in and out. I would strongly encourage if anybody buys this boot, and eventually upgrades the liners to purchase a pair of liners that has a tongue instead of a wrap.

Second, the progressive flex or lack thereof in this boot. You mentioned that in this kind of boot flexion is one of the least important things. However, I do think it warrants mention: this boot is not a progressively flexing boot. You get in it, and you are almost immediately hit its limit. I agree that for what this is designed to do, that’s appropriate. However, if you have another more free ride oriented pair of tour boots, it is quite the difference. I met you last year at the Blister Summit (and hope to see you again this year) so I know you are a bit taller and more muscular than I am. So maybe you have a different opinion/feel it is a bit more progressive but for me, it engages immediately.

Finally, the durability of this boot. On this day (1/9/2024), I have totally destroyed this boot/irreparably broke apart off of it. I’ve never had a boot fail in this manner, and was shocked when this happened. The failure I believe is due to the incredibly tight throat. I was simply putting the boot on and the combination of the gasket/gaiter combined with the plastic island the buckle clamps onto has lead me to open the upper boot completely during entry. I was spreading the buckle/island to get my foot in, and it snapped clean off at the base in my hand. Wish I could attach a picture. Unfortunately, the boot is just over a year old and so out of warranty.

Anyways, I do feel one of the key drawbacks is the difficulty of entry. For that reason alone while I am frustrated, I am not devastated that the boot is non-usable at this point. While I am going to attempt a warranty claim, I will definitely be looking for a similar light touring boot in the 100 mm last. This time, ease entry will also be high on my list. Hope you are having a great season up there and hope to see you again at the Summit!

Dano, have you picked the same shell size as the ZGTP? I did and I feel like I might have made a mistake with the boot being too small for me (I run 28.5 ZGTP and they’ve been perfect for years) – the 28.5 feels too small after a couple weeks, but initially I thought that 29.5 would be way too big for me.

Would you drive a QST Echo 106 with these?

As for Dano Monticelli comments, I could not agree more. I just purchased this solely for skimo, fast uphilling. The boot is next to impossible to get on and even hard to get off. When taking them off, I have to pull the liner out of the shell in order to get my foot out of the boot. I was thinking of cutting the instep strap on the line, which should make it easier but then the tongue could potentially come out of the boot. Any other suggestions on make this boot easier to get on and off would be appreciated. Thanks.

Hmm, I tried this boot on a lot (ordered on line and tried it at home for a few days), and although I wouldn’t say it was easy, I also did not notice it being very hard to take off. I have a high instep, but flexible ankles and narrow feet. I was using a Palau Power Lt liner: a bit thicker than the stock liner, but still a tongue liner with a good hinge in the back, and broken in and heat molded for me.

Rob Coppolillo, writing on Powdercloud also used a wrap liner and complained about taking it off.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Announcements

Norda, New Balance, HOKA & More:   Shop New Spring Footwear

Free Standard Shipping for Orders Over $50   Learn More

Cart, contains 0 items

Tahoe Collection: Ultimate UV Protection

• Rain & Wind Jackets
• Hoodies & Sweatshirts
• Fleece Jackets
• Trail Running
• Road Running
• Gloves & Mittens
• Blankets & Beach Towels
• Electronics

• Jumpsuits & Overalls
• Everyday Bags
• Beach Bags & Totes
• Toddler Boys
• Toddler Girls
• Balaclavas & Neck Gaiters
• Backpacks & Bags
• Water Sports
• Hike & Camp

2024 Camp Guide: Your Destination For All Things Camp

2024 Hike Guide: Buyer’s Guide To Top Hike Gear & Apparel

• Hiking Clothing
• Hiking Footwear
• Backpacking Packs
• Technical Daypacks
• Hydration Packs
• Kid Carriers
• Water Bottles
• Trekking Poles
• Tents & Shelters
• Sleeping Bags
• Sleeping Pads
• Camp Chairs
• Camp Tables
• Stoves & Grills
• Pots & Pans
• Roof Racks & Accessories
• Rooftop Tents
• Batteries & Solar Power
• Water Storage & Purification
• Storage Solutions
• Off-Road Recovery

Buyer’s Guide To Top Trail & Enduro Gear

• Mountain Bikes
• Gravel & Cyclocross Bikes
• Kids' Bikes
• Mountain Bike Components
• Gravel & Cyclocross Components
• Road Components
• Triathlon / TT Bike Components
• Men's Bike Apparel
• Women's Bike Apparel
• Kids' Bike Apparel
• Mountain Bike Shoes
• Road Bike Shoes
• Flat Pedal Shoes
• Triathlon Shoes
• Mountain Bike Helmets
• Full Face Helmets
• Road Bike Helmets
• Commuter Helmets
• Knee & Shin Pads
• Arm & Elbow Pads
• Chest & Spine Protection
• Bike Maintenance
• Bike Storage & Transportation
• Bike Packs & Bags
• Trainers & Accessories
• Bike Lighting & Electronics
• Water Bottles & Cages
• Bike Trailers

Bags, Totes & More Ways To Haul It All

• Duffel Bags
• Rolling Bags
• Carry-On Luggage
• Travel Packs
• Camera Packs & Bags
• Fly Fishing Bags & Luggage
• Bike Travel Cases
• Surfboard Bags & Packs
• Ski Boot Bags
• Snowboard Boot Bags
• Snowboard Bags
• Water Filters & Purification
• Travel Pillows
• Power Converters

Basecamp By The Shore: Camp, SUP & Kayak Gear

• Recreational Kayaks
• Recreational Paddles
• Recreational PFDs
• Whitewater Kayaks
• Whitewater Paddles
• Whitewater PFDs
• Stand-Up Paddleboards
• Stand-Up Paddleboard Paddles
• Drysuits & Clothing
• Safety Gear
• Reels & Spools
• Wading Boots & Sandals
• Clothing & Accessories
• Packs & Vests
• Storage & Transport
• Shortboards
• Men's Wetsuits
• Women's Wetsuits
• Hoods, Booties & Gloves
• Men's Swimwear
• Women's Swimwear
• Traction Pads
• Wakeboard Bindings
• Wakeboard Boots
• Rope & Accessories
• Wake Surfboards
• Wakefoil Boards
• Wakesurf Accessories

Snowboard Guide

• Ski Clothing
• Alpine Skis
• Alpine Bindings
• Alpine Ski Boots
• Touring Skis
• Touring Bindings
• Touring Boots
• Cross-Country Skiing
• Snowboard Clothing
• Snowboard Bindings
• Snowboard Boots
• Splitboards
• Splitboard Bindings
• Splitboard Skins
• Avalanche Safety
• Winter Packs
• Tuning Accessories

Backcountry & Stoic New Arrivals

Exclusive To Backcountry

• Backcountry
• US Ski & Snowboard
• The North Face
• Helly Hansen
• Outdoor Research
• Black Diamond
• Mountain Hardwear
• See All Brands
• District Vision
• Western Rise
• DOD Outdoors

Gear Picks & Pro Tips For However You Get Out There

2024 Bike Guide: Buyer’s Guide To Top Trail & Enduro Gear

2024 Running Gear Guide: The Best Shoes, Apparel & Sports Bras

2024 Climb Guide: This Year’s Top Trad, Sport & Bouldering Gear

20% Off 1 Full-Price Item For Members. Exclusions Apply. Ends 5/14.

Featured Deals

• Latest Price Drops
• Spring Styles On Sale
• Deals Under $100
• Deals Under $50
• Stoic On Sale
• Smartwool On Sale
• Mountain Hardwear On Sale
• Outdoor Research On Sale
• Marmot On Sale
• Shop All Sale
• Women's Clothing
• Women's Footwear
• Women's Accessories
• Men's Clothing
• Men's Footwear
• Men's Accessories

What’s Up At The Goat

• Venture Beyond
• Backcountry Podcast
• Explore Articles
• Outervention
• The Nature Conservancy
• Greener Packaging
• Find A Store

Follow Along On Social

Travel Tips: How To Pack & Fly With Skis & Snowboards

Venture Beyond | Ep. 5 | Mind The Gap

BC Pod | Ep. 17 | The Shaun White Story

Members, 20% Off 1 Full-Price Item

Up To 30% Off Socks!

Ends Wed, 5/15

$20 For Your Crew, $20 For You

Refer A Friend Now

.css-ryjapq{display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;margin-bottom:var(--chakra-space-2);} .css-1g043sj{transition-property:var(--chakra-transition-property-common);transition-duration:var(--chakra-transition-duration-fast);transition-timing-function:var(--chakra-transition-easing-ease-out);cursor:pointer;-webkit-text-decoration:none;text-decoration:none;outline:2px solid transparent;outline-offset:2px;color:var(--chakra-colors-btn-brand);font-family:var(--chakra-fonts-base);font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-sm);font-weight:var(--chakra-fontWeights-normal);}.css-1g043sj:hover,.css-1g043sj[data-hover]{color:var(--chakra-colors-btn-brand);-webkit-text-decoration:underline;text-decoration:underline;}.css-1g043sj:focus,.css-1g043sj[data-focus]{box-shadow:var(--chakra-shadows-outline);} Tecnica .css-1oyyk97{color:var(--chakra-colors-txt-primary);overflow-wrap:normal;font-family:var(--chakra-fonts-base);font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-xl);font-weight:var(--chakra-fontWeights-bold);} Zero G Tour Pro Boot - 2024

Lowest Price Guarantee

Why We Like The Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro Boot

Sometimes, the skin track makes us wish gravity would just turn off for a little bit, but the closest we have found to that sensation is the Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro Boot. This boot boasts a powerful Grilamid construction that transfers power on the downhill, a trustworthy walk mode lever, and a 4-buckle system that prevents pinching and loosens without unbuckling on the uphill.

• Backcountry ski boots designed for fast tours and faster descents
• Grilamid construction offers weight savings and lateral stability
• 130mm creates response on the downhill for powerful skiers
• 4-buckles lock in a reliable fit on both the uphill and downhill
• Trusty 2-piece design creates a timeless feel and performance
• Moldable liner with lace closure locks in a slop-free fit
• Dual-density Vibram rubber soles help you scramble on ridges
• Item runs small, so we recommend sizing up for best fit
• Item #TECR079

Overall Rating

5 based on 7 ratings

Review Summary

Fits true to size.

What do you think about this product?

April 3, 2024

Great uphill and downhill

Amazing boot. Very good articulation and reasonable weight for the uphill. Best downhill performance of any boot I’ve been in over the past 20 years of backcountry. You can find lighter boots for the uphill, but there is nothing that beats 4 buckle downhill performance. Good feedback from the ski, and the flex works well for me. Length is true to size, and while it may be a narrow last, overall volume is on the mid range side of things (I’ve added a couple footbed shims to take up some volume). Sure transitions take a bit longer with 4 buckles but who cares - unless you’re racing, in which case you’re not looking at this boot anyhow. It is difficult to get your foot into - the combination of rigid shell overlaps and the ankle features built into the liner combine to make it a bit of a struggle at the trailhead. But use a boot horn and all is good. But the same items that make it difficult to put on, make it a great boot by grabbing your foot on both the up and down.

March 17, 2024

Second pair of W Zero G

Great boot for b/c or lift service. Picked up my second pair after first pair were breaking down. I would have rated it at a 5 if power strap hook was facing down. My only complaint with the 2nd pair is the power strap buckle. For some unknown reason the hook opening is facing up so the strap falls out when skinning. Why is this a problem? It catches on hobblebush when it hangs down after coming unhooked. I don't like the top two buckles or power strap tight when in climbing mode. If you don't know what hobblebush is coming ski in the woods on the east coast.

Originally reviewed on tecnicasports.com

November 12, 2023

Outstanding Touring Boot

Extremly well engineered touring boot, which - offers low weight and mobility for uphills - is a (little) hard to get in and out of - can almost match downhill performance of some alpine boots - fits even my foot (narrow heel and wider forefoot with just heat fitting) Overall its a 50/50 boot, if you want to go for big drops and fast freeride lines this could be a bit to "spongy" otherwise this will serve any downhill purpose. Cannot judge durability yet as I purchased mine only 1y ago. Fits great with my setup (Petzl Irvis Crampons, ATK R12 on Camox Freebirds). Overall very happy that I got it despite beeing skeptical bc of the "narrow" last.

April 4, 2023

Unmatched Performance

As a former self-proclaimed "free-tourer", I got tired of having heavy boots with poor range of motion. These boots are a breath of fresh air. Light enough to not fatigue you on bigger days, but burley enough to handle steep lines. I cannot understate the difference that a proper walk mode and big range of motion makes in efficiency going uphill. Total game changer. For reference I toured in the Lange XT3's for many years, which shined in downhill performance. the Zero G Tour Pro has a comparable downhill performance with a significantly better uphill performance. I've never been on a line in these boots where I craved a stiffer boot. The power strap and classic 4-buckle design does an excellent job locking down your foot and not allowing you to flex too far through the boot when you ski it aggressively. There is a reason you see so many of these on the skinner, they are some of the best boots I've ever been in and I don't plan on looking for a new boot any time soon.

February 14, 2023

My go to for great adventure

I am 6 ft tall (190 lbs) and wear a tight 27.5. I use these all across eastern Canada backcountry skiing. Very light considering that it is fully adjustable, comfortable for the climb and a very solid boot for skiing. Definitely my go to. Love these boots!

January 26, 2023

Great boots!

I have them for two years and I am really satisfied. They are comfortable and light. A little more liner support would be welcome when going down. It's a good compromise between lightness and downhill capabilities

May 4, 2022

These boots are light, have excellent grip, and are perfect for going uphill. Once set to skiing position they make you really enjoy any descent at high speeds, whether off or on pist, due to their stiffness. Moreover, the customer service is simply the best that you can get! I contacted the customer service twice in the last two years (I really like Tecnica products I must say) and they always replied immediately and provided me with the solution to my problems!

Need Expert Advice?

Our Gearheads Can Help

THE 10 BEST Moscow Tours & Excursions

Moscow tours.

• Private Tours
• Walking Tours
• 5.0 of 5 bubbles
• 4.0 of 5 bubbles & up
• 3.0 of 5 bubbles & up
• 2.0 of 5 bubbles & up
• 3rd Transport Ring (TTK)
• District Central (TsAO)
• Garden Ring
• Boulevard Ring
• Good for Big Groups
• Budget-friendly
• Good for Couples
• Good for a Rainy Day
• Good for Kids
• Good for Adrenaline Seekers
• Honeymoon spot
• Hidden Gems
• Adventurous
• Things to do ranked using Tripadvisor data including reviews, ratings, photos, and popularity.

1. Moscow Private Tours

2. Mosstreets

3. Moscow through the Eyes of an Engineer

4. Flotilla Radisson Royal

5. Moscow Free Tour

6. Bridge to Moscow

7. Spanish Guide Moscow - Day Tours

8. Go Russia Travel Company

10. City Pub Crawl Moscow

12. Privilege Tour

13. Moscow Navigator

14. Trans-Siberian Railway Network

15. Moscow River Boat Tours

16. Put-in Tours

17. Walks With Folks

18. Moscow Bike Tours

19. Real Russia

20. Moskovskiye Gulyaki

21. Happy Moscow Tours

22. Tour of Moscow - Day Tours

24. Kremlin Tour

25. Three Whales

26. Guia de Moscú

27. Tsar Visit

28. Excursions in Russia

29. IdeaGuide - Your Personal Guide in Moscow

30. Sup-Club

What travelers are saying.

• The Red Arrow
• Put-in Tours
• Spanish Guide Moscow - Day Tours
• Walks With Folks
• Happy Moscow Tours
• IdeaGuide - Your Personal Guide in Moscow
• Moscow Private Tours
• Moscow Bike Tours
• Tour Gratis Moscu
• Moscow Free Tour
• YourLocalGuide Moscow
• Moscow Navigator
• Moscow through the Eyes of an Engineer
• Angel Taxi - Day Tour
• Your Moscow Guide & Driver
• Gulyayem po Moskve
• Tanksdriving
• PandaPark Fili
• Excursions in Russia
• Vadim Pavlov Guide and Driver in Moscow

• Full Videos
• Product Releases
• Send a news
• Social Media
• Contact / About

Grand Skate Tour 2023 - Community Shop Edit - Teaser

For the third year in a row, the Grand Skate Tour brings together the best representatives of aggressive skates on one platform. At GST23, riders were able to compete for prizes in five categories at once: boys under 15 years old, girls under 15 years old, girls, amateurs and PRO.

up: Kirill Kochetkov , Albert Valeev & Daniel Goncharov .

Filmed by Oleg Nechaev & Rodion Korneev. Edited by Oleg Nechaev for Community Shop . Grand Skate Tour 2023 in Gorky Park, Moscow ( Russia ) - 26 August / 02 September 2023. More Infos: visit Grandskatetour.com .

up: Evgeny Leonov , Daniel Goncharov .

Russian Aggressive Inline Championship 2021 (Grand Skate Tour 2021)

The best moments of the Russian Aggressive Inline Championship held on december 10-12 as part of the Grand Skate Tour'21 in Nizhny Novgorod. Video from Rodion Korneev and Viktor Bayramov.

PRO Results

• Chanchikov Ivan (Krasnoyarsk) - 74 points
• Savosin Ilya (Krasnoyarsk) - 65
• Daniil Goncharov (Belgorod) - 60
• Obydennikov Georgy (Novosibirsk) - 48
• Skvortsov Andrey (St. Petersburg) - 37
• Valeev Albert (Krasnoyarsk) - 54 points
• Kuzmenko Artyom (St. Petersburg) - 48
• Petrov Danil (Krasnoyarsk) - 45
• Rodin Danila (Balakovo) - 36
• Rumyantsev Artyom (St. Petersburg) - 34
• Demin Alexander (Krasnoyarsk, 2008)
• Gorbovsky Volodar (Sochi, 2009)
• Shevchuk Marusya (Moscow, 2010)

Red Jam Contest 2022 (Russia): Edit & Results

Here is some coverage of the Red Jam , 2022 Edition in Russia , featuring the restless trio: Ilya Savosin , Albert Valeev & Stanislav Latyntsev ; also featuring Kirill Kochetkov & friends.

Men Results

• Savosin Ilya
• Chanchikov Ivan
• Baikov Nikita
• Keith Sonya
• Elena Becker
• Pomidorkina Veronika
• Evgenia Magomedova

Full Results - Judges: Gaar Dmitry, Baskov Alexander & Alemasov Spartak. Photo .

S3T Moscow 2021 - with Ilia Savosin, Egor Loginov, Kirill Kochetkov & more

S3t 2021 contest in Moscow , featuring Egor Loginov , Ilya Savosin , Kirill Kochetkov & more!

Previously: S3T Moscow 2021 - Winner: Egor Loginov (Raw Clips + Photo Gallery) .

Andrey Zaytsev Memorial Contest: AZ Picnic & Contest 2021 - Park - Plastik Mag Edit (Moscow, Russia)

The 11th edition of the AZ ( Andrey Zaytsev , Memorial Contest ) is around the corner (May 28, 2022 - more infos on vk.com/azpicnic ). Here is the Plastik Mag edit of the park contest that took place in 2021 ; the street event had to be cancelled due to heavy rain in Moscow , Russia .

• Ilia Savosin (15000 ₽)
• Vanya Chanchikov (10000 ₽)
• Kirill Kochetkov (5000 ₽)

Photos : Selshot.

Skaters: | Joe Atkinson | Brian Aragon | Chihiro Azuma | Carlos Bernal | Beat Schillmeier | Sam Crofts | John Bolino | Alex Broskow | Julien Cudot | Warren Digne | Richie Eisler | Eugen Enin | Chris Farmer | Demetrios George | Mathieu Heinemann | Nils Jansons | Montre Livingston | Nick Lomax | Franky Morales | Mery Muñoz | Mathias Silhan | Brian Shima | Soichiro Kanashima | Chynna Weierstall | Takeshi Yasutoko Skate Brands: Adapt | Deshi | Faction | Gawds | Iqon | Nimh | Razors | Roces | Seba | SSM | Them | Trigger | USD |

Sino-Cinema 《神州电影》

Derek elley on chinese cinema. reviews, people, topics. served straight., review: moscow mission (2023), moscow mission, 93国际列车大劫案   莫斯科行动.

China, 2023, colour, 2.35:1, 127 mins.

Director: Qiu Litao 邱礼涛 [Herman Yau].

Rating: 6/10.

Action-packed crime story, based on a real event, with Chinese police going undercover in period Moscow.

Russia, 1993. With the Chinese economy booming but the Russian economy in shambles, traders are flocking to Moscow on the K3 Beijing-Moscow train to pick up bargains. Passengers with pockets stuffed with cash are a magnet for bandits. On one trip a masked Chinese gang that uses a female scout, Li Suzhen (Wen Yongshan), to identify wealthy victims, violently raids the train en route, stealing cash and valuables, and the gang’s masked boss, D, aka Miao Qingshan (Huang Xuan), rapes a female passenger, Li Fang (Xu Xiaosa). In Beijing one of the gang, Ironhead (Aruna), is arrested by Cui Zhenhai (Zhang Hanyu), a no-nonsense captain in the Railway Police. The K3 robbery has harmed relations between Russia and China, so Cui Zhenhai is assigned to investigate it by taking a small undercover team, posing as debt collectors, to Moscow. He chooses new recruit Sun Jiandong (Bainarisu), a graduate of the Public Security University; Li Jian, from the Beijing Narcotics Division; and Kazimir Gang, from the CID in Manzhouli, Inner Mongolia province. The group take the K3, which is then robbed by elements of the same gang, including the female scout, Li Suzhen, and the gangster Whisker (Zhang Benyu), who is looking to go into business on his own. Pretending to be a rival gang, Cui Zhenhai and his team fight them off. In Moscow, they are met by Zhang (Chen Daming), the Chinese consul. Li Suzhen is met by her friend and admirer Vasily, aka Liu Yuhu (Liu Dehua), a fellow southern Chinese, who once worked with Miao Qingshan but is now a trader on his own; he warns her against her current boyfriend, Miao’s devoted no. 2, Miao Ziwen (Gu Jiacheng). Cui Zhenhai meets an old Russian friend, Sergey Pavlovich Grachev, who now works for Russia’s secret service, the FSB. He introduces him to Pasha, president of the China-Russia Trade Association, but tells Cui Zhenhai not to trust him. Miao Qingshan proposes to Liu Yuhu that they team up again to rob the cash-rich Water Palace Casino. Miao Qingshan needs Liu Yuhu’s knowledge of drainage systems, as the plan is to escape with the cash via the city’s sewer system underneath the casino. To make sure Liu Yuhu doesn’t betray him (as in the past), Miao Qingshan is holding his young daughter Lili as a hostage. Also in on the plan for 10% is the casino’s manager, Igor (Danny Ray), brother of Miao Qingshan’s girlfriend Marina (Zina Blahušová). Miao Qingshan then learns that Cui Zhenhai and his team are in Moscow, looking for him. But then Cui Zhenhai learns from Whisker about a big job involving the city’s sewers.

The fourth feature this year from super-prolific Hong Kong director Qiu Litao 邱礼涛 [Herman Yau] – whom even a worldwide pandemic seemingly cannot slow down – is a fairly straightforward crime story in which a small group of Chinese cops journey to Russia to hunt down the perpetrators of a major robbery on the Beijing-Moscow train known as the K3. Unlike his international drug-buster The White Storm 3: Heaven or Hell 扫毒3   人在天涯, released two months earlier, Moscow Mission 93国际列车大劫案    莫斯科行动 has no elaborate flashback structure nor any great twists. But like WS3 , it does have a standout performance of true villainy – by the generally low-key actor and former dancer Huang Xuan 黄轩 ( Blind Massage 推拿, 2014; Extraordinary Mission 非凡任务, 2017; Youth 芳华, 2017) – that helps to jog things along on a character level between all the chases, shootouts and car stunts. The biggest earner by far of Qiu’s 2023 foursome, it’s taken a nice but not massive RMB658 million, placing it fourth in the October Golden Week battle, behind Under the Light 坚如磐石, The Ex-Files 4: Marriage Plan 前任4 英年早婚 and The Volunteers: To the War 志愿军 雄兵出击.

The film is based on a major robbery on the K3 in May 1993, an event that was big news at the time and embarrassed relations between China, whose economy was then booming, and Russia, whose economy was in a shambles after the recent collapse of the Soviet Union. The robbers were all Chinese and their targets the cash-rich passengers who were flocking to Russia to pick up bargains. Given the lackadaisical policing once the train entered Russia, robberies had been happening on the K3 for some time, with one journey seeing four robberies by separate gangs, starting on 26 May.

The actual case took years to finally resolve, but Chen’s script takes the basic facts and weaves a semi-fictional, fast-moving narrative that ties the whole thing up in one operation by a fearless railway investigator (Mainland actor Zhang Hanyu 张涵予, at his most rock-faced) and three colleagues, neatly ending on the R3 back to Beijing. ( Moscow Mission must be the only movie to have its action climax in a chassis-and-wheel-changing railway shed.) Though the production is 100% Mainland financed, Qiu again uses some of his regular Hong Kong crew, like d.p. Chen Guanghong 陈广鸿[Joe Chan], musician Mai Zhenhong 麦振鸿 [Brother Hung] and action director Li Zhongzhi 李忠志 [Nicky Li]. Hong Kong’s Liu Dehua 刘德华 [Andy Lau], with whom Qiu has worked profitably in recent years on the Shock Wave 拆弹专家 films, is billed as creative producer 监制 alongside former China Film boss Han Sanping 韩三平, and takes a typically self-effacing role alongside Huang as a kind-of-honourable baddie. His scenes alongside Hong Kong actress Wen Yongshan 文咏珊 [Janice Man], as a gangster’s moll he’s fond of, are in Cantonese, with both playing southerners.

The film gets straight into the action with the robbery itself, followed by Cui Zhenhai (Zhang Hanyu) being assigned to the case and choosing three colleagues, including an intellectual newbie, to help him. Thirteen minutes into the movie, they’re already on the way to Moscow on the K3, which is then robbed again by a member of the master villain’s gang trying to go freelance. The action basically doesn’t let up from then on, with Cui Zhenhai & Co. posing as debt collectors from China and aided by an old Russian friend now working for Russia’s secret service, the FSB. It’s actually tensions within the gang itself, whose ruthless head Miao Qingshan (Huang) has a particular liking for violent rape and Shostakovich’s Fifth Symphony, that help Cui & Co. to do their job. Chief among those tensions is the relationship between Miao Qingshan and his old colleague Liu Yuhu (Liu) that simmers with resentment.

Huang’s portrait of smiling psychopath Miao Qingshan is a study in minimalist acting, powering standoffs between him and the iron-jawed Cui Zhenhai. The soft-spoken Liu comes through in the latter stages – with a surprisingly touching finale – but few of the others make much impression on an emotional level apart from Mainland actor/boybander Gu Jiacheng 谷嘉诚 as the villain’s grovelling sidekick. Early scenes make it look as if the newbie member of Cui Zhenhai’s team will develop some character, but like many supporting roles he’s lost amid all the action or has had his role cut back during post-production.

The action setpieces – including a standoff in an opera house, a motorcycle chase in the city’s sewers, and a shootout and attempted escape on a fighter jet at an abandoned rocket base – are inventively staged, though, like the whole film, they’re sometimes so tightly cut as to be incomprehensible. Mai’s music is again unmemorable but Chen’s photography and the period design are both spot on in an unflashy way, helped by some documentary footage from the period.

The film shot from 31 Jul to 6 Oct 2022, with Harbin, northeast China, standing in for period Moscow.

Presented by Shanghai CMC Pictures Beijing Branch Office (CN), Gravity Pictures (CN), Beijing Super Lion Culture Communication (CN), Shanghai Taopiaopiao Movie & TV Culture (CN), Shanghai CMC Pictures (CN).

Script: Chen Daming. Reportage: Ai Anjun. Photography: Chen Guanghong [Joe Chan]. Music: Mai Zhenhong [Brother Hung]. Art direction: Zhao Hai. Styling: Li Zhou. Action: Li Zhongzhi [Nicky Li]. Visual effects: Li Zifei, Li Shuai. Executive direction: Wen Zhenwei.

Cast: Zhang Hanyu (Cui Zhenhai), Liu Dehua [Andy Lau] (Liu Yuhu/Vasily), Huang Xuan (Miao Qingshan/D), Wen Yongshan (Li Suzhen), Gu Jiacheng (Zhang Ziwen/Mao Ziwen), Zhao Bingrui (Mao Xiaoming), Bainarisu (Sun Jiandong), Zhang Benyu (Yizuomao/Whisker), Shang Yuxian (Zhao Na), Xu Xiaosa (Li Fang), Han Qiuchi (Zhu Banxian/Sage Zhu), He Shengming (Jin), Aruna (Tietou/Ironhead), Shi Zhaoqi (Tao, section head), Shi Liang (Zhuo, bureau head), Zhu Zhu (Lin Yanni), Chen Daming (Zhang, Chinese consul in Moscow), Ji Huanbo (Shetou/Snakehead), Zina Blahušová (Marina), Danny Ray (Igor, Marina’s brother).

Release: China, 29 Sep 2023.